View Full Version : signal strength
dmulder
08-14-02, 08:50 AM
I live in michigan and I am getting low 80,s on 101 and low 70,s on 119 on my directv system. I am wondering if that is normal or should I be able to get a stronger reading.
It's NORMAL. Is it the best you could get? Likely not. But it's certainly acceptable.
Jacob S
08-14-02, 05:17 PM
They say that anything 70 and up is acceptable although you will get a signal with anything above 40, however while you might get a signal on one transponder at a low signal rate, you may get none on another one, so the weakest transponder needs to be locked.
The advantage to having a strong signal strength is that it prevents rain fade and will not go out as easily and for as long during a hard rain.
Karl Foster
08-15-02, 10:30 AM
I have similar strength in the summer because of the trees, I believe, but in the winter I have strength in the 90's. If you get much snow, you will want to make sure you have strong signal strength before winter comes around.
I also remember reading somewhere that oval dishes have a lower signal strength than the round ones. I can't remember where, though.
Richssat
08-16-02, 03:01 AM
Karl,
For the most part that is true. An oval dish (2-3LNB) will top out at a lower overall signal strength then a round one (1LNB). It is because you are pointing the dish between two or 3 orbital slots rather then directly at one.
Around here, I routinely get signal strength readings in the mid to high 90's on a round dish. The best I normally get out of an oval dish is 80/80.
The best set up to view more then one sat would be to point a round dish at each one. Few people want 2 or 3 dishes on their house tho.
Now, can someone explain to me why E* felt the need to have their signal strength meter on their recievers go up to 125 ?
Something oddly Spinal Tap(ish) about that if you ask me.
Rich
Jacob S
08-16-02, 03:38 PM
The reason why the signal goes to 125 is because some transponders are in boost mode and they want that boost mode to be shown.
"Now, can someone explain to me why E* felt the need to have their signal strength meter on their recievers go up to 125 ?"
Because a redesigned 1-100 meter would make people think their signals had dropped, and when they moved to 240 Watt transponders (from 120) - many people were maxing out on 100. Rather than scale it back and make people think they'd lost signal, they just added 25 points.
vBulletin® v3.7.6, Copyright ©2000-2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.