1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

Cinemax

Discussion in 'General DISH™ Discussion' started by satcrazy, Mar 10, 2014.

  1. satcrazy

    satcrazy Icon

    1,016
    18
    Mar 15, 2011
    Great...
    I subbed to cinemax to watch something in particular, and when I went to cinemax's web site, I saw the channel line up, which shows 4 more channels than what Dish offers.

    Then I looked at Direct's cinemax offering, and they show the same as what Dish offers, plus 2 more [ thriller max, and movie max]

    "outer" max and "latino" max are missing on both sat providers.

    The bite is Dish is the same cost as Direct, but is missing "thriller" and "movie" max.

    Whats up with this? :raspberry




    What happened to" you get what you pay for"?
     
  2. James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    44,907
    864
    Apr 17, 2003
    Michiana
    Did you get the program you wanted to see?
     
  3. satcrazy

    satcrazy Icon

    1,016
    18
    Mar 15, 2011
    Great...
    Come on James, of course I did.

    That's not the question.
     
  4. James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    44,907
    864
    Apr 17, 2003
    Michiana
    It is a different rant. One would be "I paid $14 to watch something in particular but DISH didn't have it!" The other would be why does DISH have five Cinemax channels for $14 and DirecTV have eight Cinemax channels for $13.99. (Noting that only four of the five channels DISH has are available to DirecTV's SD customers.)

    It is always good to know what the problem is.

    The answer is that the Cinemax channels DISH carries are the channels DISH has contracted with Cinemax to carry. They did not add the three new HD only channels when DirecTV added them a few years ago,
     
  5. satcrazy

    satcrazy Icon

    1,016
    18
    Mar 15, 2011
    Great...
    Of course.
    The question is the second part.
    The program I followed is on the main Max channel which everyone carries.
     
  6. Stewart Vernon

    Stewart Vernon Leapin' Lizard Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    21,467
    358
    Jan 7, 2005
    Kittrell, NC
    Cinemax isn't the only one in this boat. There are several premium channels that Dish doesn't even have in SD I believe... and several HD feeds that they do not have.

    There doesn't seem to be anywhere near the interest or threatening to quit when premium channel negotiations come up, though... because I have to think there have been chances to add some of these missing premiums before now and yet both Dish and the channel provider were ok not doing so.
     
  7. mwdxer

    mwdxer Well-Known Member

    1,236
    73
    Oct 30, 2013
    Seaside Oregon
    I wonder for providers that have all of the Cinemax channels charge the same price per subsciber?
     
  8. damondlt

    damondlt New Member

    5,455
    232
    Feb 27, 2006
    Newfoundland...
    By the way directv does have latino max

    Sent from my PantechP8010 using DBSTalk mobile app
     
  9. Paul Secic

    Paul Secic Hall Of Fame

    6,226
    23
    Dec 16, 2003
    Most Cinamax movies are on HBO. The previews are very helpful when they come around.
     
  10. satcrazy

    satcrazy Icon

    1,016
    18
    Mar 15, 2011
    Great...
    Yeah, that's interesting. I don't normally sub to a premium because of the repetition, but if there is a series I want to follow I will. So, I just never noticed the lack of complete channel listing.

    It looks like comcast carries max with all the channels, and damondlt says direct has latino, so direct is only missing one then.

    If the provider is only offering limited channel line up, it really shouldn't cost the same as the competition [ who offers more] as premiums are "stand alone's", not package deals.

    Makes premiums even less appealing on cost point basis.
     
  11. Stewart Vernon

    Stewart Vernon Leapin' Lizard Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    21,467
    358
    Jan 7, 2005
    Kittrell, NC
    As far as the cost goes... Cinemax was $8-$10 when there was just one Cinemax channel. When they started having more, I don't remember the channel package price going up sharply... By which I mean... It didn't go from $8-$10 for one channel to $30+ for all of the Cinemax channels.

    So... basically people were used to Cinemax costing whatever it cost and you get whatever channel you get. The fact that Cinemax themselves doesn't make a bigger deal of this is telling, to me... I never see Cinemax commercials, for example, saying "leave Dish because they won't carry Cinemax 12" or whatever channel...

    Viacom, Disney, AMC, etc. had disputes and negotiations and they always want Dish to carry all of their channels... especially when they launch a new one... But I honestly can't remember the company (Cinemax) or Dish or even subscribers making a big stink at any point over any of the missing premiums.

    People would scream if Dish dropped the whole Cinemax suite I expect... but no issues with some channels being missing... and more to the point Cinemax keeps being ok not trying to get Dish to carry those missing channels.

    It's very weird to me in light of how almost all the other contracts go for channels.
     
  12. James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    44,907
    864
    Apr 17, 2003
    Michiana
    Cinemax may be getting the same payment from DISH regardless of how many channels are carried. And while getting all the channels carried would increase exposure of the channels - it isn't the same as with commercial channels (like ESPN) where not carrying a channel would cut into how many people would see their ads. As long as the core channels are carried, failure to carry "the rest" would not be a big deal for Cinemax. They would not be losing money.

    As far as DISH goes, they wouldn't be saving money by not carrying the extra channels - but three more HD feeds is three less feeds of other channels that they can carry. Back in 2008 DISH carried five channels of Cinemax with only Cinemax East in HD. In 2008 they added the HD feeds for three more of the five channels. Status has been quo since then. (DirecTV added the extra three Max channels in 2011 - only in HD.)

    Perhaps DISH will add the remaining channels at some point ... but as Stewart pointed out, there does not seem to be a huge outcry for them.


    BTW: Showtime was pulled from Time Warner Cable systems last year for a month during a larger dispute with CBS. It isn't impossible for a premium package to be involved in a dispute.
     
  13. satcrazy

    satcrazy Icon

    1,016
    18
    Mar 15, 2011
    Great...
    Your right, not a big deal for subs, it appears.

    Even if those extra channels were SD, it would at least be the full line up, in my thinking. If I subbed Max on a regular basis, I'd want the complete line up, even in SD. Maybe dish wanted the extra channel space for info mercials, and Cinemax gets paid the same. Much as I like dish, direct still gives the extra channels for the same moola. I will look at other premiums to see who provides what for how much. It has got my attention now.

    Encore has little in HD but as far as I know, it is their full line up. Sorry to say the shift in encore's programming is going backwards. Not what I would call a big plus for the 250 package.

    yeah, I guess it sounds like a bit of a rant, but bang for your buck is less of a sport and more of a necessity these days.

    Just sayin'..........
     
  14. mwdxer

    mwdxer Well-Known Member

    1,236
    73
    Oct 30, 2013
    Seaside Oregon
    I don't think the average subscriber realizes how many extra Cinemax or HBO channels they are missing either. as they never had them, then, they do not know what they are missing. I remember back before I got Dish, I had no idea how many channels they had, as I never had seen many of them. Now I would miss many of them as I have been watching them for years. My friend who lives in KC has Time Warner and they get several channels we do not get with Dish like BBC World and CNN International. I have seen both of them at times, so I really want them. The Roku has both channels, but often the pq is not the best. The pq on the Roku varies all over the board. It is nice to have access to the channels, but the pq with Dish is more stable.
     
  15. satcrazy

    satcrazy Icon

    1,016
    18
    Mar 15, 2011
    Great...
    After looking at both premium line ups, I see that direct does offer a few more in each.

    However, since cost is an issue to me, I won't sub long term to any premium.

    It's just annoying that cost is the same, even though the offering is not.
     
  16. Stewart Vernon

    Stewart Vernon Leapin' Lizard Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    21,467
    358
    Jan 7, 2005
    Kittrell, NC
    To be fair... and I realize this has very little to do with DBS... but in my city there is a gas station selling gas on average 10 cents less per gallon than all the others around it... including other franchise locations of the same gas company... no reason I can come up with selling the same gas as their other locations for 10 cents less.

    It's not apples to apples... but some stuff does cost different at different locations when it is exactly the same... so the idea of more costing less somewhere (the Cinemax channels) doesn't entirely surprise me either.
     
  17. ehilbert1

    ehilbert1 Godfather

    312
    10
    Jan 22, 2007
     
  18. James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    44,907
    864
    Apr 17, 2003
    Michiana
    The $20 (since 2011) includes $10 applied to AT250 and lower packages. AEP+Sports Pack is only $4 more than Premier. DISH gives you the choice of having AEP without paying for all the RSNs (a desired choice if you read the threads asking for sports to be sold separately). And for those who want all RSNs it is cheaper to add them to a lower package on DISH than on DirecTV.

    If one thinks another carrier has a better deal they can always take it.
     
  19. ehilbert1

    ehilbert1 Godfather

    312
    10
    Jan 22, 2007
    Why does it always have to end in that? If you don't like it leave. Why can't people have a nice discussion? I get it your going to protect Dish no matter what. I like Dish I wasn't bashing it. All I was wondering is why after a $20 increase do will still have less HD premiums than Direct. See you take that as bashing Dish so you have to pretty much say..... Leave if you don't like it.

    The sad thing about the internet is people wouldn't say half the crap they do to people if they were in person.




    Sent from my iPad using DBSTalk
     
    1 person likes this.
  20. James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    44,907
    864
    Apr 17, 2003
    Michiana
    You asked a leading question. Isn't that the answer that you were looking for? :)

    Your comment certainly was not a compliment to DISH. But I suppose compliments are not allowed and complaints must always rule the day?

    PS: I'd suggest you find another provider if we were having this discussion in person. Hopefully you're not suggesting that there would be any repercussions from making such a suggestion which could be considered a threat.
     

Share This Page