1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DirecTV 2012 Olympics coverage

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Programming' started by cjrleimer, Jun 16, 2012.

  1. Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    Of course. We've known for a while now that 3D coverage will be on tape delay until the next day. It will not be live.
     
  2. Quaker2001

    Quaker2001 Legend

    213
    0
    Feb 15, 2010
    That's exactly what the problem was. I think at the time, the theory was why should I pay for something I already get for free? The product was absolutely a great idea, but the marketing of it is what killed it. A lot of folks say it was the best coverage they ever saw of sports like track & field and gymnastics because it was live, in full, and commercial free. Definitely an idea ahead of its time, just not something people should have had to pay top dollar for. The pay-per-view model for sports beyond one off events like wrestling or boxing matches (and how relevant is that sport now) doesn't work anymore. So I don't think we'll see it again for something like the Olympics. Better to drive that type of coverage towards online where NBC doesn't have to charge and hopefully for them can start generating some revenue there.

    The 3D coverage from London is following almost exactly the same formula as the HD coverage from Athens. It'll be on tape the next day and packaged together.
     
  3. maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    Yeah 3D coverage is a day delayed. Not entirely sure why, probably has to do with feed coming from London to the U.S. or something.... as the Sky Sports 3D will do 3D live within England.
     
  4. zimm7778

    zimm7778 Hall Of Fame

    1,201
    5
    Nov 11, 2007
    Oh I'm not arguing the model now. It may work best. I just think if they did try this again and charge say $99 for the 3 channels it'd get more takers with DVRs that can automatically record what they want (pending the info was loaded in the coverage channels and not "Olympics Triplecast"), people won't bat an eye at $99 for the price since the average persons bill now is around $100 anyway, and seeing prices for sports packages of $250 and $300 each.
     
  5. gusmahler

    gusmahler Legend

    185
    0
    Aug 1, 2006
    Does nbcolympics.com have archives of the events? I realize that the site only claims to stream every event, not archive, but I was just wondering why I can't watch today's archery competition online.
     
  6. maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    They do keep archives, I was able to pull up the Brazil vs Egypt game last night after I had seen the first half on TV but had to leave. WHAT a game that was! Egypt's comeback was pretty good.

    I don't know how much time after the live event they will post them though. Could be a few hours, I don't know.

    I also don't know if they archive ALL sports. I thought they did, so maybe just wait a while longer.
     
  7. mrlqban

    mrlqban AllStar

    56
    0
    Jul 14, 2012
    Actually, primetime already feels like a highlights show. The sports that are run in primetime, all of them are filled with side stories and the actual events are reduced to show American athletes (and I do want them to show American athletes) but they cut a majority of the action that is going on with non american athletes. The problem with your argument is that you assume NBC is full of first run events in primetime when they are not. They are full of tape edited, not showing the whole spectrum of the games.

    The model that I suggested is a step further to keep everybody happy and still draw viewers. Understand that only a small portion of the Olympic events are finals or medal events, most of the olympic events are actually qualifying rounds. You can fit into the schedule the finals of the most popular events live on TV by dedicating a specialty channel and they can still keep their primetime model on NBC. The only difference here is that you are now given a chance as a sports fan and as an american viewer to watch the most important moments of the Olympic events live on TV.
    But you may say, well, this is already been done with the online coverage. But you see, the online coverage does not give you the ultimate experience. The current online coverage is a feed with no commentaries (not that I like some of these commentaries, but you still need someone to run the show, it's like having a party with no DJ). One can also make the argument that the online feed is not as appealing and practical in terms of the HD viewing experience as watching television channel. Although people are capable of turning their computer into a 65 inch HD display in decent quality, there are several things that the end user will need to be ready for in order to accomplish that. So it is not a practical idea when there are millions of fans.
     
  8. bigwilly087

    bigwilly087 AllStar

    78
    0
    Mar 28, 2007
    Today's archery was not televised by ANYONE, which is why it is not archived. Can't blame NBC for this one since there wasn't a world feed produced.

    All events will be archived, however events that are being shown in primetime will be streamed live but the archive will not be available for those events until after the primetime broadcast.
     
  9. maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    See this video for a little more explanation: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-19010407

    This event was a "seeding" event, basically deciding which athletes will play against which athletes in the actual games. The public was not allowed in, no spectators, no cameras. I didn't know this, and as you can see from the video, neither did a good many people who just decided to show up. :D
     
  10. anleva

    anleva Icon

    568
    1
    Nov 14, 2007
    Can someone please list or link to a list of the channels and channel numbers that will have Olympic events for DirecTV? I want to set up my Olympics channels list.
     
  11. gusmahler

    gusmahler Legend

    185
    0
    Aug 1, 2006
    The marquee events will be on whatever channel your local NBC is at.

    237: Bravo
    355: CNBC
    356: MSNBC
    406-407: Telemundo (Spanish)
    603: NBC Sports Network
    751: soccer channel
    752: basketball channel

    Go to http://www.nbcolympics.com/tv-listings/index.html# to find out what events are on each particular day.

    For example, tomorrow
    Bravo shows tennis from 4:00 am until 12:00 noon
    CNBC (355) airs Olympics from 12:30pm until 3:30 pm
    MSNBC (356) airs Olympics from 4:00 am until 2:00 pm (PDT)
    603 will be showing sports from Midnight (PDT) all the way through 5:00 pm (PDT).
    Soccer (751) airs from 4:00 am until 5:00 pm
    Basketball (752) air from 1:00 amuntil 4 pm

    And NBC airs Olympics from 4:00 am through 5:00 pm (PDT), then a prime time show (featuring the first Phelps/Lochte battle) at 7:00 PDT. I have no idea how these times change for you East Coast people.
     
  12. anleva

    anleva Icon

    568
    1
    Nov 14, 2007
    Thank you!
     
  13. maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    And from some of the movements Sixto has seen, it is very possible that somewhere today, these networks will get a channel remap to the 750s, so they are all grouped together.

    They did this in 2008, Sixto spotted some action on all the NBC networks, DirecTV just seems to be dragging their feet re: any announcements. The Soccer/Basketball channels aren't even announced on their website!
     
  14. Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    The BBC iPlayer will stream the opening ceremonies live in HD in two varieties - with and without commentary.
     
  15. Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,345
    578
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    Yes, I will be checking 750/1 often later today. I still bet they come through with an HD mix channel, though I'm down to even money from very high odds that they would.
     
  16. Quaker2001

    Quaker2001 Legend

    213
    0
    Feb 15, 2010
    Yes, that's still first run when you haven't seen the video yet, even if you know the results. This isn't a football game or a golf tournament. A 2-minute swim race where you know the results is a lot different than a 3-hour football game that you knew the final score to. That's why I'm saying you can't show everything earlier and then repeat it in primetime because then it's no longer first run. And if you think primetime is already a highlights show (which in some ways it is), then what's to change about it? They have to edit it down somehow. There's a lot of dead time during Olympic events, so that editing almost helps to make it more compelling, even if it cuts out a lot of competitors. But again, if you want these events in full (and you get them largely without interruption), you have that option now. That's how you satisfy both fanbases.. those who want constant action and those who are in it for the storylines.

    That's the whole point though.. NBC thinks (and I'm planning on doing this myself) that you'll watch the live feed and because it lacks context, you'll check it out again in primetime.

    You have to remember.. NBC's goal is to get you to consume as much of the Olympics as possible. If they're showing their best stuff in the afternoon, is there going to be a draw to see a highlights show in primetime? I don't see it. Besides, you don't want people to skip over the qualifying rounds and go straight to the finals. How many people want to watch all of the Phelps races, not just when he goes for medals. Setting up a specialty channel is only going to detract from what you already have, not add to it. If you're trying to maximize the total number of hours of Olympics coverage consumed (let alone the business side of things of trying to generate advertising revenue), I don't see this being able to increase that and if anything, you're hurting it if you're encouraging people just to watch finals and have the best stuff done with by the end of the afternoon. Because after that, they'll be seeking out something else to watch, not watching the highlights (which is to say the re-run) in primetime.
     
  17. maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    Well... there is another way of looking at that. Chances are high that some people can't see it at night because they work in a restaurant or store or some other evening job, and they watch it in the afternoon. Similarly plenty of people work in the day time and can't see it in the afternoon.

    If you have ONE showing, you can get say.... 10 million viewers. If you have TWO showings, maybe you will get 7 Million viewers in the afternoon, and 5 million viewers at night, effectively having 12 Million viewers watch your commercials.

    Also, LIVE viewing promotes commercial viewing. So the 7 million watching it in the afternoon will see the commercials for sure, or at least the majority.

    See, if the event is going to be tape-delayed anyways, and another 3 hours on top of that, I might as well make that 4 hours, watch some other DVR'd Olympics, and not watch ANY commercials on NBC whatsoever. I think with the live showing, they would actually get more commercial viewers. Delay is delay, for those with a DVR it then doesn't matter anymore your build in your own delay to prevent commercial watching.

    And that might also be a very compelling reason - especially in weekends - to show important stuff live.

    For myself, in 2010/2008, I watched stuff live IF it was live (and thus saw commercials). If it was delayed in any way, I just added my own DVR delay and watched NO commercials whatsoever.
     
  18. gusmahler

    gusmahler Legend

    185
    0
    Aug 1, 2006
    I disagree. Speaking as someone who watched all of his gold medals wins in 2008, I didn't see a single qualifying heat. What's the point? Everyone knows he's going to make the final. The top competitors don't even try that hard in qualifying heats (e.g., you'll see Usain Bolt pull up 20 m from the finish because he already knows he's going to finish high enough to get to the finals.) (Here's a Usain Bolt qualifying heat from the 2011 World Championships. Not exactly exciting. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PvHvGeh14co )
     
  19. Kevin F

    Kevin F Hall Of Fame

    1,128
    1
    May 9, 2010
    I'm still really disappointed that there is no live 3D coverage...

    Kevin
     
  20. maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    Yeah I still wonder why that is.

    Eurosport 3D does it live.
    Sky Sports 3D does it live.
    BBC is really just starting with 3D and has some events live.... but they aren't doing a whole lot of 3D yet.

    Maybe they can't get it fed live yet across the Atlantic and the actual programming is moved via internet connections to the n3D facility in the U.S.

    There isn't any other technical reason I can think of, 3D was designed to be live for sports and what not.
     

Share This Page