1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.
  2. Welcome to the new DBSTalk community platform. We have recently migrated to a community platform called Xenfono and hope you will find this change to your liking. There are some differences, but for the most part, if you just post and read, that will all be the same. If you have questions, please post them in the Forum Support area. Thanks!

SWM 16 in the works...

Discussion in 'DIRECTV Installation/MDU Discussion' started by k2tech, Sep 1, 2009.

  1. Sep 1, 2009 #1 of 145
    k2tech

    k2tech Cool Member

    12
    0
    Dec 9, 2008
    Since D* is now doing away with the 6X16 Multiswitch, it was leaked on the D* installer forums that the SWM 16 (LNB I assume) is in the works. Sounds like it might be a dual SWM 8, with 2 cables coming out, with each capable of 8 tuners.

    Also, they said there will be a push towards all SWM equipment (new installs) in Q4 of this year.

    What do you guys think? Anybody know anything about it?

    If this is going to be, I think a HD-DVR with 4 (or more) tuners should be developed. Outputs for multiple TV's (that could be activated by D* for $5 more per month) on it would be sweet too...
     
  2. Sep 1, 2009 #2 of 145
    RobertE

    RobertE DIRECTV A-Team

    8,024
    0
    Jun 9, 2006
    I doubt it would be twin leads from the LNB. That seems to run contray to the goal of the DECA devices, unless the two SWiM are bridged internally. Only time will tell though.
     
  3. Sep 1, 2009 #3 of 145
    ndole

    ndole Problem Solver

    1,914
    5
    Aug 26, 2009
    A Whole house DVR! Can you Imagine?
    1 or 2 cables running from the ODU to a centralized IRD up on a shelf in the basement. The only trick would be getting HD from the box to the TV locations.
     
  4. Sep 1, 2009 #4 of 145
    evan_s

    evan_s Hall Of Fame

    2,136
    0
    Mar 3, 2008
    I could easily a device that looked like a SWM8 but had 2 completely separate ports that each supported 8 tuners. If they did a SWM16 lnb they would have to have 2 ports on it. I definitely hope that they plan for DECA and set it up to automatically internally bridge the 2 sides of the SWM. It should be possible just requires the appropriate filtering.
     
  5. Sep 1, 2009 #5 of 145
    Mertzen

    Mertzen Hall Of Fame

    3,682
    0
    Dec 8, 2006
    I doubt something like that would be leaked in that way.
     
  6. Sep 1, 2009 #6 of 145
    ndole

    ndole Problem Solver

    1,914
    5
    Aug 26, 2009
    http://forums.directv.com/pe/action/forums/displaythread?rootPostID=10580185


    ["Once all the local offices burn through their existing inventory, they will no longer be able to order them from us- nothing wrong with them technically and we wont be replacing existing switches--

    its just an equipment change with our more aggressive push towards SWM in Q4--- will have less of a need (especially once the SWM16 comes out)"]
     
  7. Sep 1, 2009 #7 of 145
    jdspencer

    jdspencer Hall Of Fame

    6,629
    12
    Nov 7, 2003
    I see nothing in the attachment listed in this link that says anything about an SWM16. It's just conjecture in the replies to the thread.
     
  8. Sep 1, 2009 #8 of 145
    Grentz

    Grentz New Member

    5,916
    1
    Jan 10, 2007
    You can make your own SWM 16 as it is, just do two SWM8s together. In fact they have an all in one splitter that does it all for you.

    Now if there was a SWM LNB that supported 16 receivers, that could be pretty sweet.
     
  9. Sep 1, 2009 #9 of 145
    pressureman0

    pressureman0 AllStar

    78
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    it is coming out 2 wire lnb swm 8 each:D
     
  10. Sep 1, 2009 #10 of 145
    Shades228

    Shades228 DaBears

    6,081
    45
    Mar 18, 2008
    Unless they make SWM 8's available for non commercial/MDU accounts they will not make a SWM 16 and even then I doubt they will do so.

    The need for 16 port multiswitch's are few and far between on average. The amount they order would be overkill just to get a good price point. SWM 8's were designed to be chained together from the start unlike WB6x8's. It can be done but they lose strength or ports depending on parallel or cascade.
     
  11. Sep 1, 2009 #11 of 145
    pressureman0

    pressureman0 AllStar

    78
    0
    Jan 3, 2009
    i hear it from the form guy on channel 578 i had to do a pos on my super buddy for him on a hr22 100:D wait and see
     
  12. Sep 1, 2009 #12 of 145
    texasbrit

    texasbrit DIRECTV A-Team

    5,056
    84
    Aug 9, 2006
    Yes, there is going to be an SWM16. It's apparently not conjecture - read the third post in the thread. From a technology point of view it will be apparently look like two SWM8s (or maybe (also) an SWM dish with two outputs - not sure which, or maybe even both). Not sure what they will do about DECA.
     
  13. Sep 2, 2009 #13 of 145
    cartrivision

    cartrivision Hall Of Fame

    3,862
    0
    Jul 25, 2007

    Doing DECA across two separate SWM circuits shouldn't be a problem. The two SWM circuits could be connected via a band pass filter that passes only the DECA frequencies, thus bridging both circuits at the RF level.
     
  14. Sep 2, 2009 #14 of 145
    carl6

    carl6 Moderator DBSTalk Club

    12,390
    906
    Nov 15, 2005
    Seattle, WA
    As to pushing for all SWM intalls, I do believe that is a long term goal. How rapidly it is implemented is yet to be seen.
     
  15. Sep 2, 2009 #15 of 145
    hdtvfan0001

    hdtvfan0001 DIRECTV A-Team

    32,456
    258
    Jul 28, 2004
    Speculation threads are certainly "fun".....of course 90% of the information is typically wrong.....but they are fun. :D
     
  16. Sep 2, 2009 #16 of 145
    JosephB

    JosephB Icon

    1,300
    36
    Nov 14, 2005
    Birmingham, AL
    That would be trivial, if you can get both of the cables next to each other inside the house you can just bridge them. The coax can only handle 8 tuners, that's why there's the 8 tuner limit now..not because of the SWM switch/LNB but because RG-6 can only handle that much bandwidth reliably. Throw in a specialized DECA adapter with two RG-6 inputs, one from each SWM network and internally bridge them and the problem is solved.
     
  17. Sep 2, 2009 #17 of 145
    veryoldschool

    veryoldschool Lifetime Achiever Staff Member Super Moderator DBSTalk Club

    42,654
    338
    Dec 9, 2006
    "Another option" could be to utilize the current bandwidth by reducing the [current] SWM channel bandwidth of 100 MHz, down to 70 MHz. This would "simply" let 16 tuners access the same "SWM Band" that the eight are now. Guide Data channel stays the same, the upper limit is raised to 2150 MHz from the ~ 1800 MHz now.
    I don't know if this is the way they'll do the SWM16, but it would resolve the dual cable problem.
     
  18. Sep 2, 2009 #18 of 145
    hdtvfan0001

    hdtvfan0001 DIRECTV A-Team

    32,456
    258
    Jul 28, 2004
    Listen to this man - he know of what he speaks. :D
     
  19. Sep 2, 2009 #19 of 145
    RobertE

    RobertE DIRECTV A-Team

    8,024
    0
    Jun 9, 2006
    My thoughts exactly.

    This would also, completely kill any diplexing as well.
     
  20. Sep 2, 2009 #20 of 145
    rudeney

    rudeney Hall Of Fame

    4,266
    1
    May 28, 2007
    But wouldn't that mean none of the existing SWM-ready receivers would work on this "SWM-II" system? Or, is that something that can be reprogrammed in the existing IRD's?
     

Share This Page