Welcome to DBSTalk
- Start new topics and reply to others
- Subscribe to topics and forums to get email updates
- Get your own profile page and make new friends
- Send personal messages to other members.
Posted 11 October 2009 - 09:25 AM
Posted 11 October 2009 - 11:12 AM
My thinking is that if you have 33-2 or 33-2 those would be the sub-channels.
Where I live, 3-1, 15-1, 21-1, 27-1, and 47-1 are the 5 networks (CBS, PBS, NBC, ABC, and FOX).
At least 4 have what I think of as sub-channels, like 3-2, 15-2, and 15-3.
Posted 11 October 2009 - 11:36 AM
Posted 11 October 2009 - 12:10 PM
On September 25th, 2008, the over-the-air channel configuration became:
xx.1 main UNC-TV/PBS programming in HD
xx.2 UNC-KD (children's programming)
xx.3 UNC-NC (North Carolina-centric programming)
Receivers: H25-500 HD Receiver; H21-100 HD Receiver
Mobile Devices: Nomad
Additional equipment configuration details
Sun & moon help site your satellite dish
Posted 11 October 2009 - 12:55 PM
Posted 11 October 2009 - 01:14 PM
Posted 11 October 2009 - 01:31 PM
If DirecTV starts offering the sub channels, it doesn't necessarily mean a degrading of picture. The degrading is usually with the OTA version as there is only so much bandwidth per channel. Now if DirecTV is picking up the OTA channel, that's a whole different story.
While you're correct from an engineering point of view, in the larger scheme of things, yes, carrying them means downgrading the PQ of the main channel assignment. The only reason a station will and does do sub-channels is for revenue.
One of our local affiliates doesn't offer programming on one of it's sub-channels anymore, but only has the local time on it. Why would they ever do such thing one may ask, as it's taking bandwidth away from their HD channel? Because once the sub-channel goes black, the local cable companies don't have to carry it due to their contract. So basically, the affiliate is putting a clock on the sub-channel, in order not to lose the cable carriage.
Once Directv starts carrying the sub-channels, this gives them even more incentive. So, for the well being of the HD channel, you don't want Directv, or anyone for that matter, carrying the sub-channels.
EDIT: I'm 100% against sub-channels, and even the argument about having a local weather sub-channel doesn't hold water with me. We have two affiliates that have weather on sub-channels, but even during a time when someone needs to know about the weather (tornado warnings, flash-floods, etc), they still break into the main channel, either via crawls, OTS (over the shoulder), or flat out interrupt the programming. So, imo, what's the point of having a local weather sub-channel when you're going to interrupt the main programming anyway? All you're doing is ruining the HD picture.
Edited by taz291819, 11 October 2009 - 01:37 PM.
Posted 11 October 2009 - 07:19 PM
and they said / the GM to request it.