1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

Need advice. Do I leave D*?

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by kosh56, May 1, 2012.

  1. May 1, 2012 #1 of 35
    kosh56

    kosh56 AllStar

    68
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    OK, I'm done with my HR20-100 and HR21-700 receivers. I've been putting up with this unresponsive, slow crap for 3 years. Last night, my HR20 missed 3 recordings on my SL. I'm done!

    I've been a D* customer since 2001. I've never even looked into E* before, but I've been researching the Hopper for the last couple days. That thing looks blazing! Just incredible! The UI looks beautiful as well.

    I wouldn't be against trying an HR-34, but I don't want to get locked into a 2 year contract and find out I have to put up with the same crap. Do I have any reasonable options here or do I make the switch to E*?
     
  2. May 1, 2012 #2 of 35
    hilmar2k

    hilmar2k Hall Of Fame

    5,251
    4
    Mar 18, 2007
    It's a tough decision. You can't really try out receivers from either company without a contract. I would try to get DIRECTV to swap your receivers out for HR24's. I don't think you'll have any of the issues with those that you're having now.
     
  3. May 1, 2012 #3 of 35
    sregener

    sregener Godfather

    630
    26
    Apr 17, 2012
    From the sounds of things, the TiVo is your best choice with DirecTV. Takes the firmware out of their hands. It is somewhat lacking in the Internet features the other DirecTV DVRs have. And I believe you have to pay DirecTV the HD DVR fee as well as the $7/month TiVo fee.

    The HR24s were the gold standard for speed before the HD GUI came out, but some are now having problems with them being slow and unresponsive as well. Others have perfectly responsive HR22, 23, 21 or even 20 models. No common denominator has been found that supports a likely cause for the disparity. Other providers do have other options, and while there are some complaints, the basic speed and functionality does not seem to be an issue with them.
     
  4. May 1, 2012 #4 of 35
    Marlin Guy

    Marlin Guy Hall Of Fame

    2,129
    7
    Apr 8, 2009
    Based on my own recent experiences with D*, no.
    They wouldn't even promise me 34's with a new two year commitment.

    View my other posts for more.
     
  5. May 1, 2012 #5 of 35
    domingos35

    domingos35 Icon

    537
    0
    Jan 11, 2006
    switch and save money in the process
     
  6. May 1, 2012 #6 of 35
    kosh56

    kosh56 AllStar

    68
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    I'm not terribly interested in the HR24 or the Tivo box. If I'm going to go through the hassle (and stay with D*), then I want the HR34 and MRV.

    Honestly, the main things keeping me from calling E* today is that D* has more of the channels I watch in HD, and frankly familiarity with D*. But, I'm truly at my breaking point.

    I don't personally know anybody with an HR34 and without a guarantee that it won't be a dog, I guess I don't have a choice, but to switch. I don't want to, but I truly don't see another way.
     
  7. May 1, 2012 #7 of 35
    mdavej

    mdavej Hall Of Fame

    2,401
    32
    Jan 30, 2007
    If you really don't want to switch and can live without TV for a week or so, just cancel. Then you'll be inundated with offers from DirecTV and probably get the HR34 for free. If you do want to switch, the Hopper is indeed awesome, especially since they just doubled our recording space (and none of the big 4 prime time recordings use any of it).

    In either case, cancelling will save you the most money by far and is how all providers insist on playing the game.

    What exactly is E* missing? You may be working with old information.
     
  8. May 1, 2012 #8 of 35
    Hoosier205

    Hoosier205 New Member

    6,659
    14
    Sep 3, 2007
    If you want HD than DirecTV is the provider if choice. If you can settle for HD-Lite, Dish Network may be an option.
     
  9. May 1, 2012 #9 of 35
    kosh56

    kosh56 AllStar

    68
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    sregener, I noticed in another thread that you switched to E*. I'm a bit of a picture snob. I'll notice artifacts that other people can't see even when I point them out. Bottom line, are you happy with the HD quality on E*?
     
  10. kosh56

    kosh56 AllStar

    68
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    Disney HD is the one that jumped out at me while I was looking. Although, I've heard that the SD quality on E* is better so maybe it wouldn't be that bad?
     
  11. hilmar2k

    hilmar2k Hall Of Fame

    5,251
    4
    Mar 18, 2007
    Why no interest in HR24s? I have 3 HR24s and an HR22 with MRV and it is a great setup. I like being able to spread my recording across multiple DVRs. The HR24s are great receivers.
     
  12. Marlin Guy

    Marlin Guy Hall Of Fame

    2,129
    7
    Apr 8, 2009
    I think HR2x has earned a reputation for being problematic. That was my reason for not wanting anything but the 34.
     
  13. kosh56

    kosh56 AllStar

    68
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    This is pretty much it. I'm hearing complaints recently about the HR24s. I don't want to get into a 2 year commitment and regret it 2 months from now. Of course, I can use the same argument about E*, but at least it would cost me a lot less to find out.
     
  14. inf0z

    inf0z Legend

    273
    8
    Oct 15, 2011
    Wrong
     
  15. 242424

    242424 AllStar

    288
    44
    Mar 22, 2012
    If you leave make sure to tell them why.
     
  16. sregener

    sregener Godfather

    630
    26
    Apr 17, 2012
    I've gotten in trouble already for posting about Dish in a DirecTV forum, but I will answer your specific question as well as I can and if I get another slap on the wrist or banned from the site, so be it.

    I am the ultimate picture snob. I'll see your snobbery and raise it a notch. On HD channels that both providers have, DirecTV's picture is better. On some channels, like watching Frozen Planet on Discovery, the differences are subtle. There is a definite decrease in detail, and slightly more macro blocking. On the Tennis Channel, it's a tad blurry, but I'm now sure it is the event cameras. On Fox Sports Net North, the difference is glaring - the picture is much worse on Dish. I didn't have HD LiL with DirecTV, only OTA. Dish's HD locals are inferior to OTA., and there's no tuner currently available for the Hopper. This is my honest evaluation. SD on Dish is much better than on DirecTV - somewhere above VHS, but not approaching DVD quality.

    For me, the HD picture is watchable. Not perfect, or jaw-dropping, but it is good enough. It's also a case of lose a little, gain a little, as I could not abide Top Gear on BBC America in SD on DirecTV, and it looks very nice on Dish, which has it in HD. But if you're a pixel peeper like me and you're losing HD channels you care about without gaining some, you will not be happy with Dish's HD as it is today. If I was really into local sports on Fox Sports Net, I'd be really upset, but I almost never watch more than a half-inning of a baseball game.

    But the Hopper? It is a DVR as it was meant to be. Totally satisfied there.

    (Edited to reflect that Tennis Channel bluriness was event related. Looks fine on 5/2/12.)
     
  17. Davenlr

    Davenlr Geek til I die

    9,136
    27
    Sep 16, 2006
    If you think HR24's are problematic, wait until you get a HR34.
     
  18. Alebob911

    Alebob911 Hall Of Fame

    1,622
    6
    Mar 22, 2007
    CERES,CA
    You stole the post right out of my mouth!!:lol::lol::lol:
     
  19. kosh56

    kosh56 AllStar

    68
    0
    Sep 30, 2007
    Really? Can you elaborate please? I thought the HR34 outperformed the HR24.
     

Share This Page