1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Breaking News-Michael Jackson verdict

Discussion in 'The OT' started by Redster, Jun 13, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Darkman

    Darkman Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Gold Club

    6,900
    0
    Apr 16, 2002
    Not guilty on all counts ;)
     
  2. Nick

    Nick Retired, part-time PITA DBSTalk Club

    21,838
    186
    Apr 23, 2002
    The...
    ♪♪♪♪ BEAT IT!!!♪ ♪ ♪ ♪BEAT IT!!!♪ ♪ ♪ ♪Take you little hand and BEAT IT!! !♪ ♪ ♪ ♪
     
  3. cdru

    cdru Hall Of Fame

    2,517
    0
    Dec 4, 2003
    Agreed. The questionable past of the family is what I think did them in. If they didn't have the past of going to celebrities asking/begging for money, the JC Penny's settlement and the welfare fraud, I think things would have been a lot different.
     
  4. mainedish

    mainedish Hall Of Fame

    2,196
    0
    Mar 25, 2003
    Do you think he will let kids stay at his house?
     
  5. Frapp

    Frapp Icon

    525
    0
    Apr 23, 2002
    :wave: Bye, Bye Tom Sneddon :wave:
     
  6. Nick

    Nick Retired, part-time PITA DBSTalk Club

    21,838
    186
    Apr 23, 2002
    The...
    Can a Black Man EVER get a fair trial in CA?
     
  7. Laverne

    Laverne Guest

    2,498
    0
    Feb 17, 2005
    Well, if nothing else, SURELY all parents would be leary from now on about letting their children accept an "invitation" to Neverland.
     
  8. mainedish

    mainedish Hall Of Fame

    2,196
    0
    Mar 25, 2003
    Either way Jackson is damaged goods.
     
  9. Mark Holtz

    Mark Holtz Day Sleeper DBSTalk Club

    10,437
    77
    Mar 23, 2002
    Sacramento, CA
    Neverland Ranch should be renamed to Never-come-in Ranch.
     
  10. TNGTony

    TNGTony Hall Of Fame

    5,345
    0
    Mar 23, 2002
    Here is the actual court reading:

    Judge: I will now request that the clerk read the verdicts.

    Clerk of Courts: The superior court of the state of california for the county of santa barbara, santa maria division, the people of the state of california, plaintiff, vS. Michael joe jackson, defendant, case 1133603,

    Count one verdict. We, the jury in the above entitled case find the defendant Not Guilty in of conspiracy as charged in count one of the indictment. Dated june 13, 2005, foreperson number 80.

    Count two, verdict. We, the jury in the above entitled case find the defendant Not Guilty in of a lewd act upon a minor child as charged in count two of the indictment. Dated june 13, 2005, foreperson number 80.

    Count three, verdict. We, the jury, in the above combithesed case find the defendant Not Guilty in of a lewd act upon a minor child as charged in count three of the indictment. Dated june 13, 2005. Foreperson number 80.

    Count four, verdict. We, the jury in the above entitled case find the defendant Not Guilty in of lewd acts upon a minor child as charged in count four of the indictment, dated june 10, 2005, foreperson number 80.

    Count five, verdict. We the jury, in the above entitled case find the defendant Not Guilty in of the lewd act upon a minor child as charged in count five of the indictment. Dated june 10, 2005, foreperson number 80.

    Count six, verdict. We, the jury, in the above entitled case find the defendant not guilty of attempting to commit a lewd act upon a minor child as charged in count six of the indictment. Dated june 10, 2005, foreperson number 80.

    Count seven, verdict. We, the jury in the above combilingted case find the defendant Not Guilty in of administering an is intoxicating agent to assist in the commission of a felony in charges in count seven of the indictment. Dated june 13, 2005. Foreperson number 80.

    Count seven, lesser offense. We, the jury, find the defendant not guilty of providing alcoholic beverages to persons under the age of 21. A lesser included offense in count seven of the indictment. Dated june 13, 2005, foreperson number 80.

    Count eight, verdict. We, the jury, in the above entitled case find the defendant not guilty of administering an indicating agent to assist in the commission of a felony as charged in count eight of the dilet, dated june 13, 20 05, foreperson number 80.

    County verdict lesser offense. We, the jury in the above ---- case find the defendant Not Guilty in of providing alcoholic beverages to persons under the age of 21.

    Count 9: the jury, in the above entitled case find the defendant not guilty of administering an indicating agent to assist in the commission of a felony as charged in count nine of the indictment dated june 10, 2005, foreperson number 80.

    Count nine verdict, lesser offense. We, the jury, in the above entitled case find the defendant not guilty of providing alcoholic beverages to persons under the age of 21, a lesser included offense of that charge in count nine of the indictment. Dated june 10, 2005, foreperson number 80.

    Count 10, verdict. We, the jury, in the above entitled case find the defendant not guilty of administering an intoxicating agent to assist in the commission of a felony as charged in count 10 of the indictment. Dated june 10, 20 on 5, foreperson number 80.

    See ya
    Tony
     
  11. cdru

    cdru Hall Of Fame

    2,517
    0
    Dec 4, 2003
    Yup. His annual review is going to have low marks.

    "So Mr. Sneddon, you spent $1.8m of taxpayers dollars, thousands of hours of this office's time, and tied countless other resources. What do you have to show for all this cost?"

    "Um...the opportunity to write a book about this all?"
     
  12. Richard King

    Richard King Hall Of Fame

    21,331
    0
    Mar 25, 2002
    Disgusting.
     
  13. RichW

    RichW Hall Of Fame/Supporter DBSTalk Gold Club

    6,526
    0
    Mar 29, 2002
    What about the charge of terminal weirdness?
     
  14. RichW

    RichW Hall Of Fame/Supporter DBSTalk Gold Club

    6,526
    0
    Mar 29, 2002
    Now THATS funny!!!
     
  15. Laverne

    Laverne Guest

    2,498
    0
    Feb 17, 2005
    Now THAT'S funny!! :lol:
     
  16. Capmeister

    Capmeister Large Hairless ApeCutting Edge: ECHELON '08

    5,222
    2
    Sep 16, 2003
    I have to be honest, I find NOTHING funny about this.

    Michael Jackson will continue to molest little boys and if you believe that parents won't give him the chance, you're mistaken.
     
  17. pez2002

    pez2002 Hall Of Fame

    1,411
    1
    Dec 13, 2002

    i could not agree more
     
  18. Nick

    Nick Retired, part-time PITA DBSTalk Club

    21,838
    186
    Apr 23, 2002
    The...
    Payback for all the lynchings.
     
  19. Richard King

    Richard King Hall Of Fame

    21,331
    0
    Mar 25, 2002
    I agree with Cap. This is absolutely disgusting and he will simply continue to do what he has done in the past. Willing parents will continue to offer up their kids to this pervert.
     
  20. Nick

    Nick Retired, part-time PITA DBSTalk Club

    21,838
    186
    Apr 23, 2002
    The...
    So be it, and pity the children, but it's not fatal. I was molested by a stranger in a movie theater when I was a wee lad and look at me now! I turned out alright. :grin:

    Of course, way back then I didn't have weeping hand-wringing, do-gooders around to tell me I was a poor unfortunate victim. Somehow, I missed the "devastating" part and went on with my life, such as it is (was). :rolleyes:

    If Bogy had been around to comfort me back then, I'd probably still be a mess. :nono2:
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page