Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

SBCA Joins Must-Carry Fight


  • This topic is locked This topic is locked
No replies to this topic

#1 Guest__*

Guest__*
  • Guests
Joined: --

Posted 08 March 2002 - 04:23 AM


The Satellite Broadcasting and Communications Association joined EchoStar in filing a petition asking the Supreme Court to review an appeals court decision upholding satellite must-carry rules.

The must-carry rules are unconstitutional and anti-consumer, SBCA President Andy Wright said. "(Must-carry) clearly violates the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution because it favors certain local broadcasters over others and it penalizes DBS providers for carrying popular stations by forcing them to carry every station without monetary compensation," he said in a statement.

"As we have said from the outset, consumers in the marketplace should decide what programming satellite companies carry, not a federal mandate. We remain firmly confident that we will ultimately win this case on the merits of our constitutional arguments," Wright said.

DirecTV, which has participated in satellite's must-carry legal challenges in the past, reportedly has decided not to join the Supreme Court fight.

When the Supreme Court ruled against cable's challenge of must-carry it did so because it concluded cable was a "bottleneck monopoly wielding market power and had anti-competitive reasons for refusing to carry popular broadcast stations as a result of its vertical integration with programmers and its competition with local broadcasters for local advertising dollars," Wright said.

"Neither of those points, which were specifically cited in the Supreme Court ruling, is applicable to the DBS operators," Wright said.

From <a href="http://www.skyreport.com" target=none>SkyReport</A> (Used with permission)


...Ads Help To Support This SIte...



spam firewall