1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Distant Networks and your opinions

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Programming' started by cgmiller7171, Oct 8, 2013.

  1. slice1900

    slice1900 Well-Known Member

    7,209
    716
    Feb 14, 2013
    Iowa
    Some people have no idea what the Constitution says, so they think it says the government can't do anything that affects them negatively.
     
    1 person likes this.
  2. JosephB

    JosephB Icon

    1,399
    45
    Nov 14, 2005
    Birmingham, AL
    Which article or amendment says you have the right to watch an out of market local channel? Just curious, I must've missed it.

    The local stations are the ones that hold this stuff up. Don't expect it to change, either. The only alternative is elimination of local TV and the networks turning into national channels like the rest of cable.
     
  3. peds48

    peds48 Genius. DBSTalk Club

    19,924
    1,055
    Jan 10, 2008
    NY
    We should be able to watch anything we want on satellite TV. To me these out of town local option. no being available is so backwards and a hit on out constitutional rights of freedom to watch what we want to.
    remember that your rights end when the right for the other starts. so your right to watch free TV ends when the right for the local station to charge you begins.....


    Sent from my iPad using DBSTalk
     
  4. ejbvt

    ejbvt AllStar

    1,534
    140
    Aug 14, 2011
    VT
    It is ridiculous that the FCC can't make Comcast give us the missing CSN channels but they can tell us what local channels we should get. Local channels are still needed and provide advertising for local businesses and we should help keep that cost low. HOWEVER, there needs to be something done about specific network availability (CW is not available everywhere and a pain to get, and then it's not HD) and others. I receive a different lineup OTA than I do with Directv but that doesn't matter. I would like to see this:

    A more-regional DMA system. If your market is missing a channel (or doesn't have it in HD), bring it on from a neighboring DMA.

    Take into account the OTA coverage patterns of specific channels and overlay that map with the DMA. I shouldn't be stuck with a terrible ABC affiliate that I PAY FOR while I get two others OTA for FREE that are great. But I am. Basically, take a coverage areas, above, say 0 dB on the TV fool charts, and put in the zip codes. The spotbeam maps will cover most if not all channels. For areas with little or no OTA coverage, use a DMA-style system, but regional as noted above (within the limitations of spotbeams.)

    Fix the AM21 mess and allow all subchannels in with a guide, even if said guide only have 2 hours from the OTA signal. I know there are workarounds, but it really doesn't need to be that way.

    No one should pay for TV and not have CBS, Fox, NBC, ABC, CW, Univision, and ION - ALL IN HD. Those are basic channels that most people get for free OTA. Telemundo, My Network, Unimas, and perhaps a few others are close to being on that list too. (I know Directv has IONeHD, but many cable companies do not have any ION).

    The more options for locals the better. Quality neighboring markets that send signal for free should be able to compete for my tax dollars the same as another channel that the government forces on me. What happened to capitalism/competition?
     
  5. JosephB

    JosephB Icon

    1,399
    45
    Nov 14, 2005
    Birmingham, AL
    Rules for locals on satellite are codified in law. The FCC has nothing to do with it. You literally should call your Congressman.
     
  6. ejbvt

    ejbvt AllStar

    1,534
    140
    Aug 14, 2011
    VT
    FCC = government. Does the FCC have nothing to do with the TV stations they license?

    I also meant to write "spending money" not tax dollars in my last paragraph.
     
  7. James Long

    James Long Ready for Uplink! Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    45,749
    985
    Apr 17, 2003
    Michiana
    The FCC writes regulations that follow the law. The law is written by Congress. Yes, it is all one happy government but one needs to know which windmills to tilt at. In this case, if one does not like the rules that are codified in law one should direct their ire at Congress.

    That is what broadcasters, satellite companies and others are doing. They are talking to Congress. Trying to get the next version of the law to be more favorable to their side of the argument.
     
  8. JosephB

    JosephB Icon

    1,399
    45
    Nov 14, 2005
    Birmingham, AL
    The FCC doesn't really have much to do with retransmission, no. Licensure for broadcast isn't related to retransmission agreements with MVPDs. "The Government" isn't one big monolithic thing.
     
  9. jdspencer

    jdspencer Hall Of Fame

    6,637
    13
    Nov 7, 2003
    Now that's funny! :hurah:
     
  10. Sea bass

    Sea bass Icon

    695
    4
    Jun 9, 2005
    It would be great if east and west feeds of just the network broadcast could be put up. I remember watching FOX wild feeds in the C band days, the channel would light up at 8, national commercials only, where local ads usually run, a network logo or network ads would run. Once the programming was over a 10, there was a FOX logo until the next day or next national network broadcast. What a great way for Directv to make $$$ and keep our bills reasonable...just noticed the upcoming price jump for Premier today...
     
  11. bjlc

    bjlc Icon

    1,062
    7
    Aug 20, 2004
    trust me.. just because D* has locals, YOU DON"T HAVE TO HAVE THEM..I know this from personal tonight's viewing.. and every day for the past 14 years..
     
  12. KyL416

    KyL416 Hall Of Fame

    4,337
    572
    Nov 10, 2005
    Tobyhanna, PA
    That's because you did it 14 years ago and are grandfathered, since then a new rule went into effect that requires them.

    Now, the only way you can signup for a package without them is if you live in a market that has their locals on 119 and have line of sight issues or DirecTV doesn't carry locals for your area. If you fall under those categories the packages are $3 cheaper.
     
  13. slice1900

    slice1900 Well-Known Member

    7,209
    716
    Feb 14, 2013
    Iowa
    Once Directv is able to provide locals for all markets, and without needing 119, that means they won't allow anyone new to get distant networks? Or would they drop them entirely?
     
  14. KyL416

    KyL416 Hall Of Fame

    4,337
    572
    Nov 10, 2005
    Tobyhanna, PA
    There's still small markets that don't have full time affiliates of all of the big 4 networks so they have a remap of one the DNS stations as part of their locals. There's also some counties considered "unserved" because of the shape of the spot beam compared to the size of the market. Not to mention the RV, Marine and Air subscribers who are eligible for DNS in some cases.
     
  15. milton

    milton Cool Member

    265
    14
    Mar 12, 2011
    If Aereo wins at SCOTUS, that could change some things. It would reduce the power that local stations have over Directv, Dish, TWC, etc. in negotiations.
     
  16. slice1900

    slice1900 Well-Known Member

    7,209
    716
    Feb 14, 2013
    Iowa
    Only if those providers made deals with Aereo or set up their own Aereo like service. Relying on streaming for live content like sports is a risky proposition for a provider like Directv that doesn't provide internet service, because they'll be the ones that get the complaints when performance is subpar, but be unable to do anything about it.

    It makes more sense for cable, if it is all contained on their internal network they can insure it reaches every customer's home with the desired level of quality (assuming they also deliver that customer's internet)
     
  17. SeaBeagle

    SeaBeagle Legend

    1,222
    22
    May 7, 2006
    I used to have. C Band dish set up. Then I gave the set up to a friend. That was neat if the wild feeds that are on there. I miss the ability of order the channels individually or a programme group. My best company I used was Turner Satellite. I do wish these was such things available on the DISH and Direct TV dishes.

    Programming satellites on the CBAND Dish was not all that easy. But eventually that was figured out.

    This was like back in 1990. I wonder if CBand offers just as much today as back then.


    Sent from my iPad using DBSTalk mobile app
     
  18. joshjr

    joshjr Hall Of Fame

    4,807
    84
    Aug 2, 2008
    NE Oklahoma
    As KyL416 noted, there are reasons to keep them. There are short markets that do not have all of the big 4. For that reason alone, there will always be a need for DNS feeds until something changes that.
     
  19. Paul Secic

    Paul Secic Hall Of Fame

    6,226
    23
    Dec 16, 2003
    Local news blows.. There are too many Court shows, Judge fill the name in. Just use your iPhone for weather.
     
  20. WB4CS

    WB4CS New Member

    150
    33
    Dec 12, 2013
    Huntsville, AL
    Nope. C-Band (and Ku-Band) are mostly a vast empty sea of nothingness. There are still a few wild feeds, religious, and foreign programming in the clear (both digital and analog), and some of the network feeds are still there. A majority of feeds and "pay" TV channels have gone to digital encryption and are not able to be viewed. The last time I checked, there are about 10 Pay TV channels available for subscription but the number of the available channels has been dwindling down each year.

    Ku-Band is still pretty good to use as a hobby, but don't expect it to replace your cable/D*/E* as your primary source of TV entertainment.
     

Share This Page