1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Google, NFL meeting reportedly includes Sunday Ticket discussions

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Programming' started by Athlon646464, Aug 21, 2013.

  1. Aug 21, 2013 #41 of 133
    Doug Brott

    Doug Brott Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    28,939
    72
    Jul 12, 2006
    Los Angeles
    Wouldn't the IPTV provider be getting the ad money in that case rather than the local channel?
     
  2. Aug 21, 2013 #42 of 133
    pdxBeav

    pdxBeav Godfather

    447
    35
    Jul 5, 2007
    Not if the contracts are structured in such a way that protects the local affiliates.
     
  3. Aug 21, 2013 #43 of 133
    inkahauts

    inkahauts Well-Known Member

    21,940
    1,011
    Nov 13, 2006
    I wonder about them wanting someone to partner with that would allow them to stream every single game...... In non us markets. Expand the reach globally. They already are playing one or two games overseas. How long before try want to expand and have a European nfl league and then have a international championship game?


    Sent from my iPhone using DBSTalk mobile app
     
  4. Aug 21, 2013 #44 of 133
    tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    That would be the only advantage to local commercials. There is no real advantage to having them from the Google (or someone else) view. There are very few local spots on NFL coverage anyway. I doubt that will change much as the demand from national advertisers is not going to drop off any time soon.
     
  5. Aug 21, 2013 #45 of 133
    tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    You may have hit on something. That may be where the talks lead. Not US but international. We know that the current commish has a hard on for international football.
     
  6. Aug 21, 2013 #46 of 133
    pdxBeav

    pdxBeav Godfather

    447
    35
    Jul 5, 2007
    I agree. The only point I was making is that the argument that "the NFL Sunday Ticket can't be more widespread because of the damage to local affiliates" can be solved by other means. Maybe a portion of the subscriber cost goes to his/her local affiliate. Many ways to solve solve most "issues."
     
  7. Aug 21, 2013 #47 of 133
    tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    It is not just commercials and ad time. It is also ratings. They would have to have a mechanism to handle distributing ratings out to the locals, which does not currently exist in the Nielsen model. It is beyond the NFL, Google or the affiliates themselves. It would be a change in the entire rating system at another level. Maybe it will change someday but not in the next year or two.
     
  8. Aug 21, 2013 #48 of 133
    Beerstalker

    Beerstalker Hall Of Fame

    3,515
    66
    Feb 9, 2009
    Peoria, IL
    But it will kill the subscriber rate at bars/casinos/clubs, etc. Which is where DirecTV makes the majority of the money from on Sunday Ticket if you believe what is posted around here.

    If everyone has Sunday Ticket at their own home, why would they want to go to a bar to watch the game. If the bar doesn't get more customers by having Sunday Ticket then why would they bother subscribing to Sunday Ticket, or for that matter why have DirecTV service at all......


    The Nielsen rating model is so outdated I would be ecstatic if something like this happened if it meant that system would finally get tossed out.
     
  9. Aug 21, 2013 #49 of 133
    KyL416

    KyL416 Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    4,203
    538
    Nov 10, 2005
    Tobyhanna, PA
    They already do, Neulion provides NFL Game Pass for viewers outside of the USA and Canada. It streams every NFL game, live audio play by play along with NFL Network and Redzone.
     
  10. Aug 21, 2013 #50 of 133
    joshjr

    joshjr Hall Of Fame

    4,807
    84
    Aug 2, 2008
    NE Oklahoma
    You missunderstand, internet service providers are gonna change the caps again if this happens and even if they dont, streaming all the games in HD would really rack up the usage towards those caps.
     
  11. Aug 21, 2013 #51 of 133
    Bambler

    Bambler Legend

    412
    16
    May 30, 2006
    You know what has to be on the mind of the commissioner: young viewers, who grew up on Youtube, XBox, streaming, etc., tomorrow's audience.

    Smart move Mr. Goodell.
     
  12. Aug 21, 2013 #52 of 133
    mrdobolina

    mrdobolina AllStar

    394
    15
    Aug 28, 2006
    A Mile High
    I have heard "Streaming all of the games in HD will kill everyone's cap" several times in this thread. Would that happen? I mean, as much as everyone thinks? When I have NFLST I only really "watch" 1 game at a time. Perhaps if I had a Genie I would have 1 game in the window and 1 in the main screen. But I find myself jumping around to games instead of recording all of the games and trying to manage the jump around there. Wouldn't it be essentially the same if Google were streaming games to our homes? If they were to have some sort of "DVRing" of all of the games, wouldn't they handle that on their end? And even so, I would think the viewer would have to exit the game they are watching and resume watching the other game they had "recording". All games currently in progress wouldn't be automatically pushed to each viewer, would they?

    I dunno. I personally don't see IPTV delivery of NFL games (games that viewers like me want to see on big screens in our living room, in clear HD) happening for quite awhile now. I know MLB and NHL offer online delivery of games, but the few games I've watched via MLBTV were glitchy and blocky at best. Terrible trick play functionality. And I always watched those on my small(ish) 15 inch computer screen. I wouldn't have wanted to watch those output on my 55 inch LCD. (Yes, I've always had a great cable internet connection ~ 20mbps)
     
  13. Aug 21, 2013 #53 of 133
    joshjr

    joshjr Hall Of Fame

    4,807
    84
    Aug 2, 2008
    NE Oklahoma
    I know last year my kids were streaming Netflix and I was watching 1 MLB game in HD a night and we were using 350-450 gig a month. I had no cap at that time but it was affecting all internet in the house too. I dont know of alot of plans that allow for that much use. I know it was more then just the MLB games that was used but I was watching one a night and most would watch the early and afternoon NFL games would double that internet usage.
     
  14. Aug 21, 2013 #54 of 133
    oldschoolecw

    oldschoolecw HarpoonIPA

    1,549
    35
    Jan 25, 2007
    Halifax, MA
    That don't make sense, that is way to much. Someone is downloading torrents or a ton of other stuff, or you are not secure and your neighbors are stealing bandwidth.
     
  15. Aug 21, 2013 #55 of 133
    tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    Who says that everyone would want to pay the price? Do you think that everyone who goes to a bar to watch the games has no access to DirecTV? The bar also has the advantage of running all games at once on large TVs. Who has that at home (yes, I know some of our members come close). Why, a lot of bars show the LOCAL games now.

    Heck, I can buy booze a lot cheaper and drink at home but bars are somehow still packed.

    As for Nielsen, I agree. It would be nice to be replaced. But the NFL is not big enough to displace the entire entertainment industry ratings model. Not by itself. Eventually it will have to change. Either Nielsen will keep up or be replaced. But the NFL ST is not going to make it happen.
     
  16. Aug 21, 2013 #56 of 133
    JoeTheDragon

    JoeTheDragon Hall Of Fame

    4,579
    28
    Jul 21, 2008
    At the same time at an commercial place at home 1-2 games ok on most ISP's.
     
  17. Aug 21, 2013 #57 of 133
    JoeTheDragon

    JoeTheDragon Hall Of Fame

    4,579
    28
    Jul 21, 2008
    NV casinos let bet on the games and you can go there sit down and watch games all day.
     
  18. Aug 22, 2013 #58 of 133
    joshjr

    joshjr Hall Of Fame

    4,807
    84
    Aug 2, 2008
    NE Oklahoma
    Neither are true. My network is secured and we do not download torrents in this house.
     
  19. Aug 22, 2013 #59 of 133
    Joe Tylman

    Joe Tylman Legend

    368
    55
    Dec 13, 2012
    I understood but there's also no way they would let it go to a mainstream system without being able to protect the blackout rules. Right now online makes up so little that it's not worth enforcing due to cost. If it was a primary delivery system they would start to crack down on that and the only way is going to be gps.
     
  20. Aug 22, 2013 #60 of 133
    Bambler

    Bambler Legend

    412
    16
    May 30, 2006
    Wouldn't be difficult to solve if you think about it.

    For example, they could use your billing address, no GPS required.
     

Share This Page