1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

Breaking News: House refuses to fast track DTV Delay Act

Discussion in 'Local Reception' started by Tom Robertson, Jan 28, 2009.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jan 28, 2009 #81 of 180
    danallen

    danallen Cool Member

    10
    0
    Aug 21, 2007
    The KEY WORD is voluntary, the bad legislation would read MANDATORY. It does appear that PBS stations would be the only mandatory that would be affected for Security reasons. That being the case, only PBS would loose millions if the Bill passes from the Senate version.
     
  2. Jan 28, 2009 #82 of 180
    giantsox

    giantsox Mentor

    39
    0
    Oct 25, 2007

    Television is not a "right". People will figure it out very quickly when the TV's don't work. Priorities will then be sorted out. It will be time to decide if you want to go to the store and spend $50 to fix this the same day or wait for however long for a coupon so this costs only $10 to fix. What is the big deal?
     
  3. Jan 28, 2009 #83 of 180
    Jason Nipp

    Jason Nipp Analog Geek in a Digital World Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Gold Club DBSTalk Club

    10,058
    2
    Jun 10, 2004
    Northern...
    Please remember that it is a forum rule violation to discuss politics on DBSTalk.

    Having said that we are giving some leeway on the DTV delay...

    Please do not stray off into other political comments. Violators will receive infractions and posts will be removed.
     
  4. Jan 28, 2009 #84 of 180
    Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    37,060
    287
    Jun 18, 2006
    That's absolutely true. Before anyone else says it, the airwaves are a public trust, like a national park, and broadcasters are allowed to use them in a way that (nominally) benefits the public. However, it is neither implicit nor explicit that anyone has a right to a receiver.

    I supported the coupon program because I felt it was an inexpensive way to jumpstart the HDTV adoption process. I have never believed, nor will I ever believe, that it is the right of the people to have free electronics handed to them. If it were, I'd be first in line :)
     
  5. Jan 28, 2009 #85 of 180
    turey22

    turey22 Hall Of Fame

    1,177
    0
    Jul 30, 2007
    slow down on the typing? i cant refresh that fast LOL
     
  6. Jan 28, 2009 #86 of 180
    scooper

    scooper Hall Of Fame

    6,237
    28
    Apr 22, 2002
    Youngsville NC
    This bill is NOT dead - just the fast tracking of it is (for this week).

    The longer it takes to get through the House without changes, the more likely it is that it would be overcome by events / the calender. If they start making changes to the Senate bill - the longer it will take to become law and the more likely that it will die.

    If it doesn't get signed by President Obama by 23:59:59 EST on Febuary 17, 2009, it is effectively DOA.
     
  7. Jan 28, 2009 #87 of 180
    FTA Michael

    FTA Michael Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    3,474
    4
    Jul 21, 2002
    Although I'd still prefer to get the transition over with, I just read a reason for the delay that's the best I've seen: It's easier to put a new antenna on your roof in spring and summer than it is in February. And the major networks are now in favor of the delay because their regular season will be over by then.

    Source: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2009/01/27/arts/AP-Digital-Transition-Networks.html?_r=1

    (My apologies if this is redundant; I couldn't bear to read the whole thread. :D)
     
  8. Jan 28, 2009 #88 of 180
    kfcrosby

    kfcrosby Godfather

    383
    1
    Dec 17, 2006
    Memphis, TN
    I couldn't agree more
     
  9. Jan 28, 2009 #89 of 180
    James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    44,884
    860
    Apr 17, 2003
    Michiana
    The bill gives the FCC 30 days to create the rules needed to make this work. There is barely a time for a comment period let alone FCC action. The bill would have to be signed TODAY to have rules done by February 17th.

    Just as we have argued what this means the FCC will open their process to comments. The current rules allow early analog shut off without permission in the last 90 days of analog operation but specifies dates last November through February 17th. This bill does NOT automatically change FCC rules ... those dates don't change until the FCC changes them.

    If the law isn't passed until next week then the FCC will not have time to act. Even with Acting Commissioner Copps sharing the viewpoint that the transition delay is needed, completely scrapping the way the FCC makes rules to get this done by February 17th would not be a good thing.

    Time is up. Do it, or let it die.
     
  10. Jan 28, 2009 #90 of 180
    scooper

    scooper Hall Of Fame

    6,237
    28
    Apr 22, 2002
    Youngsville NC
    The Networks are NOT the stations...

    And while I agree that Febuary is not the optimum time to be on a roof installing an antenna - that was pointed out when this date was selected. At this point, it is my opinion that it is better to go through with it and deal with the problems than to delay it.
     
  11. Jan 28, 2009 #91 of 180
    LCDSpazz

    LCDSpazz AllStar

    75
    0
    Dec 31, 2008
    Tick tock, tick tock. Every day that passes makes it more and more unrealistic to move the date. The reality is that the ones who wanted the delay now have the political cover they need. If the transition goes smoothly, everyone forgets about all this. Now if the transition goes badly, they can say they wanted to help but were stopped by "point finger at those who voted agaisnt the delay". This has always been as much about appearances as anything else.
     
  12. Jan 28, 2009 #92 of 180
    TerpEE93

    TerpEE93 Mentor

    33
    0
    Jan 3, 2006
    I'm not sure we can blame this all on procrastinators. As I recall, the fund for the converter coupons ran out because the Government underestimated how many folks still have one or more TV's that are OTA only -- no cable or dish connected. There is a backlog of millions of requests for converter coupons that have not been fulfilled because there's no money there. I think the delay was more about trying to clear that backlog than trying to appease procrastinators.
     
  13. Jan 28, 2009 #93 of 180
    scooper

    scooper Hall Of Fame

    6,237
    28
    Apr 22, 2002
    Youngsville NC
    There is nothing stopping those 6 million households from going out and buying a converter box, without government coupon.
     
  14. Jan 28, 2009 #94 of 180
    MercurialIN

    MercurialIN Hall Of Fame

    1,448
    1
    Jul 17, 2006
    I just think the whole "delay" idea is totally ridiculous. There has been plenty of notice about the Feb. 17 switch, anyone who hasn't seen it must simply not be that interested in TV viewing in the first place.

    If it does get delayed what makes it likely those same people who will not be ready by Feb. 17 will be ready by June? The entire delay idea makes absolutely no common sense to me. :confused:


    PS. I'm not saying this because Feb. 17 happens to be my birthday either :D
     
  15. Jan 28, 2009 #95 of 180
    HDTVFreak07

    HDTVFreak07 Icon

    706
    2
    Sep 12, 2007
    Not a good reason. Millions have been warned for over a year and a half and action should have been taken when they KNEW winter would not be ideal. They knew about it in May, June, July, August, September and October, the typically ideal season to put antenna out or go buy one to put on their antenna. Instead, they sat on their phat lazy butts hoping for a miracle. Coupons? Lame excuse. They can scrounge up a few bucks to save little at a time and buy one. They're really inexpensive and I don't buy that people just didn't have the money, poor economy or not.
     
  16. Jan 28, 2009 #96 of 180
    Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    37,060
    287
    Jun 18, 2006
    True indeed. They're only $49.99 at Best Buy, or put another way the cost of 10 cups of Starbucks or two trips to the manicurist.
     
  17. Jan 28, 2009 #97 of 180
    davemayo

    davemayo Hall Of Fame

    1,118
    1
    Nov 17, 2005
    After reading this thread, I'm wishing I would have paid more attention to the School House Rock episode on how bills become laws....:eek2:
     
  18. Jan 28, 2009 #98 of 180
    cartrivision

    cartrivision Hall Of Fame

    3,862
    0
    Jul 25, 2007
    We can blame people's procrastination for them not having a coupon. The coupon giveaway started at the beginning of 2008 and the only people on the wait-list for coupons are people who didn't apply until sometime in January of 2009, a whole year after the start of the coupon program, and with only a matter of weeks remaining before the analog shutoff. The lack of a coupon at this point in time is clearly a problem that people for the most part brought on themselves through procrastination.
     
  19. Jan 28, 2009 #99 of 180
    cartrivision

    cartrivision Hall Of Fame

    3,862
    0
    Jul 25, 2007
    Does anyone have a link or info on the history of the delays in this analog shutdown? I know that this latest attempt wouldn't have been the first (or even second) time that the analogue shutdown was delayed.
     
  20. HIPAR

    HIPAR Icon

    749
    0
    May 15, 2005
    The proponents really goofed on this one. Why did they go for a two thirds majority suspended rules vote unless they were sure they had the votes for passage? Were there last moment defectors?

    --- CHAS
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page