PDA

View Full Version : EA, Eidos Have No Plans for Xbox Live


James_F
03-15-03, 01:13 PM
http://quote.bloomberg.com/fgcgi.cgi?ptitle=Technology%20News&s1=blk&tp=ad_topright_tech&T=markets_box.ht&s2=ad_right1_technology&bt=ad_position1_technology&box=ad_box_all&tag=technology&middle=ad_frame2_technology&s=APnGRuRXVTWljcm9z


Hanover, Germany, March 14 (Bloomberg) -- Microsoft Corp., which today starts an online service in Europe for its Xbox game consoles, is struggling to win over makers of the top titles.

Microsoft, whose Xbox has sold about a sixth as many as Sony Corp.'s PlayStation 2, will launch the Internet service in eight countries without the backing of Electronic Arts Inc., the biggest U.S. computer-game maker, or Tomb Raider-creator Eidos Plc.

``Microsoft should be concerned that a game maker of the size of Electronics Arts doesn't support its initiative,'' said Jason Armitage, an analyst at IDC. ``It's critical to maintain relations with the publishers.''

``We're not supporting Xbox Live for the time being because we don't feel comfortable with Microsoft's business model -- they own the consumer,'' said Eidos Chief Executive Mike McGarvey in an interview on March 6. The company is developing games for Sony's PlayStation 2 online system, because ``Sony is more of a partner,'' he said.

Redwood City, California-based Electronics Arts, which makes titles such as ``2002 FIFA World Cup'' and ``NHL 2003'' for the Xbox console, said it's also reluctant to join Microsoft's system. ``We have no plans for online games with Xbox because we couldn't agree on the terms,'' said spokesman Jeff Brown, reiterating a position held since last May.
Makes it kind of hard to pay for Xbox live without EA games. :eek2:

angiodan
03-15-03, 02:47 PM
Who needs EA? Their loss. The Sega series of sports games are equal if not better. The only thing EA does better is presentation and franchise modes.

Nick
03-15-03, 03:29 PM
The Almanac of the Third Millennium
-Year 2003

"Once again, a young Billy Gates is heard to yell EUREKA! from behind the door of his father's small garage."

marko
03-15-03, 03:45 PM
agree, i could understand ea football, but sega does a good job on a lot of other sports games (nba 2k3, baseball (although no online), hockey). Sega's football game is no slouch either.

I think ea is missing the point. If the price stays $50 for most of the year, and they keep the setup they have, xbox live will be great. It is great right now.

James_F
03-15-03, 04:38 PM
OK so what happens if EA buys Sega?

RichW
03-15-03, 04:45 PM
More likely that MicroSoft would buy EA... which is why the concern at EA.

For years, Sears Roebuck used the same model. Get suppliers to be dependent upon you for their base business, then put the screws to them. Those drop-forged Craftsman tools were a boom-then-bust experience for many companies.

Jasonbp
03-15-03, 05:05 PM
We have no plans for online games with Xbox because we couldn't agree on the terms

English: EA wanted to charge per month for games and MS wouldn't let them. MS wants to keep Xbox LIVE a monthly fee or a yearly fee for all games (other than games like "PSO Version I & II").

EA is only going to stick with PS2 (maybe GameCube) because there going to start charging $8 (maybe it was $10) per month to play online. Someone posted a link on xboxaddict.com about it.

James_F
03-15-03, 06:25 PM
Microsoft couldn't buy EA if they wanted too unless EA wanted it. Most likely what will happen is EA and Microsoft will split up SEGA. Microsoft will get the sports games and EA will get the rest. Microsoft can't buy SEGA by its self since SEGA not able to publish on all systems, would be a horrible buy. Now they buy the company with EA and get what they want, Sports games and EA would get what they want, Japan access and Arcade games.

BearsFan
03-17-03, 10:19 AM
For those that want to play EA games online via XBox, I can understand their disappointment.

For the more "frugal" consumer, however, with the lack of funds to pay $49 dollars per month for a broadband connection, I think we all collectively say: "Who cares?"

Sure, I'd like the opportunity to play games online w/ my XBox, but I won't do it until acquiring DSL/broadband connection takes on some semblance of reality. I saved for 1 1/2 years to just buy an XBox...and I ain't gonna sacrifice another $50 per month just to have a fast web connection, when the games I'd have to buy are also $50 bucks to begin with.

--BearsFan

Nick
03-17-03, 10:38 AM
But BearsFan! It's the American way, the
party line to let big business reach deep
in your pockets and help themselves. In
fact, it is your patriotic duty to give up
your cash! ;)

Either go along with the program, or pick up your ball and mitt and go outside to play catch.