1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

New Tact: HD Programmers Stop Movement!

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Programming' started by Ken S, May 22, 2007.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Ken S

    Ken S RIP

    6,201
    0
    Feb 12, 2007
    Since it has become very obvious that DirecTV is using compression that just can't seem to deliver a quality picture when the cameraperson has the audacity to move his/her camera, I suggest...

    All camera movement during sporting events be banned.

    I know this is drastic...but D is obviously incapable of HD without this rule.

    Actually, let's make it real easy on them. All movement of any sort should be stopped.

    Thanks.
     
  2. Earl Bonovich

    Earl Bonovich Lifetime Achiever

    30,092
    3
    Nov 15, 2005
    You see the same thing in OTA-HD MPEG-2... (watch a NBC Sporting event via OTA)
    You see the same thing in MPEG-2 DVD's at time... (it has gotten a lot better over the years, but some of the first DVD's where just terrible)

    Fast movement and compression schemes... simply don't play nicely together.

    Most compression schemes are done via keeping track of the changes (instead of the full picture image), so when you have a LOT of changes frame to frame...
    The compression suffers (either you have to relax it, or you lose something)...
     
  3. Ken S

    Ken S RIP

    6,201
    0
    Feb 12, 2007
    Earl,
    There's a difference. I don't pay for OTA-HD :)
    I'm watching the Yankees/Red Sox game and any time a runner jogs to the dugout or lord forbid a runner scores...the picture becomes horrid.

    So...they just need to stop movement....or do it off camera.

    Obviously D believes the product they're showing to be acceptable.
     
  4. gregchak

    gregchak Legend

    155
    0
    Jan 8, 2007
    I'm in agreement on this one. I don't notice it very much but the broadcast of the Sox/Yankees game this evening is not very good. Even the still shots don't look as good as they should or have in the past.
     
  5. richiephx

    richiephx Godfather

    335
    1
    Jan 18, 2006
    If they would allocate sufficient bandwidth, the macroblocking would be minimized.
     
  6. Drew2k

    Drew2k DIRECTV A-Team

    14,514
    228
    Aug 16, 2006
    What channel are you watching on? Here in NY it's only on channel 9 tonight, which is only available as an SD channel from DirecTV.
     
  7. Earl Bonovich

    Earl Bonovich Lifetime Achiever

    30,092
    3
    Nov 15, 2005
    Hmm... When I was watching the Bulls last week in HD... guess those fast passes, and court shots... that I could see without a blur...

    I guess I need to get my eyes checked.
     
  8. Tom Robertson

    Tom Robertson Lifetime Achiever DBSTalk Club

    21,331
    246
    Nov 15, 2005
    ? So you think DIRECTV should take a lousy, lossy original signal and compress it better? :) This would be cool magic.

    I've seen some horrible stuff come across the OTA feeds until the locals realized they can't steal bits for subchannels.

    Cheers,
    Tom
     
  9. Ken S

    Ken S RIP

    6,201
    0
    Feb 12, 2007
    So the bad PQ is NESN's fault? Ahh...I knew it couldn't be DirecTV's issue. That would be insane.
     
  10. Ken S

    Ken S RIP

    6,201
    0
    Feb 12, 2007
    731 I think
     
  11. STEVED21

    STEVED21 Godfather

    338
    0
    Feb 6, 2006
    I watched two hockey games on NBC-E last weekend. There is no sport with more constant movement on TV and there was nothing wrong with the picture. Except, of course the two second loss of picture typical with NBC HD. But the motion had nothing to do with that.
     
  12. noneroy

    noneroy Godfather

    373
    0
    Aug 21, 2006
    I propose no sports be shown on NBC for any reason.

    That would eliminate my complains about macroblocking. Everything looks fine on ESPN/ABC/CBS....but NBC can't seem to get it right to save their lives....
     
  13. Ken S

    Ken S RIP

    6,201
    0
    Feb 12, 2007
    NBC was something another poster brought up. My posts were concerning the Yankees/Red Sox game on channel 131 which was broadcast by NESN and part of the Extra Innings package with the HD extra service.
     
  14. Steve Robertson

    Steve Robertson Hall Of Fame

    1,664
    0
    Jun 7, 2005
    NESN here in Boston looked very good for the most part not as bad as you are describing
     
  15. Ken S

    Ken S RIP

    6,201
    0
    Feb 12, 2007
    Steve,

    Wasn't just me...and if you weren't watching the game closely you would miss the parts where it got horrid. The basic CF in camera during pitches were fine. It's when they switched to a camera following a guy around third...or someone jogging to the dugout.

    I'm not a PQ snob by any means. When I complain about HD it's generally because the picture looks like something I watched pre cable with my mother running the vacuum cleaner.
     
  16. wilbur_the_goose

    wilbur_the_goose Hall Of Fame

    4,476
    49
    Aug 16, 2006
    patience - once it goes to MPEG-4 on the new bird, it'll be much better. We're in a transition period now, just like earlier when the locals were on CONUS. It's gonna get better.
     
  17. Ken S

    Ken S RIP

    6,201
    0
    Feb 12, 2007
    Wilbur...umm that won't be until the baseball season is just about over (at the earliest). I'd have more patience if we weren't tagged for extra money for this quality HD on the baseball package.
     
  18. islesfan

    islesfan Hall Of Fame

    2,668
    1
    Oct 18, 2006
    Nevada
    I was about to add that the Vs HD on 94/95 are great (NHL), but the NBC feed is awful. Pixelation all the time, it looks like a mosaic, but then, I'm just happy that KRNV has finally aired a HD game in HD! In the past, most of the NHL games on NBC have been in SD on KRNV HD channel.
     
  19. Indiana627

    Indiana627 Hall Of Fame

    3,251
    4
    Nov 18, 2005
    Hockey HD on NBC OTA was much, much better than hockey HD on VS HD channel 94/95 on Directv. So there is definitely more compression with D*.
     
  20. PlanetBill

    PlanetBill Icon

    582
    0
    May 8, 2006
    Where the problem is most noticable for me is on a zoomed in camera shot on a player moving, all the background image is really bad (TNT HD Basketball) but the player is focused. somewhere down the line the bit rate is being reduced. I think the national HD's are the worst for this.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page