1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

Dish drops AMC (+WeTV, IFC & Sundance)

Discussion in 'General DISH™ Discussion' started by lparsons21, May 4, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. georule

    georule Hall Of Fame

    1,603
    5
    Mar 31, 2010
    The marketing dept doesn't advertise your own competitive disadvantages. Never seen a DISH or Comcast ad "STILL WITHOUT SUNDAY TICKET!!"

    Competitive advantages are actually more valuable and useable on the good side than competitive disadvantages are on the downside. And often competitive disadvantages you can spin as value/frugal cost advantage even further limiting the damage.

    Of course, we'll never know for sure, and it is possible the bad blood had just gotten too bad over Voom. . . but I have a feeling that if DirecTV still didn't have AMC in HD, the odds a new DISH/AMC deal would have gotten done would have improved.
     
  2. joyandjerry

    joyandjerry AllStar

    59
    0
    Jul 3, 2012
    I do realize that. We have a great Panny Blu-Ray that was very reasonable. To clarify, we just don't feel the need to purchase another computer and pay for an internet connection (for our home), as we are paying for this at work. (We're self-employed.) I'm sure that I spend more than enough time on it here! :lol:
     
  3. tampa8

    tampa8 Godfather/Supporter

    1,976
    32
    Mar 30, 2002
    I think it's a good point, though I would not say it would play much of a part. Dish was very mad at the Voom lawsuit, I'm not sure unless AMC allowed no carriage of WE and IFC would Dish have negotiated harder.
     
  4. fudpucker

    fudpucker Godfather

    1,068
    54
    Jul 23, 2007
    NW Iowa
    Wow. From the linked article:

    It really looks like Dish has been legally mis-behaving in this thing, and such moves make their chances of winning this thing look slim.
     
  5. Stewart Vernon

    Stewart Vernon Doctor Whom Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    21,486
    360
    Jan 7, 2005
    Kittrell, NC
    It isn't like the courts don't get stuff wrong... I'm not defending Dish here exactly... but just because a judge rules something, doesn't make it factual... it just makes it legally enforceable. It wouldn't be the first time IF you find out after all this shakes out that the Judge had an axe to grind and was biased.

    I'm not saying this is the case... I'm just saying, it could be... and we wouldn't find out until much later.
     
  6. fudpucker

    fudpucker Godfather

    1,068
    54
    Jul 23, 2007
    NW Iowa
    Yeah, it could be that the Judge had a Dish installer drop a dish on his mother's kittens. But more likely it is what it seems.
     
  7. Stewart Vernon

    Stewart Vernon Doctor Whom Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    21,486
    360
    Jan 7, 2005
    Kittrell, NC
    Probably so... but it was worth the reminder that our court system is all too often like our sports competitions.

    The best team doesn't always win... sometimes a less talented team wins. Nobody even has to cheat, but when a 2-14 team beats a 15-1 team nobody would argue the 2-14 team was overall the better team....

    Similarly... people are convicted of things they actually didn't do AND let go for things they actually did... so it doesn't necessarily follow that because a judge "rules" something in the Dish vs Voom case that it makes it fact... it just makes it a judgment in court.
     
  8. fudpucker

    fudpucker Godfather

    1,068
    54
    Jul 23, 2007
    NW Iowa
    Would you have posted the same thing if the rulings had gone against AMC and I had posted it doesn't look good for them? ;)

    (Just poking at you, bias is cool on web forums, in fact it is expected and makes them more fun. :) )
     
  9. clotter

    clotter AllStar

    106
    1
    Apr 12, 2008
    I was really hoping this whole issue would be taken care of before the premier of the new season of The Walking Dead.

    Like all things, I know others could care less about AMC shows, but several of their shows are favorites of my family and I. Already missed the final season of Breaking Bad, am missing Hell on Wheels, and beginning tomorrow will sorely be missing The Walking Dead. It's only my humble opinion, but I feel my Dish subscription has lost roughly 20% of it's value. :mad:
     
  10. RasputinAXP

    RasputinAXP Kwisatz Haderach of Cordcuttery

    3,145
    11
    Jan 23, 2008
    AMC wanted to be paid as the channel with Breaking Bad, Mad Men and The Walking Dead.

    Except Breaking Bad is done, Mad Men is ending (next year? I forget) and that leaves them with The Walking Dead.

    It's not worth what they were asking.
     
  11. clotter

    clotter AllStar

    106
    1
    Apr 12, 2008
    Yes, I understand all the angles, but it doesn't change my humble opinion. ;)
     
  12. mike1977

    mike1977 Legend

    225
    8
    Aug 26, 2005
  13. Stewart Vernon

    Stewart Vernon Doctor Whom Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    21,486
    360
    Jan 7, 2005
    Kittrell, NC
    Actually... with regard to this particular point... yes, I would. A judgement is court is not necessarily a statement of fact, no matter which side it is for.

    The courtroom ends up being a different kind of popularity contest sometimes... where you're either trying to please the judge or jury more than necessarily prove a point of law.

    I'm sure there are judgements in this case that will go against Voom that are not necessarily truth either. It does cut both ways.
     
  14. RVRambler

    RVRambler Legend

    151
    1
    Dec 5, 2004
    But when Dish 'destroyed' evidence (allegedly) wanted by the court, how can you argue 'in favor' of that action (by anyone), no matter which side you are 'biased' toward.

    I would find it unacceptable if Voom had destroyed evidence needed in court, and Dish was guilty of that 'allegedly', so sometimes ppl ARE guilty, but just hide behind the lawyers, hoping for .......

    As noted by others, the court system is absolutely NOT about 'truth', it is ALL about who presents the 'best' argument to sway judge/jury toward their side of the argument, nothing less or more!

    Academics 'usually' argue about the 'truth' of a thing, NOT lawyers!! Most politicians are lawyers, thus our 'irrational' US congress/senate!!

    As for me, I will find a way to watch/not miss 'Breaking Bad' & 'Mad Men' if either show ever comes on again, AMC really plays games with their audiences, don't they?!
     
  15. Stewart Vernon

    Stewart Vernon Doctor Whom Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    21,486
    360
    Jan 7, 2005
    Kittrell, NC
    While certainly not on the same scale... we just had a convicted rapist set free because of new information that basically overturned the original verdict some 20+ years ago.

    So... not in the same neighborhood at all as the Voom suit... but still proves my basic point that a court decision does not indicate absolute truth... it just indicates a verdict/judgment.

    It is fair to say "the judge ruled that Dish destroyed documents"... it is not fair to say "Dish destroyed documents"... it might seem like semantics, but it really isn't.

    Basically, you can lose in court but still be right... it just means your side was outdone by the other side... not necessarily that they are right and you are wrong.

    Courts can be a funny thing.
     
  16. fudpucker

    fudpucker Godfather

    1,068
    54
    Jul 23, 2007
    NW Iowa
    Except. when you read reports of the trial, Dish had no real defense against the ruling that they destroyed key documents. And it isn't opinion, they did not turn over the documents he ordered them to turn over.

    I get it if you have spent months making out AMC and their boss to be the bad guy, and defending Dish, but so far these haven't been controversial rulings. Yeah, you can say Jerry Sandusky has been accused and convicted of abusing a lot of young kids but, hey, that doesn't really mean anything since courts can be wrong, but sometimes you really have to be biased to ignore what's going on. Dish destroyed documents that were pertinent to the case, and said, oh, sorry. And they have refused to turn over documents the judge has repeatedly ordered them to turn over. It's not a matter of whether the glove fits.
     
  17. scottchez

    scottchez Icon

    991
    12
    Feb 4, 2003
    Neighbor just called about the missing Walking Dead that starts tonight on AMC.
    He already got a FREE Roku from Dish, now he also got a free $35 credit to pay for the Amazon Subscription to the Walking Dead to watch on the internet. Wow. Dish must be in this legal thing for the long run. Could be several more years of no AMC as I am sure if dish looses they will appeal to a higher court.
     
  18. ehilbert1

    ehilbert1 Godfather

    312
    10
    Jan 22, 2007
    Exactly!!! Sometimes it seems like Dish will be defended no matter what. There could be a video tape of them destroying evidence that damns them and people will still defend them.
    It's TV guys and not a sports team. I just don't get why their defended to the death. Ok bad analogy but you get it.
     
  19. Stewart Vernon

    Stewart Vernon Doctor Whom Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    21,486
    360
    Jan 7, 2005
    Kittrell, NC
    *sigh*

    You're clearly biased towards AMC... so you're taking things as fact that can't possibly be proven as fact.

    As I understand things... Dish deleted some emails, Voom says those were important evidence that Dish destroyed... Dish says no, they are not, and that they were accidentally deleted by an automated process and they had no reason to save them.

    The judge ruled that Dish "should have known" to save them, and as such is issuing instruction to the jury that Dish has been ruled to have destroyed evidence.

    Those are the facts as I know them pertaining to the case.

    HOWEVER... in terms of the real-world... since Dish destroyed the emails, and admits to doing so... and Voom apparently does not have copies of these emails... it is pure conjecture as to what they may or may not have contained relevant to the case! So... we don't know if Dish truly destroyed any evidence or not, there is no way to know this factually.

    Hence... the judge made a ruling relevant to the court case... but it in no way means factually that Dish actually destroyed evidence.

    That was the point I was making... just like why we say things like "allegedly" even if we feel confident that someone did something.

    The ruling of a judge, jury, or court does not have to be a statement of fact. It is merely a decision of the judge, jury, and court... People win cases without evidence and lose cases with evidence all the time.

    There is no bias here... You're seeing bias where there is none. In fact, that you are even bringing up the Voom lawsuit in this thread shows you are biased towards the AMC camp trying to convince everyone that the only reason Dish isn't carrying their channels is the unrelated lawsuit.

    The lawsuit is the lawsuit... AMC carriage today (or lack thereof) is a horse of a different color.

    Yes, one probably colors the conversation of the other... but don't forget... Dish carried AMC channels long after the Voom lawsuit... and Dish added AMC-HD during the Voom lawsuit as well. IF it was truly about the Voom lawsuit, we would have lost these channels years ago!

    So... they surely play a part... but if AMC had made what Dish felt was a fair offer, we probably would still have the channels today.

    Thus... the Voom lawsuit really has nothing to do with AMC at this point... and you show your bias by bringing it up.

    All I was pointing out was that whether Dish did anything wrong or not related to that lawsuit, the judge's ruling doesn't say anything except he ruled that way. This would still be 100% my position if the same judge had instead ruled that Dish did not destroy documents relevant to the case. It would still be just a ruling, not a statement of fact, either way...

    For that matter, Dish will likely have rulings go their way that do not necessarily reflect fact. That's the way our court system works, unfortunately.
     
  20. Eksynyt

    Eksynyt Icon

    868
    11
    Feb 8, 2008
    When Dish loses this lawsuit and billions of dollars, the last straw will be them losing all of the ESPN channels when that contract is up.

    Welcome to DirecTV, guys.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page