1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

Samsung TV quality?

Discussion in 'High Definition Displays' started by F1aReD, Jan 25, 2012.

  1. Jan 25, 2012 #1 of 114
    F1aReD

    F1aReD AllStar

    113
    4
    Sep 27, 2011
    Does anyone have any experience with Samsung quality, such as how long it lasts, etc? It just get's so repetitive so stand at Best Buy and look at TV after TV, they all look the same..but something about the Samsung Smart TVs, the color/picture quality was amazing! They just look so good.

    However, at a different forum there seems to be a number of people saying there 3 or 4 yr old Samsung died or had problems..which is making me re-consider. What is the oldest LCD TV anyone has that has actually lasted beyong 5 yrs?

    Thanks
     
  2. Jan 25, 2012 #2 of 114
    Drucifer

    Drucifer New Member

    9,371
    239
    Feb 12, 2009
    NY Hudson...
    As owner of five, look elsewhere
     
  3. Jan 25, 2012 #3 of 114
    Davenlr

    Davenlr Geek til I die

    9,136
    27
    Sep 16, 2006
    OK, dont laugh. My 37" Polaroid still works perfect. Its so old, it doesnt even have an ATSC tuner in it.

    My well over 5 yr old 46" Sharp Aquos looks as good as the day I bought it. I liked the PQ so much, I replaced it last year with a 60" Aquos.

    Cousin has a 55" LG he loves.

    Truth is, they are all pretty much the same if calibrated right. Look at warranty's, location of service center, availability of local service, features you want, etc. Only the truly el-cheapo off brand models are going to have a sub-par PQ.
     
  4. Jan 25, 2012 #4 of 114
    sigma1914

    sigma1914 DIRECTV A-Team DBSTalk Club

    14,573
    369
    Sep 5, 2006
    Allen, TX
    You bought 5 that you don't like? That's smart. :rolleyes:
     
  5. Jan 25, 2012 #5 of 114
    sigma1914

    sigma1914 DIRECTV A-Team DBSTalk Club

    14,573
    369
    Sep 5, 2006
    Allen, TX
    Excellent advice.
     
  6. Jan 25, 2012 #6 of 114
    lugnutathome

    lugnutathome Hall Of Fame

    3,003
    108
    Apr 13, 2009
    Woodburn, OR
    It's not the PQ that would be the issue. On avsforums sometime back it was a common statement that the Sammies used some components barely within spec and this resulted in in a limited lifespan. I do not know if this has changed or not. This was several years back chatter and a lot has changed I'm sure.

    Really you need deep dive over there and see what the scuttlebutt is currently.

    Don "should take my own advice time permitting" Bolton
     
  7. Jan 25, 2012 #7 of 114
    F1aReD

    F1aReD AllStar

    113
    4
    Sep 27, 2011
    Hmm, I've seen alot of threads about Sharp over at AVS, I'll have to do some research and look at them in the store. I've also liked the PQ of some LG sets, buy the guy at Best Buy said LG was on the lower end, Samsung was better. Thanks for the replys!
     
  8. Jan 25, 2012 #8 of 114
    Drucifer

    Drucifer New Member

    9,371
    239
    Feb 12, 2009
    NY Hudson...
    The don't like part came after the purchase.
     
  9. Jan 25, 2012 #9 of 114
    Davenlr

    Davenlr Geek til I die

    9,136
    27
    Sep 16, 2006
    Please check out AVSForum, and unless he is one of the 0.01% of Best Buy employees that actually knows more than the customer, I wouldnt listen to a word any of them said. Ive never owned one, but I would not consider LG as low end set. Westinghouse, Sanyo, Dynex, Insignia, etc are low end. Some consider Vizio a low end set, some dont. All opinions, really.
     
  10. Jan 25, 2012 #10 of 114
    hilmar2k

    hilmar2k Hall Of Fame

    5,251
    4
    Mar 18, 2007
    I have a older LG that has been great. I also had a Vizio that died after 2 years.

    LG = good
    Vizio = bad
     
  11. Jan 25, 2012 #11 of 114
    Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    37,060
    287
    Jun 18, 2006
    I've read all the threads about older Samsungs dying but I bought one anyway. I figure they probably learned from their mistakes.
     
  12. Jan 25, 2012 #12 of 114
    spartanstew

    spartanstew Dry as a bone

    12,561
    61
    Nov 16, 2005
    Wylie, Texas
    You can read threads about failing TV's from every manufacturer.

    Samsung is no better or worse than others in that regard.

    What matters (to some) is the final picture, which you can't gauge at the store. You need to find expert and user reviews regarding how the display (the particular model) looks after final calibration - they'e not all equal, especially with black levels.
     
  13. Jan 26, 2012 #13 of 114
    bobukcat

    bobukcat Hall Of Fame

    1,965
    2
    Dec 20, 2005
    Word! :yesman:
     
  14. Jan 26, 2012 #14 of 114
    Stuart Sweet

    Stuart Sweet The Shadow Knows!

    37,060
    287
    Jun 18, 2006
    The one thing that I'll say, and I agree with the enthusiasts here, is that there is no way to completely disable the auto-dimming feature on the Samsungs without losing a lot of other functionality. You can minimize it but you'll still see it if there is, for example, one line of white text on a completely black background.

    I'll also mention that my Samsung had some jumpiness with Auto Motion Plus with the first few software releases but it seems much better now.
     
  15. Jan 26, 2012 #15 of 114
    PCampbell

    PCampbell Icon

    1,639
    98
    Nov 18, 2006
    I have 4 and so far I have not had any problens. Oldest is 6 years old.
     
  16. Jan 26, 2012 #16 of 114
    harsh

    harsh Beware the Attack Basset

    21,192
    182
    Jun 14, 2003
    Salem, OR
    You can get a one month subscription to Consumer Reports online for under $4.

    In looking at the ratings of various TVs, it seems obvious that brand is not a determining factor in satisfaction.

    Regardless of what the people who are still clinging to their 15+ year old TVs say, most modern TVs are kinda flimsy and should not be compared with the TVs or brand names of yesteryear.

    The other issue (especially with flat screens) seems to be that repair is decreasingly an option when they crap out. Where old TVs could be repaired board-level or with the replacement of an off-the-shelf component, the new TVs may require a complete electronics or panel replacement (I worry especially about the LED backlit TVs).
     
  17. Jan 26, 2012 #17 of 114
    sigma1914

    sigma1914 DIRECTV A-Team DBSTalk Club

    14,573
    369
    Sep 5, 2006
    Allen, TX
    Consumer Reports is not where you go for electronic purchases like TVs. They're extremely skewed and flawed.
     
  18. Jan 26, 2012 #18 of 114
    klang

    klang Hall Of Fame

    1,268
    2
    Oct 14, 2003
    Near...
    They are a fine source for reliability data. For the ratings you have to see if what they consider important is the same as what you consider important. Always been that way..
     
  19. Jan 26, 2012 #19 of 114
    Laxguy

    Laxguy Honi Soit Qui Mal Y Pense.

    15,153
    546
    Dec 2, 2010
    Winters,...

    +1.

    I would search through CNN and Consumer reports for info, too.

    Looking at store displays, and/or and talking with most salespeople is a waste of time, at least as far as PQ and reliability go.
     
  20. Jan 26, 2012 #20 of 114
    koralis

    koralis Godfather

    299
    3
    Aug 10, 2005
    For what it's worth, Samsung had its second-generation DLPs melting the plastic inside, which they fixed with a replacement part.

    A year or so later the screen was half-blacking out during use. Seemed to be a heat issue. (An external fan blowing on the component fixed that)

    I used mine without much problem (barring the need for the extra fan) till about year 5 when the color wheel blew apart and I replaced it and the lamp.

    After another 3 months the system would just power down periodically for no apparent reason and it only started getting more and more frequent until I replaced it this month.



    So, I'm a little dubious about Samsung's testing methodology. Granted, it was a first gen part, but spending that kind of cash I expected longer trouble-free service. It's just an annecdote, but I'm avoiding samsung for the time being, myself. Bad vibes.


    I'm pretty happy with the new LG 55LE5600 I just got as a replacement though! I'll let you know how I feel in 5 years. ;)
     

Share This Page