1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

Business is business, but really?

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by eblong, Jun 14, 2013.

  1. eblong

    eblong New Member

    3
    0
    May 23, 2008
    This was picked up from the Colorado Springs Gazette Telegraph. I kind of understand the concept of DTV wanting back their equipment or charging the customer for it, but this is a bit too much. A homeowner who lost everything in the Black Forest fire herein Colorado Springs is being billed $400 for the equipment that wasinhis Ouse when it was burned down. Sure, the homeowner should get back the insurance cost - eventually, but that cold be Nyah's or even a year before that is worked out. In the meantime, they have,to fork over $400?

    This is not a solvated incident. This happened during the Waldo Canyon fire last year as well. Here is the link to the article http://gazette.com/directtv-to-fire-victim-who-lost-it-all-you-still-owe-400/article/1502291?custom_click=rss.

    Come on DTV! Where's your heart? In your wallet?
     
  2. dpeters11

    dpeters11 Hall Of Fame

    16,184
    483
    May 30, 2007
    Cincinnati
    I've seen similar reports over the years from cable companies. Of course many times, once the press gets involved, the issue is resolved.
     
  3. je4755

    je4755 Godfather

    396
    4
    Dec 11, 2006
    Having resided in Colorado Springs for several years during the 80s, I read the cited story in the Gazette as well.

    As an 18-year subscriber, I frankly was surprised DirecTV displayed such an insensitive attitude in the midst of a tragedy and, moreover, would prove willing to tolerate the attendant negative publicity for a few hundred dollars (especially in the context of a possible billion dollar outlay for Hulu).
     
  4. eblong

    eblong New Member

    3
    0
    May 23, 2008
    I posted it here because there are DirectTV people who scan this, and maybe they will see it and take action. As we watched live helicopter feeds of the fire, I saw several houses burning that had DirecTV antennas on their roofs. I hope he company does the right thing.
     
  5. CCarncross

    CCarncross Hall Of Fame

    7,058
    60
    Jul 19, 2005
    Jackson
    If the homeowners insurance doesnt cover it, then they would have to pay for the receivers out of their pocket. Isnt that the way it should be?
     
  6. VDP07

    VDP07 Godfather

    484
    1
    Feb 22, 2006
    I would hope that at the very least, DTV would put any collection action on hold until all insurance claims could be completed.
     
  7. trh

    trh This Space for Sale

    5,262
    219
    Nov 2, 2007
    NE FL
    So some think DirecTV should just write off their equipment because of this? Do you also expect the mortgage companies to forgive the outstanding loans on the houses that burned down?
     
  8. PCampbell

    PCampbell Icon

    1,639
    98
    Nov 18, 2006
    Even the mortgage companies must wait for the insurance company to pay up.
     
  9. peds48

    peds48 DIRECTV A-Team DBSTalk Club

    18,398
    909
    Jan 10, 2008
    NY
    First DirecTV does in fact help folks impacted by natural disasters

    http://support.directv.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/3211/~/helping-customers-impacted-by-natural-disasters

    But in reality IMHO they don't have to, are you expecting your bank forgives your car loan because it burned down in the fire?
     
  10. longrider

    longrider DIRECTV A-Team DBSTalk Club

    3,865
    156
    Apr 21, 2007
    Elizabeth, CO
    I have been watching this very closely as I am only 20 miles from the fire. Yes, the equipment is the responsibility of the customer and insurance will cover it but what I have an issue with is the claimed demand for payment NOW. At the least they should wait for insurance to process the claims. Hopefully if this is true it is just a misinformed CSR as DirecTVs own posted policy contradicts what is claimed to be happening Unfortunately even as a mistake by an employee it is very bad PR for DirecTV
     
  11. dpeters11

    dpeters11 Hall Of Fame

    16,184
    483
    May 30, 2007
    Cincinnati
    The article has been updated to include a tweet from DirecTV with the page that peds48 linked to.
     
  12. CCarncross

    CCarncross Hall Of Fame

    7,058
    60
    Jul 19, 2005
    Jackson
    That article has a few holes based on what most of us know as SOP for DIrectv....it looks more like it was written by someone like Swanni.....

    This happened 3 days ago, all he needs to do at this point is suspend his service...no fees, etc....if in 6 months he is not back in a position to get his service back up and running....again, its been 3 days, there shouldnt be any charges at all yet.....charges for non-returned equipment dont happen immediately....
     
  13. Volatility

    Volatility Legend

    436
    10
    May 22, 2010
    Correct, they should be able to suspend the services for 6 month within a 12 yr period. Also I do not really see anything wrong with DirecTV asking you to file a homeowners insurance claim to get back the non return fees.
     
  14. longrider

    longrider DIRECTV A-Team DBSTalk Club

    3,865
    156
    Apr 21, 2007
    Elizabeth, CO
    What is interesting is here is the policy direct from the link given:



    Does DIRECTV provide aid for customers impacted by natural disasters?

    DIRECTV has policies in place to assist customers who are impacted by natural disasters, and we work with these customers to find a solution that best fits their needs. Options available include:
    • Account cancellation - If service cannot be restored at the customer's home due to the damage from the storm, DIRECTV will cancel the account, and waive any fees associated with the inability to return equipment, along with any remaining agreement on the account.
    • Account suspension - For customers who are without power for an extended period, we offer to suspend their account until power and services can be restored.
    • No-cost service calls - If service can be restored at the customer's home, we will send a technician at no cost to ensure the dish is properly aligned and to fix any technical issues.
    • Equipment - For customers whose equipment was damaged in the storm, we offer to waive equipment replacement costs if they continue their DIRECTV service.
    If you are a customer that has been affected, please contact 1-800-531-5000 so we can remedy your situation immediately.

    As I read that they should not have to pay for the receivers in either case.
     
  15. goinsleeper

    goinsleeper Godfather

    673
    17
    May 22, 2012
    The same thing was said about customers affected by the tornadoes in Tuscaloosa, AL a few years ago. WIthin 72 hours there were reports on news stations saying D* was charging all the customers for their receivers even before knowing if they were damaged. It's just ludicrous to use a natural disaster as a way to have a PR bashing contest. Let's focus on taking care of the people involved! Sad 'Merica, sad.
     
  16. inkahauts

    inkahauts DIRECTV A-Team

    21,500
    954
    Nov 13, 2006
    Anyone know if maybe this guy had cut service previously and hadn't sent the boxes back yet and now lost them and can't? I know that's a cynical way to look at it, but you have to wonder sometimes.

    And I don't blame DIRECTV for wanting people to claim it on their insurance papers. You think car companies say eh, whatever I will forgive the lease on your leased car cause I don't want you to have to deal with insurance companies if its lost in a fire or storm? I'm not saying I agree with the timing that seems to be happening and the speed in which they moved, but I doubt we know all the details either. They should give people up to six months in cases with natural disasters where they have to go thought their insurance companies to get reimbursed.
     
  17. Volatility

    Volatility Legend

    436
    10
    May 22, 2010
    DirecTV is a buisness, they can't go writing off recievers on their balance sheet left and right, erm I mean only left lol, like that because of a natural disaster. That is more than they are willing to chew as they already took a lost selling you the reciever at a leased price lowered than the reciever is actually worth.
     
  18. peds48

    peds48 DIRECTV A-Team DBSTalk Club

    18,398
    909
    Jan 10, 2008
    NY
    This is because unlike the car company, DirecTV gives "stuff" for free. When I leased my car I had 60 payments, the bank never say hey you have paid 50 installments on time, we are going to waive the next two. Since customers know that DirecTV have the power to not charge for "stuff" they take advantage of the loop hole.
     
  19. damondlt

    damondlt New Member

    5,455
    232
    Feb 27, 2006
    Newfoundland...
    What if you have the protection plan with Directv. Isn't that Insurance?
     
  20. Volatility

    Volatility Legend

    436
    10
    May 22, 2010
    Actually there is a version of the PP that covers accidental damage but I believe a natural disaster would go under "acts of God" and they would not cover it.
     

Share This Page