1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

I'm tired of DIRECTV's Creative Ways of Digging into my pocket

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by Spike, Aug 11, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Aug 11, 2013 #41 of 164
    unixguru

    unixguru Godfather

    787
    33
    Jul 9, 2007
    I suspect the 25% cost of running the business includes all hardware/software development and operation, both uplinks and receivers. As well as customer service, sales, marketing, general operations, etc, etc. If it doesn't then they are incompetent.

    The biggest bite is the programming. The very thing that has been a rapidly increasing cost for some time. A mostly uncontrollable cost in the current climate. An unjustifiable cost IMO. Something has to give - either DirecTV and/or customers need more leverage on this.

    The government needs to step in and restore balance in the market.
     
  2. Aug 11, 2013 #42 of 164
    Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,232
    552
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    No, please, no Gov't. intervention. Yes on righting inequities that they caused, but heavens! Washington running our TV services?? NO! We'd never have Breaking Bad if that were the case. And, and and....
     
    2 people like this.
  3. Aug 11, 2013 #43 of 164
    PCampbell

    PCampbell Icon

    1,639
    98
    Nov 18, 2006
    When the cost gets to high more will drop the service and thats when changes will start to happen. TWC and ATT UVerce here are about the same in cost as Directv and have add on chages also so the only choice is to call and ask for a discounts or drop the service. TV service is not needed to live like food and housing.
     
  4. Aug 11, 2013 #44 of 164
    longrider

    longrider Well-Known Member DBSTalk Club

    3,947
    168
    Apr 21, 2007
    Elizabeth, CO
    Government intervention is the last thing I want. While it could control costs it would definitely control content and that would destroy it.
     
    2 people like this.
  5. Aug 11, 2013 #45 of 164
    longrider

    longrider Well-Known Member DBSTalk Club

    3,947
    168
    Apr 21, 2007
    Elizabeth, CO
    This discussion made me study DirecTVs financials a little closer and while their Income Statement is decent their Balance Sheet looks terrible. Over the past 5 years they have wiped out almost 10B of equity, while this is partly due to depreciation (a 'paper' expense in that no money actually left the company) the long term debt has more than tripled in 5 years. While it is great to see that they are willing to invest for the future this trend has to turn around. They unfortunately are at a point that any attempts to increase revenue will be ineffective in that any increase in ARPU will be cancelled out by the net loss of customers.
     
  6. Aug 11, 2013 #46 of 164
    Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,232
    552
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    Depreciation, etc., doesn't "wipe out" equity. Shareholder's Equity has increased over the last three years, as has Net Income.

    Indeed they are more leveraged than before but that alone isn't cause for concern, but as you mentioned, ARPU and maintaining or increasing those units will be key.
     
  7. Aug 11, 2013 #47 of 164
    longrider

    longrider Well-Known Member DBSTalk Club

    3,947
    168
    Apr 21, 2007
    Elizabeth, CO
  8. Aug 11, 2013 #48 of 164
    Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,232
    552
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    It looks to me as though DIRECTV has made major buybacks of their common stock.
    Depreciation occurs whether it's recognized on the Income Statement (and hence the Balance Sheet) or not. It's a book entry, usually a tax-deduction.
     
    1 person likes this.
  9. Aug 11, 2013 #49 of 164
    tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    No, please, no Gov't. intervention. Yes on righting inequities that they caused, but heavens! Washington running our TV services?? NO! We'd never have Breaking Bad if that were the case. And, and and....


    I agree that the government has other things to concern itself with but as far as the government killing quality TV, try to tell that to the BBC. I find myself watching more and more BBC originating programs every year and we get more of them (as well as a large number of successful shows going as far back as All in the Family were actually conceived under "government control" in Great Britain).

    Of course, our government has a way of screwing things up uniquely.
     
  10. Aug 11, 2013 #50 of 164
    SledgeHammer

    SledgeHammer Icon

    1,788
    98
    Dec 28, 2007
    I'm confused here. The protection plan is a complete waste of $$$, you don't need that. Unless you constantly bug DTV with issues and you're a good customer, theyll generally fix stuff for free.

    Whole Home DVR, yeah, thats only $3, but also a waste of $$$. Just record it on the TV you plan to watch it on. Or walk over to your main TV.

    I'm more pissed off on the more ridiculous charges. Like the $2 I pay for "regional sports fee". I have HONESTLY (and I'm not exagerrating here) NEVER watched a sports game on TV. Not even once. Not even the olympics. Sports just bore me. Yet I pay $2 a month for them.

    The $10 for HD is also ridiculous. Dish gives it out for free. So do most other providers. Yet, I have to call in every 6 months to get a credit. Yeah, I'm getting a credit, but I'd rather not have to call in and get it. I've been with DTV since 2002 and have always paid my bill, yet some newbie comes in and gets free HD for life? yeah, I'm gonna complain.

    $10 / month for the HD DVR is also a bit crazy. I already paid for the box.

    I'm betting it doesn't cost DTV $10/month/household to get the guide info.
     
  11. Aug 11, 2013 #51 of 164
    damondlt

    damondlt New Member

    5,455
    232
    Feb 27, 2006
    Newfoundland...
    I dropped the Protection plan, as I too think its a money grab.
     
  12. Aug 11, 2013 #52 of 164
    peds48

    peds48 Genius. DBSTalk Club

    19,092
    993
    Jan 10, 2008
    NY
    AT&T charges $35.00 to "mirror" my data plan to my 2nd and 3rd iPhone, but yet no one "complains"
     
  13. Aug 11, 2013 #53 of 164
    tonyd79

    tonyd79 Hall Of Fame

    12,971
    204
    Jul 24, 2006
    Columbia, MD
    AT&T charges $35.00 to "mirror" my data plan to my 2nd and 3rd iPhone, but yet no one "complains"


    It's all in the packaging. Call it a "family plan" and up the price.
     
  14. Aug 11, 2013 #54 of 164
    peds48

    peds48 Genius. DBSTalk Club

    19,092
    993
    Jan 10, 2008
    NY
    It's all in the packaging. Call it a "family plan" and up the price.
    SO is a good thing that DirecTV only charges $6.00 per receiver
     
  15. Aug 12, 2013 #55 of 164
    Spike

    Spike Legend

    198
    2
    Jul 4, 2007
    There are other companies out there currently that are addressing this issue to the point that people are switching and saving money. But that is the subject for a different type of web site.
     
  16. Aug 12, 2013 #56 of 164
    dpeters11

    dpeters11 Hall Of Fame

    16,247
    490
    May 30, 2007
    Cincinnati
    There certainly are ways that DirecTV could really try for a money grab, like not having the DVR fee per account. I honestly don't know of any carrier that doesn't charge a monthly fee for DVR. Tivo of course has their lifetime DVR, but you pay for that, and if the DVR fails after the warranty is expired, you lose it.

    Could DirecTV include HD? Sure, but SD subscribers would feel that they are paying for something they don't use. DirecTV used to require Superfan to get HD Sunday Ticket, they dropped that several years ago.

    All carriers have fees, everyone just has to decide which option is best for them. Fortunately, even for those in rural areas, there is more than one option.
     
  17. Aug 12, 2013 #57 of 164
    Diana C

    Diana C Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    2,117
    293
    Mar 30, 2007
    New Jersey
    On the issue of "mirror fees" - pricing is not solely based on cost, but on value. If the programming DirecTV delivers to you has value (and I don't argue that the cost is high) then delivering it to multiple outlets instead of just one has incremental value. If they charged nothing, then they would be giving away value (a cardinal sin in the rules of capitaIism). DirecTV has valued this service at $6 per outlet. Others value their service at different, but roughly analogous, prices. The same applies for whole home DVR service and HD. The fact that all the providers, satellite and cable, have pretty much the same bottom line price once you net out all the services shows that the prices are fair. If they were not, some provider would come along and try to steal market share with a lower price. Dish Network tried that, and had to bring their prices into line with everyone else to make a profit.

    As has been noted, the problem is not DirecTV or any other middleman provider, it is the cost of the content itself. There are many factors that drive this but chief among these is the cost of people. Sports content is so outrageously expensive because athletes are paid so outrageously. Entertainment costs are high because big name actors are paid obscene amounts of money. I'm not saying actors and athletes shouldn't take the money...they'd be fools to turn it down. But why are the teams and producers willing to pay so much? Because viewers and fans want the sports coverage, the movies and the TV shows.

    So, we have no one to blame but ourselves. We continue to pay for access to an ever larger pool of entertainment and sports. As long as most people keep shelling out the money costs will not come down. The consumer ultimately controls pricing.
     
    2 people like this.
  18. Aug 12, 2013 #58 of 164
    MysteryMan

    MysteryMan Well-Known Member DBSTalk Club

    8,316
    458
    May 17, 2010
    USA
    Well said. :righton:
     
  19. Aug 12, 2013 #59 of 164
    Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,232
    552
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...
    Agree. Pricing in these markets is based mostly on value, not cost. Grocery stores run off costs, by and large.

    I do wonder what will be the lever that brings down costs of sports- and team values, which I think are based mostly on TV and Gate revenues- If we consumers balk, then ad revenues fall, the value of TV contracts falls, distributors don't have to pay as much, and the poor little athletes have to settle for a few millions instead of dozens....
     
  20. Aug 12, 2013 #60 of 164
    unixguru

    unixguru Godfather

    787
    33
    Jul 9, 2007
    Intervention doesn't have to be huge. Just preventing ESPN (for example) from forcing all subscribers to receive and pay for their channels would be a big improvement.

    The only control that the consumer has over sports cost is to not have a sat/cable service at all.

    With the CBS and TWC spat we now see that the ESPN-style fleecing of the consumer is going to spread to everything. "locals" will become a package.

    The TV industry is accelerating towards it's own demise. On the one hand we get more and more worthless content (like Honey Boo Boo, Lizard Lick Towing, etc) and good content is rapidly increasing in cost beyond it's value for most people.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page