PDA

View Full Version : Want lower cable rates? Just complain!!


raj2001
02-03-03, 02:56 PM
Humm... Maybe some cableco's aren't so evil after all.

http://www.lsj.com/columnists/columnists/030201john_1b.html

By John Schneider

Schneider: It pays off to complain to AT&T

AT&T Broadband spokeswoman Leslie Brogan told me earlier this week that her company's 35 percent hike in broadband Internet rates would affect relatively few AT&T customers.

Well, I think I've heard from every one of them.

Since writing about the increase in Tuesday's column, at least 30 dismayed AT&T subscribers have called or written to

complain.

However, several of them pointed out something about the monthly fees that you may not know:

They're negotiable.

The squeaky customer gets the grease, it seems. But more about that later ...

Effective next month, the hike will take the price of broadband Internet service from $42.95 to $57.95 per month - but only for those who don't subscribe to AT&T Broadband cable TV service. For customers willing to buy the cable TV service, the price of the Internet will remain at $42.95 - for the time being anyway.

Unhappy customers

"So it seems I'm not the only one unhappy about being bullied into using AT&T cable TV," wrote Joe Norton, a network technician at Michigan State

University.

Scott Owen of Eaton Rapids wrote: "I'm another AT&T Broadband Internet user who's getting the shaft. Competitively priced? Considering that AT&T is the only broadband Internet service available in my area, they have no competition. Sounds like a monopoly to me."

However, not all of those who responded held the majority point of view.

"Tell those AT&T Internet users to quit whining," wrote Dave Hume of Charlotte. "They are getting a deal, even at the higher rates."

Instant discounts

But about those flexible prices ...

Mike Gazella of Lansing was informed by AT&T Broadband that the cost of his Internet service would rise to $57.95 - a 61 percent hike in one year. Gazella called AT&T Broadband to get a "reasonable explanation" for the hike - and to voice his intention to change Internet services, AT&T offered to drop his rate to $39.99 per month.

Brian Adkins of Haslett also got $39.99 (for the next six months) when he complained, as did Joseph Tuchinsky of East Lansing.

Bill Long of Lansing did even better. Last year, when his AT&T rate went to $42.95, he announced his intention to switch to SBC's DSL (digital subscriber line), which cost $29.95. The AT&T Broadband representative offered Long cable Internet for the same price.

"But why should I have to dicker and deal?" Long asked. "I should be given the price right from the start."

I asked AT&T spokeswoman Brogan about that. She said the lower prices reflect "specials" that are available at various times.

"When customers call in ... we can make them aware of special promotions," Brogan said. "There are always going to be special offerings."

Several readers pointed out that the increase in rates coincides with a change in the AT&T Broadband "brand."

In November, the company merged with Comcast Cable Communications and will adopt that name this month.

What do you think? Call John Schneider at 377-1175, send a fax to 377-1298 or e-mail jschneid@lsj.com. Include your name, phone number, city, town or township.

Unthinkable
02-03-03, 10:34 PM
My official AT&T RANT O' THE DAY:

I tried to get off of AT&T's mailing list for over a year and a half after switching to satellite with everything from polite phone calls to emails to faxes to visits to the local payment center here and letters and returned postcards etc... and finally gave up the futile cause. If you called them and attempted to reach anyone with any semblance of intelligence on how to opt out of postal mailings - (is there an easier request one could possibly make of them mind you?) you would wait on hold for sometimes forty minutes to an hour before getting a live voice and then either be transferred to someone with no idea on who processes such things or simply be hung up on. Thats some pretty rich customer service there. You shouldn't have to complain about the rates to get a break from them. It should be across the board for all customers and not be a "call us when your service goes out" if you want a credit type of mentality. I consider them to be as evil a company as there is. Death star logo says it all. Jordan's Furniture opened up an IMAX here which I would gladly visit all the time if it weren't for their partnership with AT&T. I'd sooner choke on my own vomit then willingly give them another pennies worth of my business.

Mike123abc
02-04-03, 10:32 AM
Why worry about junk mail? 10 minutes on the phone is probably longer than the time it takes to throw them away for years. I enjoy reading the cable junk mail, makes me chuckle... Yesterday I got an offer for free install, and 75 channels for $29.95/month for 3 months!! Of course after the 3 months the rate goes way up (note they brag about the $80.85 savings during the 3 months). Let them waste their money sending you junk mail, it will just make their costs go up even more!

Unthinkable
02-04-03, 06:23 PM
I know it sounds trivial, but junk mail out of control can become quite an annoyance over time just as email spam. I'd rather the trees be saved and the mailings actually go out to folks that want to read them as opposed to every single verifiable address in a town or city. It's a principal thing for me. A giant juggernaut of a corporation should be able to honor the mailing preferences of a consumer or ex-consumer without all the hassles I went through by all means. I had rotten service from the local cable company which extended much further beyond the minor annoyances of mailers every 3 weeks. Basic cable rates in MA offered by AT&T have been way out of whack for a long long time. I definately don't miss all the interference and cable artifacts I once put up with - thats for sure. There is a female beat writer for the Boston Herald who's name I can't recall right now, but she writes pieces all the time with AT&T complaints that would make your head spin.