1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

Lakers New Regional TV Network - NOW ON THE AIR

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Programming' started by kb24sd, Jul 1, 2012.

  1. Oct 9, 2012 #781 of 2097
    cjrleimer

    cjrleimer Godfather

    481
    1
    Nov 16, 2004
  2. Oct 9, 2012 #782 of 2097
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    I think it is the home-team's responsibility to provide the feed to whomever has rights to them, and it could very well be that Fresno State doesn't have as high quality a setup as used in NBA/NHL arena's such as the Staples Centre.
     
  3. Oct 9, 2012 #783 of 2097
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
  4. Oct 9, 2012 #784 of 2097
    Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    37,060
    287
    Jun 18, 2006
    Funniest post of the day
     
  5. Oct 9, 2012 #785 of 2097
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    I thought that is how it happened. Or does the stations that own the rights lug around their own cameras and satellite trucks (or lease them from a 3d party) to all the games? How does this work?

    When a team plays away, I always though that the stations that own the rights send their production team and hosts to the away city, but do they also bring their own camera's and uplink?

    If so, the Fresno game should have been as good quality as any NBA game, right?
     
  6. Oct 9, 2012 #786 of 2097
    Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    37,060
    287
    Jun 18, 2006
    Actually I was laughing at the dry irony of comparing Fresno's production facilities to Staples'.

    If I understand properly there are three possibilities, and I don't know which Fresno employs.

    The stadium itself can provide multiple feeds to both home and away teams, with production facilities for both. This would apply to places like baseball and football stadiums, where there are popup cameras, cameras on long cables, etc. The director, commentators and a small staff travel with the team.

    The stadium can also provide camera positions and a place for an uplink truck. I suspect this is the case in Fresno, which, all apologies to Fresno, probably doesn't have the funding for a sophisticated NBA-style system. In this case the quality of the coverage would be fairly limited.

    Finally, a stadium can simply say, "You're on your own" which I presume would be the (theoretical) case if (theoretically) the Lakers played the Inglewood HS Sentinels.
     
  7. Oct 9, 2012 #787 of 2097
    David Ortiz

    David Ortiz Save the Clock Tower!! DBSTalk Club

    2,427
    75
    Aug 21, 2006
    Fresno, CA
    <----- Hey! We resemble that remark! :)
     
  8. Oct 9, 2012 #788 of 2097
    DCSholtis

    DCSholtis Up The Irons!

    5,775
    6
    Aug 7, 2002
    Now seeing tweets/rumors that D* is adding the new Lakers channel "any day now" Take it for what it's worth...
     
  9. Oct 9, 2012 #789 of 2097
    silkypimp

    silkypimp Cool Member

    21
    0
    Sep 30, 2012
    So who is tweeting this info? Random people or actually sports writers.
     
  10. Oct 9, 2012 #790 of 2097
    lipcrkr

    lipcrkr Legend

    331
    6
    Apr 27, 2012
    Jeanne Buss.....LOL.
     
  11. Oct 9, 2012 #791 of 2097
    DeathRowsFinest2g

    DeathRowsFinest2g Mentor

    46
    0
    Sep 13, 2007
    Is anyone also having freezing issues with the new Lakers channel? Since Saturday i notice the audio drops and picture freezes often.
     
  12. Oct 9, 2012 #792 of 2097
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    They tweeted that SEVERAL times about PAC12. "any day now" "could happen as soon as today". "will happen before the weekend". That was about 6 weeks ago.
     
  13. Oct 9, 2012 #793 of 2097
    DBSNewbie

    DBSNewbie Icon

    807
    0
    Nov 3, 2007
    Yes. Lots of freezing. But, I think that's more of a TW Cable thing, rather than just a TWC SN problem. I see pixelation and freezing on all channels with TWC.

    I can't wait until D* picks up the Lakers channel. With the greater bandwidth, the pixelation should go away.
     
  14. Oct 10, 2012 #794 of 2097
    bong... james bong

    bong... james bong Mentor

    30
    0
    Sep 10, 2012
    :mad:
     
  15. Oct 10, 2012 #795 of 2097
    kb24sd

    kb24sd The Specialist

    191
    0
    Jun 21, 2012
    Some so called Laker reporter on the lakersnation.com site named Jabari Davis tweeted rumors like that also 2 weeks ago

    Yet we still don't have the channel on D*.I don't think D* or any other TV provider will strike a deal until around 10-29 to 11-4.

    Reason being is that the Lakers season opener on 10-30 is exclusively on TNT, the following game 10-31 is on NBATV but will probably get blacked out to us fans in the LAKERS DMA zone.The game on 11-2 is on ESPN that game won't get blacked out locally.
     
  16. Oct 10, 2012 #796 of 2097
    inkahauts

    inkahauts DIRECTV A-Team

    21,519
    957
    Nov 13, 2006
    That's the most ridiculous excuse ever for not getting the channel up as soon as they can. Hopefully we will at least know before the start of the season that it is coming.
     
  17. Oct 10, 2012 #797 of 2097
    kb24sd

    kb24sd The Specialist

    191
    0
    Jun 21, 2012
    I read some in some article that another reason D* and other TV providers are waiting till the last possible minute is because not carrying the channel now would save them something like 100K per day.Basically D* and the other TV providers don't want to pay for pre season games.

    If D* was smart and they struck a deal before the other TV providers say like a week in advance they could attract new D* customers to them.

    I see a lot of posts on the Laker dedicated website forums and threads that people would be willing to to ditch their current non TWC TV provider and switch to D* if they had the channel.
     
  18. Oct 10, 2012 #798 of 2097
    lipcrkr

    lipcrkr Legend

    331
    6
    Apr 27, 2012
    Does anyone know what other RSN's around the country are charging for their monthly fee? Do those RSN's show different live sports throughout the year? The reason i ask is because the Laker games are seasonal, and a quarter of them are on other stations ( ESPN, TNT, etc. ). I heard $3.95. But many people won't justify that without a full time LIVE event throughout the year. TWC will show the Lakers regular games from November-May/June (about 60 games). But what about June-Nov.?
     
  19. Oct 10, 2012 #799 of 2097
    TravelFan1

    TravelFan1 Legend

    233
    9
    Apr 1, 2009
    On a per-subscriber basis, it is believed that masn is the most expensive one, at a bit over 4 bucks per subscriber.

    TWCSN will also carry the La Galaxy, so there's some summer programming there. And it is known they bid hard to get the Dodgers.
     
  20. Oct 10, 2012 #800 of 2097
    maartena

    maartena Hall Of Fame

    2,828
    9
    Nov 1, 2010
    Here's a better excuse: A deal signed on the eve before November 4th after weeks of tough negotiations might save them a lot of money instead of signing up right now and pay the current price.

    They probably do DAILY math: How many subs did leave today and gave "Lakers" as the reason, and how much money could we potentially be saving by holding out? It is a gamble, but TWC needs DirecTV just as much as DirecTV needs TWC.

    It becomes a question on how much pre-season fans are willing to miss.
     

Share This Page