PDA

View Full Version : FCC Ponders Bond for Commercial Sat Cos


Steve Mehs
04-18-03, 02:43 AM
The Federal Communications Commission is considering a requirement for future satellite licensees that would force them to post a performance bond in order to secure an orbital slot.

A handful of commercial satellite operators recently approached staff with the FCC's International Bureau on the bond issue. According to their joint filing at the commission, the FCC is studying a requirement for a satellite applicant to post a performance bond amounting to $10 million for each orbital slot.

The bond's aim is to encourage companies to utilize their orbital resources within the milestone requirements, and not sit on an empty orbital location.

The companies told the FCC the proposed bond would not encourage growth within the U.S. satellite industry. They said the U.S. marketplace for satellite communications has flourished under the commission’s policy of open skies, and the bond would hinder that effort.

A $10 million performance bond also would create financial barriers for new entrants and small businesses that want to enter "an already risky business," the companies said. In addition, they said the bond may compel established U.S. companies to file for orbital resources through foreign administrations, which would reduce U.S. jurisdictional oversight that aims to resolve policy and security concerns.

The companies that approached the FCC's International Bureau on the bond subject are Hughes Network Systems, Lockheed Martin, Loral, Panamsat and SES Americom.

The bond proposal is part of the FCC's effort to reform space station licensing. The issue will be taken up at the commission's next meeting, scheduled for Wednesday, April 23.

From SkyReport (http://www.skyreport.com) (Used with Permission)

Cyclone
04-18-03, 07:40 AM
This FCC position makes sense to me. If you are not ready to use the Slot, don't buy it and sit on it. They'd only be blocking someone else from using it.

Jacob S
04-19-03, 07:44 AM
Yes, I agree with Cyclone, but if someone does not have that kind of money that has a small company and is just starting out then they should have just as much of a chance as everyone else to start out. Perhaps paying so much for a certain time period and giving you a little time for free, but not much time, after that having to pay so much to have the extention to the time that they give now.

Mike123abc
04-19-03, 11:01 AM
The current system is not too bad. Right now you have to use the frequencies by a given date or lose them. Dish almost lost the 121 Ka band freqencies until they convinced the FCC they really were going to use them.

The main problem is that everyone is whining and moaning for extention after extention. This leaves the freqencies unused. What the FCC really needs to do is crack down on the extentions.

Cheyenne
04-19-03, 10:43 PM
If bonds are required, expect increased sub fee's and only major corps to pursue licenses.
Bad news....

Jacob S
04-20-03, 09:56 AM
Yes but isnt the money returned after they use the slot? If that is the case then how come would it rase rates? Maybe they should have a first come first serve basis too if one cannot post bond for those that are small businesses that cannot post bond.