Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo

Will Digital Switch Leave Some Behind?


  • Please log in to reply
80 replies to this topic

#51 OFFLINE   SayWhat?

SayWhat?

    Know Nothing

  • Registered
  • 6,088 posts
Joined: Jun 06, 2009

Posted 06 June 2009 - 10:05 PM

It's going to leave me behind and that has nothing to do with my state of readiness. I have two ATSC televisions but there are no digital signals here in the Pocono Mountains of NE Pa. My weak but viewable analogs from New York and Philadelphia will be gone.

--- CHAS


You won't be the only one. I would imagine many non-urban stations will be taking a major hit in their viewer populations and subsequent loss of revenue due to having to lower their advertising rates.

But, I guess in the end, I won't really care. I don't really watch broadcast TV anymore except for the local news.
Help stamp out Twits and Twitterers!

HD, SchmacHD!! Just be glad you've got a picture at all.

...Ads Help To Support This Site...

#52 OFFLINE   aa9vi

aa9vi

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 310 posts
Joined: Sep 03, 2007

Posted 10 June 2009 - 07:59 AM

Sylvia Bridges is a moron. That's why she won't be able to watch TV any more.

#53 OFFLINE   HIPAR

HIPAR

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 749 posts
Joined: May 14, 2005

Posted 14 June 2009 - 10:54 AM

Figured it's time to try for some OTA television here in the Pocono Mountains of NE Pa .. Yep, left behind. :mad:

I receive nothing from my Scranton official DMA. I receive one local NTSC translator on Channel 60. It's some kind of marketing channel .. they're peddling a 'Greatest rock band' DVD.

I see nightlight on channels 2 and 4 from new York City. I see nightlight on KYW channel 3 from Philadelphia. They are all snowy but, as usual, watchable.

How about this .. the nightlight from KYW is being sponsored by Comcast. :rolleyes:

Of course I have satellite here but that's not the point.

--- CHAS
But I don't want to go among mad people

#54 OFFLINE   ziggy29

ziggy29

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 691 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio DMA
Joined: Nov 18, 2004

Posted 14 June 2009 - 12:15 PM

A fair number of folks in the Austin area are being "left behind" by the local Fox affiliate's move from RF channel 56 to 7. Of course, they are on a temporary facility at about 1/3 power for a few more weeks, so maybe it will resolve when they are at full power.
My stuff: D* HR20-700 (living room) / R15 (bedroom) / OTA 91XG+YA1713+HDP269 / Harmony 880

#55 OFFLINE   premio

premio

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 395 posts
Joined: Sep 26, 2006

Posted 14 June 2009 - 11:06 PM

DirecTV OTA mappings is leaving me behind in Sacramento. :sigh: At least most still work.
<!---
It's Comcastic!
--->

#56 OFFLINE   HIPAR

HIPAR

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 749 posts
Joined: May 14, 2005

Posted 19 June 2009 - 09:36 AM

It's been a week now and there's now no press coverage .. this is now ancient history. The FCC cites call volume to the help lines is continuing to diminish with the vast majority of viewer problems being easily solved by correcting converter box hook-ups and rescans.

I heard FCC Commissioner Copps dislocated his shoulder while patting himself on the back for pulling this thing off so brilliantly. :lol:

--- CHAS
But I don't want to go among mad people

#57 OFFLINE   sum_random_dork

sum_random_dork

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 893 posts
Joined: Aug 21, 2008

Posted 19 June 2009 - 10:33 AM

I know there is/will be issues in the SF/Oak/SJ DMA for a while, many of the stations had their antennas at the bottome of Sutro Tower for DTV, well now they have to move all those up to the top of Sutro. KGO and KTVU have both done stories stating it could be Oct before everything is fully operational. I lost 2 stations in the switch that use to come in in DTV, but with frequency changes were lost. Both have told me "keep rescanning, by Oct you should be ok." Doesn't bother me too much because I have D*, but if I just used an antenna I'd be a bit frustrated. I also know in Sac, KCRA still has to do some antenna modifications before they will be fully operational, according to their engineering dept that should be Sept/Oct before completed. With all this I have to imagine there are other markets still not fully operational. My question on all this is ...we had a few years to know this was happening why weren't the TV stations moving their antennas around before?

#58 OFFLINE   hobie346

hobie346

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 688 posts
Joined: Feb 23, 2007

Posted 19 June 2009 - 11:47 AM

I know there is/will be issues in the SF/Oak/SJ DMA for a while, many of the stations had their antennas at the bottome of Sutro Tower for DTV, well now they have to move all those up to the top of Sutro. KGO and KTVU have both done stories stating it could be Oct before everything is fully operational. I lost 2 stations in the switch that use to come in in DTV, but with frequency changes were lost. Both have told me "keep rescanning, by Oct you should be ok." Doesn't bother me too much because I have D*, but if I just used an antenna I'd be a bit frustrated. I also know in Sac, KCRA still has to do some antenna modifications before they will be fully operational, according to their engineering dept that should be Sept/Oct before completed. With all this I have to imagine there are other markets still not fully operational. My question on all this is ...we had a few years to know this was happening why weren't the TV stations moving their antennas around before?


My problem with 2-1 (KTVU), 4-1 (KRON) and 7-1 (KGO) is I can get them on my digtial TV but I can't get them on my HR20-700 nor my HR23-700 w/ AM21. I've call D* and a week later still no signal.

#59 OFFLINE   say-what

say-what

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 5,788 posts
  • LocationNew Orleans
Joined: Dec 13, 2006

Posted 19 June 2009 - 01:24 PM

My problem with 2-1 (KTVU), 4-1 (KRON) and 7-1 (KGO) is I can get them on my digtial TV but I can't get them on my HR20-700 nor my HR23-700 w/ AM21. I've call D* and a week later still no signal.

Try going into the antenna setup on the HR2x, select "Reset Settings" to wipe the current db, then redo the "Initial Setup", it may help if the changes have already been mapped to the DirecTV database.

I had a problem with 2 of my locals swapping: ch 26 and 38 shared a transmitter, but on the 12th 26 moved to its original frequency when they turned analog off - ch 38 went from 15-2 to 15-1 and ch 26 went from 15-1 to 26-1. Redoing everything fixed my problem.

#60 OFFLINE   samhevener

samhevener

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 302 posts
Joined: Feb 23, 2006

Posted 20 June 2009 - 04:17 AM

It's been a week now and there's now no press coverage .. this is now ancient history. The FCC cites call volume to the help lines is continuing to diminish with the vast majority of viewer problems being easily solved by correcting converter box hook-ups and rescans.

I heard FCC Commissioner Copps dislocated his shoulder while patting himself on the back for pulling this thing off so brilliantly. :lol:

--- CHAS


You must not be reading the newspapers. The Cleveland Plain Dealer has had several stories the past week about problems viewers are having. Even those with outdoor antennas. Several station's coverage area is much less than before, leaving many viewers out.
I would say 6 months from now the switchover will be, as you call it, ancient history.
AN OLD GEEZER WHO REMEMBERS THE DUMONT TELEVISION NETWORK AND IT'S TOP RATED "CAPTAIN VIDEO AND HIS VIDEO RANGERS", TV NEWS ANCHORMEN WEARING HATS DURING THE NEWSCAST, ONLY 180 SECONDS OF COMMERICALS EACH HALF HOUR, 3 STATIONS ON THE AIR WITH THEIR TEST PATTERNS AIRED FROM 2 TO 3PM, PROGRAMMING FROM 3PM TO 11:30 AND SIGNING OFF AT 11:30PM. HOW COULD I FORGET THE SINGLE FRAME VERTICAL ROLL WHEN THE STATIONS SWITCHED FROM NETWORK TO LOCAL OR LOCAL TO NETWORK AND THE TIME TONE ON THE HOUR.

#61 OFFLINE   johnp37

johnp37

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 537 posts
  • LocationCentral NJ
Joined: Sep 14, 2006

Posted 20 June 2009 - 06:20 AM

It appears I will have to replace my DB8 (UHF) antenna because NY stations 7 and 11 in their infinite wisdom decided to switch to VHF. So those are now gone until my new VHF/UHF antenna arrives. But the good news is I still have all my locals on D*. I like to have my ota locals as a back up in those infrequent foul weather outages. Anyone else lose their locals because of this?

#62 OFFLINE   ChrisPC

ChrisPC

    Godfather

  • Registered
  • 437 posts
Joined: Jun 16, 2003

Posted 20 June 2009 - 11:44 AM

It's been a week now and there's now no press coverage .. this is now ancient history.
--- CHAS


I guess you don't live in a market with VHF DTV. I have three, including one low-band on 5. All week, they've been running stories about people who can't get the signal, and sending someone out to fix it.

Of course, they usually fix it by just moving the antenna, which the viewer is usually too dumb or lazy to do. In one story, the FCC was even sending an engineer to homes and businesses to adjust their antennas.

The station keeps saying it's not their fault, it's the FCC frequency they were given. Well, who asked the FCC to keep their VHF channel? :rolleyes:

#63 OFFLINE   V'ger

V'ger

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 551 posts
Joined: Oct 03, 2007

Posted 20 June 2009 - 02:45 PM

WKRC in Cincinnati went from 800KW on Ch 31 to 15.5KW on Ch 12 on June 12th. I live about 55 miles, so was in the fringe range. I have seperate UHF and VHF antennas, amps and downfeeds from a 35' tower. I had no problem getting them on UHF at almost any angle pointed towards the south. Now on VHF, I have to be within 5 degrees of directly at their tower to get them during the day (a lot easier to get them at night).

A co-worker of mine says her mom, who leaves near the GE plant (10 miles from tower) and has an outdoor antenna, can't get them.

I got the feeling the decision to go back to VHF was a bean counter issue. It takes a lot less power to run 15KW. I also heard they reused their analog VHF 12 antenna, so it is not likely optimized for the wide band DTV transmission.

Sweeps comes in July. I bet they do something about it when their previously #1 news is 3rd or 4th due to the loss of most of their OTA viewers.

For comparision, WCPO is on VHF Channel 10 at 19.4KW at about the same height as WKRC. But I can get WCPO 10x better than WKRC. And WCPO is moving their antenna up 100' on their tower in the next week. Of course, WCPO-DT has been on Ch 10 for years and has had time to iron the bugs out. In my location, I had interference from WBNS analog 10 in Columbus. When they went dark, WCPO came in strong.

Edited by V'ger, 20 June 2009 - 02:52 PM.


#64 OFFLINE   HIPAR

HIPAR

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 749 posts
Joined: May 14, 2005

Posted 20 June 2009 - 04:16 PM

Undoubtedly, a great percentage of those who can't make DTV work aren't making a big stink over it, have just thrown up their arms in surrender and called the cable company.

The Philadelphia WPVI (RF6) website displays a big red banner on its home page that's sponsored by Comcast offering an introductory offer for basic cable.

You can play your 'poor and disadvantaged' card if you wish, but the popular press and Washington politicians are declaring this DTV thing a non-event. :nono:

--- CHAS
But I don't want to go among mad people

#65 OFFLINE   SayWhat?

SayWhat?

    Know Nothing

  • Registered
  • 6,088 posts
Joined: Jun 06, 2009

Posted 20 June 2009 - 04:39 PM

^^^^ Spoken by someone who clearly doesn't understand that unemployment is at it's highest level in decades with no end in sight. Ever increasing numbers of people are living at or below poverty level. Home prices in some areas have fallen 30% or more. People's savings have been wiped out. Visits to food banks are way up while government services to help them are down or being cancelled outright.

Where are people supposed to get $50/mo for cable? Or even $20/mo? What about the vast areas where cable isn't even available?

Try supporting a family of four on $20,000/yr or less (takehome/net about $14,000), then tell me how much of a 'non-event' it is when your kids can't watch TV anymore.

I'm sure from some of the set-ups I've seen discussed on this board some of you probably bring home $14,000 a WEEK, so you can't possibly understand how this is affecting the REAL America.

Edited by SayWhat?, 20 June 2009 - 04:55 PM.

Help stamp out Twits and Twitterers!

HD, SchmacHD!! Just be glad you've got a picture at all.

#66 OFFLINE   Stewart Vernon

Stewart Vernon

    Excellent Adventurer

  • Moderators
  • 20,615 posts
  • LocationKittrell, NC
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Posted 20 June 2009 - 05:28 PM

^^^^ Spoken by someone who clearly doesn't understand that unemployment is at it's highest level in decades with no end in sight. Ever increasing numbers of people are living at or below poverty level. Home prices in some areas have fallen 30% or more. People's savings have been wiped out. Visits to food banks are way up while government services to help them are down or being cancelled outright.

Where are people supposed to get $50/mo for cable? Or even $20/mo? What about the vast areas where cable isn't even available?


Umm... as I have said before... anyone in such dire straits that they cannot afford a converter box OR lifeline cable (assuming cable is available), probably has FAR more important expenses to attend to.

Agreed in tough economic times people need to make hard choices... but no one is owed TV... I completely sympathise with someone unable to afford food or medicine or clothing or heat/cooling... but I have ZERO sympathy for someone who wants cable/satellite/digital tv.

The homeless want homes... the hungry want food... the sick want medical care... people simply without TV should be thankful they don't have all those other problems.

-- !rotaredoM mA eM

What I do when I'm not here


#67 OFFLINE   roadrunner1782

roadrunner1782

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 748 posts
Joined: Sep 27, 2008

Posted 20 June 2009 - 06:31 PM

Umm... as I have said before... anyone in such dire straits that they cannot afford a converter box OR lifeline cable (assuming cable is available), probably has FAR more important expenses to attend to.

Agreed in tough economic times people need to make hard choices... but no one is owed TV... I completely sympathise with someone unable to afford food or medicine or clothing or heat/cooling... but I have ZERO sympathy for someone who wants cable/satellite/digital tv.

The homeless want homes... the hungry want food... the sick want medical care... people simply without TV should be thankful they don't have all those other problems.


Very well said!!!

#68 OFFLINE   Mark Holtz

Mark Holtz

    Day Sleeper

  • Topic Starter
  • DBSTalk Club
  • 10,019 posts
  • LocationSacramento, CA
Joined: Mar 23, 2002

Posted 20 June 2009 - 07:18 PM

Try supporting a family of four on $20,000/yr or less (takehome/net about $14,000), then tell me how much of a 'non-event' it is when your kids can't watch TV anymore.

The three basic human needs does not include television. So, yes, it will be an event when the television goes. After about a month of whining, they will discover alternatives.

"In an effort to increase your cable and satellite bills beyond the point of affordability and to further pad the pockets of our executives..."
Check out my list of links.


#69 OFFLINE   HIPAR

HIPAR

    Icon

  • Registered
  • 749 posts
Joined: May 14, 2005

Posted 20 June 2009 - 07:32 PM

I wouldn't be surprised if Congress passes emergency legislation providing coupons for pay TV service. Program costs will dissolve into the trillions of other government expenditures.

--- CHAS
But I don't want to go among mad people

#70 ONLINE   Tom Robertson

Tom Robertson

    Lifetime Achiever

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 20,764 posts
Joined: Nov 15, 2005

Posted 20 June 2009 - 08:13 PM

Let's not stray too far into political meanderings and guessing games. Thanks.

Besides "everyone" thought it was the elderly that weren't ready--and they were always the most ready group. :)

Yes, this was very smooth as a transition goes. Yes, there are some problems. (We have one station still off the air as near as I can tell.) Yes, there will be some tweaks. That's all ok. No one ever expected 100%.

A few people have better picture than they had before. A few do not--yet. And a few might not until they get a far bigger antenna or DIRECTV. :)

Cheers,
Tom

Go Packers!

My real treasures: 5 Grandchildren - S, D, M, M, C ; Now 5! Great-Grandtibbers - B, H, J, A, and M (Born 7/31/2011)


#71 OFFLINE   SayWhat?

SayWhat?

    Know Nothing

  • Registered
  • 6,088 posts
Joined: Jun 06, 2009

Posted 20 June 2009 - 09:43 PM

but I have ZERO sympathy for someone who wants cable/satellite/digital tv.

The homeless want homes... the hungry want food... the sick want medical care... people simply without TV should be thankful they don't have all those other problems.


What makes you think they don't have other problems?

What are they supposed to do for entertainment, stare at a blank wall? Most of them can't even afford a newspaper. Movie rentals? Not a chance. What are the kids supposed to do, go out and start robbing people? Up until a week ago, they had at least some TV to watch. Now, many of them have nothing at all. Have you ever had a houseful of small children with nothing to watch? The kids don't understand any of this, all they can do is look at Mom and wonder what happened.

When you've lived on minimum wage, working part-time jobs, you'll have a better perspective.

I just don't understand the kind of closed-minded thinking I'm seeing here.
Help stamp out Twits and Twitterers!

HD, SchmacHD!! Just be glad you've got a picture at all.

#72 ONLINE   Tom Robertson

Tom Robertson

    Lifetime Achiever

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 20,764 posts
Joined: Nov 15, 2005

Posted 20 June 2009 - 10:10 PM

What makes you think they don't have other problems?

What are they supposed to do for entertainment, stare at a blank wall? Most of them can't even afford a newspaper. Movie rentals? Not a chance. What are the kids supposed to do, go out and start robbing people? Up until a week ago, they had at least some TV to watch. Now, many of them have nothing at all. Have you ever had a houseful of small children with nothing to watch? The kids don't understand any of this, all they can do is look at Mom and wonder what happened.

When you've lived on minimum wage, working part-time jobs, you'll have a better perspective.

I just don't understand the kind of closed-minded thinking I'm seeing here.


The converter boxes were almost free. (If you looked hard, you might even get it free.) So I'm more confused rather than lack of caring. (Not that I feel you were commenting about me in particular).

And I also understand people being too busy--but all in all, they can get an inexpensive fix and get TV fairly soon.

I suspect "most" of the people who don't have TV today, really don't watch much or are able to get the fix quickly. Unless there is a much larger demographic of "poor" that didn't get the nearly free boxes than I expect.

Cheers,
Tom

Go Packers!

My real treasures: 5 Grandchildren - S, D, M, M, C ; Now 5! Great-Grandtibbers - B, H, J, A, and M (Born 7/31/2011)


#73 OFFLINE   Zellio

Zellio

    Icon

  • Banned User
  • 643 posts
Joined: Mar 08, 2009

Posted 20 June 2009 - 10:50 PM

What makes you think they don't have other problems?

What are they supposed to do for entertainment, stare at a blank wall? Most of them can't even afford a newspaper. Movie rentals? Not a chance. What are the kids supposed to do, go out and start robbing people? Up until a week ago, they had at least some TV to watch. Now, many of them have nothing at all. Have you ever had a houseful of small children with nothing to watch? The kids don't understand any of this, all they can do is look at Mom and wonder what happened.

When you've lived on minimum wage, working part-time jobs, you'll have a better perspective.

I just don't understand the kind of closed-minded thinking I'm seeing here.


Closed minded? The thinking I'm seeing from you is what got us sub-prime mortages.

Here's an idea: LIVE WITHIN YOUR MEANS. If that means you can't afford tv, then you can't.

You do know people before tv and internet did such things like throw football? You don't need the idiot box.

And btw, you act like no one shares this?

I grew up in a family that had a highly paid genius engineer dad. We were high middle class, half way between middle and upper. My dad decided to leave us (after beating up my mom) and we had to cancel pretty much everything.

I didn't have cable from 1990 until 2008 when I got directv hd. Hell, for 18 years all I had was a crappy analog signal that I'd be lucky if I got a picture, and it was color. When people had 486 machines in 1992 I had a 286.

In my area 20 minutes south of Atlanta, I'd get weak signals for local tv stations. I'd get MAYBE 1 or two channels, only 1 usually worth watching (tbs).

I worked my way past this. We had everything when I was young, lost everything, and I had to give up what I had. I had to work my way back up. So don't give me this crap.

And yes, guess what? When I was a late teen in the late 90's (I'm 30 btw) I was highly envious of people with nice stereo systems (Compared to my what, 90's boombox as a stereo? bleh), nice houses, nice everything.

But want to know something? You aren't owed anything. I now have a few nice hdtvs, but it wasn't because some generous stranger dropped them off!

If you honestly think losing your tv is such a big deal, try losing cable, expensive food, going to the movies, buying video games, good clothing (and having to buy used clothing). Try falling that far and then talk to me about tv.

Edited by Zellio, 20 June 2009 - 11:21 PM.


#74 ONLINE   Tom Robertson

Tom Robertson

    Lifetime Achiever

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 20,764 posts
Joined: Nov 15, 2005

Posted 20 June 2009 - 11:35 PM

That does remind me that as a child of the 60's and 70's, there were times we didn't have a TV after parents divorced. Usually grandparents helped with a TV, but we still had times without. Or a black and white after everything had gone color in the 70s.

And we never had cable--there weren't one :)

Go Packers!

My real treasures: 5 Grandchildren - S, D, M, M, C ; Now 5! Great-Grandtibbers - B, H, J, A, and M (Born 7/31/2011)


#75 OFFLINE   Stewart Vernon

Stewart Vernon

    Excellent Adventurer

  • Moderators
  • 20,615 posts
  • LocationKittrell, NC
Joined: Jan 07, 2005

Posted 20 June 2009 - 11:37 PM

For much of my youth I didn't have a TV of my own. We had one small TV in the living room and I was an only child. Sometimes that TV was color, sometimes it was black & white.

For a while we lived where there was no cable... so OTA was it. Even when we moved to an area where we could get cable, I was nearly 18 before we got it for the first time.

I did have an Atari videogame (the 2600, later a 5200) and we had some of the early computers... but I also played outside most of the time as a kid... riding my bike or wandering around in the woods or playing basketball.

As an adult, I've had either cable or satellite for as far back as I can remember now... and I love me some TV! I especially love me some HD and Blu ray movies.

When I first moved into my house there was an ice storm that killed power one week. A similar thing happened a year later but it was a hurricane in the fall. No power for a week meant no TV or computer or even phone. I had water, fortunately.

People were freaking out having no TV... and I remember thinking how peaceful it was. I actually didn't mind the break from TV, even as much as I like it.

Anyone who truly can't handle being without TV (as opposed to just wishing you could watch something or missing a favorite show) doesn't really have an idea what it is to need something.

I've been fortunate enough to not go without food or shelter or have need for medical care that I couldn't afford, even when without a job... but I have known people who weren't so fortunate. I never remember those people wishing for a TV.

To be somewhat on topic... At this point I suspect most people who are "left behind" fall into two categories:

1. People for whom TV wasn't a priority, so they can live without it or are intentionally choosing not to jump aboard yet.

2. People who are in need of a great many more important things than TV.

I'll say it again, I like me some TV! But if all the TVs in the world stopped working tomorrow, I'd be fine with that too... and I'd find something else to do to entertain myself.

-- !rotaredoM mA eM

What I do when I'm not here





Protected By... spam firewall...And...