1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

Apple vs Samsung trial

Discussion in 'Tech Talk - Gadgets, Gizmos and Technology' started by dpeters11, Aug 24, 2012.

  1. dpeters11

    dpeters11 Hall Of Fame

    16,184
    483
    May 30, 2007
    Cincinnati
    The verdict is in, surprisingly, just waiting for it to be read. Word is the jury has never asked for any clarifications or re-reading of testimony. They had to go through 700 individual decisions.
     
  2. klang

    klang Hall Of Fame

    1,268
    2
    Oct 14, 2003
    Near...
    Big win for Apple, not that they really need another billion bucks. ;)

    So is there an appeal process for something like this or is it finally over with?
     
  3. dpeters11

    dpeters11 Hall Of Fame

    16,184
    483
    May 30, 2007
    Cincinnati
    I don't think this is the end of the road. But I think Samsung also just lost in South Korea. Correction, they infringed on each others patents.

    Of course Motorola is now suing Apple.
     
  4. RasputinAXP

    RasputinAXP Kwisatz Haderach of Cordcuttery

    3,145
    11
    Jan 23, 2008
    Epic fail of the jury. At the very least it should have been a mutually assured destruction scenario; I find it unbelievable that the double tap to zoom and pinch to zoom patents were upheld.
     
  5. Cholly

    Cholly Old Guys Rule!

    4,787
    43
    Mar 22, 2004
    Indian...
  6. dpeters11

    dpeters11 Hall Of Fame

    16,184
    483
    May 30, 2007
    Cincinnati
    The patent system, particularly when it comes to software patents, is very broken.
     
  7. dsw2112

    dsw2112 Always Searching

    1,938
    0
    Jun 12, 2009
    Seems to me the jury already had their mind made up. What a shame...
     
  8. Shades228

    Shades228 DaBears DBSTalk Club

    6,081
    45
    Mar 18, 2008
    The jury had to fill out questionaires not really give a verdict. However it's been reported many times that Samsungs legal team was not very good at speaking to the jury and trying to convince them about the facts. I think that Samsung was prepping more for the appellate courts than it was for the jury.
     
  9. texasmoose

    texasmoose Icon

    677
    0
    May 24, 2007
  10. texasmoose

    texasmoose Icon

    677
    0
    May 24, 2007
  11. wingrider01

    wingrider01 Hall Of Fame

    1,764
    2
    Sep 9, 2005
    did you expect anything else but Apple to win? After all people venerate that company and offer tithes to the grand altar of Apple. Not even sure why they had the court decision, apple was going to win by default of their greatness
     
  12. dpeters11

    dpeters11 Hall Of Fame

    16,184
    483
    May 30, 2007
    Cincinnati
    But, did the jury have the ability to say that the Apple patents were invalid? Apple does have the patent for pinch and zoom as an example. Whether they should have been able to get that patent is a valid argument, but they do.

    Software patents are the issue, not Apple. There is a company that has been suing coffee shops and other businesses for offering wifi, because they claim wifi infringes on their patents. We've had companies sue for infringement of patents they hold, but the patent holder doesn't actually have any products of their own. Their business model basically is to sue or scare companies to license their patents. Some of them aren't even things they invented, just patents they bought.
     
  13. Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,153
    546
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    Veneration has nothing to do with the verdict.

    Do you have some reason to loathe Apple? Have any products of theirs?
     
  14. Devo1237

    Devo1237 Legend

    413
    15
    Apr 22, 2008
    Geez, I'm surprised at all the anger. Apple had some great ideas, which they want to charge a premium for. Samsung needs to either come up with their own ideas or pay the price. That's why the patent office exists. I don't hear anyone complaining when Pfizer charges $50 a bottle for some new anti-depressant that can't be turned into a generic for years. Like it or not, that's how our country works.
     
  15. hdtvfan0001

    hdtvfan0001 DIRECTV A-Team

    32,456
    258
    Jul 28, 2004
    Here's are some contrasting perspectives on that topic:

    http://techrealist.wordpress.com/
    http://www.transformerforums.com/forum/asus-transformer-news/27364-editorial-now-samsung-found-liable-what-potential-ramifications.html
    http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2012/08/25/160028467/apples-patent-win-could-alter-landscape-of-smartphone-industry
    I guess so.
     
  16. raott

    raott Hall Of Fame

    2,253
    57
    Nov 23, 2005
    I have mostly all of their products, and IMO, this "win" is a huge loss for consumers. Without Samsung and Google, you don't have notifications on your iPhone right now and don't have built in nav coming with ios6.
     
  17. Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,153
    546
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    I agree that products will cost more due to this verdict. I was inquiring about the vehement bitterness expressed by a few, not you that I've seen.

    Not clear on notifications- do you mean the popups?, and while iPhones have employed Google maps in their app, is that really a part of the litigation? Wasn't that done by agreement? And isn't Apple putting in their own mapping systems and database?
     
  18. braven

    braven Hall Of Fame

    1,033
    0
    Apr 9, 2007
    [​IMG]


    Nah, Samsung didn't copy anything. :rolleyes:
     
  19. jdskycaster

    jdskycaster Legend

    272
    7
    Sep 1, 2008
    My guess is much of the loathing for apple stems from direct statements made by Jobs that he fully intended to kill off Android. Since it would be very difficult for Apple to sue Google for damages they have decided to go after the manufacturers that are delivering Android based devices.

    This is definitely bad news for the consumer. It will not be the last lawsuit coming from Apple as you can bet preparations are already being made to sue others in the same way. If this is allowed to continue the only competitive options will be triangular shaped phones with mechanical push buttons.

    Apple did not invent the rectangle with rounded corners, touch screen interface or even soft icons on a screen. They did not invent the portable mp3 player, cell phone or tablet computer. Saying that the ipod, iphone and ipad are completely new and unique devices not based on any previous technology or idea is completely bogus. If they are allowed to continue the methodical destruction of competition in the marketplace through patent litigation our system is not just broken it is a joke.
     
  20. Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,153
    546
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    Has Apple or its lawyers made that contention?

    Are they methodically destroying competition? No doubt putting a dent in it, but enforcing patents has long been a part of capitalist America, as well as the United Kingdom, perhaps other countries.
     

Share This Page