DBSTalk.Com

Go Back   DBSTalk.Com > Special Interest > Tech Talk - Gadgets, Gizmos and Technology



Reply
Forum Jump
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-22-03, 11:13 AM   #1   |  Link
lee635
Hall Of Fame
 
Join Date: Apr 17, 2002
Location: NoCal
Posts: 1,928
User# 170
File sharing investigation

A US court has ordered an internet service provider to reveal the identity of a user accused of illegally downloading hundreds of copyrighted songs. The ruling is a landmark for the music industry.


News story
__________________
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. - Ghandi
lee635 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-03, 11:21 AM   #2   |  Link
Scott Greczkowski
Banned User
 
Join Date: Mar 21, 2002
Location: Central Connecticut
Posts: 6,992
User# 4
What a country, they can catch a guy downloading MUSIC yet they still have not found Bin Laden.
Scott Greczkowski is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-03, 04:43 PM   #3   |  Link
firephoto
Icon
 
firephoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 12, 2002
Location: WA
Posts: 863
User# 1124
And this person has hurt who exactly?

I'm sure if they hadn't of downloaded any of the music that they wouldn't of went out and bought it instead.

The RIAA isn't losing money, they just aren't making as much as they think they should be. They have killed careers of good artists, and locked away their music so they can no longer profit off of it. This isn't a poor struggling industry as they would like you to think. The RIAA would be charging everyone that listens to music on the radio if they could.

I applaud Verizon for taking a stand on this.
firephoto is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-03, 04:36 PM   #4   |  Link
lee635
Hall Of Fame
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 17, 2002
Location: NoCal
Posts: 1,928
User# 170
Quote:
Originally posted by firephoto
This isn't a poor struggling industry as they would like you to think. The RIAA would be charging everyone that listens to music on the radio if they could.
Uh....Radio stations already pay a royalty for every song they play based on the number of listeners.
__________________
An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind. - Ghandi
lee635 is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-03, 07:32 PM   #5   |  Link
firephoto
Icon
 
firephoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 12, 2002
Location: WA
Posts: 863
User# 1124
I realize that, but the end user isn't paying to listen to that radio station.
firephoto is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-03, 10:33 PM   #6   |  Link
MarkA
God Bless America!
DBSTalk GOLD MEMBER
 
Join Date: Mar 23, 2002
Location: The US of A
Posts: 2,538
User# 15
Yeah, I agree with fire. But I also see the RIAA's side of things. The law is in their favor. Therefore, I don't download music. And I guarantee you, if I was able to download music to see if I liked it, I'd probably buy a lot more CDs (a downloaded file is NOT the same thing, 128kbit MP3s that often aren't even well encoded are not the same as an uncompressed PCM bitstream. They don't sound nearly as good)
MarkA is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Reply With Quote
Old 01-29-03, 11:18 PM   #7   |  Link
TNGTony
Hall Of Fame
 
TNGTony's Avatar
DBSTalk CLUB MEMBER
 
Join Date: Mar 23, 2002
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 5,422
User# 17
Zac,

I'm with you.

I download music and if I like what I hear, I buy the CD. If I don't, I erase the file.

Since I've been doing this, I've bough music from artists I'd never heard of or would never even think played music I liked before I plucked it off the net.

India Arie, John Mayer, Bare Naked Ladies, Frankie Negron, Andrea Bocelli, Charlie Parker, Shakira, Dave Mathews Band, La India, El Gran Combo, Oscar De Leon and many more owe my CD purchase to the ability to download their music to see if I like it.

Another thing I do is I download tracks I already own on another medium. I could (and have) copied my albums to MP3. But I find it easier to ger Zep 4 from the net.

There are legitamate uses for downloading music.

See ya
Tony
__________________
For the life of me I will never understand why people will pay hundreds and thousands of dollars on a TV that provides the clearest, sharpest, most realistic picture possible and then, voluntarily, distort the image!


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.


To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 0 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
TNGTony is offline   Quote this post in a PM   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump




Bookmarks




Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:02 AM.


Load Balanced and Protected By
 

Follow us on 
 

Hosting Services Powered By


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content Copyright 2001 - 2010 DBSTalk.Com
Copyright ©2004 - 2010 DBSTalk.com - All Rights Reserved. No information may be posted elsewhere without written permission.