You said that the jury's verdicts were wrong. I stated that the rulings were overturned because the CAFC ruled that the judge made an error; they did not say the jury made a mistake.
In fact the appeals court overturned the jury's hardware claims because the jury's verdicts were wrong, if you read the appeals court decision carefully. Though in the end it blamed Judge Folsom's wrong instructions for the jury to reach the wrong verdicts.
Nothing I have written could be considered colorful, just the facts.
"This is why many of your acrobatic leaps in logic are flawed."
The above statement is a generalized opinion, not a fact, you don't even know the difference between a fact and an opinion? Now I can show you many more flawed statements said by you and your TiVo folks, but that is never useful in determining whether the next statement is correct or not. Whether the next statement/opinion is correct or not will be soley based on the facts related specifically to that statement.
Edited by jacmyoung, 03 March 2010 - 06:33 PM.