1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

DirecTV’s HD tuner set to debut with Windows 7?

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by LarryFlowers, Nov 8, 2008.

  1. Nov 9, 2008 #21 of 120
    veryoldschool

    veryoldschool Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    42,649
    338
    Dec 9, 2006
    Isn't this the same "Kool-Aid" we've been fed since Windows 1.0? :rolleyes:
     
  2. Nov 9, 2008 #22 of 120
    dennisj00

    dennisj00 Hall Of Fame

    9,673
    189
    Sep 27, 2007
    Lake Norman, NC
    I agree. . . I'll believe it when I see the product shipping.
     
  3. Nov 9, 2008 #23 of 120
    Steve

    Steve DIRECTV A-Team

    23,031
    147
    Aug 22, 2006
    Lower...
    Actually to me, the orignal promise of MCE was the concept of whole-home scheduling and networking. One PC with terabytes of storage and multiple tuners feeding content to all the displays in my home simultaneously.

    I guess I'll have to wait for MRV and hope that at some point there will be a unified scheduler managing all the networked DVR tuners in my home, along with a unified playlist accessible from any STB attached to a display. /steve
     
  4. Nov 9, 2008 #24 of 120
    russdog

    russdog Godfather

    453
    0
    Jul 31, 2006
    Right.
    But then I don't understand your concern about one MCE per display.
    It's one per PC, is it not?
     
  5. Nov 9, 2008 #25 of 120
    wingrider01

    wingrider01 Hall Of Fame

    1,764
    2
    Sep 9, 2005
    Would rather spend the extra and go with the PS3, combine that with the new netflix interface and sitting pretty. If the PS3 is not needed the Linksys DMA2100 ad the DMA2200 come in a hot second.

    Currently running a custom Vista Ultimate 64 bit, 8GB memory, mirrored 320 GB boot drives, a Esata 15 drive raid external array, 1 PS3, 3 DMA2200's - now if the directv would interface 100 percent I will dump all my DVR's both Directivo and HR2X's and come out ahead.
     
  6. Nov 9, 2008 #26 of 120
    wingrider01

    wingrider01 Hall Of Fame

    1,764
    2
    Sep 9, 2005
    1 MCE per TV
     
  7. Nov 9, 2008 #27 of 120
    russdog

    russdog Godfather

    453
    0
    Jul 31, 2006
    Didn't know that. Thanks.

    That's very unfortunate.
     
  8. Nov 9, 2008 #28 of 120
    Jeremy W

    Jeremy W Hall Of Fame

    13,447
    0
    Jun 19, 2006
    How is it unfortunate? Do you think that the TV will somehow magically be able to access the content from Media Center? Obviously an Extender will be needed.
     
  9. Nov 9, 2008 #29 of 120
    russdog

    russdog Godfather

    453
    0
    Jul 31, 2006
    It's unfortunate if one is required to purchase multiple licenses for a single product running on a single machine to serve multiple TV's, i.e. 1 per TV rather than 1 per PC.
    Not sure if that will be the case or not, but that's what I meant.
     
  10. Nov 9, 2008 #30 of 120
    Steve

    Steve DIRECTV A-Team

    23,031
    147
    Aug 22, 2006
    Lower...
    Ya, but for me, that would cost anywhere from $1200-1500 for 6 MCE's, plus the cost of several DirecTV tuners for the MC PC (I'd want at least 3 or 4, to avoid conflicts).

    That said, I guess you can't take it with you. :lol: /steve

    PS: IIRC, there used to be a limit of 3 or 4 MCE's per MC server. Is that still true?
     
  11. Nov 9, 2008 #31 of 120
    Ken S

    Ken S RIP

    6,201
    0
    Feb 12, 2007
    Why spend extra for the PS3? The XBox360 will do NetFlix and is a true Media Center Extender. Certainly the PS3 can play video, etc...but in some households the consider Media Center interface is important.
    Not arguing XBox vs. PS3...just suggesting a low-cost MCE that has some nice capabilities.
     
  12. Nov 9, 2008 #32 of 120
    Ken S

    Ken S RIP

    6,201
    0
    Feb 12, 2007
    Steve,

    I think that limit would be based more on network capacity than the actual number you could have connected. I don't think there's any limitation on how many MCEs you can have on the network...just how many that could be hitting the server at the same time.
     
  13. Nov 9, 2008 #33 of 120
    wingrider01

    wingrider01 Hall Of Fame

    1,764
    2
    Sep 9, 2005
    MCE is a piece of hardware not software.
     
  14. Nov 9, 2008 #34 of 120
    Steve

    Steve DIRECTV A-Team

    23,031
    147
    Aug 22, 2006
    Lower...
    Gotcha. It may have been an XP MC limit. I browsed the new Vista MC site and saw no limit on extenders, but did see a limit of 2 HD tuners and 2 SD tuners max. That could be a non-starter for me, because I'd want at least 3 HD tuners to resolve prime-time conflicts. /steve
     
  15. Nov 9, 2008 #35 of 120
    wingrider01

    wingrider01 Hall Of Fame

    1,764
    2
    Sep 9, 2005
    Have 6 running at the office on a single Vista Ultimate box, but it is basicly a full blown server.
     
  16. Nov 9, 2008 #36 of 120
    carl6

    carl6 Moderator DBSTalk Club

    12,389
    905
    Nov 15, 2005
    Seattle, WA
    I tend to want to agree with the KISS crowd (keep it simple stupid). TV is TV, computers are computers. Each have their uses. Among the average person paying DirecTV varying amounts of $$$ per month, there is no interest in merging the two, and no need to do so.

    For the small percentage of users who want the ability to totally integrate everything, great. I hope the hardware and software to support that comes along. But please don't expect me to help subsidize the cost of doing so in what I pay, as I have no interest or need in those capabilities. I like the direction I have seen DirecTV moving, and think they are on track to please the great majority of their customers.
     
  17. Nov 9, 2008 #37 of 120
    wingrider01

    wingrider01 Hall Of Fame

    1,764
    2
    Sep 9, 2005
    There is a 3rd party patch that allows more turners, take a look at the green button or the Australian Media center site for the patch. I believe the new "service pack" the MS reeleased to OEM builders native support more then the unenhanced version
     
  18. Nov 9, 2008 #38 of 120
    1948GG

    1948GG Icon

    952
    8
    Aug 4, 2007
    I thought about putting this in another thread, probably would have been a better thing to do. But maybe I can get the 'two birds with one stone' explaining a bit, and perhaps explaining a bit about project management as well.

    I simply think (I may be wrong, won't be the first time!), that they (DirecTV) is going about this 'ass-backwards'. They have this neat plan to have all this networked stuff going along, and oh, by the way, the MRV component of it is simply this 'module' hanging off to the side over there.

    Okay... But perhaps we should review some history (usually not a bad idea at any time) of just exactly how networks evolved in the first place. All this multi-machine, multi-protocol stuff didn't simply leap from the 'brow of zeus', so to speak. What exactly was the first networks, what did they do, and what was the goal? x machines in some homogeneous network sharing anything in a complex client/server or peering system?

    Wow, far from it. The first networks were for PRINT sharing, nothing more. Printers were VERY expensive, particularly laser ones, circa late 70's. So of course were hard discs, but hold on a sec, lets get printing working first. Later would come 'true' client-server networks that would integrate printer/file sharing, in fact, doing that efficiently and cost effectively was the whole basis behind this small company in Utah, Novell. They held onto the top dog status for a good decade.

    Microsoft and others were (as usual?), late to the game. Others were the trailblazers. As others have pointed out, the MRV part has been in existence on other DVR machines as we speak, and in fact, existed several years ago. Hmm, are we trying to re-invent the wheel?

    So, the project manager comes out. Do we want to develop a supersonic jet transport before doing, say, a bi-plane..? In fact, if one looks back at the development of heavier-than-air aircraft, that's just about exactly what a LOT of folks tried to do up until (and past!) the turn of the 20th Century. Then these two brothers from Dayton, OH, thought jeez, lets get the wheel invented first before we leap off the cliff!

    In my mind, DirecTV is trying to develop the supersonic jet transport FIRST, and do the 'simple stuff' later. Good Luck!

    I wish them luck. So far, the track record is not good; any project manager worth their salt would say if the basics aren't proven and the foundation not set within around 6 months of kickoff, then your initial plan is suspect. DirecTV has been going at this for what, at least six years...?

    As far as the 'technology changing' and some particular part of it being different than, say, 25+ years ago, then I guess anyone can't follow any new thoughts or advances about anything.

    Here's an example; do you think any Physicist from, say, the 1930's (pre atom bomb) would not understand pretty quickly exactly what Oppenheimer and friends came up with circa 1945? Or say, going back to my airplane analogy, that the Wright brothers would understand within a couple of minutes (seconds?) how a 747 flies?

    One of the greatest challenges in any career is keeping up. The biggest thing to learn as an undergraduate is.... to learn how to learn.

    The basic rules of physics don't change; although my 'atom bomb' example is a bit of a stretch, as those folks were rewriting a lot of the textbooks of the era.

    But the basics of project management don't change, whether we're talking about an 8-lane superhighway or a rocket to the moon. Wernher von Braun wasn't just a genius rocket designer, he was a suburb project manager. He had a rocket pre-Sputnik ready to go, but the DOD wanted a different rocket to go, which wasn't ready. 'Politics'.

    I don't think this question may ever get answered, but I wonder what 'politics' at DirecTV is pushing the Supersonic Transport part of MRV before the simple biplane...? Oh well....

    As an aside, my 'hero for the ages' is this guy, Leslie R. Groves. A lowly brigadier general (MG at the end of the war), running the BIGGEST (certainly the most expensive) government/military project of WW2. The Manhattan Project. A 'simple' Corps of Engineers branch graduate of West Point, he didn't know SQUAT about the physics of how Oppenheimer was going to accomplish his feat, but he knew how to manage the 130,000 people and $24B (in 2008 dollars) to support that effort to it's positive conclusion.
     
  19. Nov 9, 2008 #39 of 120
    Jeremy W

    Jeremy W Hall Of Fame

    13,447
    0
    Jun 19, 2006
    If you had anything in that novel you wanted me to address, I would suggest posting it separately. Because I'm not reading all of that.
     
  20. Nov 9, 2008 #40 of 120
    LarryFlowers

    LarryFlowers DIRECTV A-Team

    4,290
    1
    Sep 22, 2006
    Don't worry about it Jeremy.. I read it and it lacks any content of importance to us.. he doesn't like DirecTV's development process.. thinks he could manage it better.. thinks they are incompetent... made a comparison to the Manhattan Project ???... completely off topic...

    Lets cheer the fact that there is actually a driver in existence for the HDPC-20, which is way more than we have ever had before!!!
     

Share This Page