1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

HR24 over the HR23

Discussion in 'DIRECTV HD DVR/Receiver Discussion' started by abooch, Jan 15, 2013.

  1. abooch

    abooch Legend

    175
    0
    Oct 25, 2008
    Thinking about upgrading.. Is the difference that much noticeable?
     
  2. litzdog911

    litzdog911 DIRECTV A-Team DBSTalk Club

    12,171
    56
    Jun 23, 2004
    Mill Creek, WA
    The HR24 menus and stuff might be a bit speedier, but otherwise they're functionally equivalent. And don't try to get an HR24 from DirecTV because they can't guarantee a specific model. You would have to get from a satellite dealer, like Solid Signal.
     
  3. jimmie57

    jimmie57 Hall Of Fame

    6,402
    293
    Jun 26, 2010
    Texas City, TX
    I have both models. The HR23 is the oldest and my most used unit. It is in the den and runs about 11 hours per day. The HR24 is in the bedroom / office where I watch the stock market and it is on about 4 hours per day.

    The 24 is noticably faster than the 23 but it is not enough difference for me to go to the effort of swapping the locations of each of them.
    Changing channels is about a second quicker on the 24. Other than that I do not see any difference.
     
  4. mcbeevee

    mcbeevee 97% Complete

    1,283
    0
    Sep 18, 2006
    The HR24 is smaller, faster, and nicer looking (imo).

    :)
     
  5. Richierich

    Richierich Hall Of Fame

    8,489
    7
    Jan 10, 2008
    My HR24-500 is definitely Faster in every respect especially when it comes to bringing up the Guide and Surfing thru it.
     
  6. Sixto

    Sixto DIRECTV A-Team

    12,224
    94
    Nov 18, 2005
    Yes, certainly.
     
  7. Rich

    Rich DBSTalk Club DBSTalk Club

    25,674
    437
    Feb 22, 2007
    Piscataway, NJ
    But, but, but, they're functionally equivalent?... :lol:

    Seriously, how can that tired, false statement still be used?

    Rich
     
  8. litzdog911

    litzdog911 DIRECTV A-Team DBSTalk Club

    12,171
    56
    Jun 23, 2004
    Mill Creek, WA
    Because that's how DirecTV treats them. No argument from me that it's not really true, but good luck convincing DirecTV to treat them otherwise.
     
  9. Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    37,060
    287
    Jun 18, 2006
    I think what's meant is that there are no functions on the HR24 that are not also on the HR23. Having had both, I agree that the HR24 is quite a bit zippier.

    For whatever reason, DIRECTV has one entry for 2-tuner DVRs and I suspect they will have one entry for 5-tuner DVRs. You get what's in the warehouse, whether it's a refurbed HR21-100 or a new HR24-500.

    Good thing there are retailers who are willing to help you get exactly what you want.
     
  10. dpeters11

    dpeters11 Hall Of Fame

    16,184
    483
    May 30, 2007
    Cincinnati
    And in the case of where there really is a functionally different aspect, like built in OTA or 3D, they have a procedure for that.

    I'd think that there would be something similar (or hope so), for the HR44. If someone had one, and it got replaced with an HR34, it is very possible that functions won't work because the 34 lacks the wifi.

    However, if I need a replacement on my 34, feel free to send me a 44 :)
     
  11. Sixto

    Sixto DIRECTV A-Team

    12,224
    94
    Nov 18, 2005
    The HR20/21/22/23 is mostly 2005/2006 architecture/technology.

    The HR24 is 2009 technology.

    The HR44 is 2012 technology.
     
  12. Richierich

    Richierich Hall Of Fame

    8,489
    7
    Jan 10, 2008
    Retailers such as Solid Signal can help you get exactly what you want such as an HR24-500!!! :D
     
  13. Diana C

    Diana C Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    2,117
    293
    Mar 30, 2007
    New Jersey
    We have owned at least one HR20, HR21, HR23, HR24 and HR34. In terms of overall performance (speed AND reliability) I'd rank them from best to worst:

    HR24 (with the 500 model out ranking the 100 by a hair)
    HR34 (we have not experienced many of the issues reported by others)
    HR20 (this was our main viewing platform until recently)
    HR21 (this unit is okay with the base drive, but with a 1TB external it slowed to crawl)
    HR23 (most unreliable unit we've had - it died within 6 months of activation)

    We rarely watch TV via the HR34 - it is mostly used as a server to the other DVRs and receivers. While we have external 1 TB drives on both our HR24s and 1 HR21, we are running the HR34 with the internal drive only. Currently, our main viewing platform is a HR24-500, with at least half of all recordings viewed being sourced from the HR34. In our experience, the HR34 is ever so slightly slower than the HR24, but both units are very acceptable. The HR24-100 exhibits some small anomalies in trick play (mainly that the 3X FFWD seems faster than 3X at times) but is otherwise a good performer.
     
  14. CCarncross

    CCarncross Hall Of Fame

    7,058
    60
    Jul 19, 2005
    Jackson
    Saying they are "functionally equivalent" is still a true statement. A Corvette is functionally equivalent to a Chevette. Function is what they do, not how well they do it. Aside from 20's not supporting 3D, and having built-in OTA, all the other 2x series models have all the same features after you add an AM21 OTA tuner. If the dvr were hidden from view, most would not be able to tell the difference unless they noticed a speed difference. But I'd bet most couldn't tell the difference between a 21, 22, or 23 model. Since the 20's, and 24's are slightly faster by most reports, someone might be able to say they can pick it out, but not 100% of the time.
     
  15. Rich

    Rich DBSTalk Club DBSTalk Club

    25,674
    437
    Feb 22, 2007
    Piscataway, NJ
    Yeah, I've had the same conversations with D* CSRs. And I usually end up logically convincing them that they are wrong. Oddly, the CMG folks tend to agree with me.

    Problem with using that statement is that, in using it, folks who don't know better believe it and that just allows it to endure.

    Rich
     
  16. Rich

    Rich DBSTalk Club DBSTalk Club

    25,674
    437
    Feb 22, 2007
    Piscataway, NJ
    I think what D* means is that any HR is the equal of any other HR, barring the size of the internal drives. By adhering to their policy of giving an HR24 for an HR24 when it comes down to replacing them seems to give more credence to my opinion.

    Rich
     
  17. Rich

    Rich DBSTalk Club DBSTalk Club

    25,674
    437
    Feb 22, 2007
    Piscataway, NJ
    There are differences that are clear and differences that are not so clear. I do agree with you.

    Rich
     
  18. Rich

    Rich DBSTalk Club DBSTalk Club

    25,674
    437
    Feb 22, 2007
    Piscataway, NJ
    With the exception of the 34 (we don't have one), I totally agree. My 23 only lasted a week, you were fortunate.

    If you've read my posts about any HR ending with 100 before the 24-100s, you know how much dislike I have for the 100s. But, surprisingly, I find myself using one of my 3 HR24-100s an awful lot. I was horrified when I got the first 24-100 and wouldn't even put a large HDD on it. Stuck it in my wife's bedroom (she snores so badly you'd think a chainsaw was running) and forgot about it. Then she wanted more capacity and I put an owned 24-500 in that room with a 2TB internal in it. Problem solved. I took that 24-100 downstairs to my hidey-hole and put a 2TB in a TT dock and it has performed so well that I can't believe it. I even bought one for ~ $75 on eBay. Performs beautifully with a 2TB drive in it. Yet another bias wiped out... :lol:

    I do like the 500s and have 6 of them.

    Rich
     
  19. Rich

    Rich DBSTalk Club DBSTalk Club

    25,674
    437
    Feb 22, 2007
    Piscataway, NJ
    Speed is a "function". I've said the same things you've just posted to argue for my point.

    Rich
     
  20. CCarncross

    CCarncross Hall Of Fame

    7,058
    60
    Jul 19, 2005
    Jackson
    Sorry Rich, I have to disagree with you on that one. A mousetrap is still a mousetrap, there are better mousetraps...but they are still mousetraps. Its like the difference between wants and needs. You need it to play and record, etc....you want it to do it as fast as possible.

    I 100% agree that certain models are faster than others and they would be more desirable to have, but they are still functionally equivalent. I guess I dont see how anyone can disagree with pure and simple facts. Are we using different dictionaries for the term "functionally equivalent"?
     

Share This Page