Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo

DIRECTV Satellite Discussion D-14 @99W


  • Please log in to reply
2879 replies to this topic

#851 OFFLINE   Curtis0620

Curtis0620

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 1,473 posts
Joined: Apr 22, 2002

Posted 10 September 2013 - 07:46 AM

Lyngsat has DIRECTV14 as a 1/15/2014 to 3/1/2014 launch.


HR34-700
HR24-200
HR24-200

...Ads Help To Support This Site...

#852 OFFLINE   cypherx

cypherx

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,123 posts
  • LocationPA - Berks County
Joined: Aug 27, 2010

Posted 10 September 2013 - 09:54 AM

So they are going to use it to serve terrorist nations? Lovely.


Sent from my iPhone using DBSTalk mobile app

- > Link to my setup thread< -

My  DirecTV HD WISHLIST:  NickJR, Nicktoons, Revolt.TV, FXM, We, Oxygen, The Hub, Fuse, GSN, Sprout, GAC, Esquire, BBC World News, Sundance, Up, Music Choice Play HD, Al Jazeera America, Military Channel, NASA

My DirecTV SD WISHLIST: MTV Hits, MTV Jams, Music Choice, Youtoo TV

 

---

HR44-500
HR24-200

 


#853 OFFLINE   P Smith

P Smith

    Mr. FixAnything

  • Registered
  • 20,253 posts
  • LocationMediterranean Sea
Joined: Jul 25, 2002

Posted 10 September 2013 - 10:09 AM

it's money, boatload of money, dude ! :)



#854 OFFLINE   cypherx

cypherx

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 3,123 posts
  • LocationPA - Berks County
Joined: Aug 27, 2010

Posted 10 September 2013 - 10:52 AM

it's money, boatload of money, dude ! :)


True, money talks!

Now funnel that money into a massive HD channel expansion as soon as D14 is deemed operational!


Sent from my iPhone using DBSTalk mobile app

- > Link to my setup thread< -

My  DirecTV HD WISHLIST:  NickJR, Nicktoons, Revolt.TV, FXM, We, Oxygen, The Hub, Fuse, GSN, Sprout, GAC, Esquire, BBC World News, Sundance, Up, Music Choice Play HD, Al Jazeera America, Military Channel, NASA

My DirecTV SD WISHLIST: MTV Hits, MTV Jams, Music Choice, Youtoo TV

 

---

HR44-500
HR24-200

 


#855 OFFLINE   HoTat2

HoTat2

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,520 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA.
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

Posted 10 September 2013 - 12:15 PM

Lyngsat has DIRECTV14 as a 1/15/2014 to 3/1/2014 launch.

Yeah, that's simply the launch window posted in D14's Schedule S filed with the FCC last year sometime.

 

Lyngsat is posting old news on this.


DIRECTV sub. since Sep. of '95


#856 OFFLINE   HoTat2

HoTat2

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,520 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA.
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

Posted 03 October 2013 - 09:04 AM

Man ... I usually checkout the FCC's IBFS website every two or three days for any new satellite filings by DIRECTV, principally for news on D14 and D15 and for Intelsat Int'l about anything on IS30 and IS31 for DIRECTV LA. Though Sixto usually beats me to it. :)

 

And the site is offline right now due to the government shutdown ... LOL.  


Edited by HoTat2, 03 October 2013 - 09:06 AM.

DIRECTV sub. since Sep. of '95


#857 OFFLINE   Sixto

Sixto

    Hall Of Fame

  • Topic Starter
  • DBSTalk Club
  • 12,211 posts
Joined: Nov 17, 2005

Posted 03 October 2013 - 12:27 PM

Yep, noticed that yesterday. Down.
DirecTV: Genie HR44, H25, CCK, GenioGo, SWiM-16 & SWiM-8, DECA to Gigabit Switch with FiOS (75/75)
FiOS: Roamio Pro's (2), Roamio Plus, Mini's (4) with Ultimate HD (My Roamio Thoughts)

#858 OFFLINE   LameLefty

LameLefty

    I used to be a rocket scientist

  • Registered
  • 12,177 posts
  • LocationMiddle Tennessee
Joined: Sep 28, 2006

Posted 07 October 2013 - 07:56 PM

So has anyone else posted this and I just missed it? Without access to FCC filings, I'm feeling annoyingly cut off. :rolleyes:

 

http://www.arianespa...013-DIRECTV.asp

 


Arianespace to launch a small Direct to Home satellite for DIRECTV

Paris, September 9, 2013

Arianespace and DIRECTV announced today a launch contract for a small DTH satellite. The launch will take place in the second half of 2015 from Europe’s Spaceport in French Guiana on an Ariane 5.

DIRECTV, one of the world’s leading providers of television entertainment services, will utilize the satellite capacity to expand the delivery of high definition, 3-D television and cinema programming.

The satellite, built by Orbital and based on the Star 2 platform, will have a mass of approximately 3.2 metric tons at launch.

“We are honored that DIRECTV has entrusted yet another satellite launch to Arianespace. This 11th contract inked with DIRECTV reflects the adaptability of our services, which allows us to offer launches for both three-ton and six-ton satellites,” said Stéphane Israël, Chairman & CEO of Arianespace.

Any ideas what role it will play in the Directv fleet? That size is much smaller than the most recent Spaceway 1 & 2/D10/11/12/14/15 class Ka fleet. I wonder if it's for upgrades to the legacy Ku fleet. I'd love to hear some informed speculation from you guys.


"Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!"
Directv since 1997
Will Work for Beer


#859 OFFLINE   RAD

RAD

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 16,176 posts
  • LocationDripping Springs, TX
Joined: Aug 05, 2002

Posted 07 October 2013 - 08:08 PM

I think it was mentioned before that it's going to DIRECTV-LA and not for the US market.


Sent from my iPhone using DBSTalk

See post My Setup for configuration info.


#860 OFFLINE   LameLefty

LameLefty

    I used to be a rocket scientist

  • Registered
  • 12,177 posts
  • LocationMiddle Tennessee
Joined: Sep 28, 2006

Posted 07 October 2013 - 08:15 PM

I think it was mentioned before that it's going to DIRECTV-LA and not for the US market.


Sent from my iPhone using DBSTalk

 

Well, there's other stuff in there about the Intelsat leased capacity for Latin America. The first one of those is going up on Arianespace too:

 

http://www.arianespa...32Satellite.asp

 

I'm pretty sure those birds are large Astrium platforms though, like Directv 15, not the smaller Orbital platform mentioned in the press release I linked first.  

 

EDITED TO ADD:

 

Okay did some more digging and it appears you're right, RAD. The tentative Arianespace manifest lists "DIRECTV INNOVA/SKY MEXICO 1" for the second half of 2015. That seems to fit their earlier description of the satellite as a "small Direct-to-Home", when with Orbital's description of this type of satellite bus:

 

 

 

Because Orbital STAR satellites are smaller and significantly less expensive to manufacture and launch, they are an ideal fit for established companies that wish add incremental capacity for their network or provide back-up capacity for key customers.

 

http://www.orbital.c...ons/index.shtml

 

Orbital Fact Sheet, just FYI:

http://www.orbital.c...tarBus_fact.pdf

 

The Arianespace launch manifest also lists Directv 15 as "End of year" 2014. While I'm glad Directv is booking all their flights on Arianespace (currently the most reliable commercial launch provider), they are also widely regarded as the most expensive. Will be good to see SpaceX get a number of successful GTO missions over the next year or 2 in order to put some more downward pressure on launch prices. It would also be really good if ILS gets Proton reliability back up to something reasonable. Between their problems and SeaLaunch's failures (and subsequent corporate collapse), there isn't enough competition in the global GTO launch market.


"Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!"
Directv since 1997
Will Work for Beer


#861 OFFLINE   HoTat2

HoTat2

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,520 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA.
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

Posted 08 October 2013 - 01:46 PM

Well, there's other stuff in there about the Intelsat leased capacity for Latin America. The first one of those is going up on Arianespace too:

 

http://www.arianespa...32Satellite.asp

 

I'm pretty sure those birds are large Astrium platforms though, like Directv 15, not the smaller Orbital platform mentioned in the press release I linked first. ...  

 

 

Nah ...

 

Intelsat 30 and 31 (or DLA1 and 2) are being built the Space Systems Loral, not Astrium;

 http://www.spacenews...directv-1b-deal

 

Using their "SS/L 1300E" bus according the engineering statement Intelsat filed with the FCC. 

 

And both are scheduled for launch sometime in the 3rd quarters of 2014 and 2015 respectively by Arianspace.  


DIRECTV sub. since Sep. of '95


#862 OFFLINE   HoTat2

HoTat2

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,520 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA.
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

Posted 08 October 2013 - 03:25 PM

BTW;

 

Any folks here with a knack for understanding the orbital mechanics of artificial satellites have any idea as to how Intelsat plans to eventually keep the 3 satellites for DIRECTV LA (IS30, 31, and G3C) in geostationary orbit all at the same location of 95.1 W.L. yet sufficiently separated due to different orbital eccentricities the inclination offsets of their respective orbits? :confused:

 

From the Intelsat filed Engineering Statement;

 

Sec. 2.9) Satellite Station-Keeping

 

Section 25.210(j) of the Commission’s rules stipulates that space stations

operated in the geostationary satellite orbit must be maintained within 0.05°

of their assigned orbital longitude in the east/west direction, unless

specifically authorized by the Commission to operate with a different

longitudinal tolerance. In this regard, Intelsat requests that Intelsat 30 be

maintained within 0.1° of 95.1° W.L. orbital location.

As previously stated, Intelsat plans to operate Galaxy 3C, Intelsat 30 and

another planned satellite, Intelsat 31, at 95.1° W.L. Intelsat shall maintain

sufficient spatial separation between these three spacecraft through the use

of orbit eccentricity and inclination offsets. As part of this process, Intelsat

requires greater flexibility with regard to the amount of excursion that each

of these satellites may be permitted to have in the east/west direction. This

slight increase in the station-keeping tolerance will have a negligible

interference impact on the nearest adjacent satellites, Galaxy 25 at 93.1°

W.L. and Galaxy 19 at 97° W.L, which are licensed to Intelsat.

 

The attitude of the spacecraft will be maintained with accuracy consistent

with the achievement of the specified communications performance, after

taking into account all error sources (i.e., attitude perturbations, thermal

distortions, misalignments, orbital tolerances and thruster perturbations).

 

      


DIRECTV sub. since Sep. of '95


#863 OFFLINE   slice1900

slice1900

    AllStar

  • Registered
  • 3,733 posts
  • LocationIowa
Joined: Feb 14, 2013

Posted 08 October 2013 - 04:00 PM

Why should it be hard to maintain three satellites to within 0.05 degrees of their designated location? 0.05 degrees is about 10 miles. This Wikipedia article mentions the first time it was done back in the 90s they eventually had 8 satellites in one slot, inside a cube of 150 km (about 3.3 miles on each side) so keeping three in one slot should be simple by comparison.


SL5, PI-6S, SA-6AL 3xSWM16, 21 H20-100, 1 H20-600, 7 H24-700/AM21


#864 OFFLINE   HoTat2

HoTat2

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,520 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA.
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

Posted 08 October 2013 - 08:11 PM

Why should it be hard to maintain three satellites to within 0.05 degrees of their designated location? 0.05 degrees is about 10 miles. This Wikipedia article mentions the first time it was done back in the 90s they eventually had 8 satellites in one slot, inside a cube of 150 km (about 3.3 miles on each side) so keeping three in one slot should be simple by comparison.

OK;

 

But the statements about setting eccentricity and inclination offsets of the satellite orbits to assure separation seemed to indicate some kind of plan for a sort of figure-8 ("analemma") type path to be used by one or all three of the birds together to achieve this separation.     


DIRECTV sub. since Sep. of '95


#865 OFFLINE   LameLefty

LameLefty

    I used to be a rocket scientist

  • Registered
  • 12,177 posts
  • LocationMiddle Tennessee
Joined: Sep 28, 2006

Posted 08 October 2013 - 08:39 PM

OK;

But the statements about setting eccentricity and inclination offsets of the satellite orbits to assure separation seemed to indicate some kind of plan for a sort of figure-8 ("analemma") type path to be used by one or all three of the birds together to achieve this separation.

What that means is basically this: as seen from a fixed point on the Earth's surface, they vehicles will appear to the naked eye to be fixed but there is always some irreguality - eccentricity isn't precisely zero, the Earth isn't a perfect sphere, solar pressue and lunar gravity causes small perturbations, etc. So with all those influences in mind, the vehicles in that "slot" are given nominal baseline parameters several miles offset from one another (I did the math many years ago in the D10 threads). But not only are they offset a bit laterally like that, since eccentricity isn't (and cannot be) perfectly zero, a natural consequence will be that they will not EXACTLY match the Earth's rotational rate. So, they will each naturally appear to drift a tiny bit east and west. Also since the Earth isn't a perfect sphere and eccentricity isn't perfectly zero, the apparent altitude of the satellite from Earth's center of mass will change ever so slightly. This also results in east-west drift because higher orbits are slower than lower ones - the satellites will appear to move eastward when they are lower, and westward when they are higher, as seen from the ground. So the control volumes for each vehicle is thus a 3-D space defined by the limits of apparent east-west drift and by the apogee/perigee altitude difference which defines the orbital eccentricity.

"Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!"
Directv since 1997
Will Work for Beer


#866 OFFLINE   LameLefty

LameLefty

    I used to be a rocket scientist

  • Registered
  • 12,177 posts
  • LocationMiddle Tennessee
Joined: Sep 28, 2006

Posted 08 October 2013 - 08:42 PM

Intelsat 30 and 31 (or DLA1 and 2) are being built the Space Systems Loral, not Astrium;
 http://www.spacenews...directv-1b-deal
 
Using their "SS/L 1300E" bus according the engineering statement Intelsat filed with the FCC. 


Yeah, brain fart when I posted last night. I knew that but got myself off into rabbit hole digging into the oddball Orbital bird and got my mental wires crossed. I've never really made it a priority to pay much attention to the Directv Latin America stuff.

"Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!"
Directv since 1997
Will Work for Beer


#867 OFFLINE   LameLefty

LameLefty

    I used to be a rocket scientist

  • Registered
  • 12,177 posts
  • LocationMiddle Tennessee
Joined: Sep 28, 2006

Posted 08 October 2013 - 08:49 PM

What that means is basically this: as seen from a fixed point on the Earth's surface, they vehicles will appear to the naked eye to be fixed but there is always some irreguality - eccentricity isn't precisely zero, the Earth isn't a perfect sphere, solar pressue and lunar gravity causes small perturbations, etc. So with all those influences in mind, the vehicles in that "slot" are given nominal baseline parameters several miles offset from one another (I did the math many years ago in the D10 threads). But not only are they offset a bit laterally like that, since eccentricity isn't (and cannot be) perfectly zero, a natural consequence will be that they will not EXACTLY match the Earth's rotational rate. So, they will each naturally appear to drift a tiny bit east and west. Also since the Earth isn't a perfect sphere and eccentricity isn't perfectly zero, the apparent altitude of the satellite from Earth's center of mass will change ever so slightly. This also results in east-west drift because higher orbits are slower than lower ones - the satellites will appear to move eastward when they are lower, and westward when they are higher, as seen from the ground. So the control volumes for each vehicle is thus a 3-D space defined by the limits of apparent east-west drift and by the apogee/perigee altitude difference which defines the orbital eccentricity, as well as north/south drift rate caused slight variances in orbital inclination.

Planning to keep several satellites at one "slot" takes the individual orbital parameters for each vehicle into account and sets up tiny variances intentionally such that their control volumes never intersect; as one is showing a tiny apparent drift south, its nearest neighbor will appear to drift a tiny bit north, etc. It's sort of an elaborate 3D choreography to get it set up and it requires minor tweaks every so often to maintain, which is why satellites have limited lifetimes and why otherwise usable vehicles are retired - at some point their fuel reserves get low and they are required by international agreement to save enough to ensure that they can be raised a few hundred kilometers into a graveyard orbit out of the way.


EDITED TO ADD: Didn't mean to quote my own post, sorry. Meant to edit it and didn't realized I'd pressed the wrong button until I'd already posted.

"Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!"
Directv since 1997
Will Work for Beer


#868 OFFLINE   HoTat2

HoTat2

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,520 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA.
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

Posted 09 October 2013 - 02:56 AM

Planning to keep several satellites at one "slot" takes the individual orbital parameters for each vehicle into account and sets up tiny variances intentionally such that their control volumes never intersect; as one is showing a tiny apparent drift south, its nearest neighbor will appear to drift a tiny bit north, etc. It's sort of an elaborate 3D choreography to get it set up and it requires minor tweaks every so often to maintain, which is why satellites have limited lifetimes and why otherwise usable vehicles are retired - at some point their fuel reserves get low and they are required by international agreement to save enough to ensure that they can be raised a few hundred kilometers into a graveyard orbit out of the way.


EDITED TO ADD: Didn't mean to quote my own post, sorry. Meant to edit it and didn't realized I'd pressed the wrong button until I'd already posted.

Since all the satellites operate on most if not all of the same uplink frequency bands, do the large earth station dishes have to move slightly to track the individual satellites' movement throughout this "3-D choreography?"

 

That is to say with satellites performing this "orbital ballet" at the same slot, what prevents co-channel interference between the separate uplink transmissions intended for G3C, IS30, and IS31 since they all receive on most if not all the same frequencies?   


DIRECTV sub. since Sep. of '95


#869 OFFLINE   harsh

harsh

    Beware the Attack Basset

  • Registered
  • 20,236 posts
  • LocationSalem, OR
Joined: Jun 14, 2003

Posted 09 October 2013 - 06:57 AM

HoTat2, on 08 Oct 2013 - 2:25 PM, said:
Any folks here with a knack for understanding the orbital mechanics of artificial satellites have any idea as to how Intelsat plans to eventually keep the 3 satellites for DIRECTV LA (IS30, 31, and G3C) in geostationary orbit all at the same location of 95.1 W.L. yet sufficiently separated due to different orbital eccentricities the inclination offsets of their respective orbits? :confused:

If it helps to know that it is currently being done with the same type of birds, there are three TV satellites at 101W, 107.3W, 110W and 119W that are operated by different organizations and they haven't crashed yet.

Every 1/100th of a degree is 4.53 miles.

It is also important to remember that each satellite is impinged upon by roughly the same external forces so as they get pushed or pulled about, that movement is more or less in unison.

Too often we enjoy the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought. -- JFK


#870 OFFLINE   LameLefty

LameLefty

    I used to be a rocket scientist

  • Registered
  • 12,177 posts
  • LocationMiddle Tennessee
Joined: Sep 28, 2006

Posted 09 October 2013 - 08:16 AM

It is also important to remember that each satellite is impinged upon by roughly the same external forces so as they get pushed or pulled about, that movement is more or less in unison.

 

 

That's true enough for lunar tides, but it's not necessarily the case for solar radiation pressure, or resultant vectors caused by small asymmetries in attitude control and propulsion systems. That's why operators agree to coordinate their satellite control operations, and why the FCC is concerned enough about signal interference that licensees must always make sure to put assurances in their application and permit paperwork that control signals won't interfere with one another.


"Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!"
Directv since 1997
Will Work for Beer


#871 OFFLINE   LameLefty

LameLefty

    I used to be a rocket scientist

  • Registered
  • 12,177 posts
  • LocationMiddle Tennessee
Joined: Sep 28, 2006

Posted 09 October 2013 - 08:23 AM

Since all the satellites operate on most if not all of the same uplink frequency bands, do the large earth station dishes have to move slightly to track the individual satellites' movement throughout this "3-D choreography?"

 

That is to say with satellites performing this "orbital ballet" at the same slot, what prevents co-channel interference between the separate uplink transmissions intended for G3C, IS30, and IS31 since they all receive on most if not all the same frequencies?   

 

These might be better questions for VOS or someone with a lot of real-world operational RF experience like Smiddy ... As a first guesstimate, I would think the answer would depend on the beam width of the control signals as to how precise the pointing must be. I THINK that the usual variations during normal orbital operations wouldn't require re-pointing. I mean, a few miles either way, as seen from 22,300 odd miles away, is a REALLY small variation for a large uplink dish.

 

I believe the FCC permitting paperwork specifies the allowable uplink and control frequencies for each satellite vehicle and operators must again provide verification that they will not interfere with one another. I would think these days that part of that is may be use of digital encoding and encryption of control signals, as well as frequency variations for uplinked content, but I could be wrong - it's nothing I've looked at very closely.


"Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!"
Directv since 1997
Will Work for Beer


#872 OFFLINE   James Long

James Long

    Ready for Uplink!

  • Super Moderators
  • 40,954 posts
  • LocationMichiana
Joined: Apr 17, 2003

Posted 09 October 2013 - 04:31 PM

Since all the satellites operate on most if not all of the same uplink frequency bands, do the large earth station dishes have to move slightly to track the individual satellites' movement throughout this "3-D choreography?"


The uplinks are tied to the downlinks so you would only find the same uplink bands on satellites with the same downlink bands. If you can find the Schedule S filed with the FCC for US satellites or data from the ITU for all satellites it isn't hard to see how the spectrum is managed.

That is to say with satellites performing this "orbital ballet" at the same slot, what prevents co-channel interference between the separate uplink transmissions intended for G3C, IS30, and IS31 since they all receive on most if not all the same frequencies?


One common feature you will find on satellites with spotbeams or more than one footprint is a receive dish on the satellite that is aimed at a specific receive site. Uplinks from Brazil do not interfere with uplinks from LA.

The global antennas used for receiving station keeping commands require more coordination.
Welcome to DBS Talk - Let's talk about DBS! (The Digital Bit Stream)
DISH Network vs DirecTV: HD Channel List - DISH Network HD Capacity, HD Conversion and more.
DISH Network complete channel lists and lists by satellite location are in The Uplink Activity Center.
Unless otherwise noted, I speak for myself. Content is not controlled by DISH Network, DirecTV or any other company.

#873 OFFLINE   slice1900

slice1900

    AllStar

  • Registered
  • 3,733 posts
  • LocationIowa
Joined: Feb 14, 2013

Posted 18 October 2013 - 03:55 PM

I was looking back through some older posts on this thread while killing time on a conference call and saw D15 was listed as being destined for 97W. Is there still a chance for that? That would obviously require a new LNB, but presumably could use the existing Slimline dish.

 

There was a link to a patent someone dug up back on page 9 for a LNB that had feedhorns designed to receive 17.3 - 20.2 GHz (i.e. specifically including RDBS frequencies) that included a frequency selective reflecting surface on the LNB arm. This would reflect a Ku signal and pass a Ka signal after it reflected off the dish towards the 101 feedhorn, so both could be received from 101 at the same time. If they went this way the LNB arm would need to be replaced as well. Is it designed to be removable on a Slimline dish? Of course, just because there's a patent filed doesn't mean it'll go anywhere, of course. I wonder how that high tech surface would do in places that get snow/ice. Or bird poop :)

 

The other thing I was wondering about was there was some discussion about maybe needing more than 4 coaxes at some point, and going to 6. It looks like right now the only open space is 1650 - 2150 MHz on the 99/101 lines, which is where D14's Ka capacity would presumably go, creating a 99cb. But that's all there is, so either they go higher in frequency like VOS suggests, or need another pair of coaxes.

 

Going to higher frequencies is obviously preferable, assuming that the tuners in legacy capable receivers and SWM 8/16/32 switches can handle the 2350 - 2850 MHz range. If they were forced to go to 6 coaxes, I wonder if there would be any chance of using the flex ports to avoid the need to replace all those SWM multiswitches? They'd have to replicate 95's content on one of the new sats to allow freeing up on both flex ports, but 95 has only 9 transponders, so that would not be difficult.


SL5, PI-6S, SA-6AL 3xSWM16, 21 H20-100, 1 H20-600, 7 H24-700/AM21


#874 OFFLINE   inkahauts

inkahauts

    Hall Of Fame

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 17,065 posts
Joined: Nov 13, 2006

Posted 18 October 2013 - 03:59 PM

No clue and d15 could be for Latin America too you never know for sure they can always change things. I doubt it but...,

#875 OFFLINE   HoTat2

HoTat2

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,520 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA.
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

Posted 19 October 2013 - 02:06 AM

I was looking back through some older posts on this thread while killing time on a conference call and saw D15 was listed as being destined for 97W. Is there still a chance for that? That would obviously require a new LNB, but presumably could use the existing Slimline dish.

 

Know which post that is?

 

Looking back all I could locate was a brief mention of it by P. Smith on page 8 and it was in the form of a question.

 

IIRC, DIRECTV withdrew their bid for a Ka band satellite at 97W.

 

There was a link to a patent someone dug up back on page 9 for a LNB that had feedhorns designed to receive 17.3 - 20.2 GHz (i.e. specifically including RDBS frequencies) that included a frequency selective reflecting surface on the LNB arm. This would reflect a Ku signal and pass a Ka signal after it reflected off the dish towards the 101 feedhorn, so both could be received from 101 at the same time. If they went this way the LNB arm would need to be replaced as well. Is it designed to be removable on a Slimline dish? Of course, just because there's a patent filed doesn't mean it'll go anywhere, of course. I wonder how that high tech surface would do in places that get snow/ice. Or bird poop :)

 

Yeah ,,, a novel concept;

 

Not sure how much interest DIRECTV at least has in developing something akin to it for receiving the Ka and Ku band from the same slot, but did like to see how the author purposes a 17.3-20.2 GHz wide feedhorn which I feel is the approach to be used at 99 and 103 instead of separate ones for the RDBS and the Ka bands.

  

The other thing I was wondering about was there was some discussion about maybe needing more than 4 coaxes at some point, and going to 6. It looks like right now the only open space is 1650 - 2150 MHz on the 99/101 lines, which is where D14's Ka capacity would presumably go, creating a 99cb. But that's all there is, so either they go higher in frequency like VOS suggests, or need another pair of coaxes.

 

Likely to be called "99ca" :)

 

And yes, the Ka-hi band (1650-2150 MHz) at 99W currently occupied sparely by spotbeams from Spaceway 2 on tps. 1-6 is to be completely filled by D14 tps.1-24 (tps. 1-8 are spotbeams). Not sure what that means for SW2's future role at 99W now though.

 

Going to higher frequencies is obviously preferable, assuming that the tuners in legacy capable receivers and SWM 8/16/32 switches can handle the 2350 - 2850 MHz range.

 

 For the ITU region covering the U.S., RDBS band  is only 400 MHz.
If they were forced to go to 6 coaxes, I wonder if there would be any chance of using the flex ports to avoid the need to replace all those SWM multiswitches? They'd have to replicate 95's content on one of the new sats to allow freeing up on both flex ports, but 95 has only 9 transponders, so that would not be difficult.

 

Yeah, since there is really no room in the current stack of three 500 MHz wide blocks separated by 200 MHz guard bands, the LNBFs connected to external SWiM units will either have to move the converted RDBS band outside the stack "electrically" by converting to a frequency somewhere above 2150 MHz. Or move it "physically" by re-tasking the flexports.

 

I feel it will be the prior since other than mounting the SWIM module outdoors, having six coax runs to the POE of a residence is a total non-starter. Four is bad enough.   


DIRECTV sub. since Sep. of '95





Protected By... spam firewall...And...