1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DirecTV & Dish Network HD Channel Lineup Comparison

Discussion in 'General Satellite Discussion' started by Hoosier205, Aug 26, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Aug 27, 2010 #61 of 353
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    Well, as of right now, we are going to count both full-time and part-time. If it is available in HD, we'll count it. We'll color code them differently based on full-time/part-time. Of course, this is all subject to change based on feedback.
     
  2. Aug 27, 2010 #62 of 353
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    BTW...I have fixed the majority of the math in the master copy (has not been posted yet, so the one in the first post is still wrong). The grand totals are correct in my copy, but not the category totals. The formulas were shifted as some point when I was making formatting changes. I just have to go through and correct those. That will come later.

    So, until I post the correct version the one listed in the first post has fuzzy math.
     
  3. Aug 27, 2010 #63 of 353
    QuickDrop

    QuickDrop Hall Of Fame

    1,118
    0
    Jul 20, 2007
    It makes sense in that:

    a.) They are not intended as national channels. They are local channels offered nationally by one provider.

    b.) They are full time channels only if the one subscribes to at least three separate sport packages and even then some NFL related programming get blacked out. Imagine if you subscribed to HBO or Showtime and then found out you had to pay $450 more per year to get their best original programming.

    c.) Except for a subset of DirecTV subscribers, very few pay television subscribers think of them when the phrase "National HD" is used.

    d.) They are better included as it relates to individual MLB, NBA, and NHL packages and how many HD games each provider has.
     
  4. Aug 27, 2010 #64 of 353
    QuickDrop

    QuickDrop Hall Of Fame

    1,118
    0
    Jul 20, 2007
    That's my point though. He's already counting part time channels as channels. Also this whole idea got started because the OP thought RSNs chould be counted as national channels at AVS Forum, saying cable could offer them if they wanted. The same logic should then apply to PPV. Different providers offer PPVs differently; DirecTV shouldn't get extra-credit for offering them in a way that counts as linear channels.
     
  5. Aug 27, 2010 #65 of 353
    James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    45,749
    985
    Apr 17, 2003
    Michiana
    One of the goals I had when I started my list a couple of years ago was in explaining the count given by the providers ... I'd like people to look at the list and be able to say "oh, that is where they are getting that number". It gets difficult when providers claim different numbers for each other's services so I've broken away from that a little and gone on a "like channel" comparison.

    All the channels in AT250 vs all the channels in Choice Ultimate (both packages being the highest basic package before adding all the premium movie channels) seems to be a fairly good place to draw the "Standard HD" line ... even though TMC and Encore are offered at that level they are offered equally so it really doesn't make that much difference.

    All the channels in AEP (America's Everything Package) vs all the channels in Premier brings in the premium channels and on DirecTV the sports package channels.

    Then I list the Platinum HD and Extra HD packages ... they are mostly basic channels but could be considered premiums. For 10 months DISH included their Platinum HD with regular HD service ... now it is separate again. I suppose they could go into a "Plus" category but I don't like putting them into the "Standard HD" category. They are separate enough that they need recognition.

    And that is usually where I draw the line ... PPVs come after that and part-times. Since DirecTV pulls counted PPV channels to create part-time sports channels their PPV (DirecTV Cinema) count changes on a daily basis. Are there 37 PPV Cinema channels on DirecTV today? Probably not. So instead of changing the count every time Sixto notes a PPV channel being assigned to or from sports I leave them all counted as PPV channels. DISH does not reduce their PPV (DISH Cinema) channels for their part-time sports. They have dedicated channels set aside for that content. Unfortunately they only have 12 channels set aside for their 26 RSNs and any other part-time sports content so from a "bandwidth" standpoint I can't count all of their 26 RSNs ... but they claim them so going back to the first rule (explaining what channels the providers are counting) I list them with the capacity note.

    Alternate channels. That's the real mess. If you add DirecTV's alternate channels into a count without reducing their PPV count I would consider it misleading. The same would go for DISH as their alternate sports channels are the same 12 channel max capacity listed for RSNs. DirecTV has wisely chosen not to count those channels so I'll follow their lead. (The exception would be the Sports PPV channel, which shares space with DISH's channel 101.)

    Sports packages ... good to note but don't change the counts. They are mirrors of other channels not separate channels.

    Channels neither provider carries. I don't see the point. If it is a channel that IS carried in SD then listing it makes some sense as people may look for their favorite channel and want to see it listed - even if it is only in red. But channels not carried on either provider in SD? I probably wouldn't bother.
     
  6. Aug 27, 2010 #66 of 353
    dcowboy7

    dcowboy7 Hall Of Fame

    4,750
    26
    May 22, 2008
    Pequannock, NJ
    Yep im just saying that instead of having 1 line say ft/pt rsns=30 i would have 1 line be ft rsns=27 & a 2nd line pt rsns=3 instead of lumping them all in together....kinda like how the alternates have a seperate line to themselves.


    edit:
    yep the topbox #s -- u got it good now -- thx.
     
  7. Aug 27, 2010 #67 of 353
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    Do you mean a separate line at the top...where the totals are? I could separate full-time and part-time there and just keep them combined in the list.
     
  8. Aug 27, 2010 #68 of 353
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    Channels that are available, but not carried by either provider will remain in the list. They will serve as reference for what is still out there waiting to be picked up by either carrier. Upcoming (not yet launched) channels will also remain in the list as well. I think people like to know that channel XYZ has announced a future HD launch.
     
  9. Aug 27, 2010 #69 of 353
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    I just posted another updated. I have not yet added Univision HD, Telefutura HD, Galavision, the DISH HD Sports PPV channel, Hustler TV HD. Those will come in the next update.

    Am I missing anything else?

    Dcowboy7...I changed the top of the list to include those separate lines.

    Also, the last few updates have incorporated a two-tone color scheme for blue, red, and green to give them a bit more pop.
     
  10. Aug 27, 2010 #70 of 353
    QuickDrop

    QuickDrop Hall Of Fame

    1,118
    0
    Jul 20, 2007
    Assuming that the hope of this list is to accurately describe to potential satellite subscribers what each provider offers, I think it's a good idea to include the status of channels neither provider has. People might have read about them somewhere and are interested. A definitive "NO" on the chart is better than having it missing altogether. That way they don't have to wonder whether something was missed.
     
  11. Aug 27, 2010 #71 of 353
    James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    45,749
    985
    Apr 17, 2003
    Michiana
    More than one provider offers them nationally ... but they are intended for regional audiences - just like regional affiliates of broadcast networks are intended for their own markets.

    IIRC the channels themselves are still blacked out and one must find the games on channels dedicated to the sports package in question. So to watch all of the content on a distant RSN one would have to find it across several channels that would change on a daily basis.

    True. Everyone who does a fair count creates a special place for them. The argument is over whether or not they count. I don't recall anyone listing them all as "Standard HD" channels like ESPN. Even those who count them count them with an asterisk.

    Which puts them in a category to be noted but not counted.

    The primary issue to remember with the AVS list is that it is not focused on satellite. Satellite companies DO carry RSNs nationwide. I won't fault a person without satellite for not considering RSNs as nationwide carried channels. But I will remain cautious in how I count them.
     
  12. Aug 27, 2010 #72 of 353
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 Active Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    They count on the list here. AVS can choose not to count them. They are national channels featuring regional sports. There is much more to offer from RSN's beyond professional sports.
     
  13. Aug 27, 2010 #73 of 353
    woj027

    woj027 Icon

    930
    8
    Sep 3, 2007
    Portland, OR
    Yea these two RSN's are out there, just not on DirecTV or Dish.
     
  14. Aug 27, 2010 #74 of 353
    James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    45,749
    985
    Apr 17, 2003
    Michiana
    Agreed ... and that's why I put them in with the premiums where DirecTV places them instead of as a complete footnote. Full time channels "counted".
     
  15. Aug 27, 2010 #75 of 353
    James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    45,749
    985
    Apr 17, 2003
    Michiana
    Those two may be the only truly "regional" sports networks until the FCC forces them to allow carriage. They may end up being offered like SportsSouth or Cox Sports New Orleans.
     
  16. Aug 27, 2010 #76 of 353
    woj027

    woj027 Icon

    930
    8
    Sep 3, 2007
    Portland, OR
    Quite annoying that comcast isn't willing to put these channels up either for a reasonable rate, or at all.
     
  17. Aug 27, 2010 #77 of 353
    QuickDrop

    QuickDrop Hall Of Fame

    1,118
    0
    Jul 20, 2007
    I just want to say that my points about why I don't consider RSNs national channels was posted in another thread where a long discussion concerning the nature of RSNs was discussed. Nothing I wrote was meant to apply directly to this thread.

    As for RSNs as it applies to the way the OP counts them, I have no problem including them as long as they are separated out, which the OP does.

    I do think that (possible) full time RSNs and part time RSNs should be kept separate. I question whether either should be included in the full channels count since they are unique to even premium channels because you have to subscribe to several packages to make them resemble full time channels. At the very least, there should be footnotes to explain what is required to make "full time RSNs" "full time" since it's not as simple as just subscribing to them.
     
  18. Aug 27, 2010 #78 of 353
    Syzygy

    Syzygy Hall Of Fame

    1,306
    0
    Dec 5, 2005
    Beautiful, jewel-like red, blue & green boxes! Hot diggety!
     
  19. Aug 27, 2010 #79 of 353
    David Ortiz

    David Ortiz Save the Clock Tower!!

    2,427
    75
    Aug 21, 2006
    Fresno, CA
    I am a Yankee fan living in Fresno, CA. With DIRECTV I can subscribe to MLB Extra Innings and watch virtually all of the Yankees schedule, with Yankee announcers. DIRECTV provides the most HD MLB games, usually providing both home and away team's feeds for MLB Extra Innings subscribers. DIRECTV can do this because they carry all of these RSNs on CONUS transponders.

    As a Yankee fan, I wouldn't even consider subscribing to MLB Extra Innings from another provider. I'm sure many other baseball fans appreciate not being forced to watch the "other" team's announcers on DIRECTV.

    If one is a sports fan, and interested in the most HD, then these RSNs are very important in considering channel count.
     
  20. Aug 27, 2010 #80 of 353
    tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    The picture is on a picture hosting site. Some setups (like mine at work) block those sites.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page