Has the OTA antenna upgrade been released? I've been laying low so I haven't heard.
Scott
Scott
And what exactly version number support OTA ?sregener said:We know more than that. We know there is a firmware version that supports the OTA adapter, because the manual has screen shots.
Yes. That is how it works on DISH's other receivers and that is how it is expected to work on the Hopper.bigdog9586 said:I'm asking again.
I had OTA with Directv And it took the OTA channels and put them into the guide and they were no different then the Directv channels. You could click on them and record them just as you would any channel that was on the Sat. Is this how Dish works?
Always the pessimist, are we? Concentrating on what we do not know rather than on what we do.P Smith said:And what exactly version number support OTA ?
I do know what version number supports OTA but it is not released to the public, it is still in beta testing.P Smith said:And what exactly version number support OTA ?
ThanksJames Long said:Yes. That is how it works on DISH's other receivers and that is how it is expected to work on the Hopper.
Ask me and I will make same presentation/PDF for any of your weird request: say - trim recordings and remove commercial breaks from any event.sregener said:Always the pessimist, are we? Concentrating on what we do not know rather than on what we do.
We simply do not know what firmware version was used to make the screenshots. It may be an internal test-only version of the software. I chose my words carefully. However, we can clearly see that someone has written the code to make the OTA Tuner work, which I believe to be a significant step towards getting the OTA Tuner released. It is evidence that the tuner is no longer vaporware, but in the actual product development pipeline (and probably quite far along it, since this manual was released publicly.)
It strains credulity to believe they created a mockup for their documentation to be used by end customers, when it would be simpler to take screen shots of the actual menus so that users would not be confused, should design challenges change the interface. As a former developer, I can tell you that it is far harder to document something that has yet to be written. While it is by no means impossible in this day of Photoshop and sophisticated editing software to create nearly anything imaginable, the question that would have to be asked is why a corporation would do this for one of their own products? At a public media event to demonstrate some new software or feature, sure, but to quietly slip it into their support pages without fanfare?"P Smith" said:Ask me and I will make same presentation/PDF for any of your weird request: say - trim recordings and remove commercial breaks from any event.
The date on the screen shots? 2/29 on the settings menu, 3/11 on the OTA setup menu and 12/15 on the program guide. The same freeze frame is shown in December and February ... so I'd say these were mock-ups.sregener said:We simply do not know what firmware version was used to make the screenshots.
Hmmm. I wonder if Dish is allowed to provide programming info in the Guide for an OTA channel that is blocked for satellite re-transmission due to the dispute. My 722k has OTA. So when the Satellite channel is replaced with a slate, I must wonder how that will affect the OTA version of that channel in the guide. Not much of an inconvenience if it's still available.Bobham said:I want to use the OTA device as a hedge against Gannett loss. Hope Dish releases it soon enough to mitigate the loss of my local channels.
Allowed to? Perhaps ... but DISH doesn't do that. When they pull the channel they change the EPG to "important message" or something like that and there is no correct EPG until the channel returns.moman19 said:Hmmm. I wonder if Dish is allowed to provide programming info in the Guide for an OTA channel that is blocked for satellite re-transmission due to the dispute.
Thanks James, but that isn't what I wanted to hearJames Long said:Allowed to? Perhaps ... but DISH doesn't do that. When they pull the channel they change the EPG to "important message" or something like that and there is no correct EPG until the channel returns.
It is very much an inconvenience if the guide imformation isn't available for OTA channels. Timers won't work and can't even be set (except for manual timers). Some time ago one of my OTA channels I receive with my 722k stopped having guide information. It just says "Digital Service". Now the channel is almost useless. I've gone back and forth with DISH and the station but it seems nothing is going to be done about this for this stationmoman19 said:... Not much of an inconvenience if it's still available.
I have fought the same issues with DISH ... I had one channel that didn't have the correct EPG - and after reporting it I was told (incorrectly) that it was a problem with the station (yet DISH receivers do not get their EPG OTA, they get it from DISH). After that first complaint they made a change that lost me another channel's EPG. So I complained again and got more incorrect information blaming it on my receivers (no, paying for a replacement receiver is not going to help fix the uplink tables). And soon afterwards they changed the EPG data and a third OTA EPG was lost. I decided to stop complaining before I lost EPG for all the channels in my market.jeffdb27 said:It is very much an inconvenience if the guide imformation isn't available for OTA channels. Timers won't work and can't even be set (except for manual timers). Some time ago one of my OTA channels I receive with my 722k stopped having guide information. It just says "Digital Service". Now the channel is almost useless. I've gone back and forth with DISH and the station but it seems nothing is going to be done about this for this station
I really don't understand how this works. I am in the Wichita, KS DMA. KSNW has translator stations around the state. The one where I live in Salina, KS is KSNL ch 6 (low power) and it has guide information. The one in Great Bend, KS ch 2 is KSNC (high power) and it has no guide information.James Long said:BTW: I keep a current list (updated daily) of all of DISH's local market channels and additional EPG channels. It is on my website at:
http://uplink.jameslong.name/locallist.html
The channels may map to a different number than shown on my chart ... that is controlled by the local station. But if a channel isn't there DISH isn't sending EPG. (If you are receiving OTA from more than one market check the other markets on the list.)
The key is the "TSID". Each station transmits this number (or should) to uniquely identify the signal. DISH uses the TSID transmitted by whatever channels are received and matches them to their EPG data. Some matches are done based on channels DISH carries, others match EPG data carried on channels in the 14000s and 15000s.jeffdb27 said:None of these translator stations are in your map list, yet some have guide information on DISH.
James,James Long said:The key is the "TSID". Each station transmits this number (or should) to uniquely identify the signal. DISH uses the TSID transmitted by whatever channels are received and matches them to their EPG data. Some matches are done based on channels DISH carries, others match EPG data carried on channels in the 14000s and 15000s.
Translators can use the same TSID as the station they repeat or they can use a different TSID. If they use the same TSID then DISH cannot tell the difference between the original station and the translator. Usually that means the mapping works. But if the TSID is different and DISH does not add an "EPG only" channel to map to the translator's TSID then there is no match.
Check station's TSID also at www.rabbitears.info, dish could have these wrong.moman19 said:James,
This may be off-topic but it is interesting. PBS has 4 channels in my (St. Louis) market. 009-01 is the main HD channel while the other three are SD alternatives. When I review your web site, all four channels have the same TSID. However, the EPG is only correct for 09-01. EPG shows that 009-02 duplicates whats on the-01 sub (which is incorrect) the-03 sub has no info and the -04 is correct sometimes. So who's a fault here? Dish? Tribune? The station? It's never been correct since the channel went digital.
Here is the EPG in question:moman19 said:James,
This may be off-topic but it is interesting. PBS has 4 channels in my (St. Louis) market. 009-01 is the main HD channel while the other three are SD alternatives. When I review your web site, all four channels have the same TSID. However, the EPG is only correct for 09-01. EPG shows that 009-02 duplicates whats on the-01 sub (which is incorrect) the-03 sub has no info and the -04 is correct sometimes. So who's a fault here? Dish? Tribune? The station? It's never been correct since the channel went digital.
DISH has the TSID right, per "rabbitears". (Fortunately Trip bought both domains to catch the misspellers. )P Smith said:Check station's TSID also at www.rabbitear.info, dish could have these wrong.