1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

Babylon 5

Discussion in 'TV Show Talk' started by SayWhat?, Aug 1, 2009.

  1. Aug 1, 2009 #1 of 54
    SayWhat?

    SayWhat? Know Nothing

    6,255
    133
    Jun 6, 2009
    Clearly one of the best space-based SciFi series ever made. Described by the author as a novel for television.

    Anybody heard of any plans to re-air it?
     
  2. Aug 1, 2009 #2 of 54
    Mark Holtz

    Mark Holtz Day Sleeper DBSTalk Club

    10,366
    74
    Mar 23, 2002
    Sacramento, CA
    It previously aired on TNT and SciFi Channel. Best to get the DVDs.
     
  3. Aug 1, 2009 #3 of 54
    LarryFlowers

    LarryFlowers DIRECTV A-Team

    4,290
    1
    Sep 22, 2006
    Not currently in circulation on U.S. TV, probably in a "rest" cycle. Showing overseas though.
     
  4. Aug 1, 2009 #4 of 54
    RAD

    RAD DIRECTV A-Team

    16,397
    117
    Aug 5, 2002
    Dripping...
    It was nice to see a series that allowed the writer to come up with a multi year timeline/story line and we actually got to see all of it. Besides the Sporano's it's the only TV series that I purchased all the DVD's of.
     
  5. Aug 1, 2009 #5 of 54
    Drew2k

    Drew2k DIRECTV A-Team

    14,514
    228
    Aug 16, 2006
    TNT seriously damaged JMS's 5-year plan by threatening to cancel after season 4, so JMS had to compress his season 5 plot points into season 4 and then when TNT renewed for season 5, he had to go back to the drawing board. Still one of the greatest Sci Fi series ever, though.
     
  6. Aug 1, 2009 #6 of 54
    RAD

    RAD DIRECTV A-Team

    16,397
    117
    Aug 5, 2002
    Dripping...
    I thought it was PTN (Prime Time Network) that screwed things up with not renewing past season 4 and it was TNT that came to the rescue with season 5.
     
  7. Aug 1, 2009 #7 of 54
    bonscott87

    bonscott87 Cutting Edge: ECHELON '07

    9,809
    2
    Jan 21, 2003
    Some of the seasons are available on Hulu as well.
     
  8. Aug 1, 2009 #8 of 54
    V'ger

    V'ger Icon

    551
    2
    Oct 3, 2007
    There will be some die hards here to argue, but this is what I understood (with fairness to all involved).

    First, one correction: TNT was not involved in production, broadcast, or distribution of B5 until the fifth season. It later rebroadcast all five seasons in reruns.

    PTN was a company either wholly or partially owned by Warner Brothers and it distributed, by syndication, the Kung Fu remake and B5. KF was cancelled, but PTN couldn't continue with just one property to distribute. PTN was dissolved as a distribution company. So JMS had to assume the worst, that there wouldn't be a fifth season as no one at WB would make a commitment before JMS had to write and film the end of season 4. He compressed the story arc to finish by the end of the season.

    TNT stepped in at the last second and saved the show's fifth season (they aren't the villian here), but damage was done. First, cable pays lower than syndicated TV (who'd have thought that?) and the actors had to accept a significant pay cut. There are conflicting stories as to who did what, but a casualty of the late renewal was the loss of Claudia Christian (Ivanova), who was replaced by Tracy Scoggins. Some production people had also accepted jobs with other shows. Issues between CC and JMS were well documented at the time as both parties went public with their versions of what happened. As to what the truth was, I leave that for your search/judgement.

    Production values dropped, new sets looked cheaper, the lighting was too bright (a lack of detail in set design was revealed by the bright lighting) and the overall cinematography looked different. Only a few of the stories were of the quality of the prior seasons and season five ended with the last episode filmed in the fourth season ("Sleeping in Light"), which was a standalone episode based 20 years in the future that more or less wrapped things up.

    Seasons 1 though 4 were dark and had blue tint to the lighting. Season 5 looked more video-like and had a red tint. Some speculated that a different film stock was used, but I talked to a director at Agamemcon III and he said that wasn't so. I also heard a rumor that between season 4 and 5 the lighting was changed.

    In any case, Seasons 1 to 4 are, to me, the best SciFi ever produced for TV. Season 5, B5 was at best just average.
     
  9. Aug 1, 2009 #9 of 54
    V'ger

    V'ger Icon

    551
    2
    Oct 3, 2007
    I know there was a couple of direct to video releases of B5 done a few years ago (I liked them).

    One unexplained plot hole that you could drive the space station through is what happened to Draal? He was only used as a communication device once B4 was sent back 1000 years to help the Minbari in their fight. I'm not sure there was an appearance in season 5.

    Although JMS blew up B5, It is plausible in the B5 universe that Draal had the power to open a rift in time (ala B4) and move the station. How about him moving B5 and projecting a holographic explosion? So the station still exists at a place/time ready for return.

    Zathras would like that very much!

    Anyway that would be a lot better than "Spock's Brain".
     
  10. SayWhat?

    SayWhat? Know Nothing

    6,255
    133
    Jun 6, 2009
    ^^^ Interesting.


    Libidos aside, your favorite character(s)?

    I always got a kick out of Zathrus (however it's spelled).
     
  11. RAD

    RAD DIRECTV A-Team

    16,397
    117
    Aug 5, 2002
    Dripping...

    G'Kar, the longer the series went on the better I liked him.
     
  12. Christopher Gould

    Christopher Gould Icon

    979
    16
    Jan 14, 2007
    how do they look on a large HDTV. i've been watching the first couple of seasons of the x-files on a 60" sony a300 using a ps3 and i must say it does not look to good. amazon has all 5 season for $119.99. i don't know if its worth it.
     
  13. RAD

    RAD DIRECTV A-Team

    16,397
    117
    Aug 5, 2002
    Dripping...
    I pulled out season 3 disc 3 and watched a couple episodes since I didn't remember, using PS3 and 73" Mits 1080p DLP RP picture was very grainy.
     
  14. frederic1943

    frederic1943 Icon

    748
    1
    Dec 1, 2006
    Even though it ran in the 1990s Straczynski was looking ahead. In anticipation of future HDTV broadcasts and Laserdisc releases, rather than the usual 4:3 format, the series was shot in 16:9, with the image cropped to 4:3 for initial television transmissions.
     
  15. rebkell

    rebkell Godfather

    469
    0
    Sep 9, 2006
    I mentioned that a while back on avsforums and was told that it would cost a fortune to get B5 to HD, because all the effects were very low resolution and that about the only thing that resembled HD quality was the 16:9 resolution.

    My favorites were Londo and G'kar, especially when they were bickering :) I also liked Lyta, those eyes were wicked. Garibaldi was a trip, Bester, I loved that show.
     
  16. SayWhat?

    SayWhat? Know Nothing

    6,255
    133
    Jun 6, 2009
    I'm not sure I remember Lyta ( a blonde? ). Bester gave me the creeps.

    Funny though how when you mention 'lurkers' and 'the down below', nobody knows what you're talking about.
     
  17. rebkell

    rebkell Godfather

    469
    0
    Sep 9, 2006
    Lyta Alexander was played by Patricia Tallman, she was Kosh's personal psychic, she was on the original pilot, she was off for a year or so. I liked the way some characters would be off the show and then show up again, like Sinclair.

    [​IMG]
     
  18. SayWhat?

    SayWhat? Know Nothing

    6,255
    133
    Jun 6, 2009
    Yeah, I remember her now. Brain fart.
     
  19. bicker1

    bicker1 Hall Of Fame

    1,040
    0
    Oct 21, 2007
    One of the biggest problems with B5 was that (especially during the first four seasons, but probably throughout) the CGI effects were "cutting edge" for the time, but that basically was a no-man's-land (between less sophisticated special effects prior, and higher resolution CGI effects after) whereby the effects were such that they didn't translate well, in terms of production values, into the future (i.e., today). The end result is that there is no way to display the CGI effects on today's big screens, without them looking utterly crappy. There just weren't enough bits in the original production to be able to do anything to make the CGI effects look good on a 65" screen. Otherwise, the series was absolutely excellent.
     
  20. Drew2k

    Drew2k DIRECTV A-Team

    14,514
    228
    Aug 16, 2006
    You're correct ... It's been a long time and I was working from faulty memory.
     

Share This Page