1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DirecTV/Viacom Dispute?

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by danpeters, Jul 9, 2012.

  1. Jul 10, 2012 #41 of 3058
    jeffgbailey

    jeffgbailey Legend

    213
    1
    Feb 28, 2008
    not anymore. Viacom and CBS split back in 06 into 2 separate companies. So no locals are affected
     
  2. Jul 10, 2012 #42 of 3058
    capt14k

    capt14k New Member

    1
    0
    Jul 10, 2012
    Viacom says 26 channels Directv says 17 channels which is it and exactly what channels are they. Honestly I can care less about MTV, BET, VH1, LOGO Spike is OK but I can live without it. The Nickelodeon Channels I would like to have. Viacom is asking for an absurd price increase 30% or $1B is way too much. Most channels beside the Nickelodeon Networks show nothing but garbage reality shows. Viacom wants all their channels or nothing because no one would pay for anything but possibly the Nickelodeon Channels and $1B for just those channels can't be justified. If anyone knows which side is telling the truth and the complete channel list affected could you please post.
     
  3. Jul 10, 2012 #43 of 3058
    tulanejosh

    tulanejosh Godfather

    446
    10
    May 23, 2008
    Neither is being truthful.
     
  4. Jul 10, 2012 #44 of 3058
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    It's usually the media companies that start the mudslinging first.

    I say dump the channels.

    I might miss TV Land and Spike..... but ah well.
     
  5. Jul 10, 2012 #45 of 3058
    scott0702

    scott0702 Member

    246
    1
    Nov 25, 2006
    Los Angeles, CA
    They've updated their Facebook page but not the directvpromise site yet. It's probably coming soon.
     
  6. Jul 10, 2012 #46 of 3058
    kevinturcotte

    kevinturcotte Active Member

    3,957
    1
    Dec 19, 2006
    Outside...
    I say dump the channels for awhile. Let Viacom explain to their advertisers how they're suddenly 20 million viewers less. Watch their stock drop. Then renegotiate next week.
     
  7. Jul 10, 2012 #47 of 3058
    caseyf5

    caseyf5 Member

    273
    9
    Mar 21, 2009
    Bethpage,...
    Hello everyone,

    Another typical dispute between the content provider and DirecTV. Following the trend the content providers will reach a point that the content will be rejected due to overvaluation of the content vs the ability of the subscribers to pay. As others have noted the subscribers income is increasing at a very small rate, not at all or actually decreasing. The subscriber base will eventually dwindle thus making the system a candidate for collapse. :soapbox:
     
  8. Jul 10, 2012 #48 of 3058
    kevinturcotte

    kevinturcotte Active Member

    3,957
    1
    Dec 19, 2006
    Outside...
    Interesting comments on Facebook about breach of contract if channels are dropped. Is there anything in the contract about just how many channels they're allowed to drop before you can be let out of your contract? Can they just turn EVERYTHING off and you still legally have to continue to pay monthly or pay an ETF?
     
  9. Jul 10, 2012 #49 of 3058
    Davenlr

    Davenlr Geek til I die

    9,136
    27
    Sep 16, 2006
    If I recall from reading it, it just says it is at their discretion to add/drop channels. They would probably do like DISH did, and add channels to fill in the holes. There are lots of channels they dont carry they could pick up.
     
  10. Jul 10, 2012 #50 of 3058
    Inkosaurus

    Inkosaurus Icon

    678
    1
    Jul 29, 2011
    Err what? FX, FSN and Natgeo were dark on Dish Network for about 28 days I dont know where your getting your "6 months" from but it is not correct.

    Also whats this talk of being blindsided? I get that DTV might have been blind sided by the crawls but I dont see how they could be blind sided by contracts expiring o_O
     
  11. Jul 10, 2012 #51 of 3058
    espnjason

    espnjason Armchair Referee

    529
    2
    Sep 30, 2008
    I don't even know how Viacom could justify a 30% increase.

    MTV has been crap since Beavis & Butthead went off the air, Comedy Central isn't all that funny, the other 'music' channels fail to live to their names, and Nickelodeon is starting to get questionable.

    They'll be fortunate if they get 5%
     
  12. Jul 10, 2012 #52 of 3058
    kevinturcotte

    kevinturcotte Active Member

    3,957
    1
    Dec 19, 2006
    Outside...
    A
    All those reality shows they air cost SO MUCH to make don't you know :rolleyes:
     
  13. Jul 10, 2012 #53 of 3058
    Jeffro

    Jeffro AllStar

    79
    2
    Dec 23, 2006
    If Viacom is saying 26 channels and DirecTV is saying 17 channels does this possibily mean the new contract has 26 channels and not just 17 channels. That would probably justify the 30% increase. I saw Epix is one of their networks at Viacom's website, I do believe. Is this what Jim Norton meant when he said Epix is coming to DirecTV in July? Viacom and DirecTV did add channels to their contract back in 2005 that I saw on DirecTV's news release way back then.
     
  14. Jul 10, 2012 #54 of 3058
    espnjason

    espnjason Armchair Referee

    529
    2
    Sep 30, 2008
    I do like what is on Spike even after the UFC jumped ship. But really, I don't love them that much to warrant that increase.
     
  15. Jul 10, 2012 #55 of 3058
    Inkosaurus

    Inkosaurus Icon

    678
    1
    Jul 29, 2011
    unfortunately shows like "snooki goes to mexico to meet her biological parents" probably do cost small fortune, in paying for booze and ratty appartments/condos lol.

    Unfortunately millions of tools tune into that terrible programming even on reruns and Viacom is probably using those viewer ratings as a justification for there rate hike.
     
  16. Jul 10, 2012 #56 of 3058
    espnjason

    espnjason Armchair Referee

    529
    2
    Sep 30, 2008
    I counted 17 channels unless Viacom is counting their HD feeds of select channels plus Epix, otherwise the math is wrong somewhere.

     
  17. Jul 10, 2012 #57 of 3058
    Birdieman30

    Birdieman30 AllStar

    69
    0
    Aug 25, 2008
    Maybe the glass is half full. If they lose 17 or so Viacomm channels, D* would then have the bandwith to put a dent in the wish list from the Anticipation thread.
     
  18. Jul 10, 2012 #58 of 3058
    Araxen

    Araxen Icon

    792
    6
    Dec 18, 2005
    Here we go again another company that doesn't know how to make money with ad revenue and needs to stick it to the consumer instead. If I lived alone I would drop pay TV totally.
     
  19. Jul 10, 2012 #59 of 3058
    alnielsen

    alnielsen Godfather

    748
    24
    Dec 31, 2006
    ...- .....
    I watch Spike and VH1C, but I would like D* to put the screws to them. I don't want my bill to rise.
     
  20. Jul 10, 2012 #60 of 3058
    zimm7778

    zimm7778 Hall Of Fame

    1,201
    5
    Nov 11, 2007
    I think it was maybe a day and a half.
     

Share This Page