1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

Reuters Exclusive: NFL, DirecTV agree to framework for Sunday Ticket deal

Discussion in 'DIRECTV General Discussion' started by Athlon646464, Dec 13, 2013.

  1. Athlon646464

    Athlon646464 Gold Members DBSTalk Gold Club

    3,045
    66
    Feb 23, 2007
    Uxbridge, MA
    Reuters Exclusive: NFL, DirecTV agree to framework for Sunday Ticket deal

    (Reuters) - The National Football League and DirecTV have agreed on a framework for negotiations to renew the satellite TV operator's contract to offer the popular NFL Sunday Ticket football package the company uses to attract subscribers, according to two sources with knowledge of the talks.

    The two sides "are still in material negotiations," but extended their exclusive negotiating period to work through the remaining issues, according to one of the people. The talks might still not result in an agreement.

    Full Story Here

    [​IMG]
     
  2. joshjr

    joshjr Hall Of Fame DBSTalk Club

    4,807
    84
    Aug 2, 2008
    NE Oklahoma
    These things take time. No telling what the hang up is. I think its a pain to not be able to watch the games airing on local channels if I am out and about but have my phone with me. They need a way around that. Not sure what it is but it needs to be fixed as well.
     
  3. acostapimps

    acostapimps Hall Of Famer

    1,866
    50
    Nov 5, 2011
    Illinois
    you mean blackouts, I don't think they would do anything about that per the NFL rules, unless there's another way around it that I'm not aware of.
     
  4. Bambler

    Bambler Legend

    412
    16
    May 30, 2006
    The article mentions DirecTV retains an exclusive negotiating window. I wonder if the NFL will let that lapse? I think it would smart on their part, if nothing else to squeeze DirecTV even more if they do indeed decide to remain the course.

    I can see why some snippets would leak, at least from DirecTV's perspective. The last thing they would want is for their exclusive negotiating window to end without a contract. However, it would be in the best interest of the NFL to see what others may offer and personally, I think that's exactly what may happen.

    I still think that the NFL would be wise to strip DirecTV of streaming rights. Let DirecTV be the sole, "traditional" carrier, but let someone--who is in the business of streaming (like Google)--provide streaming rights for people fed up with traditional carriers and satelite dishes.

    The NFL must know how valuable this commodity is. Even stripped of streaming rights, considering how anxious DirecTV seems to be, they would still fork over a ton to be the exclusive carrier, while begrudgedly giving up streaming rights. At least that's my opinion.
     
  5. Athlon646464

    Athlon646464 Gold Members DBSTalk Gold Club

    3,045
    66
    Feb 23, 2007
    Uxbridge, MA
    ^^^
    If they did that, wouldn't it server to speed up the paradigm shift causing an increased number of cord cutters each month? The news of such a thing done by the NFL would cause more folks to look into how easily it can be done.
     
  6. ATLFAN48

    ATLFAN48 Cool Member

    75
    3
    May 28, 2010
    I read somewhere, may have been the ESPN crawl that the FCC was in negoations with the NFL about easing blackout rules. Might be the holdup.
     
  7. boukengreen

    boukengreen Legend

    396
    18
    Sep 22, 2009
    i thought they was talking about ending blackouts
     
  8. ejbvt

    ejbvt AllStar

    1,449
    130
    Aug 14, 2011
    VT
    I will not be getting Sunday Ticket Max again since it is a complete rip off. If a game is on your local channel - regardless of what the team is - you can't watch it on your phone. COMPLETELY defeats the purpose. When you contact local channels about this, they tell you to get Sunday Ticket.

    When I first got Max, I asked if I would be able to watch the Colts in NC on my phone. CSR said "sure, you're in NC and the Colts are not your local team." She didn't mention that it has nothing to do with local teams but it has to do with local channels. The 4/4:30 games that are billed as "Game of the Week" or whatever on CBS and Fox and most (85-90%) of CBS or Fox affiliates get the game, that game is essentially not on your mobile device for most people. Yet you pay for it to be. Unacceptable.
     
  9. slice1900

    slice1900 Well-Known Member

    6,560
    604
    Feb 14, 2013
    Iowa
    Selling streaming rights would make Sunday Ticket much less valuable to Directv. No one would have to choose Directv just to get access to Sunday Ticket as they do now, and the free Sunday Ticket offers would be much less likely to be a deciding factor in people choosing to switch from cable or Dish to Directv.

    Additionally, the more people have access to watching the NFL games they want at home, the less valuable Sunday Ticket becomes to sports bars and restaurants. Every year it seems like one or two places that used to carry it in this area no longer do, because Directv keeps jacking up the cost. I'm assuming that the renegotiation will cause an even bigger price increase, but if it was accompanied by a cheaper "stream just your team" option that further reduced the potential audience for commercial establishments, they might see a ton of places dropping it between those two factors. If you no longer get Sunday Ticket, it opens the door to dropping Directv entirely...
     
  10. inkahauts

    inkahauts DIRECTV A-Team

    21,529
    957
    Nov 13, 2006
    I would not be surprised if NFL Sunday ticket is the first ott service DIRECTV has, and that they may sell Internet only subscriptions to it so that people without DIRECTV may be able to buy it as well.

    And they could protect their non streaming rights in how they price it all.
     
  11. Bambler

    Bambler Legend

    412
    16
    May 30, 2006
    I would definitely think so.

    If anything, it's already happening. You don't need an abrupt change for a shift to occur; subtle changes over time do just fine. Just look at TVs and computers, for example, the shift from ten years ago to today are dramatic, although there really wasn't a single lynchpin that drove it.

    However, this change, if it did occur, would be a lynchpin in my opinion.

    Maybe DirecTV's motives aren't for the sake of keeping it for the obvious reasons, but to try and hold back what is going to happen whether they like it or not. A mud dam trying to hold back the Amazon River. Good luck.

    I tried to do the math and I think from a purely economical perspective, this thing is a loss-leader for them? Even if they lost every customer, every bar that subscribed because of it, would it equate to $1 billion per year they wouldn't have to pay anymore? I don't know. And I doubt they would really lose everyone anyways.

    A separate streaming deal just makes so much sense to me. I'm sure I'm not the only one that realizes it.
     
  12. slice1900

    slice1900 Well-Known Member

    6,560
    604
    Feb 14, 2013
    Iowa
    According to their investor day a couple days ago, Directv exceeds $1 billion a year in revenue from commercial customers. The vast majority of that would be from sports bars/restaurants, due to the far higher prices they pay than other commercial customers. They probably make a quarter to a third of the $1 billion the pay for Sunday Ticket just from them, plus they have the revenue from who knows how many residential subscribers?

    It may not quite reach break even, but the potential loss of revenue from losing the "Sunday Ticket lock-in" of subscribers who feel it's a must-have can't be underestimated. With that lock in, as more and more teams try to start their own sports channels, like the LA teams are doing, the more fans will hop around from provider to provider to get their local team. Having Sunday Ticket serves as an anchor for those sports fans to keep them with Directv.
     
  13. Bambler

    Bambler Legend

    412
    16
    May 30, 2006

    Well, all the more reasons for the NFL to let DirecTV sweat, at the very least. If it was a loss-leader, it would probably be easier for DirecTV to walk. If what you say is true, maybe not.

    The NFL should really let the exclusive negotiating period lapse. See what they can get for streaming rights or what other bidders may be willing to offer for exclusivity, especially if the above is true and I'm sure they can crunch numbers better than you or I.
     
  14. slice1900

    slice1900 Well-Known Member

    6,560
    604
    Feb 14, 2013
    Iowa
    The exclusive negotiating period isn't just an advantage for the NFL. It works both ways, depending on whether any other offers the NFL gets are better for them or not.

    Let's say Directv makes the NFL an offer that expires when the exclusive negotiating period does. The NFL says they want more, and Directv declines so the talks are at a standstill until the exclusive period ends. The NFL talks to others, then comes back to Directv a month later and says they're prepared to accept the offer Directv previously extended. If that happened, Directv would assume the NFL had looked around and figured out Directv's offer was the best deal for them. Now Directv has them over a barrel and may lower their offer and the NFL comes out a loser by waiting.
     
  15. Bambler

    Bambler Legend

    412
    16
    May 30, 2006
    Thats true, although I seriously doubt that would happen, why else would DirecTV ask for an exclusive negotiating window in their pre-existing contract.

    If a bidding war were to happen, the only winner would be the NFL. DirecTV must know this.
     
  16. davidatl14

    davidatl14 Icon

    551
    2
    Mar 24, 2006
    As long as there are "Over the Air networks" involved in broadcasting the NFL there will be no chance for an ISP to stream NFLST.

    NFL is just smart enough to throw their(ISP) name out for a little extra money and a modicum of leverage.
     
  17. peds48

    peds48 DIRECTV A-Team DBSTalk Club

    18,441
    915
    Jan 10, 2008
    NY
    you are paying for games on ST, not for those on the local station. how is that DirecTV's fault?
     
  18. Bambler

    Bambler Legend

    412
    16
    May 30, 2006
    Never say never, especially when money is involved. Who knows what's going to happen?

    MLB and the NBA have doesn't seem to have a problem with it.
     
  19. davidatl14

    davidatl14 Icon

    551
    2
    Mar 24, 2006
    Because they are completely different packages.

    If MLB played one game a week and it was telecast by local network affiliates at NFL prices there would be no streaming package for them either.
     

Share This Page