1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

Directv may consider buying Hulu again

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by mkdtv21, May 22, 2013.

  1. mkdtv21

    mkdtv21 Legend

    420
    17
    May 27, 2007
  2. Drucifer

    Drucifer New Member

    9,371
    239
    Feb 12, 2009
    NY Hudson...
    That we will pay for.
     
  3. Draconis

    Draconis DIRECTV A-Team

    4,433
    4
    Mar 16, 2007
    Las Vegas, NV
    Another article on it.

    http://mashable.com/2013/05/18/directv-hulu-report/

    My take? TV has been constantly evolving and moving into the internet. I personally have 4 programs installed on my tablet for watching content online.

    To me, a move to buy Hulu (or another company like it) would bolster the DIRECTV Everywhere platform immensely..
     
    1 person likes this.
  4. jerrylove56

    jerrylove56 Godfather

    466
    14
    Jun 14, 2008
    North Alabama
    Netflix would be the better buy, I think. Would put DTV at the top of the heap across the board.
     
  5. Mike Greer

    Mike Greer Hall Of Fame

    1,612
    15
    Jan 20, 2004
    Salt Lake...
    DirecTV needs to do something to survive. As more and more people and content move to the Internet there will be fewer and fewer subscribers for DirecTV. They need to adapt to survive.

    Not going to happen overnight but the ever increasing costs of cable and satellite TV are going to force more viewers to the Internet.

    The middle-man is going to get squeezed. We no long 'need' anyone to force us into bundled programming. Why does Showtime need to pay DirecTV when they can go directly to subscribers over the Internet?
     
  6. Athlon646464

    Athlon646464 Gold Members DBSTalk Gold Club

    3,045
    66
    Feb 23, 2007
    Uxbridge, MA
    Agreed with most of what you said, but D* pays Showtime, not the other way around.
     
  7. Mike Greer

    Mike Greer Hall Of Fame

    1,612
    15
    Jan 20, 2004
    Salt Lake...
    Well... DirecTV takes amount 'A' from subs and pays amount 'B' to Showtime. The difference between the two DirecTV keeps and ads to the bottom line.

    I'd personally pay more for and to Showtime than I pay DirecTV for Showtime if I could have access to their programming online without paying DirecTV anything. That would be a double win for Showtime and cut DirecTV out of the loop.

    Really the few reasons I have DirecTV at all are: Showtime, Sunday Ticket and convenience. If there was way for me to legally pay for Showtime and Sunday Ticket and not involve DirecTV at all I would cancel my DirecTV today. It's only a matter of time....
     
  8. goinsleeper

    goinsleeper Godfather

    673
    17
    May 22, 2012
    Netflix isn't what it was. Hulu is still on the up and up so I think they would be the better buy. Netflix made some bad business choices in the past and I doubt D* would want to go through the effort of repairing relations. At least, I wouldn't.


    I agree entirely.
     
  9. Volatility

    Volatility Legend

    436
    10
    May 22, 2010
    DirecTV acquiring Hulu would be a path in the right direction.
     
  10. Satelliteracer

    Satelliteracer Hall Of Fame

    3,042
    37
    Dec 6, 2006
    The thing is, those costs will just shift to the internet. The media companies aren't going to trade dimes for pennies in this landscape.

    Showtime doesn't pay DIRECTV, DIRECTV pays Showtime a split...this is how Showtime makes money. And think about it for a second, Directv (or Comcast, or Dish, or Verizon, etc, etc) answers all those calls for Showtime, does all the technical work for Showtime, does all the billing for Showtime, does a tremendous amount of marketing and sales for Showtime (or HBO, or Starz, or NFL, etc, etc) that they do not incur right now. All of these entities would have to establish those costly setups AND they have to rely on the customer wanting to have a separate relationship with Disney, and one iwth A&E, and one with Showtime, and one with Discovery, and one with Fox, and one with Viacom, and one with HBO, and one with Starz, and one with the NFL, and one with Big Ten, etc, etc, etc.

    This has a LONG way to go in my opinion and I'm not sure you are going to see the cost savings because I don't believe the content makers are going to make that tradeoff. Just my two cents.
     
  11. west99999

    west99999 Icon

    1,348
    45
    May 11, 2007
    There are reports online stating DTV has put in a bid.
     
  12. Mike Greer

    Mike Greer Hall Of Fame

    1,612
    15
    Jan 20, 2004
    Salt Lake...
    However you want to state it - Showtime charges DirecTV less than they could sell their programming directly to the viewer.

    Either way things are moving to the Internet and hopefully DirecTV has a plan.

    Sure DirecTV markets and supports Showtime etc... But streaming companies could do the same thing.

    It isn't going to happen overnight but there is no question the pay TV model of the 70s and 80s is outdated and is going away. Just take a look at what the 20 something year old kids are doing... How many of them plan on every paying for cable or satellite TV? As the costs of traditional pay TV continue to go insanely up fewer and fewer young people are going to pay...
     
  13. Diana C

    Diana C Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    2,117
    293
    Mar 30, 2007
    New Jersey
    Does anyone think ISPs are just going to let gigabytes of programming flow through their networks for nothing? Why do you think there are more and more caps being placed on data downloads? What about the VAST areas of the country that don't have sufficiently fast internet service? For these reasons, traditional MCOs will continue to dominate the video entertainment landscape for at least a decade yet.

    If Showtime tries to sell their programming directly, they are unlikely to make any more money than they make selling through DirecTV, Dish, Comcast, etc., because they will either have to split the money with the ISPs or price the service to take the bandwidth costs into account so that the bottom line to the viewer is a wash.
     
  14. Mike Greer

    Mike Greer Hall Of Fame

    1,612
    15
    Jan 20, 2004
    Salt Lake...
    I don't think that ISPs are going to 'let gigabytes of programming flow for nothing'. In this 'battle' the ISPs are in a great position... Traditional MCOs have to change is the bottom line.

    Costs are going up - quality programming is not - in fact I'd say having 40 'reality' TV shows a night is not worth $3 let alone $150 a month. As both the cost of Internet and pay TV continue to climb more and more people are going to have to choose one or the other and I think we all know which the majority of people will pick.

    I don't think I'm alone in paying DirecTV mostly out of convenience and a very little programming that I couldn't get online. Sunday Ticket and Showtime are the big ones for me but as costs continue to skyrocket I'm not sure how much longer I'm going to pay.

    If I could get Showtime online I'd personally pay 2 or 3 times what I pay for Showtime through DirecTV but that's just me...
     
  15. Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,153
    546
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    Don't overlook that there are large numbers of people who'll pay a premium for the PQ and convenience of big boy delivery. I will not watch anything on my HiRez computers if I can see it on an actual TV.

    The twenty somethings, not all of whom are streaming now, BTW, will eventually migrate the the higher quality delivery. Of course, some will not. Some will never watch TV. Some will have their own HMCs, and all in between.

    Look at DIRECTV's numbers for subscribers.
     
    1 person likes this.
  16. peds48

    peds48 DIRECTV A-Team DBSTalk Club

    18,451
    918
    Jan 10, 2008
    NY
  17. Mike Greer

    Mike Greer Hall Of Fame

    1,612
    15
    Jan 20, 2004
    Salt Lake...
    Good point on picture quality... I suppose I'm in that boat also.

    It looks like DirecTV's growth has slowed and the cable companies are shrinking. I think the market is pretty much saturated and will likely not get much bigger - and will soon start to slide....
     
  18. RAD

    RAD DIRECTV A-Team

    16,397
    117
    Aug 5, 2002
    Dripping...
    I've said this for awhile now. I think it would be especially smart since Netflix gets the Disney movie library starting in a couple years.
     
  19. Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,153
    546
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    If Samsung's development of a way faster IP comes to fruition, yes, the slide will be visible. Otherwise, DIRECTV will continue to add from former cable subs, though at modest rates. At some point, growth in adult population will be the only thing that drives higher subs, as I agree we are near saturation.
     
  20. Phil T

    Phil T DIRECTV A-Team DBSTalk Club

    2,336
    23
    Mar 25, 2002
    Littleton,...
    I am finding the older I get the less TV I watch. I am 61 and not in the demagraphic the shows are made for any longer. I have helped friends "cut the cord" and go to what ever they can find for free OTA or on the internet. I even know some younger (30's) folks who have done this. The cost of having a HD DVR and a programming package is driving a lot of folks back to basics. Newspapers and magazines have seen this happen and I think DirecTV and the others have to change or watch their number go down.
     

Share This Page