For purposes of this poll, please only answer IF you have owned and used both the HR10-250 (original TiVo based HD DVR) and an HR20-xxx receiver (any sub model of the HR20) for more than one week each. I'm not looking for answers from people that used one or the other for only a day or two, I'm looking for answers from people that have used both enough to HONESTLY answer as to whether or not they can truly say that they believe that the HR20 is an inferior product. Further, I'm gonna ask that when you choose your answer you don't simply choose 'Yes, it's inferior' just because it's not TiVo based. Answering that it's inferior because it's not TiVo doesn't address whether the units work as DVRs and do the jobs they were intended to do. Such answers merely inject opinions into the poll and that isn't what the poll is trying to find. The question is if you really consider the HR20 an inferior machine, most especially when compared to the HR10 units. If I can set the options correctly, this will be a PUBLIC POLL so haters that have never used one or the other of the two choices will be seen.