PDA

View Full Version : Least Powerful (not PowerFull) PC?


Nick
02-24-08, 11:24 AM
Is this the Least Powerful (not PowerFull) but most Expensive personal PC...?

http://hame.ca/news/pictures/ads/radioshacka.jpg

...and I thought the Compaq Presario (80486), monitor & printer I bought at the end
of 1994 cost a ton at $3,000.

Draconis
02-24-08, 12:10 PM
Oh man, that brings back memories.

cadet502
02-24-08, 01:36 PM
monitor and mouse not included
LOL

Doesn't even mention a hard drive. At first I thought the main reason for the big price was the 2megs of ram, that was a lot in 89.

I paid over $3000 for a 386SX in 89, but at least it came with a monitor and mouse, and a 20meg hard drive. I think it may have had a whopping 512k ram.

Draconis
02-24-08, 02:28 PM
512k is more than enough cadet502, especially if you listen to Bill Gates

"Nobody will ever need more than 512k RAM" - Bill Gates, 1981

smiddy
02-24-08, 04:28 PM
Whoa! I forgot about those days.

Richard King
02-24-08, 05:41 PM
Whoa! I forgot about those days.you obviously needed a memory upgrade. :D

Steve Mehs
02-24-08, 05:44 PM
'Lightning fast 20Mhz' :lol:

Is that Adobe PageMaker? OS/2 how I miss thee. NOT!

dave29
02-24-08, 06:14 PM
wow, thats funny. where did you dig that up at?

Pinion413
02-24-08, 07:26 PM
That's quite amusing. Even though I was a young'n, I still remember those days quite well. It's amazing to see how far home computing technology has come in the last 20 years. :lol:

BaldEagle
02-24-08, 07:28 PM
Seems like we paid about that in the office I worked at in 1983. IBM computer with 256RAM (could have been 512), 5" floppy, no software, and no hard drive. The first time we used it to combine 32 stores P & L's for a district total it ran out of memory. Had to buy more ram and I think that (additional 256) cost over $700.

We also paid over $400 for a Lotus123 number cruncher software program to do the P & L's and over $350 for word perfect to do any correspondence.

djlong
02-24-08, 07:38 PM
I have "Creative Computing" issues from the late 1970s. The ads in there are like a history lesson.

HIPAR
02-24-08, 07:58 PM
I'm wasn't exactly poor back then but I wouldn't spend that kind of money on a PC either now or then.

--- CHAS

B Newt
02-24-08, 08:09 PM
'Lightning fast 20Mhz' :lol:

Is that Adobe PageMaker? OS/2 how I miss thee. NOT!

OS/2 blewaway the original version of windoz!:thats:

HIPAR
02-24-08, 08:32 PM
OS/2 blewaway the original version of windoz!:thats:

OS2 had the same problem Linux has today; poor device support. I have a copy of OS2 Warp collecting dust somewhere in my basement. I couldn't get the video working properly so I went back to Windoze.

--- CHAS

4DThinker
02-25-08, 04:09 PM
It's hard to believe it's not a typo where the 8499 was really supposed to be $499, and the type setters doing the ad didn't have a "$" to use, or at least failed to read the poorly written ad copy and mistook the $ for an 8.

Nick
02-25-08, 04:25 PM
Not hardly - in 1989, those specs were fairly high-end, and you have to about double
the price because it was sold by Radio Shack. Back then there was no such thing
as a $499 pc.

HighVoltage
02-28-08, 08:52 PM
Back then there was no such thing
as a $499 pc.

:confused: Guess it depends on your definition of PC (personal computer)... Amiga, Atari St, Apple IIgs, etc. all fell around that price.

bobnielsen
03-05-08, 04:46 PM
I think my first PC in 1985 was around $2500 (Compaq 8086 DeskPro). I found a lot of software wouldn't run on it.

Stuart Sweet
03-05-08, 04:58 PM
Hardly. The first IBM PC I worked on, which was the first IBM PC, had a 4.77MHz (.00477 GHz) processor and one floppy drive, no hard drive. 128K (.125MB, roughly .001GB) of memory.

cadet502
03-05-08, 06:26 PM
Hardly. The first IBM PC I worked on, which was the first IBM PC, had a 4.77MHz (.00477 GHz) processor and one floppy drive, no hard drive. 128K (.125MB, roughly .001GB) of memory.

Sounds like as much fun as a DEC "robin". Can't recall the speed or memory, but I remember when we added a second dual floppy drive, we were cooking with gas. Imagine being able to run the O/S, dBaseII?, and a data disk without having to swap floppies. :grin: