1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Acoustic Research XSight: Discussion Thread

Discussion in 'Miscellaneous Equipment' started by Stuart Sweet, Aug 27, 2009.

  1. Sep 1, 2009 #141 of 305
    Drew2k

    Drew2k New Member

    14,514
    228
    Aug 16, 2006
    Did you experiment with multiple IR code sets? Wondering if that's more successful than RF. (Although this was probably covered already, wasn't it? My memory has been fuzzy the last couple of days.)

    So that's 1 hour and 18 minutes. I'm wondering if you know how long you had the device plugged in to your laptop - was it approximately that long? Just a stab in the dark, thinking maybe it stops the clock when it's connected, but you'd think that an update to the remote via the USB cable would include synchronizing or updating the time! :nono:
     
  2. Sep 1, 2009 #142 of 305
    TheRatPatrol

    TheRatPatrol Hall Of Fame

    7,259
    198
    Oct 1, 2003
    Phoenix, AZ
    Wow after all this, now I'm not so sure. I wonder if they know this about the RF mode, and maybe they'll work on a software/firmware upgrade?

    Well I guess this gives Harmony the opportunity to step up to the plate now and create an RF remote that controls more then one HR. ;)
     
  3. Sep 1, 2009 #143 of 305
    spartanstew

    spartanstew Dry as a bone DBSTalk Club

    12,563
    61
    Nov 16, 2005
    Wylie, Texas
    ..

    No, the original IR2BT came about about 18 months ago.

    HERE'S a youtube video of it being set up. It's pretty simple and slick. It originally sold for about $70, but they don't make this IR2BT anymore, they started making a pro model that sells for $150 instead (ir2bt.com)
     
  4. Sep 2, 2009 #144 of 305
    RunnerFL

    RunnerFL Well-Known Member

    17,054
    311
    Jan 4, 2006
    I wasn't able to do that either. It appears to be one DirecTV receiver period.

    I even tried having the remote learn the alternate codebases for 0002 and 0003. It accepted them but it wouldn't really let you add the units to an activity because when you went to setup your activity it didn't allow you to set the power state of the units and it defaulted them to "off". If a unit is set as "off" in that part of the setup of an activity it is not included in the rest of the activity setup.
     
  5. Sep 2, 2009 #145 of 305
    RunnerFL

    RunnerFL Well-Known Member

    17,054
    311
    Jan 4, 2006
    Yeah, I messed with multiple IR and that didn't seem to work either. Seems like it's on DirecTV receiver only regardless of IR or RF.

    A little bit about the setup:

    In order to "learn" you new codes you must first set it up using one of the devices listed in the database. You then have to let it fail, which means disconnecting and running the verification test that the remote forces on you, and then when you hook it back up it knows the code failed. At that point you can select to learn from the units existing remote. You then go thru a button by button process to setup the new codebase, and of course then you have to test it [I really hated the forced tests unit by unit activity by activity instead of waiting until the end]. Then when you go thru the activity setup. The first step is to choose the power state of each device you have setup. The 2 DVR's I setup [0002 and 0003 codebases] didn't allow me to change the power state at all. Since I could not change the power state when I got to the next step the devices were excluded from the activity.

    As far as the clock question... There is no way I had it hooked up that long the way they force tests on you. It's crazy... Add a device, you must test it. Add another device you must test that... Add an activity, you must test it, and so forth.

    The unit does charge when plugged in via usb so I wouldn't think the clock would stop.
     
  6. Sep 2, 2009 #146 of 305
    RunnerFL

    RunnerFL Well-Known Member

    17,054
    311
    Jan 4, 2006
    I emailed them about it [I'm not one to sit on the phone all day] and the auto response said to allow 72 hours for a response. No way I'm sitting on this purchase 72 hours waiting for an answer, it's going back on my way to work this morning. I will post what they reply with if/when they reply though.
     
  7. Sep 2, 2009 #147 of 305
    anubys

    anubys Godfather

    432
    0
    Jan 19, 2006
    this was a big blow (controlling only one DVR) that effectively eliminates this remote from contention...I just hope it puts downward price pressure on the new Harmony at this point...
     
  8. Sep 2, 2009 #148 of 305
    John Buckingham

    John Buckingham AllStar

    55
    0
    Sep 15, 2006
    I know I'm a novice compared to most of you. However, I'm having difficulty understanding why would you need this device to operate more than one D* receiver? My remote stays in my home theater room.
     
  9. Sep 2, 2009 #149 of 305
    RunnerFL

    RunnerFL Well-Known Member

    17,054
    311
    Jan 4, 2006
    I have an HR21-700, HR21-100 and H21-100 all in my living room. Thus the need to control more than one DirecTV receiver. :)
     
  10. Sep 2, 2009 #150 of 305
    Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    37,060
    287
    Jun 18, 2006
    Well, I was at Best Buy last night and I saw the beast. I picked it up, shook my head sadly, and put it back down. :(
     
  11. Sep 2, 2009 #151 of 305
    Lee L

    Lee L Hall Of Fame

    3,134
    0
    Aug 15, 2002
    Well, lots of people have more than one DirecTV receiver in one room.
     
  12. Sep 2, 2009 #152 of 305
    RunnerFL

    RunnerFL Well-Known Member

    17,054
    311
    Jan 4, 2006
    Beast is the right word. I'll give them this much, it's very well made. It's has some weight to it. It's made of thick plastic and doesn't feel like a toy, like most Harmony remotes do. It's not very ergonomic in comparison to others but it's well balanced and sits comfortably in your hand.

    If you have a ton of stuff and only one DirecTV receiver it may be the right remote for you. But in most of our cases it won't work because of multiple receivers.
     
  13. Sep 2, 2009 #153 of 305
    John Buckingham

    John Buckingham AllStar

    55
    0
    Sep 15, 2006
    What are the advantages of having multiple receivers?
     
  14. Sep 2, 2009 #154 of 305
    Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    37,060
    287
    Jun 18, 2006
    Being able to record more than two things for watching on the same TV
    Being able to watch/buffer more than two things at the same time
    Organizing recordings (his/hers/kids DVRs)
     
  15. Sep 2, 2009 #155 of 305
    TheRatPatrol

    TheRatPatrol Hall Of Fame

    7,259
    198
    Oct 1, 2003
    Phoenix, AZ
    So you can record more then 2 things at once.
     
  16. Sep 2, 2009 #156 of 305
    anubys

    anubys Godfather

    432
    0
    Jan 19, 2006
    in additions to what others have said: being able to watch two things at once (e.g. Red Zone Channel on one TV and a football game on the other)...

    I might also watch a game on one TV (on mute) while the second TV has something playing for the kids...
     
  17. Sep 2, 2009 #157 of 305
    gully_foyle

    gully_foyle Hall Of Fame

    1,301
    5
    Jan 18, 2007
    Los Angeles
    You can. I have. I'm a bit wary of assuming that one user has managed to eliminate all possibilities of RF as well. The IR setup is a bit odd for multiple boxes, so it would not shock me if the RF method is odd as well. I am especially wary when he reports you cannot do something that I have already managed to do (IR control of two boxes).

    For IR, one has to use the advanced mode to select specific device codes (S1388 for the AV1 position), or both "devices" will control the original unit. For RF I'd suggest setting two boxes up in IR, getting them to work separately, THEN converting each to RF. I'd also suggest calling their support folks.

    At the very least, this is something a software update will fix. Since my unit re-flashed itself coming out of the box, such updates are possible. Contact their support.
     
  18. Sep 2, 2009 #158 of 305
    gully_foyle

    gully_foyle Hall Of Fame

    1,301
    5
    Jan 18, 2007
    Los Angeles
    It is NOT a Harmony device. It is designed by One4All and marketed in the USA by Acoustic Research. Harmony is owned by Logitech.
     
  19. Sep 2, 2009 #159 of 305
    gully_foyle

    gully_foyle Hall Of Fame

    1,301
    5
    Jan 18, 2007
    Los Angeles
    When setting up these remotes I STRONGLY recommend that one set up all the devices before setting up activites. This is not a Harmony and is at its base, device and macro based. "Activities" are just wizard-generated macros. The problems people are having may be because they are trying to set up activities first.
     
  20. Sep 2, 2009 #160 of 305
    Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    37,060
    287
    Jun 18, 2006
    To be more precise, it's designed by Universal Electronics, makers of the One-For-All products.
     

Share This Page