1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DIRECTV Nomad

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by Scott Kocourek, Oct 6, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Sep 8, 2011 #1761 of 2007
    Justin23

    Justin23 Hall Of Fame

    1,218
    1
    Jan 10, 2008
    Hmmmm, interesting. What about trying to add additional devices like your screenshot shows?
     
  2. Sep 8, 2011 #1762 of 2007
    dpeters11

    dpeters11 Hall Of Fame

    16,322
    500
    May 30, 2007
    Cincinnati
    Yep. See the option of the AM21, but no Nomad.
     
  3. Sep 8, 2011 #1763 of 2007
    beeper3000

    beeper3000 AllStar

    62
    0
    Mar 3, 2004
    brings me to the same nomad coming soon website.
     
  4. Sep 8, 2011 #1764 of 2007
    nike5580

    nike5580 AllStar

    75
    0
    Jun 29, 2010
    Pittsfield,...
    I just see the AM21 as well.
     
  5. Sep 9, 2011 #1765 of 2007
    harsh

    harsh Beware the Attack Basset

    21,192
    183
    Jun 14, 2003
    Salem, OR
    From the description, it would seem to be your dish as opposed to the nomad.

    The database weenies at DIRECTV certainly have their problems.
     
  6. Sep 9, 2011 #1766 of 2007
    KenW

    KenW Legend

    213
    0
    Nov 16, 2005
    Doesn't show for me either. Yes, I went to that tab. I see my AM21.
     
  7. Sep 9, 2011 #1767 of 2007
    Justin23

    Justin23 Hall Of Fame

    1,218
    1
    Jan 10, 2008
    Glutton for punishment?
     
  8. Sixto

    Sixto Well-Known Member

    12,224
    94
    Nov 18, 2005
  9. Jeremy W

    Jeremy W Hall Of Fame

    13,447
    0
    Jun 19, 2006
    Sounds like they've made the right call.
     
  10. Justin85

    Justin85 Legend

    121
    0
    Jun 16, 2010
    I agree a subscription model wouldn't be a good option, but if this device only allows the transfer of recordings to a mobile device, why not spend a couple more dollars, get a sling box and watch anything you want, including live tv?
     
  11. Jeremy W

    Jeremy W Hall Of Fame

    13,447
    0
    Jun 19, 2006
    Slingbox requires you to have a constant Internet connection, Nomad will not.
     
  12. Sgt. Slaughter

    Sgt. Slaughter Hall Of Fame

    2,981
    34
    Feb 20, 2009
  13. Beerstalker

    Beerstalker Hall Of Fame

    3,549
    70
    Feb 9, 2009
    Peoria, IL
    Little bit higher than I was hoping (I was thinking more like $99), but not as bad as I feared. Also I'm definitely happy to hear it won't have a monthly fee, I guess they figured between the $7 DVR fee, and $3 MRV fee they couldn't get away with another one.
     
  14. Richierich

    Richierich Hall Of Fame

    8,489
    7
    Jan 10, 2008
    And Internet Connectivity is getting More Expensive with more and more Bandwidth Caps being put in place and with Tiered Pricing Netstreaming is going to be Very Expensive in the near future as more and more savvy technogeeks cause Netstreaming to be more Mainstream!!!
     
  15. Sgt. Slaughter

    Sgt. Slaughter Hall Of Fame

    2,981
    34
    Feb 20, 2009
    Ehh not so sure bout bandwidth caps. Maybe for certain cell providers but even the most greedy of them all cable providers TWC ran trials of tiered data plans and ended up doing away with them I thought.

    Btw where all those ppl at that were saying nomad would for sure have a separate fee? Lol jk
     
  16. YakeVlad

    YakeVlad Legend

    103
    0
    Aug 12, 2011
    The lack of Live TV streaming with Nomad kills my interest in it. I'm disappointed with the fact that despite many other providers offering such a capability that DirecTV failed to step up to the plate.

    I see the bandwidth situation a bit differently. Currently yes that is the direction of things, but we're quickly reaching the boiling point. There are two sides lining up for battle (ISPs and telcos on one side, with streaming services and customer demand on the other). The tension is building and before long a fight is going to break out. The warning shot was already fired with the Net Neutrality debate. That one came close to getting ugly and down right dirty. The next one over pricing and bandwidth will be an all out no-holds slugfest.

    There are more and more streaming services coming out each year with an ever growing customer base demanding additional services. However, the associated bandwidth costs money and someone has to either pay the bill or find a cheaper way to deliver the necessary bandwidth. The ISPs and telcos are reacting now by raising prices to try and slow the growth of heavy bandwidth consuming users on their networks. Their problem today isn't the 2%-5% its the prospect of that small minority becoming a majority. With the number of smartphones sold growing each quarter they are coming closer and closer to that potential. But the current strategy of price increases and bandwidth caps/throttling will only have a temporary effect. Once the smartphone customer base reaches a critical mass the ISPs and telcos hands will be forced one way or another.

    The ISPs and telcos may have been able to sweep away the streaming service companies if they struck when it was all in its infancy, but now they are too many, with too large a customer base, and with an established market clamoring for more. The streaming service companies aren't going to go away, nor is the demand for their products. Now add to that smartphone & tablet manufacturers, smartphone & tablet OS makers, SmartTV's, PS3's, and Xbox360's(soon) which derive marketing and significant sales off of streaming apps. You now have a formidable army of corporations with the deep pockets and legions of lawyers at the ready to take on anyone who tries to affect their bottom line by poisoning the demand for their devices with excessive fees.

    Something has to give and it will. Either the two sides will work it out, or once enough outrage has built up either the ISPs and telcos will divine a solution, being able to drop pricing and caps, or there will be some savvy entrepreneur who comes along with a new business model and technology delivering that for which customers are looking. Necessity is the mother of invention.
     
  17. spartanstew

    spartanstew Dry as a bone DBSTalk Club

    12,564
    61
    Nov 16, 2005
    Wylie, Texas
    And IMO, that's what will make Nomad better than what the others offer. If what I've read is true, they stepped up to the plate and hit a homer. With everyone and their brother offering GO products with an internet connection, that seems almost pointless.
     
  18. YakeVlad

    YakeVlad Legend

    103
    0
    Aug 12, 2011
    I respect your opinion and I recognize there are others out there that share your position. Don't get me wrong. I think that the ability to transfer DVR content to mobile devices is an important capability and a good addition to DirecTV's offerings. However, IMHO it is half of a solution, just as TV Everywhere offerings from other providers are half solutions. Here's why I say that:

    Scenario 1
    You're away from home, but somewhere that you have Wifi / 4G / 3G access. You want to watch the new episode of (insert show name) or a big game live. With the TV Everywhere offerings that's no problem. However, if you're somewhere that you don't have access you're up the creek on being able to watch anything (no recorded content).

    Scenario 2
    You're away from home, but somewhere that you don't have Wifi / 4G / 3G access. You want to watch the latest episode of (insert show name) or a movie. With Nomad that's no problem. However, if you're somewhere that you do have access and you want to watch today/tonight's new episode or the big game live, you're up the creek on being able to watch anything (no Live TV content).

    Scenario 3
    You're away from home, but somewhere that you have Wifi / 4G / 3G access. You forgot to transfer the latest episode of (insert show name) or a movie onto your mobile device before you left home. So you open up your handy mobile app, which authenticates your registered device and stream the DVR content to it. None of the providers that I'm aware of have a solution for this, a gaping whole in the current solutions.

    Both scenarios 1 and 2 are HALF solutions as they both have their limitations and hinder your ability to view the content you're really after. A complete solution would have 3 important elements:

    1. Live TV streaming
    2. Ability to transfer DVR content
    3. Ability to stream DVR content
     
  19. Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,345
    578
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    I understand that that's what you'd like. Others, too.

    But I am quite happy taking my iPad with me, with a bunch of shows I might like to see already on there. If there's something I have to see that night, I'll find it live, or simply record it at home and wait till I get back.

    The expense of having it your way has to be high.
     
  20. Jeremy W

    Jeremy W Hall Of Fame

    13,447
    0
    Jun 19, 2006
    Not really. Although it requires two devices, a Nomad and a Slingbox would take care of all three scenarios.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page