PDA

View Full Version : EchoStar Agrees to Yield Frequencies to Save a Deal


John Corn
10-28-02, 04:47 AM
In a last-ditch attempt to rescue its proposed acquisition of DirecTV, EchoStar Communications has tentatively agreed to transfer dozens of communications frequencies and three satellites to Cablevision, the cable-television company that is making a push into the satellite business, people close to the companies said yesterday.

EchoStar and Cablevision have presented the plan to antitrust officials at the Justice Department as a way to potentially salvage EchoStar's proposed $25.8 billion acquisition of the Hughes Electronics division of General Motors, which includes DirecTV.

Financial terms were unclear yesterday, but it appeared that Cablevision could receive the frequencies free. The Justice Department has been leaning against the Hughes deal because of concerns that it would combine the nation's two largest providers of satellite TV service. DirecTV is the No. 1 satellite television provider, with about 11 million customers. EchoStar's Dish Network is No. 2 with about 7.8 million subscribers.

On Oct. 10, the Federal Communications Commission refused to approve the deal but gave EchoStar and Hughes 30 days to revise the terms. At least one F.C.C. commissioner said in public comments that a deal to transfer significant satellite systems to a third party could be a way to save the merger. The Justice Department has been expected to render its opinion on the EchoStar-Hughes this week.

Cablevision, the nation's No. 7 cable-television company, plans to begin its own satellite next spring and to begin offering satellite-television service later next year. Many analysts have been skeptical about Cablevision's plans because the company has appeared strapped for cash and also because they think that one satellite would not be enough to provide a nationwide television service.

But under the deal with EchoStar, Cablevision would receive the rights to use 51 satellite frequencies now controlled by EchoStar. When added to the 11 frequencies that Cablevision already owns, that would give Cablevision 62 frequencies, which would appear to be enough to provide a robust service.

In addition, EchoStar has tentatively agreed to sell Cablevision its EchoStar 3 satellite and to lease its EchoStar 1 and EchoStar 2 satellites, according to people close to the negotiations. Spokesmen for Cablevision and EchoStar declined to comment.

According to people close to the negotiations, the deal by Cablevision and EchoStar is contingent upon EchoStar's completing its acquisition of Hughes, which requires approval from both the Justice Department and the F.C.C.

The 11 frequencies that Cablevision already controls are at an orbital position that could make it difficult for consumers on the West Coast to receive the company's satellite service. Under the proposed deal with EchoStar, Cablevision would receive satellite capacity and communications frequencies at an additional orbital location farther west, making it easier for Cablevision to provide nationwide service.

In addition to the transfer of frequencies and satellites, EchoStar has tentatively agreed to share with Cablevision many of its systems for transmitting signals from local stations, according to people close to the two companies. Transmitting local broadcast stations from a satellite to consumers can be costly and complicated. Sharing EchoStar's systems would make the process easier for Cablevision.

Even if regulators and antitrust authorities approve the deal and allow EchoStar's acquisition of Hughes, it would take Cablevision years to build a satellite business. Cablevision has been looking for a potential partner to help share the financial load of the satellite project.

At the same time, Cablevision has been selling assets and paring costs in an effort to strengthen its core cable-television operation. The company could sell additional assets to underwrite its satellite plans. A deal with EchoStar, however, would jump-start the company's entrance into the satellite business.


http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/28/technology/28DISH.html

PeterB
10-28-02, 08:39 AM
Hmmmm who didnt see this one coming? :rolleyes:

Jacob S
10-28-02, 03:22 PM
duh!!! this would be good for echostar by giving them this space because echostar would have a lot of stock in the company, so if this new satellite company by cablevision does well and even if it does some harm to echostar, if they own stock in the company, then they are still a winner, no matter which way this thing goes.

I know that cablevision can get customers that Dish and DirecTv would not be able to get because of their well known name. I see all kinds of satellites that Charter has up out in the country now, they put it in without a credit card requirement and all that money up front. Its like Primestar.

jeffwtux
10-28-02, 03:39 PM
whose well known name?

Kevin
10-28-02, 04:05 PM
Originally posted by Jacob S
I know that cablevision can get customers that Dish and DirecTv would not be able to get because of their well known name. You mean their well-known name for inferior cable service. Ask anyone in the NY Metro area. :)

Richard King
10-28-02, 05:11 PM
would have a lot of stock in the companyWrong. Per the agreements, Dish will own no stock in Cablevision.

raj2001
10-28-02, 05:31 PM
I wish Charlie would just quit already. He is wasting time and energy with this merger. FCC already said no. No is no. Is it that hard for him to understand? The fat lady is getting really sleepy as she should have sung a long time ago.

raj2001
10-28-02, 05:34 PM
Originally posted by Kevin
You mean their well-known name for inferior cable service. Ask anyone in the NY Metro area. :)

Actually, just Brooklyn, Long Island and parts of New Jersey. The rest of NYC is Time Warner territory.

Alot of people I know get cablevision for Optimum Online, and nothing else. The TV service sucks, but the cable modem service is super fast.

belsokar
10-28-02, 08:23 PM
"...I wish Charlie would just quit already. He is wasting time and energy with this merger. FCC already said no. No is no. Is it that hard for him to understand? The fat lady is getting really sleepy as she should have sung a long time ago..."

well technically, as far as I understand it, the FCC said NO to the current deal, but allowed for "...revised terms..." within 30 days...so really, its a tentative NO, based on the outcome of said revisions...

mattb
10-28-02, 10:34 PM
what will this mean for SKyangel, they currently have leased space on echo 3 if i remeber (well whatever the bird is at 61.5*

Ray_Clum
10-29-02, 02:45 AM
I'd be willing to guess that E* would begin leasing space on E1 & E2 to SA* instead of on E3, assuming that SA* is currently paying E* for transmission. If, as part of their current arrangement, SA* is allowing E* to use the extra transponder space that SA* has (IIRC, SA* has 8 licenses at 61.5) in exchange for transmission (i.e. no $$$ being transferred), then SA* & E* would probably have to negotiate a new contract and therefore SA* monthly charges would probably go up...

bryan27
10-29-02, 07:10 AM
There won't be any changes with regard to SA. The agreement is for the life of E-3. Most likely it will be a simple swap, SA continues to use E-3 and leases 6 TPs back to Cablevision. Since there are agreements with regard to E-3, the satellite can only be sold with those agreements.