1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DirecTV & Dish Network HD Channel Lineup Comparison

Discussion in 'General Satellite Discussion' started by Hoosier205, Aug 26, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Aug 26, 2010 #21 of 353
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 New Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    Is ESPN Full Court in HD only on Dish Network or on both providers? I want to confirm this before updating the list again.
     
  2. Aug 26, 2010 #22 of 353
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 New Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    Hmm...I have an idea for that. I'll work on it and see how it looks.
     
  3. Aug 26, 2010 #23 of 353
    anleva

    anleva Icon

    568
    1
    Nov 14, 2007
    Confirmed what the issue is. I viewed page info and noticed the image URL of http://img832.imageshack.us/img832/7970/directvdishnetwork14.jpg. Pasted that in my browser and got an access denied message.

    Apparently that site is is blocked by my corporate IT department.
     
  4. Aug 26, 2010 #24 of 353
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 New Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    That made a huge difference. Thanks again.
     
  5. Aug 26, 2010 #25 of 353
    Altales Teriadem

    Altales Teriadem New Member

    9
    0
    Aug 29, 2009
    You should make a distinction between part-time and full-time carriage for channels other than RSNs—for instance, Fox Soccer Plus HD is a full-time channel which DirecTV only carries part-time, while ESPN 3D and NFL RedZone are part-time channels on any carrier. Using a different color for part-time carriage would also allow you to have just one list of RSNs.
     
  6. Aug 26, 2010 #26 of 353
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 New Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    Yes, I am thinking of doing something like that. Those changes will likely come tomorrow.Thank you.
     
  7. Aug 26, 2010 #27 of 353
    RasputinAXP

    RasputinAXP Kwisatz Haderach of Cordcuttery

    3,145
    11
    Jan 23, 2008
    Honestly, no idea. D* doesn't mention it on their Full Court site.
     
  8. Aug 26, 2010 #28 of 353
    BqWUDUDj

    BqWUDUDj Mentor

    93
    4
    Feb 26, 2007
    That's a nice chart. Should "HD" be in the thread title, because the chart seems to be exclusive to HD. I'm on Dish for the internationals and I'd like to see how Dish stacks up against DirecTV and Verizon.
     
  9. Aug 26, 2010 #29 of 353
    harsh

    harsh Beware the Attack Basset

    21,192
    182
    Jun 14, 2003
    Salem, OR
    This gets dicey when some of the cinema channels go off temporarily for events. I question whether something that gets taken down for events should be considered part time.

    Then again, if they're playing the same thing on more than one channel (I'm thinking primarily Cinema HD, but this may include sports alternate channels), should they all count?
     
  10. Aug 26, 2010 #30 of 353
    georule

    georule Hall Of Fame

    1,603
    5
    Mar 31, 2010
    I would suggest instead of showing RED blocks on the DirecTV side for the part-time RSNs section where D* provides that RSN full-time that you use a different color and put a note in the squares like "Full Time". Otherwise someone just skimming might get the wrong idea.

    I know this is DBSTalk, but I must say I miss not having the other providers in the list as well, because when my D* contract ends, I'll be considering the entire universe of options open to me in making a decision on what to do going forward.

    But good work.

    And credit/link whats-his-name anyway, even if you do it in a left-handed fashion like ". . . and I did this list because I found his original to be unsatisfactory for reasons A, B, C. . . "
     
  11. Aug 26, 2010 #31 of 353
    harsh

    harsh Beware the Attack Basset

    21,192
    182
    Jun 14, 2003
    Salem, OR
    You're on your own on that front. I'm not convinced that Verizon even has a horse in that race.
     
  12. Aug 26, 2010 #32 of 353
    georule

    georule Hall Of Fame

    1,603
    5
    Mar 31, 2010
    The other thing that occurred to me to do is to split the "Standard HD" into "Standard HD (Sports)" and "Standard HD (non-sports)". The first of those would include the dedicated sports channels like the ESPNs, Versus, Golf HD, etc.

    The reason for doing so is you'd then be able to have a subtotal for sports in total (including that and the RSNs and sports premiums).

    My theory is that people tend to relate to their programming needs in at least 3 catagories --sports, non-sports, and premiums-- and those catagories impact their decision making.

    You could probably make an argument for subsetting movies the same way, so you could have a subtotal for Standard movie channels (AMC, TCM, whatever) plus premiums. so that the first catagory becomes "Standard HD (non-sports general)", "Standard HD (movies)" and "Standard HD (sports)".

    Instead of breaking non-sports general and movies out of their blocks in the detail list, you could use different colors than green (or different shades of green) for them if the provider has it and leave them in their current blocks.

    Just a suggestion. . . .
     
  13. Aug 26, 2010 #33 of 353
    DogLover

    DogLover Hall Of Fame

    2,510
    0
    Mar 18, 2007
    While the sports/non-sports may make sense, tyring to identify "movie" channels vs non-movie channels may get tough. So many channels now days (even those that started out as movie channels) show a variety of programming. You run into too many different opinions of what is a movie channel and what isn't.

    The detail is there, so people can count the channels however they want. The counts may give a general idea to people, but the detail is the important part. (It doesn't matter how much HD a provider has, if the channels you watch aren't in HD.)
     
  14. Aug 26, 2010 #34 of 353
    georule

    georule Hall Of Fame

    1,603
    5
    Mar 31, 2010
    Regarding the "RSNs are useless" vs "RSN's aren't useless" debate, it occurred to me it might be worthwhile for somebody to canvass those RSNs for their unique locally produced content that is not blacked out, to make that case more objectively.

    Here's my contribution (FSN North): http://www.gophersports.com/ViewArticle.dbml?DB_OEM_ID=8400&ATCLID=3731527

    FSN North also does a limited schedule of high school hockey.

    And before you sun-belters sneer at hockey in general, if you're a "Minnesotan in exile" this kind of thing could be very compelling to you.
     
  15. Aug 26, 2010 #35 of 353
    Syzygy

    Syzygy Hall Of Fame

    1,306
    0
    Dec 5, 2005
    Hoosier, I like how responsive you are to our suggestions.

    Here's more: In the body of each table, please use another color than green for the background behind the current HD channel names. It would be less confusing. And I think a key, or legend, is needed to remind the reader that green means Yes and red means No.
     
  16. Aug 26, 2010 #36 of 353
    GlennDio

    GlennDio Icon

    620
    5
    Jan 19, 2007
    Castle...
    wow ...I don't know about this one ... D* full court Channels are SD only ..however if the game is in HD on the RSN it comes through there in HD (Although I also sub to the Sports pack so it may just be me) anyways ... is this just Dish not having Full time HD RSNs so they put the games that we can get in HD on the Fulltime RSNs in "fullcourt" even though we at D* get the same (or more I guess if the game is on YES or any RSN that Dish doesn't get) games in HD ...

    seems like it shouldn't be counted for Dish to me but I really don't like giving D* credit for it either ... this is different than the Game Plan scenario where many games are not on RSNs (ABC alt games) but are NOT shown in HD in the Game Plan channels
     
  17. Aug 26, 2010 #37 of 353
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 New Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    I have a key in the master document now. I just haven't finished it in order to upload it yet. What color would folks recommend behind the text of the channel names?
     
  18. Aug 26, 2010 #38 of 353
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 New Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    I agree...I don't know either. We need more feedback from both DirecTV and Dish Subs. I am not familiar enough with Full Court.
     
  19. Aug 26, 2010 #39 of 353
    Syzygy

    Syzygy Hall Of Fame

    1,306
    0
    Dec 5, 2005
    Well, now, since you asked, I have to start thinking about it for the first time... ;)

    1. I guess it should be a light, or even a pastel color, with a brightness similar to the yellow that's already in use.

    2. My own preference would be for a light blue; but maybe a pinkish color, or even a pale green, would make the chart appear less busy than a blue would.

    Just my 2 cents' worth.
     
  20. Aug 26, 2010 #40 of 353
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 New Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    The list has been updated. I added a third color for part-time channels, changed the background color behind the names of each channel, and combined the full-time and part-time RSN channels into one section.

    When I get a moment I am going to clean up the RSN sections. They are not in any particular order...just scattered about as I tried to make sure I had them all. They will be alphabetized. Also, some FSN channels are listed as "FS" while others are listed as "FSN" and I will fix those inconsistencies.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page