1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

DISH to release the 411 receiver by end of the month?

Discussion in 'DISH™ High Definition Discussion' started by SummitAdvantageRetailer, Nov 10, 2005.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Nov 10, 2005 #1 of 144
    SummitAdvantageRetailer

    SummitAdvantageRetailer Godfather

    422
    0
    Feb 20, 2005
    I was bombarded by customers so I couldn't watch the Retailer Chat too well but did any other retailer catch that they're releasing the 411 by the end of the month? They didn't announce a new satellite launch for MPEG4, though. And how come no one did a retailer chat recap this time?! It was chock full of info.
     
  2. Nov 10, 2005 #2 of 144
    Jason Nipp

    Jason Nipp Analog Geek in a Digital World Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Gold Club DBSTalk Club

    10,064
    2
    Jun 10, 2004
    Northern...
    Don't need a new bird. Technically they could use the same sat for both MPEG2 and 4 simultaneously from what I have come to understand.
     
  3. Nov 10, 2005 #3 of 144
    digiblur

    digiblur Guest

    106
    0
    Jun 10, 2005
    Yep... no new bird needed. They could even run analog on the transponders if they wanted, as long as you had an analog receiver to pick it up.
     
  4. Nov 10, 2005 #4 of 144
    JohnH

    JohnH Hall Of Fame

    7,802
    0
    Apr 22, 2002
    If analog were legal in the DBS band.


    Yep, they can even intermix Mpeg2 and H.264(Mpeg4) on the same transponder.
     
  5. Nov 10, 2005 #5 of 144
    rocatman

    rocatman Icon

    815
    0
    Nov 27, 2003

    Correct me if I am wrong but I don't think they could intermix QPSK and 8PSK on the same transponder.
     
  6. Nov 10, 2005 #6 of 144
    SummitAdvantageRetailer

    SummitAdvantageRetailer Godfather

    422
    0
    Feb 20, 2005
    I actually meant to ask where (which satellite and transponders) the new MPEG4 satellite programming will be uplinked and available from. Right now, there are only test channels uplinked but no HD LIL MPEG4 channels uplinked. They didn't mention where the new MPEG4 channels would come from and you bet I'm VERY curious.
     
  7. Nov 10, 2005 #7 of 144
    JohnH

    JohnH Hall Of Fame

    7,802
    0
    Apr 22, 2002
    That is correct. QPSK and 8PSK are modulation techniques. Mpeg2 and H.264(Mpeg4) are encoding techniques.
     
  8. Nov 10, 2005 #8 of 144
    JohnH

    JohnH Hall Of Fame

    7,802
    0
    Apr 22, 2002
    It's a secret. As far as Digital Locals are concerned, they may not actually know either. The plan for those may still be in formation. We have seen what appears to be some HD Distant Networks activity on EchoStar 5, but they have not said that is the plan for those.
     
  9. Nov 10, 2005 #9 of 144
    juan ellitinez

    juan ellitinez Icon/Supporter DBSTalk Gold Club

    1,982
    0
    Jan 31, 2003
    I know this queston would be rediculed at the "other" site...If they were to put 3 HD channels on a transponder .would they be able to encode them mpeg2 and mpeg4 simutaneously..or would they have to put two different verisions( mpeg2 and mpeg4) of the same channel taking up twice as much bandwidth?
     
  10. Nov 10, 2005 #10 of 144
    JohnH

    JohnH Hall Of Fame

    7,802
    0
    Apr 22, 2002
    The latter, but it would not take as much as twice the bandwidth of an Mpeg2 channel.

    3 HD channels would likely not fit.
     
  11. Nov 12, 2005 #11 of 144
    tnsprin

    tnsprin Hall Of Fame

    2,129
    0
    Mar 15, 2003
    Apparently they showed a 411 and a 211vip. Anyone now anything about the 211vip, other then it has an ethernet adapter (for future use).
     
  12. Nov 12, 2005 #12 of 144
    James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    45,751
    985
    Apr 17, 2003
    Michiana
    The best solution would be to encode it in MPEG2 only or MPEG4 only. MPEG4 receivers could get both types of channels. MPEG2 receivers would just get the MPEG2 channels. Whether they choose MPEG2 or MPEG4 depends on the audience. (E* has announced plans to make all new HD MPEG4.)

    E* CAN mix MPEG2 and MPEG4 on the same transponder - and newer receivers can pick up 8PSK receivers - so if E* wanted to introduce new channels in 8PSK/MPEG2 and upgrade receivers as needed for old subscribers they could. (8PSK can put 18 SD channels in the space of 12.)

    JL
     
  13. Nov 15, 2005 #13 of 144
    James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    45,751
    985
    Apr 17, 2003
    Michiana
    Update: Based on Tech Forum -

    The 411 and 211 will be released within a week or two - both to replace the 811 (Basic HD receiver) in the shift to MPEG4. The 211 is the newer model.

    Evidently between the design of the 411 and now they came up with a reason for an ethernet port, which is only on the 211. Given the choice of just these two I'd look at the one with more ports. :)

    (But I'm holding out for a "422" or a DVR anyways so 211 vs 411 doesn't matter to me.)

    JL
     
  14. Nov 15, 2005 #14 of 144
    invaliduser88

    invaliduser88 Welcome to Torchwood DBSTalk Gold Club

    1,602
    0
    Apr 23, 2002
    Marketing BS...Report viewing habits...other privacy abuses?:confused:

    I'd like to see DVR's with ethernet to allow programming to be moved between them to view on other TV in my house other than the one that I originally recorded it on.
     
  15. Nov 15, 2005 #15 of 144
    Jason Nipp

    Jason Nipp Analog Geek in a Digital World Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Gold Club DBSTalk Club

    10,064
    2
    Jun 10, 2004
    Northern...
    I eagerly await the ethernet port and it's full functionality. I like the ideas behind it. Now if they can get those ideas fully functional?
     
  16. Nov 15, 2005 #16 of 144
    UTFAN

    UTFAN Legend

    230
    0
    Nov 11, 2005
    I don't watch Tech Forums, engineers talking to other engineers. Hate to critizize. but ya'll make it even more complicated.

    At the risk of sounding obtuse, I have a 921, (yes, I know it's a lemon but it works generally good most of the time) will I be able to get additional HD channels or will I have to fork out more money for a receiver to handle what ever the latest technology is?

    I just like to come home and watch TV, I don't care from which satellite, just need to know my options.

    Thanks to whomever can translate gooblygook into English!

    UTFAN
    (See everyone at the Rose Bowl!) :confused:
     
  17. Nov 15, 2005 #17 of 144
    olgeezer

    olgeezer Guest

    1,833
    0
    Dec 5, 2003
    My brother Jim lived in Westcliffe, raised some alpacas and caused other mayhem a few years ago. The answer is yes soon maybe
     
  18. Nov 15, 2005 #18 of 144
    Jason Nipp

    Jason Nipp Analog Geek in a Digital World Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Gold Club DBSTalk Club

    10,064
    2
    Jun 10, 2004
    Northern...
    Just for clarification, It is my understanding that the 411 and the 211 are the same product. They decided to use 211 for the product nomenclature in lieu of 411.
     
  19. Nov 15, 2005 #19 of 144
    Mikey

    Mikey Hall Of Fame

    1,295
    0
    Oct 26, 2004
    I understood from the Retailer Chat that they are indeed two different receivers.
     
  20. Nov 15, 2005 #20 of 144
    Jason Nipp

    Jason Nipp Analog Geek in a Digital World Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Gold Club DBSTalk Club

    10,064
    2
    Jun 10, 2004
    Northern...
    Only the ethernet connector distingishes the two, which Jackson explained. The 211 is the final released product. The 411 will not be mass produced. Again, this is just my understanding.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page