- mnassour, Alan Gordon, loudo and 12 others like this
- → Most Liked Content
Most Liked Content
Posted by Stuart Sweet on 08 April 2014 - 01:02 PM
Posted by Doug Brott on 02 June 2009 - 06:16 PM
What you should not do
Do not contact DIRECTV
You agree that all support for this software will be through DBSTalk.com. Contacting DIRECTV about your receivers while they are running pre-release software is grounds for immediate removal from the group.
Do not post about Cutting Edge versions in public forums
The Cutting Edge program is located in a private area that requires opting in for access. This is to protect the information so that it cannot be easily searched on the Internet. All Cutting Edge discussion should take place here in the Cutting Edge forums. You should never post information about the Cutting Edge versions in public areas either on DBSTalk.com or other forums.
Do not download just to get a new feature
Cutting edge versions are typically not "customer ready" which means that there is an increased chance that a major bug may exist.
Do not download if you are unwilling to risk it all
If you are not willing to accept these risks, then do not download a cutting edge version to your receiver.
Do not create polls right after a download
All polls created on the first day a cutting edge release is available or on the two (2) days following the day a cutting edge release is available will be deleted without discussion. The reason for this is to give people a chance to see the changes in action before passing judgment.
What you should do
Understand a cutting edge version may not be stable
This is the cutting edge. There is a chance that your receiver may stop working. There is a chance that you may lose all of your programming. Understand that there are no guarantees of anything.
Understand there is a chance of decreased performance
A cutting edge version often includes new pieces of code as enhancements are added and bugs are fixed. As a result, there are times when the performance will decrease.
Report issues at DBSTalk
You should report issues whenever appropriate, so as to improve the software in future releases. All reports should be made @ DBSTalk.com in the Cutting Edge forum. Do not contact DIRECTV or post issues in the general forum area.
Inform all members of your household
Make sure folks who use this receiver understand that everything could be lost. Downloading a cutting edge version could lead to unsatisfactory results.
Understand that participation is voluntary
No one is forcing you to participate in the Cutting Edge program. If you are dissatisfied with your receivers while running pre-release software, you have one and only one recourse: revert to the national release.
Have the right equipment
In order to participate in the Cutting Edge Program, you must have the right receiver. This list includes an HR, H, D or R series receiver from DIRECTV.
While the Cutting Edge Program is a cooperative effort, DirecTV and DBSTalk are not affiliated. DBSTalk is ultimately not responsible for any issues related to DIRECTV hardware, software and programming.
These rules are subject to change at anytime without notice.
- LanMan, bcherry, tonyc and 11 others like this
Posted by Gary Toma on 26 December 2012 - 04:47 PM
Data Updated 8/13/2014
DIRECTV TRANSPONDER MAP
@ 95W: G3C
@ 99W: SW2 , D11
@101W: D4S, D8, D9S
@103W: SW1; D10, D12
MPEG2 / MPEG4
Blue shading identifies channels using MPEG4 compression; these typically are HD channels. However, a small number of SD and Audio-Only channels use MPEG4 compression. Un-shaded records indicate channels using MPEG2 compression; MPEG2 is not used for HD. Blue shading in the 'Market' tab identifies DMAs served with only MPEG4 LIL channels.
MPEG2 DISPLAY NOTE
Beginning with the 5/14/14 data, MPEG2 records have their channel name and channel number columns presented in 10 point instead of the larger 12 point used throughout the Excel. While the Blue shading distinguishes MPEG4 from MPEG2, some versions of Excel do not display the color shading while other Excel implementations, such as iPad, ignore shading.
Effective December 17, 2012, Puerto Rico began transitioning from Directv Latin America (DLA), to Directv US Domestic resources. This new Puerto Rico service is administered as if it were a US DMA; see the LIL tab for complete details.
See this link for an understanding of "Virtual" Channels which appear throughout the LIL data.
1. TPN_MAP Domestic This Excel presents all US DIRECTV Channels and Transponders CONUS (Continental US or wide/National beams) and LIL (Local-Into-Local or narrow/Spot beams).
There are eight tabs at the bottom of the Domestic Excel page
CONUS all CONUS channels, grouping first MPEG4 then MPEG2 channels in channel number sequence
LIL all Local-Into-Local channels in DMA Market Name sequence, grouping first MPEG4 then MPEG2 channels in channel number sequence. As noted above, Puerto Rico appears as a pseudo DMA
OTA the Directv supported database of Over-The-Air channels in DMA Market Name then channel number sequence
HYBRID includes Video-On-Demand channels, Interactive channels, Test channels and Offline channels; each grouping in channel number sequence. A large number of part-time channels, seasonal channels, RSN Alternate channels and ‘Game-Only’ sports channels appear since such channels are typically inactive at the time of day the TPN Map is assembled.
MARKET Local Market or Designated Marketing Area (DMA) database with status and reference information
CHANNEL COUNT a periodic snapshot of channels provided per satellite
NETWORK DECODER correlates satellites and their transponders graphically to explain the receiver's signal strength presentation
TUTORIAL procedure to acquire channel information and signal strength using interactive IP (SHEF) commands with your receiver
Additional insight for US Domestic channels is available regarding:
OTA (Over The Air) information and discussion in this DBSTalk thread
DNS (Distant Network Service) information and discussion in this DBSTalk thread
2. TPN_MAP Panamericana is the first division of DLA. Entities in this division are Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Uruguay and Venezuela. El Caribe entities are Aruba and Curacao, Barbados, Trinidad and Tobago and Caribe Regional. Puerto Rico is transitioning from DLA to US Domestic resources.
There are eight tabs at the bottom of the Panamericana Excel page
BEAM OESTE all channels in Network 0, grouping first MPEG4 then MPEG2 channels in channel number sequence
BEAM SUR all channels in Network 1, grouping first MPEG4 then MPEG2 channels in channel number sequence
BEAM PR all channels in Network 2 in channel number sequence
OTA the Directv supported database of Over-The-Air channels in Regional Market Name, then channel number sequence
HYBRID includes Video-On-Demand channels, Interactive channels, Test channels and Offline channels, each grouping in channel number sequence
MARKET Satellite Beam and OTA Network Numbers
LA NETWORK DECODER correlates satellites and their transponders graphically to explain the receiver's signal strength presentation
TUTORIAL procedure to acquire channel information and signal strength using interactive IP (SHEF) commands with your receiver
3. TPN_MAP SKY-Mexico is part of a second DLA division. A fledgling Excel attachment presents SKY-Mexico Channels and Transponders. Other entities in this SKY Division are Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, and Panama. There is much detail to be added, but little interest has been shown, limited certainly by our English-only presentation. The SKY-Mexico data is very stale, last updated 10/6/2012.
4. TPN_MAP SKY-Brazil is a third DLA division but is not yet presented here
All documents are fully unprotected so you may copy and use the data as you wish
The free Microsoft Excel Viewer
- KyL416, scott0702, tonyn and 10 others like this
Posted by catnapped on 07 February 2014 - 02:37 PM
The Weather Channel's spokesmodel:
- carlsbad_bolt_fan, Herdfan, PCampbell and 8 others like this
Posted by Diana C on 25 April 2014 - 06:00 AM
- Herdfan, Steve, FHSPSU67 and 7 others like this
Posted by sigma1914 on 04 August 2014 - 05:33 PM
I was the first one to report this here. I heard it on the radio coming home at 4:00 PM. My ESPN Radio Station Reported the Breaking News Just As I was Pulling Into My Driveway That DirecTv Just signed the deal Today. It is official we will be getting the SEC Network.
Sent from my iPhone using DBSTalk mobile app
- damondlt, jagrim, mrdobolina and 5 others like this
Posted by treecastle on 29 May 2014 - 03:55 PM
Sounds like Fox News Jr.
- carlsbad_bolt_fan, JcT21, BubblePuppy and 5 others like this
Posted by MysteryMan on 08 April 2014 - 12:51 PM
David Kenny, Chief Emasculated Officer.
- mnassour, carlsbad_bolt_fan, treecastle and 5 others like this
Posted by sdk009 on 11 January 2014 - 10:27 AM
- DCSholtis, damondlt, PCampbell and 5 others like this
Posted by Diana C on 10 June 2014 - 10:10 PM
MAVTV was just added (in HD) to FiOS-TV this week (as was Fusion)...<yawn>. If EVERY registered member of this forum clamored for a given channel, that would translate to 0.025% of all DirecTV customers - good luck getting 1/4 of the members to back a "missing" channel.
Speculating about the launch date can be great fun. The NASA Space Flight website is largely built on launch related news and speculation.The impact comes in the form of not throwing the customer a bone in a rather long time. Kind of like when DIRECTV promised dozens and dozens of HD channels back in 2004. In this marketplace where cable's fortunes seem to be rising again (while DIRECTV's US fortunes are looking flat) and with OTT services gaining familiarity and interest, this should not be ignored. DIRECTV is charging premium prices but they're still not offering some important channels (probably more than 5% interest if the anticipation thread is to be considered) in HD as well as a few channels that aren't offered at all (the international news channels are always chewy). The AT&T thread has also driven home some non-negligible deficiencies in the race for market share but it will be at least two commitment cycles before that really catches on.DIRECTV has offered up one not yet linear news channel in the foreseeable future and it is a domestic news channel. Is this the best they can do? I'm pretty sure that there would be a whole lot more interest in MAV TV if it were offered in HD.DIRECTV doesn't shut down their precious PPV channels for more than a few hours at a time. Imagine how much more they could make if they didn't shut them down at all.
I just went through the exercise of comparing the channel lineup of DirecTV, Dish Network, Verizon and Cablevision...I don't think there was more than a 4 or 5 channel difference between any of them, and each one was missing a few channels that one or the other carried. While we here love to speculate about all sorts of things, from satellite launches to channel additions to new features in the next software release, the reality is that pretty much anyone would be satisfied with any of the major providers' channel lineup.
While DBSTalk may be important to DirecTV, they don't run their business based solely on what they read here.
All that said, I think you missed my point (either accidentally or purposefully): nearly every post you make is derogatory to DirecTV, either overtly or by inference. You criticize their satellite technology, their content management, their business practices and virtually every aspect of the service and company one can name. So, you should not be surprised when some other posters call you to task for it. One can only reap what one sows.
- RAD, HoTat2, kevinwmsn and 4 others like this
Posted by CCarncross on 13 July 2013 - 03:48 PM
Its an entertainment luxury item, if you can't afford to pay for it or dont want to, move on to another provider, or drop to lower programming package/less equipment. In my opinion, the packages prices and discounts should be fixed so everyone pays the same and there is no more of these BS threads.
- duffytoo, marabunta, nap81992 and 4 others like this
Posted by Diana C on 13 June 2014 - 08:40 AM
Time to move along....nothing to see here.
- damondlt, mshaw2715, sigma1914 and 3 others like this
Posted by Diana C on 11 June 2014 - 10:21 AM
bingo ! this is what I have been saying all along
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
And at no time did I suggest that everyone should do as I do. You started out by saying: "I can't see myself wasting over $1500 dollars for equipment that would be obsolete in a few years" and then went on to make a completely invalid comparison to somehow "finessing" the system to get DirecTV equipment for free, which almost never happens for existing customers. As each of your points were refuted by others, you kept changing the context of your responses, and it was that practice that raised the ire of several members.
The point of my post is simply that if you have access to a viable alternative for multichannel TV there are options that can save you a lot of money in the long run. Had I not seen Sixto's original post a couple of months ago, I would never have considered switching. Once I did, I spent weeks working on a spreadsheet analysis of the costs, the payback period and aggregate savings. I found a path that realized significant savings, although with the caveat of a fairly significant up front investment. I simple shared the results of that analysis. I never criticized DirecTV - I only observed that, compared to the options I investigated, they are charging a premium for their service. I leave it to the individual reader to determine whether or not, in their particular circumstance, that premium is justified.
- damondlt, mrdobolina, sigma1914 and 3 others like this
Posted by sigma1914 on 09 June 2014 - 06:51 AM
Why do people critique or care what provider anyone chooses? It's their house and money. Diana or anyone doesn't need to justify to any fanboys why she's switching.
These topics are very helpful to learn about other options, though, it's just a shame naysayers and zealots muddy them up.
- raott, damondlt, JACKIEGAGA and 3 others like this
Posted by Scott Kocourek on 02 June 2014 - 01:21 PM
Thank you !
I complained ,called directv for an update, they don't have one yet. But its well know wide spread issue.
They flat out said do not force a download. And since my equipment is leased I'm not authorized to do such as its the property of directv.
FLAT OUT told me this.
But okay now I know a fix is on the way, so I'll wait.
They did say it's an urgent issue.
So that should be quick.
I'm glad the information I had was able to help some of the members at DBSTalk and if there are anymore opportunities I will certainly pass them on. For those that were not comfortable forcing a download I wish there was another way I could help. I do not work for DIRECTV so information I give is obviously not going to be supported by DIRECTV but I do my best to give out correct information. I try and post when I know and don't go off of other websites for my info.
- Jon J, tonyd79, sigma1914 and 3 others like this
Posted by James Long on 29 April 2014 - 12:24 AM
(Isn't that pretty much the answer?)
- carlsbad_bolt_fan, damondlt, joed32 and 3 others like this
Posted by I WANT MORE on 05 September 2013 - 05:39 AM
DirecTv, Please remove all soccer channels and replace them with something I like.
- PrinceLH, sigma1914, Tom Servo and 3 others like this
Posted by Scott Kocourek on 29 July 2014 - 05:20 PM
Please take your personal discussion to the Messenger feature at the site or maybe even exchange phone numbers and you can discuss who knows less about DIRECTV that way.
- tonyc, jagrim, I WANT MORE and 2 others like this
Posted by veryoldschool on 18 July 2014 - 01:43 PM
The idea I was trying to convey....
Diana, let me introduce you to a brick wall: meet Harsh.
- JACKIEGAGA, dpeters11, peds48 and 2 others like this
Posted by Bill Broderick on 12 June 2014 - 05:10 PM
The way you see it does not necessarily means that that is the real deal or the same way everyone sees it.
Has there been a single post in the 17 pages of this thread where someone has said when they read your statement "While TiVO is a great platform, I can't see myself wasting over $1500 dollars for equipment that would be obsolete in a few years." that they didn't read that as you implying that Diana wasted her money when she purchased Tivos? I haven't read one. I have, however, read many posts from many different people who read your statement exactly the same way that I read it.
When a few people misinterpret what you write, that's probably their fault. When everybody misinterprets what you write, then you wrote it incorrectly. When you unrepentantly continue to use the same inflammatory phrase that you're claiming that people are misinterpreting, it make people less inclined to belive that they misinterpreted what you wrote in the first place.
- damondlt, sigma1914, Diana C and 2 others like this