1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

How many care about HD locals?

Discussion in 'ViP612/622/722/722K DVR Support Forum' started by auburn2, Apr 12, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. auburn2

    auburn2 AllStar

    66
    0
    Sep 8, 2005
    just soliciting opinons here. With the OTA tuner available I could care less if Dish ever decides to carry my locals in HD, and to be honest I would rather they DIDN'T. The dish HD locals will never match OTA locals in PQ (assuming you have Line of sight to the Tx antenna) , and they could use that bandwidth for improving PQ on other HD stations instead.

    What do the rest of you think?
     
  2. omeletpants

    omeletpants Cool Member

    18
    0
    Mar 10, 2006
    In some areas the locals are unreliable. I get a lot of wind here and that sometimes screws up reception. Don't be offended but the phrase is "I couldn't care less", not "I could care less".
     
  3. liferules

    liferules Godfather

    305
    0
    Aug 14, 2005
    Bring on the HD Lil's! I definitely want them. The OTA is great but reception is very patchy...sometimes great, and other times, for no apparent reason, the channel disappears (and this is 20 miles from the towers).

    I prefer the HD content on major networks as opposed to the Voom channels...there are maybe 2 that I sometimes watch, the rest are of little value to me...
     
  4. PeggyD

    PeggyD AllStar

    93
    0
    Apr 5, 2006
    Locals in HD is why we just upgraded to a 622. We've had the SD locals package since it was available.

    We can't get network OTA locals. ABC, CBS & NBC are about 22 miles away, but there is a 900 ft. hill about 3-4 miles from us, right in the line of site & all the tall buildings in downtown Seattle are in the way closer to the transmitters. The FOX transmitter is about 35 miles away & even an analog signal is iffy. The only OTAs we can get are a couple of shopping channels & PAX since those transmitters are up in the Cascade foothills & less than 7 miles away.
     
  5. davidxlai

    davidxlai AllStar

    75
    0
    Jan 20, 2006
    Are you kidding me? The reason I got 622 is because sometime this quarter E* will carry local HD in the San Francisco market. I live among the rolling hills in coastal California and I cannot get local OTA HD.

     
  6. abricko

    abricko Mentor

    49
    0
    Mar 1, 2006
    I'd prefer more national HD programs, (HD) LILs are a waste of space (for me)... I have an antenna on my roof and I get great reception... it's also nice having 3 tuners!
     
  7. BillJ

    BillJ Icon

    859
    6
    May 5, 2005
    Dish is the only way I can receive locals - HD or SD. Even with a 50 foot tower the OTA reception here is poor. Cable added two network feeds last year but still doesn't have the other two. I'm getting really tired of people saying "oh, just get them OTA". For many of us that' just not possible.
     
  8. Stewart Vernon

    Stewart Vernon Roving Reporter Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    21,572
    373
    Jan 7, 2005
    Kittrell, NC
    I get all my locals just fine, and most are in HD as well as some extra digital substations.

    But if I ever dive into the DVR, having HD locals via satellite would give me more flexibility for recording/watching programs since I'd be able to record an HD local via OTA or via satellite and watch another on the other tuner.
     
  9. redbird

    redbird AllStar

    90
    0
    May 8, 2005
    HDMe said it perfectly for me. But, I would trade some HD locals for more national HD channels.
     
  10. Powie

    Powie Cool Member

    20
    0
    Apr 8, 2006
    I'm not able to get locals in HD without getting a big antanae, and then getting permission from my HOA to mount it. And I don't really want an ugly antanae mounted to my townhouse, so yes I want/need locals via dish. A major part of me updating to the 622 from my 6 month old 942.
     
  11. skassan

    skassan AllStar

    52
    0
    Jan 10, 2004
    I want HD LIL because there's only one OTA tuner. With LIL, I can record conflicting network programming.
     
  12. oljim

    oljim Godfather

    484
    0
    Aug 6, 2002
    I am all for HD nationals, Just so I can get network HD. My socalled local do not all send out HD or are still low power
     
  13. olgeezer

    olgeezer Guest

    1,833
    0
    Dec 5, 2003
    If they ever get the tower up, you'll be able to get HD with a coathanger.:D I live in an area where ABC is digital no HD transmitter and Fox is analog. To retrieve those stations in HD, I use an antenna to pickup Kansas City stations. Satellite for OTA, other than its OTA tuner doesn't help me.
     
  14. boylehome

    boylehome Hall Of Fame/Supporter

    2,143
    0
    Jul 16, 2004
    auburn2, I'm looking forward to HD Locals VIA satellite. Currently with the OTA, I can only record one channel at the same time. Usually at prime time there are other programs that I desire to record. With Satellite HD Locals I can record up to three networks programs at the same time.
     
  15. zeekle

    zeekle Mentor

    48
    0
    Jun 18, 2005
    i am looking forward to HD locals myself. OTA may be better but its not 100% where I live (NBC is no go for me at all)

    It will be interesting to me to see the difference in PQ over OTA on the channels I get most fo the time.
     
  16. zer0cool

    zer0cool Godfather

    264
    0
    Nov 23, 2004
    Having HD locals would allow me to record two network programs in HD, which would be great. Sure, I'd like StarzHD, Cinemax HD, or MHD, but locals would be more useful to me than say, HD networks devoted to Fashion, Extreme sports, Art, or Kung Fu.
     
  17. wingnut1

    wingnut1 Legend

    112
    0
    Nov 10, 2005
    I don't think my market will get HD locals so I will have to continue to use OTA. It would be nice to have satelitte hd locals so that I could record conflicting HD Network shows that I like to watch. I can do this to some extent by recording one set on my 942 the other on my 622. It would probably be better to have more national channels in HD. USA, FX, SciFi, TBS, etc... I would trade off most of the VOOM channels to get these in HD.
     
  18. djmav

    djmav AllStar

    51
    0
    Apr 14, 2005
    I care. I hope they get the SF HD locals soon.
     
  19. Rob Glasser

    Rob Glasser Hall Of Fame Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    3,055
    0
    Feb 22, 2005
    I am looking forward to HD locals, just for the fact that I'll be able to record up to 3 network shows in HD at once. However, the Sat provided HD locals will not be the ones I primarily view. Since I get all my locals in HD via OTA I will continue to record all shows possible via OTA since the picture quality will be better.
     
  20. tomcrown1

    tomcrown1 Hall Of Fame

    1,576
    0
    Jan 16, 2006
    San Francisco get HD locals Dish Care?? If Dish Cared San Francisco would have been one of the first to get HD local since the bay area is the leader in HD as far a number of household ownership of DH Tv is concern. But dish care about the bay area I doubt it.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page