1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Another school board run amok

Discussion in 'The OT' started by wilbur_the_goose, May 23, 2012.

  1. SayWhat?

    SayWhat? Know Nothing

    6,259
    133
    Jun 6, 2009
    http://kdvr.com/2012/09/14/loveland-school-seizes-rosary-beads-to-fight-gangs/
     
  2. The Merg

    The Merg 1*

    10,289
    35
    Jun 24, 2007
    Northern VA
    Just as a point... I have seen first hand kids that wear rosary beads due to their gang affiliation, usually MS-13, but also SSL. The beads in question are usually blue or light blue for MS-13. It is used as a subtle way for the kid to show he is affiliated without the need for wearing colors.

    And while this kid might not be in a gang, do you really think he's going to admit to it when questioned by a teacher or a reporter?

    And also, I always thought that you are not supposed to wear rosary beads.

    - Merg
     
  3. trh

    trh This Space for Sale

    5,466
    242
    Nov 2, 2007
    NE FL
    [​IMG]

    If Amy Winehouse can wear them, it must be OK. ;)
     
  4. SayWhat?

    SayWhat? Know Nothing

    6,259
    133
    Jun 6, 2009
    http://www.wptv.com/dpp/news/local_...topless-picture-to-students-ipads-by-accident
     
  5. sigma1914

    sigma1914 Well-Known Member DBSTalk Club

    14,583
    369
    Sep 5, 2006
    Allen, TX
    I believe it's the number of beads...13 for MS-13, and regular rosaries have 10.
     
  6. wilbur_the_goose

    wilbur_the_goose Hall Of Fame

    4,476
    49
    Aug 16, 2006
  7. yosoyellobo

    yosoyellobo Icon

    2,727
    162
    Nov 1, 2006
    Jacksonville Fl
    Good thing the kid is not allergic to water.
     
  8. yosoyellobo

    yosoyellobo Icon

    2,727
    162
    Nov 1, 2006
    Jacksonville Fl
    We might have to cut all the Oak trees in all schools.:)
     
  9. Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,240
    552
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    What about grass allergies— and blacktop or concrete allergies?? No recess, no ball playing.
     
  10. Rich

    Rich DBSTalk Club DBSTalk Club

    26,102
    463
    Feb 22, 2007
    Piscataway, NJ
    I know whole civilizations were dependent on acorns, but did you ever taste one that hadn't been cooked? Yuk.

    Rich
     
  11. Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,240
    552
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    Those tribes summering in Yosemite, to mention a few.

    But cooked acorns isn't exactly a gourmet feast....:lol: unless it's a minor ingredient in stuffing for a nice roasted turkey.
     
  12. AntAltMike

    AntAltMike Hall Of Fame

    3,783
    107
    Nov 20, 2004
    College...
    Nuts and berries? Yech!
     
  13. dpeters11

    dpeters11 Hall Of Fame

    16,251
    490
    May 30, 2007
    Cincinnati
    That's crazy. We need to find a middle ground. People need to realize that some allergies cause more dangerous symptoms than pollen etc does. But acorns wouldn't do it, even if thrown at someone.
     
  14. RasputinAXP

    RasputinAXP Kwisatz Haderach of Cordcuttery

    3,145
    11
    Jan 23, 2008
    Or that acorns are not allergenic for peanut allergy types.
     
  15. Rich

    Rich DBSTalk Club DBSTalk Club

    26,102
    463
    Feb 22, 2007
    Piscataway, NJ
    I read that northern CA was an acorn based civilization. Those severe fires that are common in CA destroyed most trees, but oaks seem to stand up well in fires.

    I've never had a cooked acorn, but one bite into a raw acorn is enough to put anyone off. Of course a lot of plants are inedible or poisonous if not cooked.

    Rich
     
  16. alex000

    alex000 Cool Member

    27
    0
    Oct 19, 2012
    You definitely won't get an allergy if somebody did throw an acorn at you :grin:
     
  17. SayWhat?

    SayWhat? Know Nothing

    6,259
    133
    Jun 6, 2009
    http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/news/57472249-78/lunch-district-lunches-students.html.csp
     
  18. MysteryMan

    MysteryMan Well-Known Member DBSTalk Club

    8,323
    460
    May 17, 2010
    USA
  19. phrelin

    phrelin Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    14,944
    294
    Jan 18, 2007
    Northern...
    While someone at the school is basically an idiot, at least there's this:

     
  20. Stewart Vernon

    Stewart Vernon Roving Reporter Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    21,579
    374
    Jan 7, 2005
    Kittrell, NC
    Two things in play here...

    If the parents are supposed to be paying, and they are not paying... then it should be appropriate not to give those kids lunch it seems. I mean, if you go to McDonald's and place an order you have to pay before you get your food... if you can't pay, you don't get your food. It seems like the school could handle this better so that food has not been given to students before payment has been verified.

    To me the stupid part is... they have already given the food to the kids... so to take it and throw it away and then give the kids something else to eat seems absurd. They are needlessly wasting food in that scenario.

    While it might seem mean to not feed a kid who had a parent that didn't pay... it would be less mean and less wasteful to handle that up front.

    I do feel for kids in this scenario... and I'm in favor of the lunch programs that help kids get at least the one good meal per day... but this doesn't sound like that... this sounds like a pre-payment program for kids so their parents can pre-pay... so if those parents don't pre-pay it isn't quite the same as a kid whose parents can't pay at all.
     

Share This Page