1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DBSTalk.com Exclusive First Look: Cisco/Linksys WET610N

Discussion in 'DIRECTV HD DVR/Receiver Discussion' started by Stuart Sweet, Oct 5, 2009.

  1. Oct 5, 2009 #1 of 130
    Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    37,060
    287
    Jun 18, 2006
    [​IMG]

    DBSTalk.com is proud to present this first look at support for the WET610N Wireless Ethernet Bridge in DIRECTV receivers!

    WET610N First Look (pdf)

    Thanks to alebob911, Movieman, Drew2K, Greg Alsobrook, Huskie_2009 and the whole test team!

    Please note that you may require the latest version of the free Adobe Reader, available at http://www.adobe.com, to view this document. Third-party readers, including Mac OS X Preview, may not display properly.

    Please note that some DBSTalk.com testers and staff members may have received free equipment from DIRECTV or its partners for the purpose of evaluation and testing.
     
  2. Oct 23, 2009 #2 of 130
    hdtvfan0001

    hdtvfan0001 Well-Known Member

    32,456
    258
    Jul 28, 2004
    Great job on the First Look, and also to the test team!

    The WET610N is indeed a nice "N" class unit, and will only help those who are looking for solid wireless network connectivity.
     
  3. Oct 23, 2009 #3 of 130
    dorfd1

    dorfd1 Icon

    978
    0
    Jul 15, 2008
    I think my wrt320n in client bridge mode is better because 320n has a 5 port gigabit siwtch. the wet610n and the wga600n only have 1 100mb ethernet port which means it can't go as fast as 300mb or 600mb.
     
  4. Oct 23, 2009 #4 of 130
    hdtvfan0001

    hdtvfan0001 Well-Known Member

    32,456
    258
    Jul 28, 2004
    Maybe, maybe not....the port difference alone wouldn't necessarily make anything "better".

    Point 2 - the WET610N installed at this location is running at 300Mbps right now here.

    Also...a cost comparison comes into play.

    So I'm not sure I could agree with much of your statement.
     
  5. Oct 23, 2009 #5 of 130
    dorfd1

    dorfd1 Icon

    978
    0
    Jul 15, 2008
    because the wet610n can only do 100mb ethernet the max speed is really 100mbps. because my 320n has gigabit ethernet it can reach full n speeds.
     
  6. Oct 23, 2009 #6 of 130
    Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    37,060
    287
    Jun 18, 2006
    I think the WET610N is a better fit for DIRECTV to add to their DVR. If you're using a 320N then you're probably more of an advanced user and don't need them to hold your hand through the configuration process.
     
  7. Oct 23, 2009 #7 of 130
    hdtvfan0001

    hdtvfan0001 Well-Known Member

    32,456
    258
    Jul 28, 2004
    Note that even with your 320n...you are still limited to the 100/10 Ethernet on the HD DVR port side...

    But rest assured...I have 300Mbps running between the WEET610N and my router at this very moment - see attached photo.

    I am running a "G" at 54Mbps and the WET at the same time, so you can see the differences in results in the picture itself.
     

    Attached Files:

  8. Oct 23, 2009 #8 of 130
    Doug Brott

    Doug Brott Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    28,939
    72
    Jul 12, 2006
    Los Angeles
    Couple of things .. The WET610N support is integrated into the receiver. You can set it up with your remote. Secondly, the HR2x only has a 100mbps port .. Gig Ethernet is not relevant.
     
  9. Oct 23, 2009 #9 of 130
    dorfd1

    dorfd1 Icon

    978
    0
    Jul 15, 2008
    the dvr will transfer at only 100mbps
     
  10. Oct 23, 2009 #10 of 130
    Alebob911

    Alebob911 Hall Of Fame

    1,622
    6
    Mar 22, 2007
    CERES,CA
    I was just getting ready to say that but a little to slow on the typing!:lol:
     
  11. Oct 23, 2009 #11 of 130
    Doug Brott

    Doug Brott Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    28,939
    72
    Jul 12, 2006
    Los Angeles
    Actually, I don't even think it uses that much to stream video .. As for the WET610N, you can rest assured that DIRECTV did due diligence in choosing this adapter. The WET610N is a very good device and is the right one for the task.
     
  12. Oct 23, 2009 #12 of 130
    hdtvfan0001

    hdtvfan0001 Well-Known Member

    32,456
    258
    Jul 28, 2004
    Agreed...reliability, steady streaming, and compatibility are 3 key benefits.
     
  13. Oct 23, 2009 #13 of 130
    Groundhog45

    Groundhog45 Hall Of Fame

    4,580
    89
    Nov 9, 2005
    Cedar Park,...
    This is a good review of the WET610N. The install using your HR2x is pretty simple. Note that Linksys has a firmware update out that folks may want to install.
     
  14. Oct 23, 2009 #14 of 130
    dorfd1

    dorfd1 Icon

    978
    0
    Jul 15, 2008
    if you plugged the wet610n into a gigabit switch to connect other devices to the network the other devices even ones that support gigabit ethernet would still be limited to 100mbps wireless transfer rate.
     
  15. Oct 23, 2009 #15 of 130
    Doug Brott

    Doug Brott Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    28,939
    72
    Jul 12, 2006
    Los Angeles
    And the HR2x uses what? maybe 20mbps? Does it matter?
     
  16. Oct 23, 2009 #16 of 130
    Mike Bertelson

    Mike Bertelson 6EQUJ5 WOW! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    14,040
    94
    Jan 24, 2007
    As always, very nice First Looks. :)

    I like that there's no CDs/software to install. Plug it into the receiver and it's supported. Just set it up with the remote and you're on your way. Very Cool. :D

    Mike
     
  17. Oct 23, 2009 #17 of 130
    argonaut

    argonaut AllStar

    64
    2
    Dec 16, 2006
    Thanks for the review.

    I have been using the Linksys WGA600N for about a year with no issues. It is directly connected to an HR21-700. Is anyone able to compare the WET610N with the WGA600N?

    Additionally, one thing I am interested in is placing a small switch between the WET610N and my networked AV equipment to eliminate a few cables. They are all UTP CAT6 connections except for the HR21 (on the WGA600N). Since the WET610N is a true bridge unlike the WGA600N there is no reason it should care about multiple MAC addresses passing through it, as it really does not have to do anything smart. In the switch I would connect my Blu-ray player, my Network Video player, and my HTPC. The cables are all run through the sub-floor but less cables would make the SO happy. Obviously using more than one of those at a time for streaming video might impact performance. Anyone tried this yet?

    P.S. I know the wired connections will be faster, more reliable, etc.
     
  18. Oct 23, 2009 #18 of 130
    Doug Brott

    Doug Brott Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    28,939
    72
    Jul 12, 2006
    Los Angeles
    If the WGA600N is working well for you already, there may not be a reason to swap it out. However, the WET610N will give a longer range and overall better performance. The thing is though if performance needs are already met, do you want to spend the money again? :shrug:

    If you don't have an adapter yet, then definitely take the WET610N over the WGA600N.
     
  19. Oct 23, 2009 #19 of 130
    dorfd1

    dorfd1 Icon

    978
    0
    Jul 15, 2008
    yes if you had a computer hooked up to the same tv as the hd dvr is hooked up to and that computer supported gigabit ethernet.

    any adapter that allows you to connect a device with an ethernet port on it is a bridge.
     
  20. Oct 23, 2009 #20 of 130
    Doug Brott

    Doug Brott Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    28,939
    72
    Jul 12, 2006
    Los Angeles
    You have different needs than what this device is designed for .. Apples and Oranges here.

    If all you need is wireless connectivity to your HR2x, the WET610N is the right way to go. That being said, it's not the only way. If you already have hardware that works and you don't want to spend more money then yeah, use what you have. Nothing wrong with that.
     

Share This Page