Jump to content


Welcome to DBSTalk


Sign In 

Create Account
Welcome to DBSTalk. Our community covers all aspects of video delivery solutions including: Direct Broadcast Satellite (DBS), Cable Television, and Internet Protocol Television (IPTV). We also have forums to discuss popular television programs, home theater equipment, and internet streaming service providers. Members of our community include experts who can help you solve technical problems, industry professionals, company representatives, and novices who are here to learn.

Like most online communities you must register to view or post in our community. Sign-up is a free and simple process that requires minimal information. Be a part of our community by signing in or creating an account. The Digital Bit Stream starts here!
  • Reply to existing topics or start a discussion of your own
  • Subscribe to topics and forums and get email updates
  • Send private personal messages (PM) to other forum members
  • Customize your profile page and make new friends
 
Guest Message by DevFuse

Photo

Considering FiOS (Tough decision)


  • Please log in to reply
47 replies to this topic

#26 OFFLINE   HoTat2

HoTat2

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,600 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA.
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

Posted 20 July 2010 - 12:22 PM

Yes... and yes. You can hook up as ethernet with FiOS internet, allowing you to use whatever router you want. Or you can bridge their router to one of your choosing. The only reason you would need to use coax to the router at all is if you have their TV service AND you use one of their set top boxes (doesn't apply if you have, say, a TiVo). The reason is that the use MoCA for guide data, VOD, and for the multi-room DVR feeds.
The router that Verizon supplies is a combo router/NIM.

When I first got FiOS (I only had internet/phone with them (they didn't offer TV in my area yet). They hooked me up as ethernet, and gave me a Linksys router to use. When I upgraded to TV service, they swapped out my router for an Actiontec, and hooked a coax from the cable splitter to the router.


Ok, thanks;

So in this example image below of a FiOS ONT from the WiKipedia, if I'm reading it correctly this customer has FiOS internet and telephone service with cabling for both run directly to the ONT. But no TV judging by the lit red indicator LED for "VIDEO" and the empty coax F connector positioned in the upper right of the image?

Posted Image

...Ads Help To Support This Site...

#27 OFFLINE   jpl

jpl

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,776 posts
Joined: Jul 09, 2006

Posted 20 July 2010 - 12:39 PM

Ok, thanks;

So in this example image below of a FiOS ONT from the WiKipedia, if I'm reading it correctly this customer has FiOS internet and telephone service with cabling for both run directly to the ONT. But no TV judging by the lit red indicator LED for "VIDEO" and the empty coax F connector positioned in the upper right of the image?

Posted Image


Yeah, I believe that's right. Not sure about the indicator light, but that was what my set-up looked like before I moved to FiOS TV service.

#28 OFFLINE   pjsauter

pjsauter

    Mentor

  • Registered
  • 45 posts
Joined: Jan 06, 2008

Posted 20 July 2010 - 12:46 PM

They won't pay for FIOS internet, or they won't pay for FIOS TV?

I've been expensing FIOS internet for 5 years. Why would it matter to your employer who your internet provider is?


I believe they have a contract with Time Warner to provide business class service. My guess is they get a fairly decent deal, but that's just speculation. TW bills them directly.

#29 OFFLINE   fiendz666

fiendz666

    AllStar

  • Registered
  • 84 posts
Joined: Oct 06, 2006

Posted 20 July 2010 - 02:34 PM

Everyone that I've talked to that has FIOS TV loves it. Personally, I love D* and have no plans on switching. I haven't had one issue with their service.

I do have FIOS for internet and phone. I just received a letter from them that my bill was going up by $10. That would have brought my bill up to close to $100. So, I called them and asked if they had any promotions. They said they would upgrade my internet to 25/25 and keep my phone the way it is. The price was $95/month. But they offered me $30 off my bill for a year. Once the year is up, I can call back and get more credits added. Not a bad deal for phone and internet.

They tried to get me to switch to FIOS for TV but I just can't. I am so happy with D* service. No complaints here :D

#30 OFFLINE   bullwinklehdtv

bullwinklehdtv

    New Member

  • Registered
  • 9 posts
Joined: Dec 07, 2006

Posted 20 July 2010 - 05:34 PM

I have FIOS for phone and internet, but I've never been able to justify switching from DirecTV. The bundles sound attractive, but once you start adding in equipment (I have four DVRs), the price isn't that great. As others have mentioned, they have nowhere near the sports in HD, and what they have isn't all available in the lower priced bundles.

#31 OFFLINE   billsharpe

billsharpe

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,389 posts
  • LocationSouthern California
Joined: Jan 25, 2007

Posted 21 July 2010 - 10:54 AM

I have FIOS for phone and internet, but I've never been able to justify switching from DirecTV. The bundles sound attractive, but once you start adding in equipment (I have four DVRs), the price isn't that great. As others have mentioned, they have nowhere near the sports in HD, and what they have isn't all available in the lower priced bundles.


The lower capacity of the FiOS DVR is the main reason I won't switch to FiOS TV. When I checked prices in detail last month it was virtually a wash in price between FiOS TV and DirecTV. I already have FiOS internet and phone service and am quite happy with it. Also happy with DirecTV and committed to another two years by adding a second DVR.
Bill

Family room: Sony Bravia KDL-40SL130
Living room: Sceptre 32 inch

#32 OFFLINE   apet8464

apet8464

    New Member

  • Registered
  • 2 posts
Joined: Jul 25, 2010

Posted 26 July 2010 - 11:02 PM

For anyone considering a move from DirecTV to FiOS, I may be able to provide some guidance. I know I'm not alone in being a long-time DirecTV customer that now has the option to move to FiOS.

To put things in perspective, I have been a DirecTV subscriber since 2002, and was with Dish Network several years prior to that. As for DVR hardware, I started out with DishPlayers (precursor to the now deceased MS Ultimate TV). When I moved to DirecTV in 2002, I started with three DSR6000 Series 1 DirecTivos, and later, replaced one with a series 2 model which I actually still have. When the HR10-250 came out, I got one of those too, and over the years, did all the usual hacks and tweaks (i.e. Instant Cake, PTVnet, drive expansions, etc.). Like many others, I finally succumbed to the MPEG-4 HD content migration, and in late 2007, I reluctantly gave up my beloved HR10 Tivo for a pair of new HR21-700s that I picked up at Costco (home of the impulse buy).

Although the HR21s were a little flakey at first, most of the nastier bugs had already been worked out by then, and they ended up being solid DVRs. As I recall, the biggest things I missed from the Tivos were the dual-live buffers, and the true 30-sec skip - though the HR2x DVRs eventually got the tuner swap. I also added a 1TB eSATA to each of the HR21s shortly after getting them, and even though that slowed them down quite a bit, in general I have been very satisfied with them.

When FiOS came to town in early 2009, I happily ditched my overpriced $70/month Comcast cable modem for a FiOS internet and landline bundle. I was still under a 2 yr commitment w/ DirecTV at that time, so FiOS TV wasn't even a consideration. Beginning in May of this year, I began to have serious problems with one of my HR21s. In hindsight, I now suspect it was related to a widespread firmware glitch that was pushed out, but I didn't know that at the time, and so in late June, I made an executive decision to finally go for the FiOS TV. My main motivator was saving money, while also getting an upgrade to 35/35 internet service. Of course, going from 1 TB to 160 GB was out of the question, so the FiOS DVR wasn't going to cut it. Having many fond Tivo memories, my decision was easy. I went ahead and ordered a pair of Tivo Premieres, and proceeded with ordering FiOS TV service.

What follows is my experience with ordering FiOS TV service. First of all, I wasn't able to specify cable cards when I ordered my new FiOS bundle online, but after a live chat with a relatively helpful CSR, it was suggested that I go ahead and place the order with basic set top boxes and then call in later and have them change the order to replace the set top boxes with cable cards. The best install date I was able to get at that point was July 5th, which was about a week out. Acceptable. I received an email confirmation for my FiOS bundle order moments later, including my assigned install date of July 5th, and I promptly ordered the Tivo Premieres. A few days later, I called FiOS to have the cable cards reflected on the order, and was surprised to learn that they had no record of my order. After several transfers and disconnects, and about an hour of my time, I was finally connected to a web order CSR, who researched my situation and informed me that my order had "fallen out of the system" and would need to be placed again. She then kept me on the phone while she entered my order in again via the same web order form I had used (which I could have done in half the time). When she was nearly done, she informed me that my install date would be pushed out to July 16th! After some serious whining and subsequent conversations with a supervisor and then someone in retention, the best they could do was the 16th. As before, I received an email confirming the order and my install appt. But wait - it gets better. On the 14th, I received a call from an automated system verifying my install on the 15th - yes, the 15th. Of course, I had blocked out my calendar for the 16th, and as luck would have it, I had several work-related meetings on the 15th - including one I could not ditch. Not wanting to loose my appt., I confirmed for the 15th. BTW - they give you an all day window, so the night before, in preparation for the possibility that the installer would end up arriving moments after I left for my afternoon meeting, I spent several hours cleaning up 10 years of coax cables, patch cords, and orphaned power bricks. I kid you not, there was some serious spaghetti behind my TVs. My house has 4 coax runs to every TV area, so I also labeled everything so the installer would at least have a chance at successfully installing something.

Fortunately, the installer arrived in the morning when I was still home. When I mentioned the cable cards, he said he was unaware of any cable cards on the order, but that he had some in the truck. He also told me he had never installed them before. Anyway, the install went fairly smooth, and after making a call to one of his colleagues, the M-cards were activated and the Tivos were up and running. I will say that my general impression was that the installer was fairly experienced, so the fact that he had never worked with cable cards before goes to show you how few FiOS subscribers opt for Tivos.

Anyway, I see that this post is getting ridiculously long, so I'll share my subsequent 10-days of FiOS/Tivo experiences in another post.

Edited by apet8464, 26 July 2010 - 11:26 PM.


#33 OFFLINE   winstoda

winstoda

    New Member

  • Registered
  • 3 posts
Joined: Jul 25, 2010

Posted 27 July 2010 - 07:30 AM

I just left Fios TV after 2.5 years. Still have phone and internet. My main reason for leaving was the terrible DVR they offer and the monthly equipment costs. Having been a Fios TV customer from day 1 in my area the other thing that bothered me was the evolution of the programming packages. While I was able to keep an old package any change I made - to upgrade internet speed, etc - meant a large price hike and abandoning my old TV package.

I had an HD Tivo with two S cards and a Fios HD DVR plus two HD boxes. No premiums. With phone and 20/5 internet I was paying $180 a month. Tolerable but not spectacular.

A few days in with DTV and I'm content with my decision. I see no difference in picture quality. I lost two stations that I watched often - CSN Philly HD and AMC HD - but I can live with that. I gained MASN2 HD which was only SD on Fios in my area. DTV DVR (HR24) rocks and the multi-room works flawlessly. Plus now I have Sunday Ticket which will make the football season a pleasure. Fios only gave my Philly locals. As a Ravens fan that made for a long NFL season.

#34 OFFLINE   Hutchinshouse

Hutchinshouse

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,632 posts
Joined: Sep 27, 2006

Posted 27 July 2010 - 08:08 AM

I have Fios TV running side by side with DirecTV. As for PQ, pretty much DirecTV's HD is as good or better. Fios's SD is slightly better on some channels and a lot better on a few.

The DVR is pretty stinky but it is a lot better than the Comcast piece o' crap I had when I had them.

I love the internet speed but I have seen many reliability issues with Fios and the Rube Goldberg nature of their setup makes it difficult to see what is going on while their customer support, while very friendly, is very slow and pretty much clueless.

I have seen breakups on TV (particularly on On Demand) when a phone call comes in and problems with my internet connection when that happens.

Just about every Fios customer I know has had hardware replaced at least once in the first few months. Either they have problems with hardware or that is just their way of fixing problems.

The router is another POS. They do not have a Wireless N router at this point and the Wireless G is pretty old.

I use them for additional channels I don't get on DirecTV (like Washington locals and a few HD channels) and for overflow and On Demand. The incremental cost to me after phone and internet is minimal, so it is worth it.

You can often get several months free of a premium (I am just finishing a three month stint with HBO/Cinemax at no cost) but finding that stuff can be painful on their webpage.

What I have heard for future expansion (as they are filled to the max) is not packing more on a QAM (on dslreports, there is a guy there who seems to have inside info and it makes me think that the avsforum report was a one-time thing...maybe to fix a temporary issue) but in going to IP and the new boxes they are testing are MPEG4 capable, which should help them quite a bit.

From the lack of out of town sports, especially HD, I could NEVER use them as my primary TV source as long as I can get DirecTV. And I don't think they will ever have enough bandwidth to compete on that front.


Wow, I’ve never heard that before. All reviews I’ve read stated FiOS was slightly better due to less HD compression than DIRECTV. Does “running side by side” mean the same TV was used when comparing FiOS to DIRECTV? Did ya review fast motion content too?

I’d love to have FiOS internet. Now that DIRECTV has my HD channel, no need for me to switch to FiOS. I love my HR24 too. :D

#35 OFFLINE   tonyd79

tonyd79

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 12,910 posts
  • LocationColumbia, MD
Joined: Jul 24, 2006

Posted 27 July 2010 - 08:29 AM

Wow, I've never heard that before. All reviews I've read stated FiOS was slightly better due to less HD compression than DIRECTV. Does "running side by side" mean the same TV was used when comparing FiOS to DIRECTV? Did ya review fast motion content too?

I'd love to have FiOS internet. Now that DIRECTV has my HD channel, no need for me to switch to FiOS. I love my HR24 too. :D


Yes. Same TV. And I am serious about PQ. Small issues annoy me so I notice everything.

Fios is good and I usually recommend it to friends who are not into sports or cannot get satellite but I get a more consistent picture on satellite than fios. That may be a local or installation issue (fios seems more installation temperamental maybe because it is still really cable and local networking can have an affect) but it is what I am seeing.
LR: HR34-700, H24-200, Fios DVR, BD350 Blu Ray, Roku Netflix Player, Chromecast, Sony 65w850 TV
BR: HR21-200, Viso 32LX, DB350 Blu Ray
Dish: Slimline, SWM8
Other: genieGo

#36 OFFLINE   spartanstew

spartanstew

    Dry as a bone

  • Registered
  • 12,523 posts
  • LocationWylie, Texas
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

Posted 27 July 2010 - 08:31 AM

Wow, I’ve never heard that before.


That's my experience too. I have D*, but most of my neighbors have FIOS. All different displays, but I've calibrated most of them. Can't see any FIOS picture advantage and guess which house is most often used for get togethers, movie nights and sporting events? Mine - the lone D* house.

I'm sure Directv can't wait to get their hands on your unit.

 
Directv customer since 2000

#37 OFFLINE   Hutchinshouse

Hutchinshouse

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,632 posts
Joined: Sep 27, 2006

Posted 27 July 2010 - 08:50 AM

That's my experience too. I have D*, but most of my neighbors have FIOS. All different displays, but I've calibrated most of them. Can't see any FIOS picture advantage and guess which house is most often used for get togethers, movie nights and sporting events? Mine - the lone D* house.


I guess you learn something new every day. A lower bit rate can have a better picture. Not to make an issue out of this, but I have to ask. A zillion times I’ve seen posts stating DIRECTV has better HD quality than DISH due to compression rates. I’ve seen countless micro blocking complaints too due to compression rates.

What magic algorithm is DIRECTV using to beat FiOS’ higher bit rate, yet DISH cannot beat DIRECTV’s higher bit rate? I thought when comparing apples to apples, less compression always wins.

#38 OFFLINE   cforrest

cforrest

    Icon

  • DBSTalk Club
  • 820 posts
Joined: Jan 20, 2007

Posted 27 July 2010 - 09:14 AM

I have both FIOS TV and Directv in my condo on both my TVs, all with the same settings on both HDMI inputs, FIOS is sharper. I still do my primary viewing on D* but if I ever switch over the picture from FIOS is better. To each their own I guess, but that is what I see with my eyes in my place.

And the red light on the ONT for video, means video is provisioned but signal level is too low. Dirty fiber or bad drop, service call time!

D* Setup:

Slimline (AU9-S) w/no multiswitch
(1) HR21-100 0x87F (7/8/08 Made in Mexico) via HDMI to Pioneer PDP-6020FD
(1) HR24-100 0x87F (11/9/10 Made in Thailand) via HDMI to Panasonic TC-P58S2

FIOS 150/150


#39 OFFLINE   spartanstew

spartanstew

    Dry as a bone

  • Registered
  • 12,523 posts
  • LocationWylie, Texas
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

Posted 27 July 2010 - 09:26 AM

I guess you learn something new every day. A lower bit rate can have a better picture. Not to make an issue out of this, but I have to ask. A zillion times I’ve seen posts stating DIRECTV has better HD quality than DISH due to compression rates. I’ve seen countless micro blocking complaints too due to compression rates.

What magic algorithm is DIRECTV using to beat FiOS’ higher bit rate, yet DISH cannot beat DIRECTV’s higher bit rate? I thought when comparing apples to apples, less compression always wins.


Well, to be fair, it's possible that FIOS has a better picture, but if it does, it's by a minimal amount (and my comment was more focused on the fact that they're the same, not that D* is better). So minimal that when going from house to house and display to display, it's not noticeable.

Now, if I had D* and FIOS set up on the same display next to each other (like forrest does), perhaps I'd see the difference. But I don't and I doubt many people do.

It's similar to black levels on displays that people get so worked up over. If you compare the black level on the best display to the black level on the next best display side-by-side, you'd might see a difference. However, without having two displays side-by-side, 99% of viewers wouldn't notice the difference.

So, IMO, switching to FIOS because of some leap in picture quality is a falacy. The quality is just too close to notice in real world viewing.

I'm sure Directv can't wait to get their hands on your unit.

 
Directv customer since 2000

#40 OFFLINE   Hutchinshouse

Hutchinshouse

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,632 posts
Joined: Sep 27, 2006

Posted 27 July 2010 - 09:33 AM

Well, to be fair, it's possible that FIOS has a better picture, but if it does, it's by a minimal amount (and my comment was more focused on the fact that they're the same, not that D* is better). So minimal that when going from house to house and display to display, it's not noticeable.

Now, if I had D* and FIOS set up on the same display next to each other (like forrest does), perhaps I'd see the difference. But I don't and I doubt many people do.

It's similar to black levels on displays that people get so worked up over. If you compare the black level on the best display to the black level on the next best display side-by-side, you'd might see a difference. However, without having two displays side-by-side, 99% of viewers wouldn't notice the difference.

So, IMO, switching to FIOS because of some leap in picture quality is a falacy. The quality is just too close to notice in real world viewing.


I agree, I would not switch for a miniscule improvement (if any) in picture quality. Programming and H/W a big consideration too.

#41 OFFLINE   apet8464

apet8464

    New Member

  • Registered
  • 2 posts
Joined: Jul 25, 2010

Posted 27 July 2010 - 10:57 PM

I have now been officially on FiOS TV, along with a pair of Tivo Premieres, for 11 days, and I am actually leaning heavily toward canceling, and going back to DTV - especially if I can get my hands on a pair of new HR24s. The issue isn't FiOS. In fact, my FiOS service and PQ have been fine. I do have to say, in my opinion DTV has slightly better PQ - at least for the channels I watch on my 63" Sami plasma. Must be the DTV signal processing since FiOS apparently has the advantage on bandwidth.

Now on to my dilema. In a nutshell, I am very disappointed with the Tivos, and not just because of problems or defects with them, but also because of some of the basic functionality they lack. Not to say there aren't problems or defects. Between the two units I have running, I've had to hard reboot about 10 times in the last 11 days, as they seem to lock up a lot. The lockups have occurred either after a channel lineup change, or while accessing music or video from the network. It could be an issue with my network I suppose, but they still shouldn't lock up and be completely unresponsive. We're talking about pulling the power plug here. The other problem is that he new flash interface is very laggy. So laggy, that I have finally moved back to the old menu, which seems to work much better.

As for missing functionality, many of these are nitpicks, and specific to my needs. Lets just say that I definitely have a new found appreciation for the HR21, and suspect that the HR24 is probably the best DVR on the market. Hard to believe, based on some of the fiery HR20 forum posts from a few short years ago. DTV has really made the investment (unlike Tivo).

Here are are a few of the negatives of the Tivo Premieres. Again, some of these are specific to my needs/tastes:

1. No RF remote. Big issue since I share one of these DVRs between two TVs in different rooms. It's also a pain to watch TV in bed now, as I have to hold the remote up in the air and aim it (I know, poor me!). I do have an old IR to RF repeater system working, but it's not a very elegant setup and it doesn't work very well. I know I can add RF capability to the Tivo remote via a special battery, but that's another $100 on top of the $550 I already spent on these units. On a positive note, I've always liked the Tivo peanut remotes, and when I have line of sight, the Tivo's remote is smooth and responsive, with little if any lag, except when on the Flash based menus (more on that later).

2. No coaxial digital audio out (Toslink only). As I mentioned, I share one of my DVRs between two entertainment areas, and my setup employs four coax cables between the areas to pass component video to the 2nd TV, and digital audio to the 2nd receiver. Again, I know I can buy a Toslink to coax converter, but that's more money, and I'm not sure how well it will work. The coax runs are around 40 feet. By the way, the Tivo's component out signal appears to be slightly stronger than the HR21's, as the picture on my 2nd TV is noticeably better over the 40 foot coax run.

3. I won't recap all of the GUI limitations with the Premieres, as plenty of other reviews and postings have pointed them out, but honestly, based on my experience, I would still have to classify the Tivo Premiere as a beta product at this point. For example, when you press the Tivo button while watching a show, the audio cuts out for a second or two. Not a big deal, but it's annoying. The HR21 certainly never did that. Also, many of the GUI menus are still the same old Tivo menus I had back in 2002 with my series 1 boxes, and whenever you switch over to them from the Flash menus, the mini-picture and sound disappear.

4. No FiOS on-demand content. Yes, this was a known limitation when I signed up, as were many of the other limitations I mentioned, so I won't blame FiOS or Tivo. And, yes, I have Amazon and Netflix now, but it's a relevant limitation. I already have Netflix on my PS3, and what I could really use is Hulu access.

5. The much talked about FiOS copy flag issue will supposedly render my MRV capability useless since Tivo still copies the content to the other receiver, though I haven't actually experienced this yet. The MRV functionality actually works very well with the Tivos. Nothing like having the data local for trick play. I haven't had an opportunity to see the HR24s in action yet with DECA, but I suspect MRV has improved over the HR21 MRV, which was solid, but a little slugish at times.

6. The 30 minute pause buffer is too short.

7. I can't use my eSATA drives with the Tivos, so I will either have to spend another $250 just to buy the official Tivo approved HDDs, or assuming a Premiere-specific utility appears at some point, replace the internal HDDs, which means I void my warranty.

So, now I have a short few days left before my 30-day Tivo cancellation period ends, and about 2 weeks for my FiOS cancellation period. I was actually considering a Moxi setup, but I think I would still end up missing my HR21s. I have come to the conclusion that DTV is the most serious about home entertainment. TV is basically all they do, and they do it well. Yes, they command a premium over FiOS (for now at least), but I'm starting to think it's worth it for the consistent service and better DVRs. Still, I think I'm going to call DTV tomorrow to cancel, and see if they will come up with a compelling reason for me to stay (as in a pair of HR24s). If they do, I will definitely just cancel FiOS and Tivo and re-up with DTV. If they don't, I may just stay with DTV anyway. Even the HR21s are better than these Tivos.

Edited by apet8464, 27 July 2010 - 11:20 PM.


#42 OFFLINE   HoTat2

HoTat2

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 5,600 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles, CA.
Joined: Nov 16, 2005

Posted 28 July 2010 - 03:23 AM

I guess you learn something new every day. A lower bit rate can have a better picture. Not to make an issue out of this, but I have to ask. A zillion times I’ve seen posts stating DIRECTV has better HD quality than DISH due to compression rates. I’ve seen countless micro blocking complaints too due to compression rates.

What magic algorithm is DIRECTV using to beat FiOS’ higher bit rate, yet DISH cannot beat DIRECTV’s higher bit rate? I thought when comparing apples to apples, less compression always wins.


Well first as was pointed out the respective HD PQs between FiOS and DirecTV, and even dish for that matter, are practically the same.

But from a theoretical standpoint at least, DirecTV can offer comparable HD picture quality to FiOS at lower bit rates because DirecTV uses MPEG-4 compression which requires roughly half the bit rates than does FiOS who like all other CATV providers use MPEG-2.

In dish network's case while they also uses MPEG-4 compression, in theory dish offers less HD PQ since they actually down-rez the source image resolution from 1920 x 1080i to 1440 x 1080i before MPEG compression ("HD-lite"). This results in lower comparable bit rates than DirecTV and thereby reduces bandwidth, but results in less picture quality.

Keep in mind that dish does not use the separate Ka band for HD channels like DirecTV does, but only the Ku band to be shared by all their SD and HD channel offerings to subscribers. Therefore bandwidth conservation measures are much more critical to dish than DirecTV.

#43 OFFLINE   texasbrit

texasbrit

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 4,424 posts
Joined: Aug 09, 2006

Posted 28 July 2010 - 06:22 AM

The place you should definitely see differences between FIOS and DirecTV is on HD locals. FIOS has higher bandwidth (although it's difficult to compare because MPEG-4 requires less bandwidth) and since it is MPEG-2 does not have to convert the signals to MPEG-4 like DirecTV does. The conversion to MPEG-4 has some losses and therefore typically the DirecTV PQ will be slightly worse then FIOS (and OTA).
There are of course conversion losses on the other channels also (except those delivering MPEG-4 signals to DirecTV) but there are bandwidth and other conversion issues earlier in the chain that apply to both services. Two of my neighbors have FIOS and the generally quality of HD seems about the same, with the exception of locals. I have off-air as well as DirecTV and although the PQ of the DirecTV HD locals is excellent you can often see that the quality of off-air is higher. My neighbor's FIOS HD locals are basically the same as my off-air signals.

Edited by texasbrit, 28 July 2010 - 06:23 AM.
addition re MPEG-4 bandwidth


#44 OFFLINE   Rich

Rich

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 22,512 posts
  • LocationPiscataway, NJ
Joined: Feb 22, 2007

Posted 28 July 2010 - 07:42 AM

I haven't read the whole thread, but if you're comparing the TiVo to an HR21 and find the TiVo lacking, the 24s will be an improvement that you might not believe, at first. They simply blow away the 21s.

Rich


I have now been officially on FiOS TV, along with a pair of Tivo Premieres, for 11 days, and I am actually leaning heavily toward canceling, and going back to DTV - especially if I can get my hands on a pair of new HR24s. The issue isn't FiOS. In fact, my FiOS service and PQ have been fine. I do have to say, in my opinion DTV has slightly better PQ - at least for the channels I watch on my 63" Sami plasma. Must be the DTV signal processing since FiOS apparently has the advantage on bandwidth.

Now on to my dilema. In a nutshell, I am very disappointed with the Tivos, and not just because of problems or defects with them, but also because of some of the basic functionality they lack. Not to say there aren't problems or defects. Between the two units I have running, I've had to hard reboot about 10 times in the last 11 days, as they seem to lock up a lot. The lockups have occurred either after a channel lineup change, or while accessing music or video from the network. It could be an issue with my network I suppose, but they still shouldn't lock up and be completely unresponsive. We're talking about pulling the power plug here. The other problem is that he new flash interface is very laggy. So laggy, that I have finally moved back to the old menu, which seems to work much better.

As for missing functionality, many of these are nitpicks, and specific to my needs. Lets just say that I definitely have a new found appreciation for the HR21, and suspect that the HR24 is probably the best DVR on the market. Hard to believe, based on some of the fiery HR20 forum posts from a few short years ago. DTV has really made the investment (unlike Tivo).

Here are are a few of the negatives of the Tivo Premieres. Again, some of these are specific to my needs/tastes:

1. No RF remote. Big issue since I share one of these DVRs between two TVs in different rooms. It's also a pain to watch TV in bed now, as I have to hold the remote up in the air and aim it (I know, poor me!). I do have an old IR to RF repeater system working, but it's not a very elegant setup and it doesn't work very well. I know I can add RF capability to the Tivo remote via a special battery, but that's another $100 on top of the $550 I already spent on these units. On a positive note, I've always liked the Tivo peanut remotes, and when I have line of sight, the Tivo's remote is smooth and responsive, with little if any lag, except when on the Flash based menus (more on that later).

2. No coaxial digital audio out (Toslink only). As I mentioned, I share one of my DVRs between two entertainment areas, and my setup employs four coax cables between the areas to pass component video to the 2nd TV, and digital audio to the 2nd receiver. Again, I know I can buy a Toslink to coax converter, but that's more money, and I'm not sure how well it will work. The coax runs are around 40 feet. By the way, the Tivo's component out signal appears to be slightly stronger than the HR21's, as the picture on my 2nd TV is noticeably better over the 40 foot coax run.

3. I won't recap all of the GUI limitations with the Premieres, as plenty of other reviews and postings have pointed them out, but honestly, based on my experience, I would still have to classify the Tivo Premiere as a beta product at this point. For example, when you press the Tivo button while watching a show, the audio cuts out for a second or two. Not a big deal, but it's annoying. The HR21 certainly never did that. Also, many of the GUI menus are still the same old Tivo menus I had back in 2002 with my series 1 boxes, and whenever you switch over to them from the Flash menus, the mini-picture and sound disappear.

4. No FiOS on-demand content. Yes, this was a known limitation when I signed up, as were many of the other limitations I mentioned, so I won't blame FiOS or Tivo. And, yes, I have Amazon and Netflix now, but it's a relevant limitation. I already have Netflix on my PS3, and what I could really use is Hulu access.

5. The much talked about FiOS copy flag issue will supposedly render my MRV capability useless since Tivo still copies the content to the other receiver, though I haven't actually experienced this yet. The MRV functionality actually works very well with the Tivos. Nothing like having the data local for trick play. I haven't had an opportunity to see the HR24s in action yet with DECA, but I suspect MRV has improved over the HR21 MRV, which was solid, but a little slugish at times.

6. The 30 minute pause buffer is too short.

7. I can't use my eSATA drives with the Tivos, so I will either have to spend another $250 just to buy the official Tivo approved HDDs, or assuming a Premiere-specific utility appears at some point, replace the internal HDDs, which means I void my warranty.

So, now I have a short few days left before my 30-day Tivo cancellation period ends, and about 2 weeks for my FiOS cancellation period. I was actually considering a Moxi setup, but I think I would still end up missing my HR21s. I have come to the conclusion that DTV is the most serious about home entertainment. TV is basically all they do, and they do it well. Yes, they command a premium over FiOS (for now at least), but I'm starting to think it's worth it for the consistent service and better DVRs. Still, I think I'm going to call DTV tomorrow to cancel, and see if they will come up with a compelling reason for me to stay (as in a pair of HR24s). If they do, I will definitely just cancel FiOS and Tivo and re-up with DTV. If they don't, I may just stay with DTV anyway. Even the HR21s are better than these Tivos.



#45 OFFLINE   lman12

lman12

    AllStar

  • Registered
  • 55 posts
Joined: May 23, 2007

Posted 28 July 2010 - 08:35 AM

Just curious - where did you see the information about 3 HD channels per QAM? From where I sit, that's not true. Verizon recently got rid of 4 premium HD west coast feeds (2 Max and 2 TMC), and added a couple channels in their place.

Are they butting up against a space issue? Yes, they are. Is their plan to go to 3 channels per QAM? Not that I'd heard. From what I understand, their plan is and always has been to migrate to IP.

On the DVR capacity... yeah, that's an issue. They currently offer a 160 GB box that can store about 20 hours of HD. There is a new box coming out later this year which will double that capacity, and include esata. They were supposed to have a new box out already (by CISCO) but they hit major production problems, pushing them to go back to Motorola to come out with a newer version of the boxes they currently offer.

If recording space is that much of an issue, then you do have other options - the most obvious being a 3rd party DVR (TiVo or Moxi, e.g.). You can have multiple DVRs on FiOS as well, but as someone else pointed out, for now you can't share recordings from one DVR to another. You can only have one DVR specified as your Home Media DVR (multiroom) and it would share recordings with other stand-alone STBs on your other TVs. It's the setup I have and I have to say, it works beautifully. My one nit on that is that I can't manage recordings from those other STBs. I can only play back what I have recorded.

Overall their PQ is just outstanding. Their boxes aren't as feature-rich as DirecTV's, in my opinion, but are really fast, and pretty darn bug-free.

If you're considering FiOS, but aren't sure, then you may want to just try it. Suspend your DirecTV service, and sign up - I believe Verizon is still offering a trial period for FiOS service...

Even if you don't get their TV service, though - their internet service is (again, in my opinion) the best going. It's fast - there are no slow periods... none... there's no throttling... there are no download caps... and it's rock solid - in my 4 1/2 years as a FiOS internet customer I've had one minor outage.


This review appears to be written by a Verizon employee in the FIOS marketing department.

#46 OFFLINE   jpl

jpl

    Hall Of Fame

  • Registered
  • 2,776 posts
Joined: Jul 09, 2006

Posted 28 July 2010 - 11:26 AM

This review appears to be written by a Verizon employee in the FIOS marketing department.


No, it's written by a former DirecTV customer who's now a FiOS TV customer. The one thing I can't comment on is the difference in the HD PQ, since I never had HD with DirecTV.

On the bug-free front, the end of my tenure with DirecTV left a bad taste in my mouth. I found my R15s sluggish and buggy (with one of them, every time I unplugged it, it was a crap-shoot if it would reboot right). Even something as simple as caller ID never worked right. On that same box I would get phantom calls every minute or so, meaning that I had to turn off the feature on that box. Yeah, I've seen issues crop up with FiOS, but I can't classify any of them as show-stoppers (their s/w just seems a hell of alot more mature - not as feature-rich, like I said, but clearly they actually do things like regression testing).

I freely admit that all of my comments are subjective - because they're MY comments. But from my experience, that's what you get. I find the service to be solid... the PQ outstanding... and the performance to be quick. I'll also grant that DirecTV's h/w seems to have come a long way since I left (over 3 years now), and that Verizon's lack of recording space is a big issue for some (not really for me, but I can see where it can be).

No... I don't work for Verizon... I'm not a share-holder. Sorry if the review seems biased, but it's going to be. If, on balance, my view didn't favor FiOS, I'd be a moron - I chose them for reasons that are important to me.

Now, there are other nits that I have against Verizon/FiOS, but I was trying to gear my response to the concerns of the OP. For example, their ordering system sucks. Their billing system used to suck too, but it's improved dramatically. They need to apply the same improvements to the ordering system. I was also trying to give the OP some avenues if he was considering FiOS, but not sure what to do (e.g. suspending his DirecTV account and trying out FiOS, since they have a trial period). And as for the internet service - yes, it's that good. I have 35/35 internet service that I can't say enough good things about. I get the full speed, any time, day or night, with no download caps and no throttling. I never really appreciated that speed until just the other night (wasn't sure I would need 35Meg down). My wife was watching something on our one TV (not using IP), but my one daughter was watching something via Netflix, streamed through my Wii onto our second TV. Another daughter was playing around the web. So I fired up the laptop, and watched a movie, streaming in, via Epix HD. I never noticed so much as a hiccup during my entire movie-viewing time.

Edited by jpl, 28 July 2010 - 11:33 AM.


#47 OFFLINE   ksupmac

ksupmac

    New Member

  • Registered
  • 4 posts
Joined: Jul 23, 2010

Posted 28 July 2010 - 02:22 PM

I'm currently with FIOS, and I'm canceling in a couple weeks to go with DirecTV. I got FIOS a few years ago as soon as it was available in my area. The TV and internet has been fine. The phone has been awful -- terrible sound (even directly from the ONT, despite Verizon's claims that the problem is my internal wiring) -- but that's not a big deal to me since I rarely use the phone anyway.

My 2 biggest reasons for the move are 1.) curiosity about satellite TV, and 2.) the cost. When my bundle was set to expire, I tried to renew it, but I Verizon wouldn't allow me to even keep the TV package I had because it didn't exist in their system anymore. I was being forced into choosing between 2 different packages, and of course the more expensive was the one I would need. On top of that, the amount I had to pay with FIOS for the equipment was really starting to annoy me. So I'm switching. I intend to keep FIOS internet, I intend to cancel FIOS phone service, and I just hope my DTV turns out to not suck. If it does, I would go back to FIOS. I didn't have a terrible experience with them, but it wasn't a super-positive experience that will make me regret leaving (unless DTV sucks).

#48 OFFLINE   ranmic

ranmic

    New Member

  • Registered
  • 2 posts
Joined: Jun 12, 2010

Posted 29 July 2010 - 06:34 AM

I have DirecTV and my best friend has Verizon FIOS. He got a deal on his service because he is a former Verizon employee. He FINALLY made the switch to FIOS for high speed internet. DSL was not available in his neighborhood before FIOS and he loathed Cox Cable so it wasn't an option for him and he was satisfied.

Now that he has FIOS, he loves it. I actually like it a lot too. It's definitely a different system from DirecTV but he has had absolutely zero problems w/ his service. I'm not 100% sure of the specs of how much HD the DVR's will hold but he hasn't had a problem with that generally because he deletes things pretty quickly after he watches them. The On Demand service is pretty cool. The On Demand portion does have quite a few options in HD. During the regular viewing season, the list can be pretty nice - especially if you miss and episode and forgot to DVR it. We missed the first night of Big Brother on both my DVR AND his DVR and was able to pull it up from the FIOS On Demand service essentially commercial free. It was pretty cool.

I may not be the best person to ask about HD quality - because I think ANY HD quality is better than Standard Def! But he does have channels in HD that I don't. I realize that some people really do not care about having HSN or QVC in HD on DirecTV but I do tend to flip to those channels every once in a while and believe me....it's tough watching it on DirecTV when I see the fantastic quality of those channels in HD on FIOS. It's definitely quite a difference! I would love to have those channels in HD on DirecTV just for the sheer pleasure having them in high definition. Pretty cool. They also have quite a few more Premium Channels in the HBO and Cinemax packages if you're into the movie stations. And they're ALL in HD starting at Channel 899 to boot.

He did have DirecTV prior to FIOS and had absolutely no complaints. He very much enjoyed DirecTV - but the bundle package was too good for him to pass up plus he was able to get rid of the dish on his house. I would consider FIOS if offered in my apartment complex now that I've had some experience with it. It would be hard though because I do love my DirecTV.

If there are any specific channels you are looking for in HD, I would be happy to see if they are on there for you. :-)

Not sure if my post helped in your decision but I don't think you'd be disappointed in FIOS. For me, I would choose either or depending on what I could get in HD and what channels I would be receiving for how much. As in any situation, there are services unique to each provider and it's going to be all about what you want to receive programming wise. Good luck!


I agree norfolktide. I had Cox and absolutely hated it......service was constantly down. I switched to FIOS in Newport News when it was offered and never looked back. The quality was great and their internet speeds WERE as advertised.....not like Cox. Then I moved up North for job transfer and FIOS was not an option so I took Direct and I love it as much as FIOS. Both of those services are great choices in my opinion, but cable is by far lagging way behind them all.




Protected By... spam firewall...And...