PDA

View Full Version : The Independent, "PROOF: marketplace deaths were caused by US missile"


Jack White
04-08-03, 10:01 AM
Kind of funny how the Neocon Propoganda Channel there(and you know which channel I'm talking about) kind of seemed to have covered this story up. :lol:

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=393066

"The proof: marketplace deaths were caused by a US missile
By Cahal Milmo
02 April 2003


An American missile, identified from the remains of its serial number, was pinpointed yesterday as the cause of the explosion at a Baghdad market on Friday night that killed at least 62 Iraqis.

The codes on the foot-long shrapnel shard, seen by the Independent correspondent Robert Fisk at the scene of the bombing in the Shu'ale district, came from a weapon manufactured in Texas by Ray- theon, the world's biggest producer of "smart" armaments.

The identification of the missile as American is an embarrassing blow to Washington and London as they try to match their promises of minimal civilian casualties with the reality of precision bombing.

Both governments have suggested the Shu'ale bombing * and the explosion at another Baghdad market that killed at least 14 people last Wednesday * were caused by ageing Iraqi anti-aircraft missiles. Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, said yesterday it was "increasingly probable" the first explosion was down to the Iraqis and Peter Hain, the Welsh Secretary, suggested on BBC's Newsnight last night that President Saddam sacked his head of air defences because they were not working properly.

But investigations by The Independent show that the missile * thought to be either a Harm (High Speed Anti-Radiation Missile) device, or a Paveway laser-guided bomb * was sold by Raytheon to the procurement arm of the US Navy. The American military has confirmed that a navy EA-6B "Prowler" jet, based on the USS Kittyhawk, was in action over the Iraqi capital on Friday and fired at least one Harm missile to protect two American fighters from a surface-to-air missile battery.

The Pentagon and Raytheon, which last year had sales of $16.8bn (£10.6bn), declined to comment on the serial number evidence last night. A US Defence Department spokeswoman said: "Our investigations are continuing. We cannot comment on serial numbers which may or may not have been found at the scene."

An official Washington source went further, claiming that the shrapnel could have been planted at the scene by the Iraqi regime.

On Saturday, Downing Street disclosed intelligence that linked the Wednesday attack * and by implication Friday's killings * on Iraqi missiles being fired without radar guidance and falling back to earth. The Prime Minister's spokesman said: "A large number of surface-to-air missiles have been malfunctioning and many have failed to hit their targets and have fallen back on to Baghdad. We are not saying definitively that these explosions were caused by Iraqi missiles but people should approach this with due scepticism."

The Anglo-American claims were undermined by the series of 25 digits and letters on the piece of fuselage shown to Mr Fisk by an elderly resident of Shu'ale who lived 100 yards from the site of the 6ft crater made by the explosion.

The numbers on the fragment * retrieved from the scene and not shown to the Iraqi authorities * read: "30003-704ASB7492". The letter "B" was partially obscured by scratches and may be an "H". It was followed by a second code: "MFR 96214 09."

An online database of suppliers maintained by the Defence Logistics Information Service, part of the Department of Defence, showed that the reference MFR 96214 was the identification or "cage" number of a Raytheon plant in the city of McKinney, Texas.

The 30003 reference refers to the Naval Air Systems Command, the procurement agency responsible for furnishing the US Navy's air force with its weaponry.

The Pentagon refused to disclose which weapon was designated by the remaining letters and numbers, although defence experts said the information could be found within seconds from the Nato database of all items of military hardware operated across the Alliance, "from a nuclear bomb to a bath plug", as one put it.

Raytheon, which also produces the Patriot anti-missile system and the Tomahawk cruise missile, lists its Harms and its latest Paveway III laser-guided bombs, marketed with the slogan "One bomb, one target", as among its most accurate weaponry.

The company's sales description for its anti-radar missile says: "Harm was designed with performance and quality in mind. In actual field usage, Harm now demonstrates reliability four times better than specification. No modern weapons arsenal is complete without Harm in its inventory."

Faced with apparent proof that one of its missiles had been less accurate than specification, Raytheon was more coy on the capabilities of its products. A spokeswoman at the company's headquarters in Tucson, Arizona, said: "All questions relating to the use of our products in the field are to be handled by the appropriate military authority."

Defence experts said the damage caused at Shu'ale was consistent with that of Paveway or, more probably, a Harm weapon, which carries a warhead designed to explode into thousands of aluminium fragments and has a range of 80km.

Despite its manufacturer's claims, it also has a record of unreliability when fired at a target which "disappears" if, as the Iraqi forces do, the target's operators switch their radar signal rapidly on and off. Nick Cook, of Jane's Defence Weekly, said: "The problem with Harms is that they can be seduced away from their targets by any sort of curious transmission. They are meant to have corrected that but there have been problems." During the Kosovo conflict four years ago, a farmer and his daughter were badly injured when a missile exploded in their village. A shard of the casing was found near by with a reference very similar to that found in Baghdad: "30003 704AS4829 MFP 96214."

The American navy confirmed that one of its Prowler jets, which is used to jam enemy radar, had been over an unspecified area of Baghdad on Friday night. A pool reporter on the carrier USS Kittyhawk was told that the Prowler squadron had fired its first Harm on Friday evening in response to an air-defence unit that was threatening two F/A-18 Hornet jets. Lieutenant Rob Fluck told the journalist that the crew had not seen where their missile had landed.":lol:

Nick
04-08-03, 10:10 AM
Hey! It's WAR. SH** HAPPENS.

The official U.S. response should be "Ooops!"

Rick_EE
04-08-03, 10:14 AM
I would not call it "proof" There are now tens of thousands of missile fragments in Iraq. The fragment could easily have been moved there.

Jack White
04-08-03, 10:32 AM
Originally posted by Nick
Hey! It's WAR. SH** HAPPENS.

The official U.S. response should be "Ooops!"

NO, that SHOULD NOT be the official response of the news people who stated not as an opinion or a guess that it was Iraq that bombed the marketplace, but stated as a FACT.
I don't have a problem with the government's response to the missile accident, but I'm SICKENED by the MEDIA's TOTAL LACK of journalistic integrity and stating as FACT that it was NOT a US missile that killed those people and that it was the Iraqis trying to frame the US.
If you live in a Democracy with Freedom of the Press, then YOU EXPECT better than this.
It's NO WONDER that US was rated LOWER in Freedom of The Press than ALL OF Western Europe by Journalists from around the world.
The US is better than countries like Saudi Arabia in Freedom of The Press, but it has LONG LONG LONG way to get into the same league as the real democracies of the world like in Western Europe, Canada, etc.
I also find it surprising how the media in the US almost IGNORES the people dying from war while all the news from all over the world shows BOTH sides of the story instead of showing just one side of the story and TOTALLY covering up the other side of the story.
The LACK of Freedom of The Press in the US is VERY VERY saddening indeed.
This is NOT what our founding fathers wanted.
The difference between the press in REAL democracies and the mainstream press here is like the difference between an NBA All-Star team and a girl's middle school basketball team.
All this liberal press stuff is BULL.
The REAL people in power like Network Execs are NOT liberals.
It's only the little guys who are sometimes liberals who get the attention but don't have the real power.
If the press really was so liberal then it would pay equal attention to the deaths of Palestinian civilians as it does to the deaths of Israeli civilians.
When Israeli civilians die, it's BREAKING NEWS and covered for HOURS UPON HOURS straight.
When DOZENS of Palestinian civilians are killed by the IDF, they'd be LUCKY if the get 1 second on the ticker thing(or whatever you call it) at the bottom of the screen on the news channels.
The news channels also call it a "PERIOD OF CALM" when DOZENS of Palestinians are being killed by the IDF everyday, but when 1 Israeli civilian dies, then "THE PERIOD OF CALM IS SHATTERED".
It's a FRIGGIN' joke.
I mean the media isn't even bias in subtle ways, it's bias BLATANTLY. People really need to watch some other international news channels like TV Japan, DW, or even BBC-America to realize just HOW BIAS the news on the mainstream media really is.

sampatterson
04-08-03, 11:00 AM
Jack, I wouldn't say we don't have freedom of the press. I would say that we have STUPID journalists that will report anything from any source, rumor or otherwise and try to remain credible. This applies equally to CNN, NBC/MSNBC, and Fox News.

Western Europe, a real democracy??? Please. I guess you don't travel much and talk to the people there...

toenail
04-08-03, 11:16 AM
Originally posted by Jack White


All this liberal press stuff is BULL.
The REAL people in power like Network Execs are NOT liberals.
It's only the little guys who are sometimes liberals who get the attention but don't have the real power.


Here we go again. First, the reports I saw on Fox about the missile indicated that it COULD, repeat COULD have been Iraqi, or it COULD have been ours. I never heard anyone make a conclusive statement about it. Instead, just like the reports about Sadam's supposed demise and the "finding" of chemical weapons, everything was supposition and conjecture.

Second, as I've mentioned before, there are all sorts of examples that disprove your claim about the Network Execs all controlling the news that is shown on the tube. The best example, and the one I'm most familiar with and have written about before, is Dan Rather. For years, Dan has written his own copy and chosen the stories that will air on the CBS Evening News. He is the chief editor. Not some schmuck up in the Black Rock. The other main news anchors, Brokaw and Jennings (from whom most Americans still get their television news) have the same control. Not the suits in the office buildings. Why? Because those men draw the viewers, which draw advertisers, which draw money to the networks. If the networks don't make money, the men in suits lose their jobs. So even if they might tend toward conservatism, their self-preservation instinct controls. When Rather's power was threatened years ago, HE threatened to walk over to an opposing network. CBS didn't think they could afford to lose him, so they gave him complete control over the newscast. That set the pattern. Dan is, guess what, a LIBERAL. Needless to say, his shows have a liberal spin to them.

Maybe you didn't hear the news a couple of weeks ago, Jack. Even the "beloved" Walter Cronkite, while criticizing the war, acknowledged that the media had and still has a liberal bias. As he explained it, reporters go out in the world and see a lot of suffering, and this gives them compassion for others, which tends to make them more liberal. While I think his explanation is self-supporting, his conclusion seems right on.

Rick_EE
04-08-03, 12:42 PM
Liberal/conservative is a matter of perspective.
Look at a see-saw. It appears a lot longer when sitting at either end than in the middle. Also, a small tip in one direction or the other affects the ends a lot more than the center.

 

From Jack's perspective, the media actually appars to the right of him.

gcutler
04-08-03, 01:03 PM
Originally posted by Rick Densing
From Jack's perspective, the media actually appars to the right of him.

Please don't insult Left Wing Liberals by putting Jack in their midst, no one deserves that ;)

Mike123abc
04-08-03, 05:14 PM
I think we need to start giving Jack the Roger treatment... bring on the babes!

lastmanstanding
04-08-03, 08:47 PM
league as the real democracies of the world like in Western Europe, Canada, etc.~~~~~~~

Real democracies? Canada and Europe?
Wow, that's rich.

Karl Marx, your table is ready. . .

firephoto
04-09-03, 12:39 AM
If you lived in a city with hundreds of buildings damaged by missiles and bombs, how hard would it be to find your choice of missile flavor part and put it anywhere else in the city you choose? I would think it would be as simple as finding a rock in your front yard and moving it to your back yard.

Proof would a picture of the missile hitting the marketplace. Iraqi censored news isn't a reliable or accurate source. Baghdad Bob, with a tank burning in the background, saying how the Americans aren't in Baghdad is a good example of the accurate info that the Iraqi gov't allows to be reported on.

Mark Holtz
04-09-03, 01:46 AM
It sounds less like a news piece and more like a hit piece on Raytheon and the Pentagon.

Did a US missile hit a Iraqi marketplace? Probably. But, the story which Jack White posts make it sounds like the US Pilot got up and said, "I'm going to bomb civilians today." Now, tell me, how absurd is that?

What bothers me more is the rumors of possible Weapons of Mass Destruction or Pesticides buried in civilian areas such as hospital, schools, and other "civilian" areas.

firephoto
04-09-03, 10:19 AM
How about the comments that it's "just pesticides" and not WMD. If that was so then why are the pesticide manufacturing plants and other agricultural areas so heavily armed and fought over?

lee635
04-09-03, 11:26 AM
Well, proof that the US didn't misfire might also be the US releasing the cool video footage showing where that missle fired that day by the Prowler actually hit. Also, footage of all other missles fired, say within an hour of the accident. That would satisfy me.

RE: "The American military has confirmed that a navy EA-6B "Prowler" jet, based on the USS Kittyhawk, was in action over the Iraqi capital on Friday and fired at least one Harm missile to protect two American fighters from a surface-to-air missile battery. "

John Corn
04-09-03, 12:07 PM
Knowing what I know now, I believe less Iraqi people will die during this war, than would have died under another year of Saddam Hussein.

RJS1111111
04-09-03, 01:57 PM
Originally posted by John Corn
Knowing what I know now, I believe less Iraqi people will die during this war, than would have died under another year of Saddam Hussein.

I dunno. I think that still "remains" to be seen. An awful lot of Iraqi RG and regular army are nowhere to be found. I don't think anyone has any clear estimate yet of how many may have just walked home, and how many were blown to smithereens by air bombardment or other action, because their "commanders" or enforcers told them to dig in or strap on explosives and "die like men".

It might be safest to say that we hope and pray that the war will bring an end to the grinding mortal misery and fear of all Iraqis, and that the world will be a safer and better place. Unfortunately people have been killed and injured. Fortunately a malignant regime has been removed.

waydwolf
04-09-03, 03:04 PM
Originally posted by firephoto
How about the comments that it's "just pesticides" and not WMD. If that was so then why are the pesticide manufacturing plants and other agricultural areas so heavily armed and fought over?

    Exactly. They said that the complex found by UN inspectors shortly after the Gulf War that contained biological, chemical, and nuclear weapons experimentation was a pesticide and chicken feed plant.

Halfsek
04-10-03, 02:46 AM
Originally posted by Mike123abc
I think we need to start giving Jack the Roger treatment... bring on the babes!

Sergei, Sergei.. you're one lucky man.

http://images.art.com/images/PRODUCTS/large/10038000/10038859.jpg

Screw politics! I like this much better!