Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk, like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community, but don't worry this is a simple free process that requires minimal information for you to signup. Be a part of DBSTalk by signing in or creating an account.
  • Start new topics and reply to others
  • Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
  • Get your own profile page and make new friends
  • Send personal messages to other members.
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo

Quantum of Solace Already Breaking Records


  • Please log in to reply
19 replies to this topic

#1 OFFLINE   LarryFlowers

LarryFlowers

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,290 posts
Joined: Sep 22, 2006

Posted 10 November 2008 - 10:41 AM

It hasn't opened in the USA yet (opens Nov 14th) and Quantum of Solace has already taken in $130 million on 9800 screens in 57 countries. It is expected to reach the $150M mark before it opens here to what is expected to be record breaking numbers for the USA.

It's on my "must see" list.
Larry R. Flowers
Winder (Atlanta) GA
Twitter @larryflowers
HR20-700 HR23-700 H24-100
1st DirecTV Receiver Install Nov 1994
i'm a PC Guy

...Ads Help To Support This SIte...

#2 OFFLINE   JM Anthony

JM Anthony

    Child of the 60's

  • Gold Members
  • 3,126 posts
Joined: Nov 16, 2003

Posted 16 November 2008 - 11:33 PM

Just saw it earlier today with #1 daughter. It is a great movie in and of itself and the best of the Bond series. Some aspects of the plot could have been a wee bit stronger, but the movies definitely has the right mood, and I think Craig captures the true spirit of Bond. Some great action sequences.

John
John Anthony
and Gus, the 22# Wonder Cat
E* since ‘96

#3 OFFLINE   spartanstew

spartanstew

    Dry as a bone

  • Registered
  • 12,427 posts
  • LocationWylie, Texas
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

Posted 16 November 2008 - 11:37 PM

I'll see this no matter what and I'm sure I'll enjoy it when it comes out on Blu Ray, but a couple of my favorite critics have panned it.

Robert Wilonsky (from the Ultimate Trailer Show) basically said it was terrible.

I'm sure Directv can't wait to get their hands on your unit.

 
Directv customer since 2000

#4 OFFLINE   Nick

Nick

    In Loving Memory of Lisa Sullivan

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 21,082 posts
  • LocationThe Beautiful Golden Isles of Georgia
Joined: Apr 23, 2002

Posted 17 November 2008 - 09:41 AM

I have done extensive research on the title of this film and the definition of the term "Quantum of Solace". The fact of the matter is that it means nothing, therefor, the title of this movie has no meaning. Did the producer just play word scramble to come up with that?

Since I no longer go to theaters, I haven't seen the film yet and may not even when it comes out on disc. I'm a patient man -- I'll wait and watch it 'free' on HBO HD.

I just don't want to pay good money to see a movie whose title has no meaning.

:sure:

.


~ 12 Year Anniversary Month ~
Charter Gold Club Member
DBSTalk Club ~ 21k Club
Top 10 Poster

.


#5 OFFLINE   paulman182

paulman182

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,832 posts
Joined: Aug 04, 2006

Posted 17 November 2008 - 10:22 AM

"Quantum" means "quantity" or "amount."

"Solace" means "comfort" or "consolation."

So I would take it to mean "A quantity of comfort."

It was the title of an Ian Fleming short story, although the movie is not based on that story.

Now if you are saying the title has no meaning in regards to the plot of the film, maybe that's so. But it's not like they picked a title like "Orange of elephants."

Equipment includes a buncha stuff that I no longer have interest in detailing


#6 OFFLINE   jodyguercio

jodyguercio

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,793 posts
Joined: Aug 16, 2007

Posted 17 November 2008 - 11:34 AM

"Quantum" means "quantity" or "amount."

"Solace" means "comfort" or "consolation."

So I would take it to mean "A quantity of comfort."

It was the title of an Ian Fleming short story, although the movie is not based on that story.

Now if you are saying the title has no meaning in regards to the plot of the film, maybe that's so. But it's not like they picked a title like "Orange of elephants."


Using your definitions of the words of the title, one could take this to mean that Bond was looking for a "Quantum of Solace" in the fact that he was going to try and avenge the death of Vesper from Casino Royal. I havent seen the movie yet just the trailer and what has been written about the film so far.

#7 OFFLINE   tcusta00

tcusta00

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 7,911 posts
Joined: Dec 31, 2007

Posted 17 November 2008 - 11:48 AM

Makes better sense with some background on the title as it pertains to the Bond character... I'm sure it ties in with this particular movie somehow, though I haven't watched it yet:

http://www.tjbd.co.u...oes-it-mean.htm

#8 OFFLINE   cweave02

cweave02

    W4SKO

  • Registered
  • 283 posts
Joined: Oct 12, 2007

Posted 17 November 2008 - 11:58 AM

Can't wait to see it. I took the title to mean that there really is no quantity - or measure, for solace.
HR21-100, Samsung HLT-5076S (HDMI)
HR21-100, Samsung LN-S4096
H20-700 (x2 in Virginia)

Go TRIBE!

#9 OFFLINE   njblackberry

njblackberry

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 653 posts
Joined: Dec 29, 2007

Posted 17 November 2008 - 12:08 PM

I enjoyed the film much more than I had expected. Many of the criticisms made are justified, but it was a very well done movie. A bit short compared to many Bond movies, but excellent nonetheless.

#10 OFFLINE   JM Anthony

JM Anthony

    Child of the 60's

  • Gold Members
  • 3,126 posts
Joined: Nov 16, 2003

Posted 17 November 2008 - 03:15 PM

I'll see this no matter what and I'm sure I'll enjoy it when it comes out on Blu Ray, but a couple of my favorite critics have panned it.

Robert Wilonsky (from the Ultimate Trailer Show) basically said it was terrible.


Wow! That's surprising. I usually see eye to eye with Robert on films, but not this one. As I said earlier, the story line isn't the strongest, but the rest of the film is first rate.

John
John Anthony
and Gus, the 22# Wonder Cat
E* since ‘96

#11 OFFLINE   hdtvfan0001

hdtvfan0001

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 31,529 posts
Joined: Jul 28, 2004

Posted 17 November 2008 - 04:59 PM

There's never been a doubt that Bond sells.
DBSTalk CHAT ROOM MODERATOR
DirecTV Customer Since 1996

#12 OFFLINE   bobukcat

bobukcat

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,957 posts
Joined: Dec 20, 2005

Posted 18 November 2008 - 09:55 AM

I purchased one of the 3 movie BD bundles from Amazon and the package included a code to redeem for two free (up to $10.50 each) tickets to Quantum. I was definitely going to go see it anyway (I've seen every Bond film since For Your Eyes Only (except the License to Kill because Dalton was so bad in Living Daylights)) so this was just a nice bonus, now I just have to find time to go - I'm looking forward to it!

#13 OFFLINE   HIPAR

HIPAR

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 749 posts
Joined: May 14, 2005

Posted 19 November 2008 - 04:52 PM

I saw it . . my immediate impressions (without writing a treatise) about the movie and general direction Bond movies are heading:

This modern Bond behaves as a psychopathic killing machine who lacks the sophistication of a Connery era Bond. Although, I believe Craig has a proper Bond presence and temperament he isn't being allowed to develop his character into someone we get to know. For the movies, I'll take a debonair style Bond.

If you think Bond movies are about 'Bond Girls' you might be somewhat disappointed. Although the girls are very pretty, don't expect 'sex bombs' like Claudine Auger or Ursula Andress and they don't exude the sophistication of a Maud Adams or Jane Seymour. Modern Bond girls seem to be tending towards Sci-fi channel style 'super chicks' who kick the stuffing out of the bad guys and are smarter than Einstein.

Maybe they are running out of evilness. Gone are the days of SPECTRE with insanely evil sophisticated plots spreading dominance through worldwide chaos. The organization Bond now confronts has 'people everywhere' but operates more akin to a gang of dope pushing street thugs.

M's office now looks like a gigantic iPhone rather than the nerve center of British Intelligence. Then, relations between the CIA and British Intelligence have been severely strained and they are no longer fully cooperating with the US going alone for its own interests. Is there some anti-American message there?

They do include lots of action scenes but you really can't see them. I actually experienced a headache from the 'Spaz-cam' shooting style. Many scenes go by so fast that I couldn't follow the continuity. To worsen matters, the dialog was often unintelligible. I hope they fix this for the next film.

One more thing, I wish they told me Casino Royale is a prerequisite to the storyline before I bought my ticket. Is Bond turning into a Flash Gorden style serial?

--- CHAS
But I don't want to go among mad people

#14 OFFLINE   BattleZone

BattleZone

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 8,969 posts
Joined: Nov 13, 2007

Posted 19 November 2008 - 05:21 PM

Maybe they are running out of evilness. Gone are the days of SPECTRE with insanely evil sophisticated plots spreading dominance through worldwide chaos. The organization Bond now confronts has 'people everywhere' but operates more akin to a gang of dope pushing street thugs.


In this era of complete moral relativism, I'm not sure most people even know what "evil" is anymore. Society has spent the last few decades trying to convince everyone that there's no such thing; that "bad guys" are really victims, and we just need to understand them, etc.

Bond was always about "good vs. evil", and the lines were very clear. Today's writers don't have much practice with such well-defined distinctions, Bond or otherwise.

#15 OFFLINE   Captain_Canuck

Captain_Canuck

    Mentor

  • Registered
  • 38 posts
Joined: Dec 02, 2008

Posted 02 December 2008 - 06:46 PM

it was a good movie but confusing. Daniel Craig still does a good job as Bond tho 7/10

#16 OFFLINE   wilbur_the_goose

wilbur_the_goose

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,370 posts
Joined: Aug 16, 2006

Posted 03 December 2008 - 07:57 AM

I give it 1.5 stars. Horrible screenwriting.

#17 OFFLINE   joshjr

joshjr

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 4,288 posts
  • LocationNE Oklahoma
Joined: Aug 02, 2008

Posted 03 December 2008 - 10:56 AM

I thought it was an okay movie. Casino Royal was way better. It was not bad acting or anything like that just the story was a little lack luster for a normal Bond film. I liked it but expected better I guess. I still think Daniel Craig is the right person for the job for the time being.

#18 OFFLINE   Lee L

Lee L

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,134 posts
Joined: Aug 15, 2002

Posted 03 December 2008 - 12:03 PM

I thought it could have been maybe 5-10 minutes longer with some more plot development in the right places and it would have rocked. We had watched Casino Royale the night before and that helped, but QoS does not stand alone too well IMO.


DirecTV, please don't make me have to go back to watching March Madness in standard Def! Oh, and the usual begging for AMC and BBC America. You are so close to actually being the HD Leader.

#19 OFFLINE   turey22

turey22

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,177 posts
Joined: Jul 30, 2007

Posted 03 December 2008 - 12:16 PM

haha it was a great movie. watched it on sunday and i loved it

#20 OFFLINE   turey22

turey22

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,177 posts
Joined: Jul 30, 2007

Posted 03 December 2008 - 12:17 PM

the movie was kind of confusing though. i wish it had a better plot




spam firewall