1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

New DIRECTV Ku Band Sat @79W

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Tips and Resources' started by Gary Toma, Mar 1, 2012.

  1. Mar 1, 2012 #1 of 13
    Gary Toma

    Gary Toma UNIX DBSTalk Club

    2,306
    130
    Mar 22, 2006
    The attachment is the DIRECTV FCC filing.

    I will leave it to the experts to make sense out of this.


    *edit* 4/18/2015: the link to the attachment has been clobbered, so I have removed the bad link.
     
  2. Mar 1, 2012 #2 of 13
    LameLefty

    LameLefty I used to be a rocket scientist

    12,182
    105
    Sep 28, 2006
    Middle...
    They're aiming this (I gather from the narrative) MOSTLY at Mexico and Puerto Rico, with the secondary goal of increasing specialty programming in the targeted areas. Note the wording on page 3:

    What kind of line-of-sight problems would there be for a 79W slot from the western US?
     
  3. Mar 1, 2012 #3 of 13
    veryoldschool

    veryoldschool Lifetime Achiever Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    42,683
    348
    Dec 9, 2006
    Elevation looks a bit low here: 27.8°
     
  4. Mar 1, 2012 #4 of 13
    evan_s

    evan_s Hall Of Fame

    2,136
    0
    Mar 3, 2008
    If you look later in the document it also shows an uplink from Mexico, so Hispanic content seems like a given.
     
  5. Mar 1, 2012 #5 of 13
    HoTat2

    HoTat2 Hall Of Fame

    7,260
    179
    Nov 16, 2005
    Los...
    While I can't speak for how practical a dish/LNB arrangement would be for DLA and Sky Mexico at 79W. I don't see how 79W really serves DIRECTV USA with its core HD at 99 and 103W without a separate wing dish.

    Possibly re-task the 72.5W flexport on an external multiswitch module?

    Anyway, going to Ku/FSS with linear polarization over at 79W for future HD programming seems so counter to DIRECTV's current direction, for CONUS programming anyhow, I'm really surprised by this LOA application.
     
  6. Mar 1, 2012 #6 of 13
    LameLefty

    LameLefty I used to be a rocket scientist

    12,182
    105
    Sep 28, 2006
    Middle...
    Yeah, that was my general feeling, too: why? Unless it's primarily for Mexico/Central America, with the CONUS/Puerto Rico stuff just thrown in as a "kind of what-the-hell/why not?" Or alternately, the whole thing is just trade-bait for another provider: get the license, then sell/lease the capacity - a possibility noted in the body of the application, actually.
     
  7. Mar 1, 2012 #7 of 13
    Davenlr

    Davenlr Geek til I die

    9,136
    27
    Sep 16, 2006
    Last sentence on page two says they need it to enhance capabilities of their current satellite serving Mexico.
     
  8. Mar 1, 2012 #8 of 13
    HoTat2

    HoTat2 Hall Of Fame

    7,260
    179
    Nov 16, 2005
    Los...
    And/or it's saying the present use of an FSS/Ku band satellite for the SKY Mexico service will "ease the transition" to the use of an additional one in DIRECTV KU-97W.

    From the end of p. 2

    I suppose the "existing" Ku-band satellite (actually "satellites") are Ku-band payloads aboard Intelsat 9 and 16 where Sky Mexico programming is relayed from.
     
  9. Mar 1, 2012 #9 of 13
    Davenlr

    Davenlr Geek til I die

    9,136
    27
    Sep 16, 2006
    Dont know for sure. I can think of one perfect use for a KU satellite outside of the normal DirecTv orbital group, and that would be if DirecTv actually thinks 3D HD programming is going to expand and take off above and beyond the current handful of channels, they could dedicate the satellite there now, while there are relatively few 3D customers, and allow them to roll out all new 3D capable installations with a wing dish for that satellite, freeing up valuable HD space on the KA fleet.

    Id still bet it is going to just be used for outside the US programming. Their Latin American services seem to be doing very well, financially.
     
  10. bobnielsen

    bobnielsen Éminence grise

    8,473
    92
    Jun 29, 2006
    Bainbridge...

    Which is better than when Dish only had HD from a satellite at 61.5º. A Sears near here had a dish on the roof which could see it, but I doubt there were many customers who had LOS.
     
  11. carl6

    carl6 Moderator Staff Member DBSTalk Club

    12,473
    937
    Nov 15, 2005
    Seattle, WA
    I had a dish aimed at 72.5 for awhile, but it was really low. I seriously doubt the average customer on the west coast would be able to get line of sight.
     
  12. awblackmon

    awblackmon Legend

    183
    1
    May 20, 2009
    Some, but it will be a big enough problem to aim from every customers home where I live. I hope this is for Mexico.
     
  13. kevinturcotte

    kevinturcotte Active Member

    3,957
    1
    Dec 19, 2006
    Outside...
    Plus throwing up a second dish for whoever wants what's on that bird, completely redesigning the SWM modules (And having to come up with something to combine the signal from the 79 LNB and SWM LNB).
     

Share This Page