PDA

View Full Version : Man sues Charter Cable over 'addiction'


bills976
01-07-04, 02:05 PM
These lawsuits just keep getting better and better....

http://www.wisinfo.com/thereporter/news/archive/local_14044768.shtml

Man says he’s addicted to cable; wants to sue Charter


By Lee Reinsch
the reporter lreinsch@fdlreporter.com

Cable TV made a West Bend man addicted to TV, caused his wife to be overweight and his kids to be lazy, he says.

And he’s threatening to sue the cable company.

Timothy Dumouchel of West Bend wants $5,000 or three computers, and a lifetime supply of free Internet service from Charter Communications to settle what he says will be a small claims suit.

Dumouchel blames Charter for his TV addiction, his wife’s 50-pound weight gain and his children’s being “lazy channel surfers,” according to a Fond du Lac police report.

Charter employees called police to the local office at 165 Knight’s Way the evening of Dec. 23 after Dumouchel showed up with a small claims complaint, reportedly intimidated an employee and made “low-level threats” to employees’ safety, according to a police report.

The report states Dumouchel gave an employee five minutes to get a supervisor to talk to him or their next contact would be “in the ocean with the sharks.”

According to the report, Dumouchel told Charter employees he plans to sue because his cable connection remained intact four years after he tried to get it canceled.

The result was that he and his family got free cable from August of 1999 to Dec. 23, 2003.

“I believe that the reason I smoke and drink every day and my wife is overweight is because we watched TV every day for the last four years,” Dumouchel stated in a written complaint against the company, included in a Fond du Lac police report.

“But the reason I am suing Charter is they did not let me make a decision as to what was best for myself and my family and (they have been) keeping cable (coming) into my home for four years after I asked them to turn it off.”

According to the police report, Dumouchel called Charter to stop his cable service in August of 1999 and was taken off the billing but not the cable service.

In a written statement, he said he put the family TV in the basement in 1999 after he had called to get cable disconnected, but soon thereafter, his wife had moved it back and hooked up the cable connection, and it still worked.

He stated he “made a deal” with her that “she could watch TV as long as the cable worked.”

He then went back to Charter and asked that they disconnect his service, which they reportedly never did.

He stated that he called Charter several times to get the service disconnected for good because he felt it was addictive, according to the report.

Charter’s director of government and public relations for eastern Wisconsin, John Miller, says he doesn’t take the threat of a lawsuit seriously.

“Even though we consider our services to be a very powerful entertainment product, I don’t think it’s reached a medical level yet where it could be proved to be addictive,” Miller said.

“In our society, any kind of legal action shouldn’t come as a surprise to anyone,” he added.

Wisconsin Circuit Court records show no civil lawsuit papers filed in Dumouchel’s name.

dtcarson
01-07-04, 02:17 PM
But he's willing to take 3 computers and lifetime internet service instead? Those will surely be healthy...maybe he'll play Everquest and sue Sony also....

"According to the police report, Dumouchel called Charter to stop his cable service in August of 1999 and was taken off the billing but not the cable service."

Countersuit--seeing as how he was technically stealing cable.....

What boggles me is that he and his family found enough on tv worth watching to be 'addicted' to it.

Sigh--even though they didn't turn off the cable, no one was forcing him to keep the televisions. If this suit is true, this just epitomizes what is wrong with our society today.

Bill R
01-07-04, 02:43 PM
Being in a family of three lawyers (I am not one myself), I am constantly amazed about the stories about what people want to sue over.

This is just a money grab, pure and simple.

Mike123abc
01-07-04, 02:57 PM
I can see it now... The all exercise channel... Coming soon to every cable/DBS provider soon. Use it as protection against these type of suits... But Judge they could have just tuned into the motivational exercise channel and saved themselves. We provide this channel because we care about the health and wellbeing of our subscribers.

catman
01-07-04, 03:07 PM
Is this guy working with a full deck ? God . I hear of some stupid stuff on tv . You don't expect it to be true .

DS0816
01-08-04, 01:28 AM
I don't want to pass judgment on anyone. That's because some amazingly incomprehensible lawsuits brought forth over the most recent of years have actually been won in court.

Nick
01-08-04, 08:31 AM
"...he and his family got free cable from August of 1999 to Dec. 23, 2003."

This clueless idiot has publicly admitted committing cable theft over a 4 year period. What we have here is the possiblity of a criminal case, a civil action, and Charter billing this jerk for a huge sum of $$$.

This guy's picture appears in the dictionary next to the definition of "stupid".

CB3
01-08-04, 09:59 AM
"...he and his family got free cable from August of 1999 to Dec. 23, 2003."

This clueless idiot has publicly admitted committing cable theft over a 4 year period. What we have here is the possiblity of a criminal case, a civil action, and Charter billing this jerk for a huge sum of $$$.

This guy's picture appears in the dictionary next to the definition of "stupid".

Not starting anything, Just curious. I'm not defending his law suit. But, how is he stealing cable?

He did not modify his TV to receive their service. He did not modify his cabling in his house to receive their service. He didn't modify his set-top box to receive their service. he didn't modify the cable box outside his house to receive their service. He notified the company many times to let them know that he was receiving a service he wasn't subscribed too and for them to fix it.

if ANY of the above turns out to be not true, then he was stealing cable.

btbrossard
01-08-04, 10:08 AM
Timothy Dumouchel of West Bend wants $5,000 or three computers, and a lifetime supply of free Internet service from Charter Communications to settle what he says will be a small claims suit.
Like three computers and a lifetime supply of free internet is going to get his wife and kids in shape :rolleyes: .

/Benjamin

jgoggan
01-08-04, 10:36 AM
Indeed -- regardless of his suit, I am quite curious about whether or not he has committed a crime. Is it theft if they give it to you? I mean, if you are in the grocery store, take a look at a bag of oranges and then decide that you don't want them -- but then the manager comes out and gives them to you in the parking lot -- is that theft? (I realize that isn't a perfect example...)

But, it just seems like it shouldn't be illegal to leave your TV connected to a cable jack and watch what is on -- especially if you've called (TWICE) and told them to cancel it. That isn't theft -- that's them giving him free cable...

- John...

dtcarson
01-08-04, 11:24 AM
Indeed -- regardless of his suit, I am quite curious about whether or not he has committed a crime. Is it theft if they give it to you? I mean, if you are in the grocery store, take a look at a bag of oranges and then decide that you don't want them -- but then the manager comes out and gives them to you in the parking lot -- is that theft? (I realize that isn't a perfect example...)

But, it just seems like it shouldn't be illegal to leave your TV connected to a cable jack and watch what is on -- especially if you've called (TWICE) and told them to cancel it. That isn't theft -- that's them giving him free cable...

- John...

I generally agree with that; in this case he made the attempt to alert the company that he was getting service for free. But if he can get a judge to hear this case, and especially to find for him, if I were Comcast, I'd darn sure try to fight back with something. If you can sue for stupid stuff, so can I [the company.]

jgoggan
01-08-04, 11:59 AM
Oh -- agreed! I'm not saying Comcast won't try it -- they might even win. I'm just not convinced that it should be illegal to do what he did...

- John...

durl
01-09-04, 11:52 AM
I'm going to sue the guy that's suing the cable company. When I first heard about his "lawsuit" I laughed so hard that I fell back in my chair and bumped my head. Or maybe I should sue because reading about his suit caused me trauma.

Seriously, I believe the man should be countersued for court and legal costs.

Richard King
01-09-04, 12:37 PM
It's time for a loser (not looser) pay court system. This would go a long way toward stopping this kind of garbage.

CB3
01-09-04, 02:41 PM
It's time for a loser (not looser) pay court system. This would go a long way toward stopping this kind of garbage.


I agree. Would also stop companies from filing bs lawsuites as well ;)

Richard King
01-09-04, 03:23 PM
If you are speaking of the company I think you are ;) it probably wouldn't have an effect on them ;) since they have a staff of lawyers to handle such things.