1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Gannett Broadcasting and DirecTV contract

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Programming' started by trh, Nov 28, 2012.

  1. Nov 30, 2012 #61 of 123
    harsh

    harsh Beware the Attack Basset

    21,192
    182
    Jun 14, 2003
    Salem, OR
    Probably because the cable companies found out that they weren't paying and they wanted to make sure the DBS companies got equally bent over.
     
  2. Nov 30, 2012 #62 of 123
    harsh

    harsh Beware the Attack Basset

    21,192
    182
    Jun 14, 2003
    Salem, OR
    As I pointed out earlier, the suffering continues for Pac-12 hopefuls and those many HD channels that carriers offer that DIRECTV doesn't.
    If success is measured in churn, DIRECTV is running high (for both the DIRECTV US and DIRECTV LA segments). Same with BBB complaints (DIRECTV 3:1 .vs. DISH). Neither is an indicator happy customers nor a mark of an organization who is "remaining ethical".

    As I observed earlier, you seem to be favoring the viewpoint of a stockholder as opposed to that of a subscriber and even that seems to be mostly a matter of ginormous revenues over not-so-great metrics.

    It seems likely that the Gannett deal will come soon enough and it will be back to business as usual but the battles seem to be more frequent and more public as time goes on.
     
  3. Nov 30, 2012 #63 of 123
    hdtvfan0001

    hdtvfan0001 Well-Known Member

    32,456
    258
    Jul 28, 2004
    It's interesting to note that in at least 2 of the affected cities...the big black annoying banners with bold yellow print "warning" people of the impending potential loss of the local station has been replaced by a softer occasional screen showing up during commercial times.

    Hmmm.....
     
  4. Nov 30, 2012 #64 of 123
    Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,239
    552
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    Suffering, eh?! Yes, a half dozen folks whined and moaned loudly re Pac12, but so what? And many worthy HD channels DIRECTV doesn't carry!!What are they??

    I'll be enjoying the rematch of UCLA and Stanford this afternoon. Name one great game I missed because I don't have the Pac12 Network.....
     
  5. Nov 30, 2012 #65 of 123
    harsh

    harsh Beware the Attack Basset

    21,192
    182
    Jun 14, 2003
    Salem, OR
    There comes a point in every campaign where everyone knows what's at stake and the banners/signs are just plain annoying. I congratulate the stations for recognizing this.
     
  6. Nov 30, 2012 #66 of 123
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 New Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    That's industry wide.

    The fact remains however that DirecTV has been far more successful in actually resolving disputes and/or doing so more quickly than Dish Network has. Given that...plus having more HD channels, superior HD picture quality, and my being repulsed by the Dish penchant for patent theft/contract violation/industry poisoning technology choices...I'm happy with DirecTV.

    Yes, the deal with Gannett will get done. Why? Because DirecTV happens to be good at getting things like this done. As opposed to the revolving door of FAIL that is Dish Network.
     
  7. Nov 30, 2012 #67 of 123
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 New Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    Both sides seem to soften their public posturing when a deal is getting closer to being completed.
     
  8. Nov 30, 2012 #68 of 123
    hdtvfan0001

    hdtvfan0001 Well-Known Member

    32,456
    258
    Jul 28, 2004
    You noticed that too huh? ;)
     
  9. Nov 30, 2012 #69 of 123
    harsh

    harsh Beware the Attack Basset

    21,192
    182
    Jun 14, 2003
    Salem, OR
    This thread is, in part, about how well DIRECTV is doing with both its negotiations and clearly defined segments of its subscribers. If DIRECTV wasn't all about providing the best sports coverage bar none, it wouldn't be a big deal.
    There's a thread for that: http://www.dbstalk.com/showthread.php?t=209073&highlight=channel+anticipation Post #3 has a mostly complete run-down.

    There are ongoing crys for the various CSNs (Philly, Houston, Northwest) that are missing. I'm pretty sure if DIRECTV subscribers were given a crack at MAV TV or Outdoor and Sportsman in HD, they'd enjoy it.
    If Stanford hadn't beat Oregon, you probably would have missed the original matchup. Dodged that bullet -- this time. I'm betting that you didn't have an opportunity to watch the Oregon - UCLA volleyball match.
     
  10. Nov 30, 2012 #70 of 123
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 New Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    Which DirecTV does a much better job of than any other provider in the country. The lone exceptions to to their lineup are very limited. Dish Network is WAY behind in sports content. DirecTV IS the sports leader and no one else even comes close.
     
  11. Nov 30, 2012 #71 of 123
    TMan

    TMan Legend

    216
    1
    Oct 30, 2007
    Here's my dream scenario for locals and broadcast networks that will never, ever come to pass.

    Satellite subscribers would have east and west feeds of the big four broadcast networks, much like HBO, Showtime, etc. These feeds would not be associated with any particular local affiliate. It would be the very same feeds they distribute to their affiliates. They would be dark during hours when the network is not running national programming.

    Of course this would screw up local ads that appear in national programming. :D

    Pacific and Mountain folks could enjoy prime time programming earlier in their local time, if they desired, by watching the east feeds. Central and Eastern folks could enjoy later opportunities to watch or record shows during the west feed.

    Local affiliates would also remain in the lineup, and one could watch network programming on these channels or on the raw feeds mentioned above. This is where local news and syndicated programming would continue to be viewed.

    One could add additional locals from one or more additional DMAs for a small fee, subject to them being present in the spotbeam that reaches your dish. It seems like so many cable companies provide duplicate network affiliates from adjoining DMAs; why can't satellite do this?

    Of course, there would still be carriage fights, but hopefully when a particular network was fighting with a satellite provider, the affiliate carrying that same network wouldn't be fighting with the satellite provider, and vice versa. :nono:

    That is my completely frivolous take on the matter. Yeah, it's all money and advertising and territorial. Bah.
     
  12. Nov 30, 2012 #72 of 123
    harsh

    harsh Beware the Attack Basset

    21,192
    182
    Jun 14, 2003
    Salem, OR
    The NAB puts on a multi-million dollar lobbying effort that you would have to surpass. Let us know when you're getting close and maybe we'll throw in.
     
  13. Nov 30, 2012 #73 of 123
    KyL416

    KyL416 Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    4,207
    538
    Nov 10, 2005
    Tobyhanna, PA
    DirecTV does in some areas, parts of the Hartford market that are close to NYC can get WCBS, WNBC and WNYW and the parts that are close to Boston can get some of their stations.

    Also, while cable can do it, depending on the area, some cable systems have to black out the network programming on the neighboring affiliates and the local affiliates can also invoke the syndex rules blocking duplicate syndicated shows.
     
  14. Nov 30, 2012 #74 of 123
    nmetro

    nmetro Godfather

    940
    53
    Jul 11, 2006
    This ability was available with the large satellite dishes, before the advent of DirecTV and DISH. Matter of fact ABC, NBC, CBS and PBS offered pure wild feeds; originally free, eventually one had to pay for them.

    Of course, Congress, with heavy lobbying by NAB, created the restrictions we see today.

    One note, in Canada not only one can get any major Canadian station on satellite, you can also get the US major networks. I guess CTRC and Parliament are not as bought off as the FCC and Congress.
     
  15. Nov 30, 2012 #75 of 123
    KyL416

    KyL416 Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    4,207
    538
    Nov 10, 2005
    Tobyhanna, PA
    While they do carry the US networks in Canada, during prime time most of them are replaced with a simulcast of the Canadian network whenever the same program is on, so if you were to watch Grey's Anatomy on ABC, you would see CTV's broadcast.
     
  16. Nov 30, 2012 #76 of 123
    Davenlr

    Davenlr Geek til I die

    9,136
    27
    Sep 16, 2006
    Actually, with a big dish, you can get all the networks, and in most cases, all four time zone feeds, free right now. I watch them all the time, especially football. The Canadian ones, however, are all scrambled, and cannot be received in the US. Shame, since I used to watch quite a few programs on CBC.
     
  17. Nov 30, 2012 #77 of 123
    Lefky

    Lefky AllStar

    60
    0
    Jun 22, 2007
    Does anyone know if my local CBS is still gone on Sunday, will DirecTV lift the blackout of the NFL football game my local CBS channel would have normally broadcast?
     
  18. Nov 30, 2012 #78 of 123
    Draconis

    Draconis New Member

    4,433
    4
    Mar 16, 2007
    Las Vegas, NV
    Yep <sigh>
     
  19. Nov 30, 2012 #79 of 123
    HGuardian

    HGuardian Godfather

    429
    0
    Aug 9, 2010
    No. Your local broadcaster has exclusive rights to the broadcast inside your DMA.
     
  20. Nov 30, 2012 #80 of 123
    neeme

    neeme New Member

    4
    0
    Nov 28, 2012
    .
    What out of all markets billing address would I need to get long distance network feeds permitted and would I be able to get both east and west coast feeds? Would an RV account allow this? HR10-250, HR20 and AM21 would provide OTA locals assuming the guide data remains available. Gannet disallowed my HD LDN waiver when they did not even offer HD in their market. How about DirecTV drop all Gannet networks and rather than a bill credit, they ship each affected customer an AM21 upon request. They wouldn't have to pay for what they do not distribute and neither would the customer.
     

Share This Page